黏土场地—海上风电单筒基础地震响应试验研究

谢优 ,  许成顺 ,  凌薇宇 ,  刘开源

地震工程与工程振动 ›› 2026, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (3) : 13 -23.

PDF (28202KB)
地震工程与工程振动 ›› 2026, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (3) : 13 -23.

黏土场地—海上风电单筒基础地震响应试验研究

作者信息 +

Seismic response test of single-bucket foundation for offshore wind turbine in clay site

Author information +
文章历史 +
PDF (28878K)

摘要

为系统研究海上风电单筒基础在黏土场地中的地震响应,开展了黏土场地—海上风电单筒基础体系振动台试验,研究了黏土场地—海上风电单筒基础体系受常态风、浪、流荷载和风、浪、流、地震荷载共同作用下的动力响应。通过分析地基土和结构的地震动力响应,探究单筒基础在黏土场地中的失效模式。结果表明,长期的风、浪、流等环境荷载使筒基础周围和内部的土体刚度发生改变,其对于筒内土体的影响更大,软化程度高于筒外侧土体。小震作用下,黏土场地中的海上风机—筒基础体系表现较好,地基土体未出现软化,结构的水平位移和沉降较小,风机体系可以正常工作。在强震作用下,筒中心和筒周围土体发生软化,黏土的软化导致地基失去承载能力,筒基础逐步沉降且发生不可恢复性倾斜,最终体系失效。与筒中心相比,筒周围土体的软化更为明显。在遭遇强震时,海上风机—筒基础体系的安全性无法得到保障,黏土场地中筒基础的使用值得关注。

Abstract

To systematically study the seismic response of single-bucket foundations for offshore wind turbines in clay sites,a shaking table test of the clay site-offshore wind turbine single-bucket foundation system was conducted. The dynamic responses of the system under the combined action of normal wind,wave,current loads and wind, wave,current and seismic loads were investigated.By analyzing the seismic dynamic responses of the soil and structure,the failure modes of the single-bucket foundation in clay sites were explored.The results show that the long-term environmental loads such as wind,waves and current cause stiffness changes of the soil around and inside the bucket foundation,which exert a greater influence on the soil inside the bucket with a higher soil softening degree than the outside soil.Under the action of small earthquakes,the offshore wind turbine-bucket foundation system in clay sites performs well,no soil softening occurs,the horizontal displacements and settlements of the structure are small,and the wind turbine system can operate normally.Under the action of strong earthquakes,the soil at the center and around the bucket softens,and the softening of the clay leads to the loss of bearing capacity of the soil,the bucket foundation gradually settles and undergoes irreversible tilting,and the system eventually fails. Compared with the center of the bucket,the softening of the soil around the bucket is more obvious.When encountering strong earthquakes,the safety of the offshore wind turbine-bucket foundation system cannot be guaranteed,and the engineering application of bucket foundations in clay sites deserves attention.

关键词

单筒基础 / 地震响应 / 振动台试验 / 失效模式 / 黏土场地

Key words

single-bucket foundation / seismic response / shaking table test / failure modes / clay site

引用本文

引用格式 ▾
谢优,许成顺,凌薇宇,刘开源. 黏土场地—海上风电单筒基础地震响应试验研究[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2026, 46(3): 13-23 DOI:

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

参考文献

[1]

王立忠, 王立林, 洪义, . 海上风电技术发展趋势[J]. 能源工程, 2024, 44(6):3-12.

[2]

WANG Lizhong, WANG Lilin, HONG Yi, et al. Offshore wind power technology development trends[J]. Energy Engineering, 2024, 44(6): 3-12. (in Chinese)

[3]

GENG F, YANG W X, NADIMI S, et al. Study for predicting the earthquake-induced liquefaction around the monopile foundation of offshore wind turbines[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2023, 268: 113421.

[4]

邓伟, 金波, 郑涛, . 高桩-混凝土承台式海上风电塔强振分析[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2020, 40( 1 ):233-241.

[5]

DENG Wei, JIN Bo, ZHENG Tao, et al. Analysis of vibration characteristics of high-pile at sea-concrete offshore wind turbine tower[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics, 2020, 40(1):233-241. (in Chinese)

[6]

KUMAR R, KASAMA K, TAKAHASHI A. Reliability assessment of the physical modeling of liquefaction-induced effects on shallow foundations considering nonuniformity in the centrifuge model[J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2020, 122: 103558.

[7]

BHATTACHARYA S, GODA K. Use of offshore wind farms to increase seismic resilience of nuclear power plants[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2016, 80:65-68.

[8]

MATSUI T, ODA K. Foundation damage of structures[J]. Soils and Foundations, 1996, 36:189-200.

[9]

高彦斌, 晁浩. 沿海软土地区浅部土层地震运动特征研究[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2024, 44(4):193-200.

[10]

GAO Yanbin, CHAO Hao. Research on seismic motion in shallow depth in coastal soft soil area[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics, 2024, 44(4):193-200. (in Chinese)

[11]

徐龙军, 何晓云, 谢礼立. 海上风电工程基础结构抗震性能研究[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2012, 32(3):1-7.

[12]

XU Longjun, HE Xiaoyun, XIE Lili. On seismic performance of offshore wind turbine foundation and structures[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics, 2012, 32(3):1-7. (in Chinese)

[13]

GAO B, LI C, ZHOU F L, et al. Shaking table tests of offshore wind turbine systems with a suction bucket foundation in sandy seabed subject to earthquake and wind loads[J]. Marine Structures, 2025, 99: 103706.

[14]

SEONG J, HAIGH S K, MADABHUSHI S P G, et al. On seismic protection of wind turbine foundations founded on liquefiable soils[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2022, 159: 107327.

[15]

ZHANG J X, CHENG W L, CHENG X L, et al. Seismic responses analysis of suction bucket foundation for offshore wind turbine in clays[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2021, 232: 109159.

[16]

MA S L, XIE L Q, JI Y F, et al. Nonlinear 3D finite element analysis of suction caisson-tower-soil system subjected to horizontal earthquake excitation[J]. International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, 2022, 14: 100478.

[17]

刘润, 马鹏程, 练继建. 黏土中宽浅式筒型基础与地基的地震响应[J]. 天津大学学报(自然科学与工程技术版), 2020, 53(4):366-377.

[18]

LIU Run, MA Pengcheng, LIAN Jijian. Seismic response of shallow bucket foundation of soft clay[J]. Journal of Tianjin University(Science and Technology), 2020, 53(4):366-377. (in Chinese)

[19]

ZHANG Y H, ZHAO S F, ZHOU H J, et al. Long-term settlement of suction bucket foundations supporting offshore wind turbines in clay[J]. Applied Ocean Research, 2024, 145: 103922.

[20]

ZHANG B F, LIU R, WANG L Z, et al. Cyclic response and load transfer mechanism of suction bucket jackets supporting offshore wind turbines in soft clay[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2024, 313: 119135.

[21]

崔鹤, 黄茂松, 时振旲. 饱和黏土中吸力桶基础离心振动台试验及地震响应分析[ J ]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2025, 44(3):769-780.

[22]

CUI He, HUANG Maosong, SHI Zhenhao. Centrifugal shaking table tests and seismic response analysis of suction caisson foundation in saturated clay[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2025, 44(3):769-780. (in Chinese)

[23]

ZHENG X Y, LI H B, RONG W D, et al. Joint earthquake and wave action on the monopile wind turbine foundation:An experimental study[J]. Marine Structures, 2015, 44:125-141.

[24]

PROWELL I, VELETZOS M, ELGAMAL A, et al. Experimental and numerical seismic response of a 65 kW wind turbine[J]. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 2009, 13(8):1172-1190.

[25]

TAO L J, DING P, SHI C, et al. Shaking table test on seismic response characteristics of prefabricated subway station structure[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2019, 91: 102994.

[26]

刘春晓, 陶连金, 边金, . 振动台试验新型叠层剪切模型箱的改进与性能测试[ J ]. 振动与冲击, 2021, 40(21):82-89.

[27]

LIU Chunxiao, TAO Lianjin, BIAN Jin, et al. Improvement of new laminated shear model box and verification tests[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2021, 40(21):82-89. (in Chinese)

[28]

张梓鸿, 许成顺, 闫冠宇, . 液化夹层场地地铁车站结构离心机振动台试验方案设计[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2022, 44 (5):879-888.

[29]

ZHANG Zihong, XU Chengshun, YAN Guanyu, et al. Experimental design for dynamic centrifuge tests on a subway station structure in liquefied interlayer site[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2022, 44(5):879-888. (in Chinese)

[30]

ARANY L, BHATTACHARYA S. Simplified load estimation and sizing of suction anchors for spar buoy type floating offshore wind turbines[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2018, 159:348-357.

[31]

BHATTACHARYA S, LOMBARDI D, MUIR WOOD D. Similitude relationships for physical modelling of monopile-supported offshore wind turbines[J]. International Journal of Physical Modelling in Geotechnics, 2011, 11(2):58-68.

[32]

秦天庆, 袁长丰, 袁铭徽, . 基于2010-2020年东海风、浪、流统计数据的海上风电吸力桶基础动荷载承载特性[J]. 海洋工程, 2023, 41(1):169-178.

[33]

QIN Tianqing, YUAN Changfeng, YUAN Minghui, et al. Dynamic load bearing characteristics of wind power suction bucket foundation based on wind wave statistics in the East China Sea from 2010 to 2020[J]. The Ocean Engineering, 2023, 41(1):169-178. (in Chinese)

[34]

贾科敏, 许成顺, 杜修力, . 液化侧向扩展场地-群桩基础-结构体系地震破坏反应大型振动台试验方案设计[J]. 工程力学, 2023, 40(7):121-136.

[35]

JIA Kemin, XU Chengshun, DU Xiuli, et al. Experimental design of shaking table tests for seismic failure response of pile-group-superstructure subjected to liquefaction-induced lateral spreading[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2023, 40(7):121-136. (in Chinese)

[36]

陈苏, 陈国兴, 韩晓健, . 基于计算机视觉的位移测试方法研究与实现[J]. 振动与冲击, 2015, 34(18):73-78, 99.

[37]

CHEN Su, CHEN Guoxing, HAN Xiaojian, et al. Development of vision-based displacement test method[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2015, 34(18):73-78,99. (in Chinese)

[38]

SUN Y L, XU C S, EL NAGGAR M H, et al. Cumulative cyclic response of offshore monopile in sands[ J]. Applied Ocean Research, 2023, 133: 103481.

[39]

王欢. 砂土海床大直径单桩基础和桶形基础水平受荷特性研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2020.

[40]

WANG Huan. Lateral behaviour of offshore monopile and bucket foundations in sand[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2020. (in Chinese)

[41]

DNV-OS-J101 Design of offshore wind turbine structures[S]. Oslo: DNV GL AS, 2014.

基金资助

国家杰出青年科学基金项目(52225807)

中国长江三峡集团项目(NBZZ202200447)

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (28202KB)

0

访问

0

被引

详细

导航
相关文章

AI思维导图

/