采伐强度对次生阔叶红松林森林质量的长期影响

董润远 ,  姜俊 ,  赵秀海

北京林业大学学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (7) : 58 -68.

PDF (999KB)
北京林业大学学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (7) : 58 -68. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000−1522.20250486
林学

采伐强度对次生阔叶红松林森林质量的长期影响

作者信息 +

Long term effects of thinning intensities on forest quality in secondary broadleaved Korean pine forest

Author information +
文章历史 +
PDF (1022K)

摘要

【目的】以 12 年连续定位监测探究采伐强度对次生阔叶红松林森林质量的长期影响,构建科学的森林质量评价体系,明确不同采伐强度下林分质量恢复规律,为该林分可持续经营提供理论依据与技术参考。【方法】以吉林蛟河林业实验管理局 4 hm2 次生阔叶红松林为研究对象,设置 4 种采伐处理:对照(CK,0%)、轻度采伐(LT,约 15%)、中度采伐(MT,约 30%)、重度采伐(HT,约 50%)。从森林生产力、结构、更新、物种多样性及健康 5 个维度选取 21 项指标,采用层次分析法确定指标权重,构建森林质量评价体系,对比分析采伐前及采伐后 12 年的森林质量变化,探究不同采伐强度对次生阔叶红松林的影响,确定最有助于森林恢复的采伐强度。【结果】采伐后 12 年,4 种处理的森林质量指数分别为 0.808,0.888,0.860,0.793。LT 处理的森林质量指数最高,且较采伐前提升 14.7%,其年均蓄积量增长量最高、枯死木比例最低,森林更新、物种多样性及健康指标均优于 CK 处理;MT 处理目标树种蓄积量占比提升 8.95%,但森林生产力评分较低,采伐后 10 年森林质量恢复至伐前水平;HT 处理对森林生态系统干扰显著,短期内难以恢复,但可促进森林更新,12 年后森林质量指数恢复至伐前水平。【结论】轻度采伐(15% 左右)能显著提升次生阔叶红松林综合质量,生态恢复效果最优,可作为东北地区阔叶红松林经营的适宜抚育采伐强度。

Abstract

[Objective] Based on 12 years of continuous fixed-position monitoring, this study investigates the long-term effects of thinning intensity on the forest quality of a secondary broad-leaved Korean pine forest. It aims to construct a scientific forest quality evaluation system, clarify the recovery patterns of stand quality under different thinning intensities, and provide a theoretical basis and technical references for the sustainable management of this forest type. [Method] A 4-hectare secondary broadleaved Korean pine forest plot in the Jiaohe Forestry Experiment Bureau, Jilin Province, served as the research site. Four thinning treatments were established: control (CK, 0%), light thinning (LT, approximately 15%), moderate thinning (MT, approximately 30%), and heavy thinning (HT, approximately 50%). A forest quality evaluation system was constructed by selecting 21 indicators across five dimensions: forest productivity, structure, regeneration, species diversity, and health. The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) was used to determine indicator weights. Forest quality was assessed before thinning and 12 years post-thinning to analyze changes under different intensities and identify the optimal thinning threshold for forest recovery. [Result] Twelve years after thinning, the forest quality indices for the four treatments were 0.808, 0.888, 0.860, and 0.793. The forest quality index of the LT treatment was the highest, representing a 14.7% increase compared to the pre-logging level. The LT treatment also showed the highest mean annual volume increment, the lowest proportion of deadwood, and superior performance in forest regeneration, species diversity, and health indicators compared to the CK treatment. The MT treatment increased the volume proportion of target tree species by 8.95%, but its forest productivity score was relatively low, with forest quality recovering to the pre-logging level approximately 10 years post-logging. The HT treatment caused significant disturbance to the forest ecosystem, making short-term recovery difficult, although it promoted forest regeneration, with quality recovering to the pre-logging level after 12 years. [Conclusion] Light thinning (around 15%) can significantly enhance the comprehensive quality of secondary broad-leaved Korean pine forests, representing the optimal ecological restoration effect. A light thinning intensity of approximately 15% is recommended as an appropriate tending intensity for managing these forests in northeast China.

关键词

采伐强度 / 次生阔叶红松林 / 森林质量 / 林分生长 / 长期监测

Key words

cutting intensity / broadleaved Korean pine forest / forest quality / stand growth / long-term monitoring

引用本文

引用格式 ▾
董润远,姜俊,赵秀海. 采伐强度对次生阔叶红松林森林质量的长期影响[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2026, 48(7): 58-68 DOI:10.12171/j.1000−1522.20250486

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

参考文献

[1]

冯继广, 王景升, 姚帅臣, . 基于因子分析的森林资源质量综合评价[J].中南林业科技大学学报, 2017, 37(1): 27-32,42.

[2]

Feng J G, Wang J S, Yao S C, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of forest resources quality based on factor analysis[J].Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2017, 37(1): 27-32,42.

[3]

邹文涛, 李婷婷, 辛绍钢. 森林质量评价指标体系构建及评估[J].林业科技通讯, 2024(9): 7-10.

[4]

Zou W T, Li T T, Xin S G. Construction and evaluation of forest quality evaluation index system[J].Forest Science and Technology, 2024(9): 7-10.

[5]

邹文涛, 陈绍志, 方庆, . 中国森林质量评价指标研究进展[J].世界林业研究, 2024, 37(5): 67-72.

[6]

Zou W T, Chen S Z, Fang Q, et al. Research advances in China’s forest quality evaluation indicators[J].World Forestry Research, 2024, 37(5): 67-72.

[7]

李建, 彭鹏, 何怀江, . 采伐对吉林蛟河针阔混交林空间结构的影响[J].北京林业大学学报, 2017, 39(9): 48-57.

[8]

Li J, Peng P, He H J, et al. Effects of thinning intensity on spatial structure of multi-species temperate forest at Jiaohe in Jilin Province, northeastern China[J].Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2017, 39(9): 48-57.

[9]

陈辉荣, 周新年, 蔡瑞添, . 天然林不同强度择伐后林分空间结构变化动态[J].植物科学学报, 2012, 30(3): 230-237.

[10]

Chen H R, Zhou X N, Cai R T, et al. Tracking analysis of forest spatial structure change after different selective cutting intensities in a natural forest[J].Plant Science Journal, 2012, 30(3): 230-237.

[11]

梅浩, 佘宇晨, 陆翔. 基于小班尺度的生态公益林质量评价指标筛选研究[J].中南林业科技大学学报, 2019, 39(11): 14-22.

[12]

Mei H, She Y C, Lu X. Study on the quality assessment index selection of ecological public-welfare forests based on subcompartment scale[J].Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2019, 39(11): 14-22.

[13]

赵海兰, 菅宁红, 刘珉, . 森林质量精准提升工程进展、监测与评价: 以四川省乐山市为例[J].西部林业科学, 2022, 51(6): 101-107.

[14]

Zhao H L, Jian N H, Liu M, et al. Progress, monitoring and evaluation of the accurate improvement project of forest quality: Taking Leshan City, Sichuan Province as an example[J].Journal of West China Forestry Science, 2022, 51(6): 101-107.

[15]

朱教君, 刘足根. 森林干扰生态研究[J].应用生态学报, 2004, 15(10): 1703-1710.

[16]

Zhu J J, Liu Z G. A review on disturbance ecology of forest[J].Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2004, 15(10): 1703-1710.

[17]

Zhou D, Zhao S Q, Liu S, et al. A meta-analysis on the impacts of partial cutting on forest structure and carbon storage[J].Biogeosciences, 2013, 10(6): 3691-3703.

[18]

周梦丽, 张青, 亢新刚, . 不同采伐强度对云冷杉天然林主要针叶树种生长的影响[J].东北林业大学学报, 2015, 43(7): 7-10,30.

[19]

Zhou M L, Zhang Q, Kang X G, et al. Effects of different cuttings on growth of primary coniferous species in natural spruce-fir forest[J].Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 2015, 43(7): 7-10,30.

[20]

Geng Y, Yue Q, Zhang C, et al. Dynamics and drivers of aboveground biomass accumulation during recovery from selective harvesting in an uneven-aged forest[J].European Journal of Forest Research, 2021, 140(5): 1163-1178.

[21]

刘相兵, 刘亚茜, 李兵兵, . 生态疏伐对林分密度及直径结构的影响[J].西北林学院学报, 2012, 27(3): 145-149.

[22]

Liu X B, Liu Y (Q/X), Li B B, et al. Influences of ecological thinning on the stand density and diameter structure[J].Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2012, 27(3): 145-149.

[23]

苏文会, 朱晓武, 范少辉, . 采伐对森林生态系统的影响综述[J].林业资源管理, 2017(3): 35-40.

[24]

Su W H, Zhu X W, Fan S H, et al. Review of effects of harvesting on forest ecosystem[J].Forest Resources Management, 2017(3): 35-40.

[25]

李仲芳, 王刚. 种内竞争对一年生植物高生长与生物量关系的影响[J].兰州大学学报 (自然科学版), 2002, 38(2): 141-146.

[26]

Li Z F, Wang G. The effects of intraspecific competition on the relationship between height growth and biomass of annual plants[J].Journal of Lanzhou University (Natural Sciences), 2002, 38(2): 141-146.

[27]

欧江, 张捷, 崔宁洁, . 采伐林窗对马尾松人工林土壤微生物生物量的初期影响[J].自然资源学报, 2014, 29(12): 2036-2047.

[28]

Ou J, Zhang J, Cui N J, et al. The early effects of forest gap harvesting on soil microbial biomass in Pinus massoniana plantations[J].Journal of Natural Resources, 2014, 29(12): 2036-2047.

[29]

Peng C, Zhou X, Zhao S, et al. Quantifying the response of forest carbon balance to future climate change in Northeastern China: model validation and prediction[J].Global and Planetary Change, 2009, 66(3−4): 179-194.

[30]

于大炮, 周旺明, 周莉, . 长白山区阔叶红松林经营历史与研究历程[J].应用生态学报, 2019, 30(5): 1426-1434.

[31]

Yu D P, Zhou W M, Zhou L, et al. Exploring the history of the management theory and technology of broad-leaved Korean pine (Pinus koraiensis Sieb. et Zucc.) forest in Changbai Mountain Region, Northeast China[J].Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2019, 30(5): 1426-1434.

[32]

Yue Q, Geng Y, von Gadow K, et al. Effects of neighborhood interaction on tree growth in a temperate forest following selection harvesting[J].Ecological Indicators, 2022, 136: 108663.

[33]

吴志军, 苏东凯, 牛丽君, . 阔叶红松林森林资源可持续利用方案[J].生态学报, 2015, 35(1): 24-30.

[34]

Wu Z J, Su D K, Niu L J, et al. Evaluation of a sustainable forest utilization program for broadleaved Korean pine mixed forests in the Changbai Mountain region of Northeast China[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2015, 35(1): 24-30.

[35]

耿燕, 赵秀海, 安黎哲. 阔叶红松林乔木地上碳储量和碳增量对采伐强度的响应[J].北京林业大学学报, 2022, 44(10): 23-32.

[36]

Geng Y, Zhao X H, An L Z. Responses of tree aboveground carbon storage and carbon increment to logging intensity in a broadleaved Korean pine forest[J].Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2022, 44(10): 23-32.

[37]

王惠, 李倩, 韩雪梅, . 采伐干扰下长白山阔叶红松林优势树种生态位变化动态[J].东北林业大学学报, 2011, 39(10): 18−20,53.

[38]

Wang H, Li Q, Han X M, et al. Effect of harvesting on niche dynamics of main arborous species in broadleaved-Korean pine mixed forests in Changbai Mountain[J].Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 2011, 39(10): 18−20,53.

[39]

刘晨, 张春雨, 赵秀海. 采伐干扰对吉林蛟河针阔混交林生产力稳定性的影响[J].林业科学, 2022, 58(3): 1-9.

[40]

Liu C, Zhang C Y, Zhao X H. Effects of disturtance by thinning on productivity stability of conifer−broadleaf mixed forest in Jiaohe, Jilin Province[J].Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2022, 58(3): 1-9.

[41]

李明鲁, 吴兆飞, 邱华, . 采伐对吉林蛟河阔叶红松林生态功能的短期影响[J].北京林业大学学报, 2019, 41(9): 40-49.

[42]

Li M L, Wu Z F, Qiu H, et al. Short−term effects of tending felling on ecological services of mixed broadleaved−Korean pine forests at Jiaohe in Jilin Province, northeastern China[J].Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2019, 41(9): 40-49.

[43]

梁晶文, 翟凯涛, 李静, . 大兴安岭次生林森林生态系统健康评价研究[J].西南林业大学学报, 2024, 44(11): 98-106.

[44]

Liang J W, Zhai K T, Li J, et al. Study on forest ecosystem health evaluation of secondary forest in the greater Hinggan Mountains[J].Journal of Southwest Forestry University, 2024, 44(11): 98-106.

[45]

GB/T 26424-2010 森林资源规划设计调查技术规程[S].

[46]

GB/T 26424−2010 Technical regulations for inventory for forest management planning and design[S].

[47]

20171243-T-432 森林资源连续清查技术规程[S].

[48]

20171243-T−432 Technical regulations for continuous forest inventory[S].

[49]

T/CSF 002-2021 森林生态质量监测指标体系及技术规范[S].

[50]

T/CSF 002−2021 Monitoring indicator system and technological specification of forest ecological quality[S].

[51]

GB/T 44351-2024 退化林修复技术规程[S].

[52]

GB/T 44351-2024 Code of practice for degraded forest remediation and restoration[S].

[53]

李霄宇. 国家级森林类型自然保护区保护价值评价及合理布局研究 [D]. 北京: 北京林业大学,2011.

[54]

Li X Y. Conservation value evaluation and reasonable distribution of national nature reserve for forest[D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University,2011.

[55]

Thorpe H C, Thomas S C, Caspersen J P. Residual−tree growth responses to partial stand harvest in the black spruce(Picea mariana) boreal forest[J].Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 2007, 37(9): 1563-1571.

[56]

Curzon M T, D’Amato A W, Fraver S, et al. Harvesting influences functional identity and diversity over time in forests of the northeastern USA[J].Forest Ecology and Management, 2017, 400: 93-99.

[57]

米爽, 宋子龙, 秦江环, . 抚育采伐对吉林蛟河针阔混交林幼苗更新的影响[J].北京林业大学学报, 2019, 41(5): 159-169.

[58]

Mi S, Song Z L, Qin J H, et al. Effects of tending thinning on seedling regeneration in a mixed conifer−broadleaf forest in Jiaohe, Jilin Province of northeastern China[J].Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2019, 41(5): 159-169.

[59]

董希斌, 王立海. 采伐强度对林分蓄积生长量与更新影响的研究[J].林业科学, 2003, 39(6): 122-125.

[60]

Dong X B, Wang L H. Impacts of cutting intensity on volume increment and regeneration of different forests[J].Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2003, 39(6): 122-125.

[61]

张晓, 潘磊磊, Semyung Kwon, . 沙地天然樟子松径向生长对干旱的响应[J].北京林业大学学报, 2018, 40(7): 27-35.

[62]

Zhang X, Pan L L, Kwon S, et al. Climatological response of radial growth for Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica to drought in Hulun Buir Sandland, Inner Mongolia of northern China[J].Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2018, 40(7): 27-35.

[63]

龚固堂, 牛牧, 慕长龙, . 间伐强度对柏木人工林生长及林下植物的影响[J].林业科学, 2015, 51(4): 8-15.

[64]

Gong G T, Niu M, Mu C L, et al. Impacts of different thinning intensities on growth of Cupressus funebris plantation and understory plants[J].Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2015, 51(4): 8-15.

[65]

何怀江, 张忠辉, 张春雨, . 采伐强度对东北针阔混交林林分生长和物种多样性的短期影响[J].林业科学, 2019, 55(2): 1-12.

[66]

He H J, Zhang Z H, Zhang C Y, et al. Short-term effects of thinning intensity on stand growth and species diversity of mixed coniferous and broad-leaved forest in northeastern China[J].Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2019, 55(2): 1-12.

[67]

魏龙鑫, 耿燕, 崔可达, . 阔叶红松林不同林层和生长阶段树木生长对采伐强度的响应[J].植物生态学报, 2022, 46(6): 642-655.

[68]

Wei L X, Geng Y, Cui K D, et al. Responses of tree growth to harvesting intensity among forest strata and growth stages in a broadleaved Korean pine forest[J].Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2022, 46(6): 642-655.

[69]

孙楠, 李兴安, 张怡春. 采伐强度对水胡黄硬阔叶混交林主要树种及林下更新生长的影响[J].林业科技, 2015, 40(1): 30-33.

[70]

Sun N, Li X A, Zhang Y C. Effects of logging intensity on dominant tree species and understory regeneration growth in Fraxinus mandshurica, Juglans mandshurica, and Phellodendron amurense mixed hardwood forests[J].Forestry Technology, 2015, 40(1): 30-33.

[71]

Bataineh M, Kenefic L, Weiskittel A, et al. Influence of partial harvesting and site factors on the abundance and composition of natural regeneration in the Acadian Forest of Maine, USA[J].Forest Ecology and Management, 2013, 306: 96-106.

基金资助

国家重点研发计划重点专项(2022YFD2201003)

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (999KB)

0

访问

0

被引

详细

导航
相关文章

AI思维导图

/