基于非线性混合效应模型的蒙古栎1年生苗木生长拟合

许诺 ,  李翔宇 ,  杨明灏 ,  虞家昕 ,  张晓林

北京林业大学学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (10) : 98 -110.

PDF (2035KB)
北京林业大学学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (10) : 98 -110. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000−1522.20260081
林学

基于非线性混合效应模型的蒙古栎1年生苗木生长拟合

作者信息 +

Growth modeling of one-year-old Quercus mongolica seedlings using a nonlinear mixed-effects model

Author information +
文章历史 +
PDF (2082K)

摘要

【目的】筛选适宜描述蒙古栎1年生苗木苗高与地径生长的最优非线性生长模型,并构建非线性混合效应模型解析种源与个体层次的变异来源,揭示蒙古栎苗期生长节律及种源间生长差异。【方法】以来自辽宁、吉林、黑龙江3省9个种源地的757株蒙古栎1年生实生苗为研究对象,采用定株定时测定法,在生长季内(2025年6月20日—11月20日)每30 d测定一次苗高和地径,共获得6次重复观测数据。运用Logistic、Gompertz和von Bertalanffy 3种非线性生长模型对苗高和地径的生长动态拟合,基于均方根误差(RMSE)和平均绝对误差(MAE)最小原则筛选最优基础模型。在此基础上,进一步构建非线性混合效应模型,将渐近线参数a设为随机效应,b和k设为固定效应。采用限制性极大似然法(REML)估计参数,通过似然比检验比较不同随机效应结构的拟合优度,并利用决定系数(R2)、RMSE和MAE评价模型拟合效果。【结果】(1)以RMSE最小为主要准则,Logistic模型在苗高与地径生长拟合中均表现最优:苗高RMSE范围为3.152 ~ 7.965 cm,MAE范围为2.459 ~ 6.077 cm,地径RMSE范围为0.549 ~ 0.977 mm,MAE范围为0.439 ~ 0.731 mm。(2)基础Logistic模型因未考虑数据层次结构,拟合优度偏低,苗高R2介于0.312 ~ 0.510,地径R2介于0.453 ~ 0.594。引入种源与个体嵌套随机效应后,非线性混合效应模型的拟合优度显著提升,苗高R2提升至0.611 ~ 0.852,地径R2提升至0.685 ~ 0.868,各种源R2平均提升苗高约0.356、地径约0.257;RMSE平均降低苗高约34%、地径约33%;MAE平均降低苗高约39%、地径约36%。(3)随机效应方差组分分解结果显示,苗高生长极限的变异主要来源于个体间(方差分量22.09,占总变异39.48%),种源间变异次之(方差分量14.59,占总变异26.07%);地径生长变异同样主要来源于个体间(方差分量0.55,占总变异44.16%),种源间变异次之(方差分量0.34,占总变异27.70%)。(4)种源间生长潜力存在显著差异,抚顺、金州、龙江种源的苗高理论最大生长量(a值)较高(分别为30.779、30.038、29.346 cm),柴河、叶赫种源较低(分别为20.359、19.786 cm);地径生长方面,龙江种源理论最大地径最高(5.037 mm),盖州种源最低(3.245 mm)。蒙古栎苗期生长呈现“先高后径”的节律特征,9个种源苗高达到最大生长速率点的时间均早于地径。【结论】Logistic模型可作为蒙古栎1年生苗木苗高与地径生长的普适性优选模型。非线性混合效应模型通过引入种源与个体嵌套随机效应,显著提升了模型拟合精度,有效解析了苗期生长性状的层次结构变异。研究结果可为蒙古栎优质苗木培育、苗期管理优化及种质资源早期评价提供科学依据和量化工具。

Abstract

[Objective] This study sought to identify the most suitable nonlinear growth model for describing height and ground diameter growth in one-year-oldQuercus mongolica seedlings, and to develop a nonlinear mixed-effects model that partitions variation at provenance and individual levels, and to characterise the seedling growth rhythm and growth differences among provenances of Q. mongolica. [Method] We used 757 one-year-old seedlings from nine provenances across Liaoning, Jilin and Heilongjiang provinces. Height and ground diameter were measured every 30 days during the growing season (20 June to 20 November 2025), giving six repeated observations per seedling. Three growth functions—Logistic, Gompertz and von Bertalanffy—were fitted to the data. The best basic model was selected by minimising root mean square error (RMSE) and mean absolute error (MAE). We then constructed a nonlinear mixed-effects model, treating the asymptotic parametera as random and parameters b and k as fixed. Parameters were estimated using restricted maximum likelihood (REML). Likelihood-ratio tests were used to compare different random-effect structures, and model performance was evaluated using the coefficient of determination (R2), RMSE and MAE. [Result] (1) The Logistic model achieved the lowest RMSE across all provenances (3.152–7.965 cm), MAE of 2.459–6.077 cm; for ground diameter, RMSE was 0.549–0.977 mm and MAE was 0.439–0.731 mm. (2) The basic Logistic model, which ignored the hierarchical data structure, exhibited poor fit:R2 ranged from 0.312 to 0.510 for height and from 0.453 to 0.594 for diameter. After incorporating provenance and individual nested random effects, the mixed-effects model performed substantially better: R2 increased to 0.611–0.852 for height and 0.685–0.868 for diameter. On average, R2 rose by about 0.356 for height and 0.257 for diameter, RMSE decreased by about 34% for height and 33% for diameter, and MAE decreased by about 39% for height and 36% for diameter. (3) Variance component decomposition revealed that most of the variation in asymptotic height came from individuals (variance component 22.09, 39.48% of total variation), followed by provenances (14.59, 26.07%). Similarly for ground diameter, individual variation contributed 0.55 (44.16%) and provenance variation 0.34 (27.70%). (4) Growth potential differed significantly among provenances. The Fushun, Jinzhou and Longjiang provenances had higher theoretical maximum height (a values: 30.779, 30.038 and 29.346 cm, respectively), while the Chaihe and Yehe provenances had lower values (20.359 and 19.786 cm). For ground diameter, Longjiang had the highest theoretical maximum (5.037 mm) and Gaizhou the lowest (3.245 mm). Seedling growth followed a “height-first, diameter-later” rhythm: all nine provenances reached their peak height growth rate earlier than their peak diameter growth rate. [Conclusion] The Logistic model is a broadly suitable choice for modelling height and ground diameter growth in one-year-oldQ. mongolica seedlings. By incorporating provenance and individual nested random effects, the nonlinear mixed-effects model greatly improved fitting accuracy and effectively captured the hierarchical variation in seedling growth traits. These findings provide a scientific basis and quantitative tools for cultivating high-quality seedlings, optimising nursery management, and evaluating germplasm resources at an early stage.

关键词

蒙古栎 / 苗高 / 地径 / Logistic模型 / 非线性混合效应模型

Key words

Quercus mongolica / seedling height / ground diameter / Logistic model / nonlinear mixed-effects model

引用本文

引用格式 ▾
许诺,李翔宇,杨明灏,虞家昕,张晓林. 基于非线性混合效应模型的蒙古栎1年生苗木生长拟合[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2026, 48(10): 98-110 DOI:10.12171/j.1000−1522.20260081

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

参考文献

[1]

Li G Y, Xu J M, Li J, et al. Growth rhythm analysis of young stand and selection of superior families in Choerospondias axillaris [J].Forests, 2022, 13(12): 2145.

[2]

Caré O, Gailing O, Müller M, et al. Crown morphology in Norway spruce (Picea abies [Karst.] L.) as adaptation to mountainous environments is associated with single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in genes regulating seasonal growth rhythm [J].Tree Genetics & Genomes, 2019, 16(1): 4.

[3]

马子威, 赵瑞, 蒋翔宇, 等. 蒜头果半同胞家系苗期生长特性评价及配合选择 [J].林业科学, 2025, 61(10): 96-110.

[4]

Ma Z W, Zhao R, Jiang X Y, et al. Evaluation of growth characteristics at seedling stage and combined selection of half—sib families of Malania oleifera [J].Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2025, 61(10): 96-110.

[5]

王玉虓, 史雯茜, 李倩中, 等. 元宝枫1年生苗木生长模型的拟合 [J/OL].分子植物育种, 2023: 1-14 [2026−03−10].https://link.cnki.net/urlid/46.1068.S.20231205.1107.004.

[6]

Wang Y X, Shi W Q, Li Q Z, et al. Fitting of one—year—old Acer truncatum seedlings [J/OL].Molecular Plant Breeding, 1-14 [2026−03−10].https://link.cnki.net/urlid/46.1068.S.20231205.1107.004.

[7]

岩旺, 罗德义, 钟宇, 等. 西南地区青杨派乡土杨树的早期生长性状 [J].中南林业科技大学学报, 2022, 42(7): 44-54.

[8]

Yan W, Luo D Y, Zhong Y, et al. Early growth characteristics of the native Populus in Tacamahaca from southwest China [J].Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2022, 42(7): 44-54.

[9]

邱思玉, 曹元帅, 孙玉军, 等. 杉木人工林与年龄无关的优势高生长模型 [J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 43(5): 121-127.

[10]

Qiu S Y, Cao Y S, Sun Y J, et al. Age—independent dominant height growth model for Chinese fir plantation [J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition), 2019, 43(5): 121-127.

[11]

赵海文, 周长品, 刘一贞, 等. 粗皮桉早期生长模型拟合以及生长节律研究 [J].华南农业大学学报, 2025, 46(2): 212-221.

[12]

Zhao H W, Zhou C P, Liu Y Z, et al. Early growth model fitting and growth rhythm of Eucalyptus pellita [J].Journal of South China Agricultural University, 2025, 46(2): 212-221.

[13]

蔡金峰, 郁万文, 汪贵斌, 等. 不同产地苦楝苗期生长节律研究 [J].广西植物, 2022, 42(6): 1018-1028.

[14]

Cai J F, Yu W W, Wang G B, et al. Annual growth rhythm of Melia azedarach seedlings from different seed sources [J].Guihaia, 2022, 42(6): 1018-1028.

[15]

Hu X F, Jin Y S, Zhang X H, et al. Individual tree height increment model forQuercus mongolica secondary forest in the northeastern China using generalized nonlinear two—level mixed—effects model [J].Forests, 2023, 14(11): 2162.

[16]

Liu J T, Feng J, Gao H L, et al. Nonlinear mixed—effect branch growth model development for planted Korean pine in Northeast China [J].Trees, 2024, 38(2): 409-421.

[17]

Şahin A. Nonlinear mixed—effect models for height—diameter relationships of oriental beech trees in Artvin region, Eastern Black Sea Region of Türkiye [J].Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 2025, 40(7—8): 396-407.

[18]

李想, 刘万生, 周玮, 等. 蒙古栎次生林群落结构及优势种群点格局分析 [J].植物研究, 2020, 40(6): 830-838.

[19]

Li X, Liu W S, Zhou W, et al. Analysis on community structure and dominant population point pattern of secondary forest of Quercus mongolica [J].Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2020, 40(6): 830-838.

[20]

陈建伟, 康晓梅, 蔡艺玮, 等. 蒙古栎生长节律及开花结实过程观测 [J].北华大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 24(6): 737-743.

[21]

Chen J W, Kang X M, Cai Y W, et al. Observation of growth rhythm and flowering and fruiting process of Quercus mongolica [J].Journal of Beihua University (Natural Science), 2023, 24(6): 737-743.

[22]

张同兴, 李昕蔓, 张欢, 等. 蒙古栎不同种源苗期形态及生理性状变异 [J].东北林业大学学报, 2025, 53(6): 1-9.

[23]

Zhang T X, Li X M, Zhang H, et al. Variation in seedling morphological and physiological traits among different provenances of Quercus mongolica [J].Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 2025, 53(6): 1-9.

[24]

张晓林, 张宝瑞, 许诺, 等. 蒙古栎不同种源家系苗期生长性状变异及前期评价 [J].沈阳农业大学学报, 2025, 56(5): 80-89.

[25]

Zhang X L, Zhang B R, Xu N, et al. Growth performance of offspring in half—sibling families of Quercus mongolica fisch. ex ledeb. at the seedling stage [J].Journal of Shenyang Agricultural University, 2025, 56(5): 80-89.

[26]

李波. 基于表型和SSR分子标记的蒙古栎遗传多样性分析 [D].北京: 中国林业科学研究院, 2021.

[27]

Li B. Analysis of genetic diversity of Quercus mongolica based on phenotype and SSR molecular markers [D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Forestry,2021.

[28]

程雯, 武晓昱, 叶尔江·拜克吐尔汉, 等. 基于混合效应和分位数回归的温带针阔混交林树高与胸径关系研究 [J].北京林业大学学报, 2024, 46(2): 28-39.

[29]

Cheng W, Wu X Y, Yeerjiang Baiketuerhan, et al. Research on the relationship between tree height and DBH of temperate coniferous and broadleaved mixed forests based on mixed effects and quantile regression [J].Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2024, 46(2): 28-39.

[30]

蒋燚, 李娟, 刘晓蔚, 等. 黑荆树苗期生长节律研究 [J].西南林业大学学报, 2015, 35(1): 17-20.

[31]

Jiang Y, Li J, Liu X W, et al. Study on the seedling growth rhythm of Acacia mearnsii [J].Journal of Southwest Forestry University, 2015, 35(1): 17-20.

[32]

Li C, Xia H, Bai H, et al. Genetic variation of height growth rhythm between clones of Larix kaempferi × L. gmelini based on logistic models [J].Journal of Forestry Research, 2018, 29(5): 1387-1394.

[33]

于志民, 康文娟, 涂淑萍. 基于Logistic、Gompertz模型的圆齿野鸦椿幼苗生长模拟与分析 [J].江西农业大学学报, 2017, 39(6): 1187-1195.

[34]

Yu Z M, Kang W J, Tu S P. Simulation of growth curve based on nonlinear models of Logistic and Gompertz for Euscaphis konishii seedling [J].Acta Agriculturae Universitatis Jiangxiensis, 2017, 39(6): 1187-1195.

[35]

葛会硕, 宋跃朋, 苏雪辉, 等. 基于Logistic和Gompertz模型的小叶杨幼苗生长组合优化模型 [J].北京林业大学学报, 2020, 42(5): 59-70.

[36]

Ge H S, Song Y P, Su X H, et al. Optimal growth model of Populus simonii seedling combination based on Logistic and Gompertz models [J].Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2020, 42(5): 59-70.

[37]

罗元, 孙琪, 蔡年辉, 等. 油松不同种群1年生苗木生长节律研究 [J].西南农业学报, 2017, 30(4): 900-906.

[38]

Luo Y, Sun Q, Cai N H, et al. Study on annual seedling growth dynamic rhythm of different populations of Pinus tabulaeformis [J].Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 30(4): 900-906.

[39]

周光锋, 徐佳, 赵进红, 等. 基于非线性混合效应模型的泰山地区麻栎人工林地位指数表编制 [J].山东农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2026, 57(1): 179-188.

[40]

Zhou G F, Xu J, Zhao J H, et al. Development of a site index table for Quercus acutissima plantations in the Mount Tai region based on nonlinear mixed—effects models [J].Journal of Shandong Agricultural University (Natural Science Edition), 2026, 57(1): 179-188.

[41]

李欣宇, 叶尔江·拜克吐尔汉, 王娟, 等. 基于非线性混合效应模型的东北红松树高−胸径关系 [J].北京林业大学学报, 2025, 47(3): 38-48.

[42]

Li X Y, Yeerjiang Baiketuhan, Wang J, et al. Relationship between tree height and DBH of Pinus koraiensis in northeastern China based on nonlinear mixed effects model [J].Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2025, 47(3): 38-48.

[43]

冯源, 李贵祥, 和丽萍, 等. 基于非线性混合效应模型的云南松林树高曲线 [J].北京林业大学学报, 2025, 47(3): 49-60.

[44]

Feng Y, Li G X, He L P, et al. Tree height curves of Pinus yunnanensis forest based on nonlinear mixed effects model [J].Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2025, 47(3): 49-60.

[45]

倪铭岐, 高慧淋, 刘家腾, 等. 辽东山区日本落叶松一级枝条数量及密度预估模型 [J].应用生态学报, 2024, 35(8): 2082-2090.

[46]

Ni M Q, Gao H L, Liu J T, et al. Prediction model for the quantity and density of first—order branches of Larix kaempferi in eastern area of Liaoning Province, China [J].Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2024, 35(8): 2082-2090.

[47]

刘帅东, 苗铮, 郝元朔, 等. 基于非线性混合效应模型的长白落叶松人工林冠长率预估模型 [J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2026, 50(5): 152-160.

[48]

Liu S D, Miao Z, Hao Y S, et al. An efficient prediction model for crown ratio for Larix olgensis plantations based on nonlinear mixed—effects model [J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2026, 50(5): 152-160.

[49]

何星谊, 刘恩林, 吕勇, 等. 基于立地和气候效应的杉木优势木胸径生长模型 [J].中南林业科技大学学报, 2026, 46(6): 91-102, 183.

[50]

He X Y, Liu E L, Lü Y, et al. A diameter at breast height growth model for dominant Chinese fir trees incorporating site and climatic effects [J].Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2026, 46(6): 91−102, 183.

[51]

刘建锋, 肖文发, 熊定鹏, 等. 不同纬度栓皮栎幼苗生理生态特征的比较 [J].植物研究, 2011, 31(4): 467-471.

[52]

Liu J F, Xiao W F, Xiong D P, et al. Comparison on the physio—ecological characteristics of Quercus variabilis seedlings from various latitude sites [J].Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2011, 31(4): 467-471.

[53]

李文文. 蒙古栎种源变异及无性繁殖研究 [D].北京: 中国林业科学研究院, 2010.

[54]

Li W W. Study on provenance variation and asexual propagation of Quercus mongolica Fisch. [D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Forestry,2010.

[55]

樊莹, 乔雪涛, 赵秀海. 长白山自然保护区蒙古栎幼树生理生长特性随海拔梯度的变化 [J].北京林业大学学报, 2019, 41(11): 1-10.

[56]

Fan Y, Qiao X T, Zhao X H. Physiological and growth variations of Quercus mongolica saplings along an elevational gradient in Changbai Mountain Nature Reserve, northeastern China [J].Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2019, 41(11): 1-10.

[57]

Qi Z Z, Huang X, Peng Y, et al. Identifying superior growth and photosynthetic traits in eighteen oak varieties for southwest China [J].Forests, 2024, 15(11): 2006.

[58]

宋淑媛, 顾宸瑞, 李春旭, 等. 应用曲线模型解析施肥对白桦苗期年高生长节律的影响 [J].东北林业大学学报, 2021, 49(4): 17-23.

[59]

Song S Y, Gu C R, Li C X, et al. Fertilization effect on annual growth rhythm of Betula platyphylla using Logistic growth model [J].Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 2021, 49(4): 17-23.

基金资助

国家重点研发计划(2024YFD1501400)

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (2035KB)

5

访问

0

被引

详细

导航
相关文章

AI思维导图

/

〈 〉