分子胶药物活性测定方法的研究进展

曹培芳 ,  蒋南

中国药科大学学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (3) : 401 -410.

PDF (5933KB)
中国药科大学学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (3) : 401 -410. DOI: 10.11665/j.issn.1000−5048.2025112802
综述

分子胶药物活性测定方法的研究进展

作者信息 +

Research advances in methods for determining the activity of molecular glue drugs

Author information +
文章历史 +
PDF (6074K)

摘要

分子胶药物通过诱导或稳定蛋白-蛋白相互作用来发挥药理作用。对其进行活性评价除了需要评估它们与蛋白间的结合能力以外,还需评估三元复合物形成、界面稳定性、协同性和细胞内功能等多个方面。本文从体外定量检测、细胞学验证、理论计算与模拟等三个方面,对目前常用的分子胶活性评价方法及其应用进行总结;并结合药物研发过程对活性评价工作效率的实际需求,提出了分层次活性评估的方法,以期为分子胶药物活性研究和方法选择提供参考。

Abstract

Molecular glue drugs exert pharmacological effects by inducing or stabilizing protein-protein interactions. Evaluating their activity not only requires assessing their binding to proteins, but also involves the evaluation of multiple aspects such as ternary complex formation, interface stability, cooperativity, and intracellular function. This review summarizes the commonly used methods and applications for evaluating the activity of molecular glues from three aspects: in vitro quantitative detection, cellular validation, and theoretical calculations and simulations; and proposes a hierarchical approach to activity evaluation based on the actual needs for efficiency in drug development, aiming to provide some reference for the study of molecular glue drug activity and the selection of evaluation methods.

关键词

分子胶药物 / 活性评价 / 蛋白-蛋白相互作用 / 生物物理检测 / 理论预测

Key words

molecular glue drugs / activity assessment / protein-protein interactions / biophysical assays / theoretical prediction

引用本文

引用格式 ▾
曹培芳,蒋南. 分子胶药物活性测定方法的研究进展[J]. 中国药科大学学报, 2026, 57(3): 401-410 DOI:10.11665/j.issn.1000−5048.2025112802

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

参考文献

[1]

Oleinikovas V, Gainza P, Ryckmans T, et al. From thalidomide to rational molecular glue design for targeted protein degradation[J]. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol, 2024, 64: 291-312.

[2]

Zhang RY, Zheng YR, Xiang FJ, et al. Inducing or enhancing protein—protein interaction to develop drugs: molecular glues with various biological activity[J]. Eur J Med Chem, 2024, 277: 116756.

[3]

Fischer ES, Böhm K, Lydeard JR, et al. Structure of the DDB1—CRBN E3 ubiquitin ligase in complex with thalidomide[J]. Nature, 2014, 512(7512): 49-53.

[4]

Schreiber SL. The rise of molecular glues[J]. Cell, 2021, 184(1): 3-9.

[5]

Ward JA, Perez—Lopez C, Mayor—Ruiz C. Biophysical and computational approaches to study ternary complexes: a ‘cooperative relationship’ to rationalize targeted protein degradation[J]. Chembiochem, 2023, 24(10): e202300163.

[6]

Békés M, Langley DR, Crews CM. PROTAC targeted protein degraders: the past is prologue[J]. Nat Rev Drug Discov, 2022, 21(3): 181-200.

[7]

Tinworth CP, Lithgow H, Dittus L, et al. PROTAC—mediated degradation of bruton’s tyrosine kinase is inhibited by covalent binding[J]. ACS Chem Biol, 2019, 14(3): 342-347.

[8]

Zorba A, Nguyen C, Xu YR, et al. Delineating the role of cooperativity in the design of potent PROTACs for BTK[J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2018, 115(31): E7285-E7292.

[9]

Roy MJ, Winkler S, Hughes SJ, et al. SPR—measured dissociation kinetics of PROTAC ternary complexes influence target degradation rate[J]. ACS Chem Biol, 2019, 14(3): 361-368.

[10]

Bondeson DP, Mares A, Smith IED, et al. Catalytic in vivo protein knockdown by small—molecule PROTACs[J]. Nat Chem Biol, 2015, 11(8): 611-617.

[11]

Burslem GM, Crews CM. Proteolysis—targeting chimeras as therapeutics and tools for biological discovery[J]. Cell, 2020, 181(1): 102-114.

[12]

Holdgate GA, Bardelle C, Berry SK, et al. Screening for molecular glues: challenges and opportunities[J]. SLAS Discov, 2024, 29(2): 100136.

[13]

Myszka DG. Kinetic analysis of macromolecular interactions using surface plasmon resonance biosensors[J]. Curr Opin Biotechnol, 1997, 8(1): 50-57.

[14]

Banaszynski LA, Liu CW, Wandless TJ. Characterization of the FKBP·rapamycin·FRB ternary complex[J]. J Am Chem Soc, 2005, 127(13): 4715-4721.

[15]

Konstantinidou M, Zingiridis M, Pennings MAM, et al. Scaffold—hopping for molecular glues targeting the 14—3—3/ERα complex[J]. Nat Commun, 2025, 16: 6467.

[16]

Wesley NA, Skrajna A, Simmons HC, et al. Time resolved—fluorescence resonance energy transfer platform for quantitative nucleosome binding and footprinting[J]. Protein Sci, 2022, 31(6): e4339.

[17]

Petzold G, Fischer ES, Thomä NH. Structural basis of lenalidomide—induced CK1α degradation by the CRL4(CRBN) ubiquitin ligase[J]. Nature, 2016, 532(7597): 127-130.

[18]

Faust TB, Yoon H, Nowak RP, et al. Structural complementarity facilitates E7820—mediated degradation of RBM39 by DCAF15[J]. Nat Chem Biol, 2020, 16(1): 7-14.

[19]

Chiad K, Stelzig SH, Gropeanu R, et al. Isothermal titration calorimetry: a powerful technique to quantify interactions in polymer hybrid systems[J]. Macromolecules, 2009, 42(19): 7545-7552.

[20]

Hsia O, Hinterndorfer M, Cowan AD, et al. Targeted protein degradation via intramolecular bivalent glues[J]. Nature, 2024, 627(8002): 204-211.

[21]

Velours C, Zhou JJ, Zecchin P, et al. Determination of the absolute molar mass of [Fe—S]—containing proteins using size exclusion chromatography—multi—angle light scattering (SEC—MALS)[J]. Biomolecules, 2022, 12(2): 270.

[22]

Jackson C, Beveridge R. Native mass spectrometry of complexes formed by molecular glues reveals stoichiometric rearrangement of E3 ligases[J]. Analyst, 2024, 149(11): 3178-3185.

[23]

Bates TA, Gurmessa SK, Weinstein JB, et al. Biolayer interferometry for measuring the kinetics of protein—protein interactions and nanobody binding[J]. Nat Protoc, 2025, 20(4): 861-883.

[24]

Seidel SAI, Dijkman PM, Lea WA , et al. Microscale thermophoresis quantifies biomolecular interactions under previously challenging conditions[J]. Methods, 2013, 59(3): 301-315.

[25]

Du YH. Fluorescence polarization assay to quantify protein—protein interactions in an HTS format[J]. Methods Mol Biol, 2015, 1278: 529-544.

[26]

Gooran N, Kopra K. Fluorescence—based protein stability monitoring: a review[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2024, 25(3): 1764.

[27]

Masson GR, Burke JE, Ahn NG, et al. Recommendations for performing, interpreting and reporting hydrogen deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX—MS) experiments[J]. Nat Meth, 2019, 16(7): 595-602.

[28]

Wurz RP, Rui H, Dellamaggiore K, et al. Affinity and cooperativity modulate ternary complex formation to drive targeted protein degradation[J]. Nat Commun, 2023, 14: 4177.

[29]

Sule R, Rivera G, Gomes AV. Western blotting (immunoblotting): history, theory, uses, protocol and problems[J]. Biotechniques, 2023, 75(3): 99-114.

[30]

Lu G, Middleton RE, Sun HH, et al. The myeloma drug lenalidomide promotes the cereblon—dependent destruction of ikaros proteins[J]. Science, 2014, 343(6168): 305-309.

[31]

Schwinn MK, Machleidt T, Zimmerman K, et al. CRISPR—mediated tagging of endogenous proteins with a luminescent peptide[J]. ACS Chem Biol, 2018, 13(2): 467-474.

[32]

Cossarizza A, Chang HD, Radbruch A, et al. Guidelines for the use of flow cytometry and cell sorting in immunological studies (third edition)[J]. Eur J Immunol, 2021, 51(12): 2708-3145.

[33]

Gross PH, Sheets KJ, Warren NA, et al. Accelerating PROTAC drug discovery: establishing a relationship between ubiquitination and target protein degradation[J]. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 2022, 628: 68-75.

[34]

Brownell JE, Sintchak MD, Gavin JM, et al. Substrate—assisted inhibition of ubiquitin—like protein—activating enzymes: the NEDD8 E1 inhibitor MLN4924 forms a NEDD8—AMP mimetic in situ[J]. Mol Cell, 2010, 37(1): 102-111.

[35]

Kadimisetty K, Sheets KJ, Gross PH, et al. Tandem ubiquitin binding entities (TUBEs) as tools to explore ubiquitin—proteasome system and PROTAC drug discovery[M]// Targeted Protein Degradation. New York, NY: Springer US, 2021: 185-202.

[36]

Burckhardt CJ, Minna JD, Danuser G. Co—immunoprecipitation and semi—quantitative immunoblotting for the analysis of protein—protein interactions[J]. STAR Protoc, 2021, 2(3): 100644.

[37]

Liu J, Farmer JD, Lane WS, et al. Calcineurin is a common target of cyclophilin—cyclosporin A and FKBP—FK506 complexes[J]. Cell, 1991, 66(4): 807-815.

[38]

Sanchez TW, Ronzetti MH, Owens AE, et al. Real—time cellular thermal shift assay to monitor target engagement[J]. ACS Chem Biol, 2022, 17(9): 2471-2482.

[39]

Vickery HR, Virta JM, Konstantinidou M, et al. Development of a NanoBRET assay for evaluation of 14—3—3σ molecular glues[J]. SLAS Discov, 2024, 29(5): 100165.

[40]

Emmel EA, Verweij CL, Durand DB, et al. Cyclosporin a specifically inhibits function of nuclear proteins involved in T cell activation[J]. Science, 1989, 246(4937): 1617-1620.

[41]

Ben Geoffrey AS, Agrawal D, Kulkarni NM, et al. Molecular glue—design—evaluator (MOLDE): an advanced method for in—silico molecular glue design[J]. ACS Omega, 2025, 10(7): 6650-6662.

[42]

Rui H, Ashton KS, Min J, et al. Protein—protein interfaces in molecular glue—induced ternary complexes: classification, characterization, and prediction[J]. RSC Chem Biol, 2023, 4(3): 192-215.

[43]

Zhang ZM, Li YQ, Yang J, et al. Dual—site molecular glues for enhancing protein—protein interactions of the CDK12—DDB1 complex[J]. Nat Commun, 2024, 15: 6477.

[44]

Miñarro—Lleonar M, Bertran—Mostazo A, Duro J, et al. Lenalidomide stabilizes protein—protein complexes by turning labile intermolecular H—bonds into robust interactions[J]. J Med Chem, 2023, 66(9): 6037-6046.

[45]

Dudas B, Athanasiou C, Mobarec JC, et al. Quantifying cooperativity through binding free energies in molecular glue degraders[J]. J Chem Theory Comput, 2025, 21(11): 5712-5723.

基金资助

江苏省自然科学基金项目(BK20211254)

教育部产学合作协同育人项目(231103177201655)

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (5933KB)

0

访问

0

被引

详细

导航
相关文章

AI思维导图

/