农地经营权流转方式对粮油生产成本的影响:“规模效应”与“租金效应”*
Impact of Agricultural Land Management Right Transfer on Grain and Oil Production Costs: Scale Effect or Rent Effect
粮油农产品的稳定供给关乎国家粮食安全,但生产成本上升削弱了农民生产积极性。文章利用9类粮油农产品的1 260个宏观数据,实证分析出租(转包)、入股及其他流转方式在“规模效应”和“租金效应”上的异质性影响,并探讨各方式对粮油生产成本的作用机制。结果表明:出租(转包)方式的“规模效应”大于“租金效应”,可有效降低亩均直接生产成本,其主要通过机械化节约人工成本;入股方式虽无显著的“规模效应”,但其负向的“租金效应”降低了流转地租金;其他流转方式则因中介服务、合同签订、管理等费用增加导致总成本上升。据此,政策上应因地制宜推动多元化的流转方式。建议重点鼓励入股方式的推广,以实现土地要素的有效利用,并通过农地适度规模经营,优化生产成本结构。
The stable supply of food and oil agricultural products is related to national food security, but the rising production costs have weakened farmers' incentive to produce. This study employs 1 260 macro-economic data points across 9 categories of grain and oil crops to empirically analyze the heterogeneous impacts of leasing (subcontracting), shareholding, and other transfer methods in terms of the "scale effect" and the "rent effect", while exploring the underlying mechanisms through which each method influences grain and oil production costs. The results show that: leasing (subcontracting), shareholding and other transfer methods have heterogeneous effects on "scale effect" and "rent effect; the "scale effect" of the leasing (subcontracting) method is larger than the "rent effect", which can effectively reduce the direct production cost per mu, and save the labor cost mainly through mechanization; the shareholding method does not have significant "scale effect", but its negative effect is not significant. Although the shareholding method has no significant "scale effect", its negative "rent effect" reduces the rent of the transferred land; the other transfer methods increase the total cost due to the increase in the costs of intermediary services, contract signing, and management, etc. Accordingly, the impact of different transfer methods on food production is not significant. Thus, the policy should promote diversified transfer methods according to local conditions. It is recommended to focus on encouraging the promotion of the shareholding method in order to realize the effective use of land elements and optimize the production cost structure through the moderate scale operation of agricultural land.
| [1] |
徐亚东, 张应良. 新征程中全方位夯实粮食安全根基的深刻内涵与关键举措[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2023, 23(4): 95-103. |
| [2] |
张应良, 徐亚东. 新形势下我国粮食安全风险及其战略应对[J]. 中州学刊, 2023(3): 52-61. |
| [3] |
许庆, 饶清玲, 张宽. 集中流转与农地租金: 效应及机理[J]. 中国农村经济, 2024(7): 35-54. |
| [4] |
张聪颖, 畅倩, 霍学喜. 适度规模经营能够降低农产品生产成本——基于陕西661个苹果户的实证检验[J]. 农业技术经济, 2018(10): 26-35. |
| [5] |
李文明, 罗丹, 陈洁, |
| [6] |
顾天竹, 纪月清, 钟甫宁. 中国农业生产的地块规模经济及其来源分析[J]. 中国农村经济, 2017(2): 30-43. |
| [7] |
张晓恒, 周应恒. 农户经营规模与效率水平不匹配对水稻生产成本的影响[J]. 中国农村经济, 2019(2): 81-97. |
| [8] |
曾福生, 李飞. 农业基础设施对粮食生产的成本节约效应估——基于似无相关回归方法[J]. 中国农村经济, 2015(6): 4-12+22. |
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
李尚蒲, 仇童伟, 谢琳. 粮食直补、农地市场结构与农地租金决定[J]. 学术研究, 2021(4): 95-100. |
| [12] |
蔡颖萍, 杜志雄. 玉米临时收储政策调整对家庭农场土地流转租金的影响分析[J]. 中国农村观察, 2020(3): 114-129. |
| [13] |
宫斌斌, 杨宁, 刘帅. 玉米生产者补贴政策实施效果及其完善[J]. 农业经济问题, 2021(10): 127-138. |
| [14] |
陈荣源, 林文声. 农产品价格政策、农地流转租金与农业经营规——来自2011-2018年CHARLS调查的证据[J]. 湖南农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 23(4): 28-36. |
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
李星光, 霍学喜. 农地确权和非正式规则如何影响农地流转租金[J]. 江西财经大学学报, 2021(6): 88-97. |
| [17] |
邢琦, 王健, 袁士超, |
| [18] |
蔡昉, 王美艳. 从穷人经济到规模经——发展阶段变化对中国农业提出的挑战[J]. 经济研究, 2016, 51(5): 14-26. |
| [19] |
何秀荣. 关于我国农业经营规模的思考[J]. 农业经济问题, 2016, 37(9): 4-15. |
| [20] |
王嫚嫚, 刘颖, 陈实. 规模报酬、产出利润与生产成本视角下的农业适度规模经——基于江汉平原354个水稻种植户的研究[J]. 农业技术经济, 2017(4): 83-94. |
| [21] |
李谷成, 冯中朝, 范丽霞. 小农户真的更加具有效率吗?来自湖北省的经验证据[J]. 经济学(季刊), 2010, 9(1): 95-124. |
| [22] |
徐亚东, 张应良. 非粮化农地流转对粮食生产土地成本的实证分析[J]. 农业经济与管理, 2024(2): 25-37. |
| [23] |
刘汉成, 关江华. 适度规模经营背景下农村土地流转研究[J]. 农业经济问题, 2019(8): 59-64. |
| [24] |
马遇伯, 李全新. 苹果种植适度规模经营研——以陕西省白水县为例[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2020, 41(9): 230-237. |
*国家社会科学基金重点项目(21AZD032)
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |