基于院前动态生命体征的创伤性脑损伤患者院内死亡相关因素分析:一项单中心回顾性研究

曹俊杰 ,  张颜果儿 ,  王兵 ,  申思慧 ,  徐祥 ,  叶胜

遵义医科大学学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (7) : 782 -789.

PDF (1189KB)
遵义医科大学学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (7) : 782 -789.
临床研究

基于院前动态生命体征的创伤性脑损伤患者院内死亡相关因素分析:一项单中心回顾性研究

作者信息 +

Analysis of factors associated with in-hospital death of patients with traumatic brain injury based on prehospital dynamic vital signs: a single-center retrospective study

Author information +
文章历史 +
PDF (1217K)

摘要

目的 基于院前监测的短时动态生命体征数据,探讨院前短时动态生命体征指标与创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者院内死亡的关联。方法 回顾性纳入2020年1月1日至2024年12月31日由救护车转运至皖南医学院第二附属医院的TBI患者,提取院前生命体征的初始值、最小值、最大值及短时动态变化趋势指标。采用单因素及多因素Logistic回归分析院前生命体征指标与院内死亡的关系,并绘制受试者操作特征曲线(ROC),评价独立相关因素及其联合指标对院内死亡的区分能力。结果 研究共纳入TBI患者263例,其中院内死亡42例(15.97%)。多因素Logistic回归分析显示,呼吸频率(OR=1.358,95%CI:1.004~1.838,P=0.047)、SpO2-min(OR=0.498,95%CI:0.277~0.895,P=0.020)、收缩压变化趋势_Z(OR=0.028,95%CI:0.004~0.194,P<0.001)、SpO2变化趋势_Z(OR=0.055,95%CI:0.010~0.302,P<0.001)及格拉斯哥昏迷评分(GCS)变化趋势_Z(OR=0.364,95%CI:0.138~0.956,P=0.040)为院内死亡的独立相关因素。基于多因素Logistic回归模型预测概率构建的联合指标ROC曲线下面积(AUC)为0.992(95%CI:0.979~1.000,P<0.001),且高于各预测因子,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。校准曲线及决策曲线分析(DCA)均提示预测模型具有较好的校准能力及临床应用价值。结论 院前短时动态生命体征变化趋势与TBI患者院内死亡密切相关,较单一时间点的预测指标可能提供更多病情评估信息。多项院前动态指标联合后对院内死亡具有较好的区分能力,可为院前高危患者的早期识别提供一定参考。

Abstract

Objective This study aimed to investigate the association between prehospital short-term dynamic vital-sign indicators and in-hospital mortality in patients with TBI based on prehospital monitored dynamic vital-sign data. Methods In this retrospective study, patients with TBI who were transported by ambulance to the Second Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College between January 1, 2020, and December 31, 2024, were included. Initial, minimum, and maximum values of prehospital vital signs, as well as their short-term dynamic trend indicators, were extracted. Univariate and multivariable Logistic regression analyses were performed to examine the associations between prehospital vital-sign indicators and in-hospital mortality. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted to evaluate the discriminative ability of independent factors and their combined model for in-hospital mortality. Results A total of 263 patients with TBI were included, of whom 42 (15.97%) died during hospitalization. Multivariable Logistic regression analysis showed that respiratory rate (OR=1.358, 95%CI: 1.004-1.838, P=0.047), minimum SpO2 (OR=0.498, 95%CI: 0.277-0.895, P=0.020), standardized systolic blood pressure trend (OR=0.028, 95%CI: 0.004-0.194, P<0.001), standardized SpO2 trend (OR=0.055, 95%CI: 0.010-0.302, P<0.001), and standardized Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) trend (OR=0.364, 95%CI: 0.138-0.956, P=0.040) were independently associated with in-hospital mortality. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for the combined predictor based on the multivariable Logistic regression model was 0.992 (95%CI: 0.979-1.000, P<0.001), and was significantly higher than those of individual predictors (P<0.05). Calibration curves and decision curve analysis (DCA) indicated that the prediction model demonstrated good calibration and potential clinical utility. Conclusion Short-term dynamic changes in prehospital vital signs were closely associated with in-hospital mortality in patients with TBI and may provide more prognostic information than single time-point indicators. The combination of multiple prehospital dynamic indicators showed good discriminative ability for in-hospital mortality and may help facilitate the early identification of high-risk patients in the prehospital setting.

关键词

创伤性脑损伤 / 院前急救 / 动态生命体征 / 院内死亡

Key words

traumatic brain injury / prehospital emergency care / dynamic vital signs / in-hospital mortality

引用本文

引用格式 ▾
曹俊杰,张颜果儿,王兵,申思慧,徐祥,叶胜. 基于院前动态生命体征的创伤性脑损伤患者院内死亡相关因素分析:一项单中心回顾性研究[J]. 遵义医科大学学报, 2026, 49(7): 782-789 DOI:

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

参考文献

[1]

杨阳, 田小溪, 史正华, . 成人创伤性颅脑损伤院前与急诊诊治中国专家共识[J]. 解放军医学杂志, 2025, 50(2): 123-133.

[2]

Zhong H, Feng Y, Shen J, et al. Global burden of traumatic brain injury in 204 countries and territories from 1990 to 2021[J]. Am J Prev Med, 2025, 68(4): 754-763.

[3]

何君梅, 李思宇, 唐志红 . 创伤性颅脑损伤的临床治疗进展[J]. 中国临床医生杂志, 2025, 53(1): 19-23.

[4]

Miller GF, DePadilla L, Xu L. Costs of nonfatal traumatic brain injury in the United States, 2016[J]. Med Care, 2021, 59(5): 451-455.

[5]

Feng JF, Huang XJ, Yang XF, et al. Traumatic brain injury in China: an update on epidemiology, care pathways, and clinical research[J]. Lancet Neurol, 2026, 25(4): 396-405.

[6]

陈琳, 葛红飞, 喻安永 . 红景天苷改善创伤性脑损伤后继发性神经损伤的作用机制研究进展[J]. 遵义医科大学学报, 2024, 47(4): 416-423.

[7]

Lulla A, Lumba-Brown A, Totten AM, et al. Prehospital guidelines for the management of traumatic brain injury 3rd edition[J]. Prehosp Emerg Care, 2023, 27(5): 507-538.

[8]

Butterfield M, Bodnar D, Williamson F, et al. Prevalence of secondary insults and outcomes of patients with traumatic brain injury intubated in the prehospital setting: a retrospective cohort study[J]. Emerg Med J, 2023, 40(3): 167-174.

[9]

陈天喜, 姜岱山, 沈艳, . 基于决策树的急性创伤性脑损伤患者早期死亡风险分诊模型的构建及验证[J]. 军事护理, 2023, 40(10): 34-38.

[10]

Afshari A, Torabi M, Khazaei A, et al. Unveiling the performance of the prehospital rapid emergency medicine score (pREMS): how the predictive score impacts in-hospital outcomes in traumatic brain injury (TBI): a retrospective observational cohort study[J]. BMC Emerg Med, 2024, 24(1): 139.

[11]

苏观, 陈延茹, 杨涛, . 不同评分系统对颅脑外伤患者近期预后预测效能的对比分析[J]. 中华全科医学, 2021, 19(1): 27-30.

[12]

Wang B, Liu Y, Xing J, et al. Development and validation of a clinical nomogram for predicting in-hospital mortality in patients with traumatic brain injury prehospital: a retrospective study[J]. Heliyon, 2024, 10(17): e37295.

[13]

Tanii R, Hayashi K, Naito T, et al. Impact of dynamic parameter of trends in vital signs on the prediction of serious events in hospitalized patients-a retrospective observational study[J]. Resusc Plus, 2024, 18: 100628.

[14]

Placido D, Thorsen-Meyer HC, Kaas-Hansen BS, et al. Development of a dynamic prediction model for unplanned ICU admission and mortality in hospitalized patients[J]. PLoS Digit Health, 2023, 2(6): e0000116.

[15]

Salada K, Ehrmann J, Saylor KM, et al. Intermittent vs continuous pulse oximetry for bronchiolitis hospitalizations: a systematic review[J]. Hosp Pediatr, 2025, 15(9): e460-e473.

[16]

Rasmussen L, Christensen ML, Poulsen CW, et al. Effect of high versus low carbohydrate intake in the morning on glycemic variability and glycemic control measured by continuous blood glucose monitoring in women with gestational diabetes mellitus-a randomized crossover study[J]. Nutrients, 2020, 12(2): 475.

[17]

Alizadeh A, Burns A, Lenigk R, et al. A wearable patch for continuous monitoring of sweat electrolytes during exertion[J]. Lab Chip, 2018, 18(17): 2632-2641.

[18]

Churpek MM, Adhikari R, Edelson DP. The value of vital sign trends for detecting clinical deterioration on the wards[J]. Resuscitation, 2016, 102: 1-5.

[19]

Efthimiou O, Seo M, Chalkou K, et al. Developing clinical prediction models: a step-by-step guide[J]. BMJ, 2024, 386: e078276.

[20]

Ma J, Dhiman P, Qi C, et al. Poor handling of continuous predictors in clinical prediction models using logistic regression: a systematic review[J]. J Clin Epidemiol, 2023, 161: 140-151.

[21]

孙成智, 肖遥, 乔光念, . 时间因素在颅脑损伤过程中的研究进展分析[J]. 生物医学转化, 2024, 5(3): 84-90.

[22]

Maiga AW, Lin HS, Wisniewski SR, et al. Adverse prehospital events and outcomes after traumatic brain injury[J]. JAMA Netw Open, 2025, 8(1): e2457506.

[23]

Lee JW, Wang W, Rezk A, et al. Hypotension and adverse outcomes in moderate to severe traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. JAMA Netw Open, 2024, 7(11): e2444465.

[24]

Rice AD, Hu C, Spaite DW, et al. Correlation between prehospital and in-hospital hypotension and outcomes after traumatic brain injury[J]. Am J Emerg Med, 2023, 65: 95-103.

[25]

Spaite DW, Hu C, Bobrow BJ, et al. Optimal out-of-hospital blood pressure in major traumatic brain injury: a challenge to the current understanding of hypotension[J]. Ann Emerg Med, 2022, 80(1): 46-59.

[26]

Thirawattanasoot N, Chantanakomes J, Pansiritanachot W, et al. Association between prehospital oxygen saturation and outcomes in hypotensive traumatic brain injury patients in Asia (Pan-Asian Trauma Outcomes Study (PATOS))[J]. Int J Emerg Med, 2025, 18(1): 104.

[27]

Atkin-Jones T, Solorzano-Aldana MC, Rezk A, et al. Impact of oxygen and carbon dioxide levels on mortality in moderate to severe traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Crit Care, 2025, 29(1): 357.

[28]

练皎, 刘文科 . 中重度颅脑损伤患者28d死亡影响因素分析及NLR联合GCS评分对其28d死亡预测价值[J]. 临床误诊误治, 2021, 34(3): 101-107.

[29]

Robba C, Graziano F, Rebora P, et al. Intracranial pressure monitoring in patients with acute brain injury in the intensive care unit (synapse-icu): an international, prospective observational cohort study[J]. Lancet Neurol, 2021, 20(7): 548-558.

[30]

Zhang Y, Chen F, Ma N, et al. Association between glasgow coma scale trajectory and in-hospital mortality in traumatic brain injury in the ICU: a retrospective cohort study[J]. Nurs Crit Care, 2025, 30(5): e70139.

基金资助

安徽省卫生健康科研项目(2024Aa10038)

安徽省教育厅自然科学研究项目(2025AHGXZK31460)

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (1189KB)

4

访问

0

被引

详细

导航
相关文章

AI思维导图

/