水平地震作用下软黏土中桩承输电塔系统的动力响应分析
张磊 , 卢琳禄 , 石浚 , 陈成 , 许标 , 王恒
地震工程与工程振动 ›› 2026, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (3) : 179 -193.
水平地震作用下软黏土中桩承输电塔系统的动力响应分析
Dynamic response of pile-supported transmission tower system installed in soft clay under horizontal earthquake action
本文基于常重力振动台地震模型试验结果的验证,建立了充分考虑土-结构相互作用影响的桩承输电塔体系三维有限元模型。针对水平地震作用下软黏土地基中桩承输电塔的动力响应开展了一系列数值参数分析,系统地探讨了地震动强度、地震动方向角及桩基抗弯刚度等因素的影响规律。研究结果表明,地震动方向角为30°~60°之间时,桩基及输电塔的地震响应相对较大。随着水平地震动强度的增大或桩身抗弯刚度的减小,桩身最大曲率呈非线性增大。当桩身抗弯刚度小于9.82×105 kN/m2或峰值基岩加速度(peak bedrock acceleration,PBA)大于0.12 g时,桩顶附近率先进入塑性状态,随后桩身中下部(埋深9~11 m)逐渐出现塑性变形,输电塔的水平相对变形及层间位移比也较为显著。此外,对桩承输电塔的地震安全性能评价结果表明,与输电塔相比,桩基更易发生不同程度的地震破坏。因此,针对文中考虑的远场地震动类型,软土中桩承输电塔系统地震安全性主要取决于桩基的抗震性能。
With the validation from previous 1 g shaking table model test results, three-dimensional finite element models of piled power transmission tower system have been established with the consideration of soil-structure interaction. A suite of numerical parametric analyses have been performed to investigate the dynamic response of piled power transmission tower in soft clay subjected to horizontal seismic shakings, to account for the effects of seismic motion intensity, seismic shaking direction angle and pile flexural rigidity. The results indicate that the responses of both pile and power transmission tower become larger when the seismic shaking direction angle ranges from 30° to 60°. With the increasing ground motion intensity or decreasing flexural rigidity of pile, the maximum curvature of the pile increases nonlinearly. When pile flexural rigidity less than 9.82×10 5 kN/m 2 or peak bedrock acceleration (PBA) larger than 0.12 g, the pile head first enters the plastic state, and then the lower part (9 to 11 m below pile head) of pile gradually enters the plastic state, and the relative horizontal displacement and interlayer displacement ratio become more significant. In addition, the seismic safety performance evaluation of both pile foundation and power transmission tower shows that, compared to the power transmission tower, pile foundation is more vulnerable to earthquake-induced damages to varying extents. Hence, for the far-field ground motions considered in this study, the seismic safety of piled power transmission tower system in soft clay mainly depends on the seismic performance of the pile foundation.
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
谢强, 白杰, 薛松涛 . 特高压交流同塔双回输电塔地震模拟振动台试验[J]. 高电压技术, 2012, 38(6): 1410-1419. |
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
李钢, 谢强, 文嘉意 . 地震作用下输电塔线耦联体系导线减震作用研究[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2015, 35(5): 47-53. |
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
田利, 刘俊才, 潘海洋, |
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
魏文晖, 袁超, 王浩, |
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
李宏男, 肖诗云 . 高压输电塔-桩-土相互作用分析模型及地震反应: 侧向分析[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 1998, 18(2): 79-84. |
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
李宏男, 石文龙, 贾连光 . 考虑导线影响的输电塔侧向简化抗震计算方法[J]. 振动工程学报, 2003, 16(2): 233-237. |
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
沈国辉, 孙炳楠, 何运祥, |
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
邓洪洲, 司瑞娟, 邓凌君 . 大跨越输电塔线体系地震反应分析[J]. 振动与冲击, 2011, 30(7): 173-177. |
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
魏奇科, 李正良 . 行波效应对大跨越输电塔-线体系纵向地震响应影响[J]. 振动与冲击, 2011, 30(10): 236-240. |
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
田利, 李宏男, 王文明 . 地震动空间变化对高压输电塔线体系地震反应的影响[J]. 振动与冲击, 2013, 32(8): 79-87. |
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
田利, 李宏男, 李术才 . 多点地震激励下考虑地形变化输电塔线体系的响应分析[J]. 应用基础与工程科学学报, 2013, 21(2): 257-266. |
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
安利强, 冯亮, 张志尧, |
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
田利, 李兴建, 易思银, |
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
魏文晖, 徐辅中, 袁超, |
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
王天宇, 李黎 . 多点地震激励下输电塔动力响应分析[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2014, 34(增刊1): 269-273. |
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
李宏男, 胡大柱, 黄连状 . 地震作用下输电塔体系塑性极限状态分析[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2006, 26(24): 192-199. |
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
熊铁华, 梁枢果, 邹良浩, |
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
盖霞, 田利 . 多维地震激励下考虑构件滞回性能的输电塔倒塌分析[J]. 地震工程学报, 2020, 42(2): 352-359. |
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
谢丽宇, 唐珏, 谢强, |
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
张伟, 周强, 唐可人 . 基于位移的输电塔地震易损性分析[J]. 钢结构, 2016, 31(12): 47-52. |
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
|
| [48] |
|
| [49] |
|
| [50] |
赵仰康, 王晨, 宋鹏彦 . 横隔数目对猫头型输电塔抗震性能的影响[J]. 防灾减灾工程学报, 2022, 42(6): 1287-1293. |
| [51] |
|
| [52] |
|
| [53] |
|
| [54] |
|
| [55] |
|
| [56] |
|
| [57] |
张磊, 许徐晗, 陈成, |
| [58] |
|
| [59] |
|
| [60] |
|
| [61] |
|
| [62] |
董瑞, 景立平, 单振东, |
| [63] |
|
| [64] |
刘敬羽, 景立平, 齐文浩 . 桩-土-结构动力相互作用影响因素分析[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2024, 44(5): 210-221. |
| [65] |
|
| [66] |
|
| [67] |
|
| [68] |
|
| [69] |
T/CECS 39- 2021 建筑结构抗倒塌设计标准[S]. 北京: 中国计划出版社, 2021. |
| [70] |
T/CECS 39- 2021 Standard for anti-collapse design of building structures[S]. Beijing: China Planning Press, 2021. (in Chinese) |
| [71] |
DL/T 741- 2019 架空输电线路运行规程[S]. 北京: 中国电力出版社, 2019. |
| [72] |
DL/T 741- 2019 Operating code for overhead transmission line[S]. Beijing: China Electric Power Press, 2019. (in Chinese) |
国家自然科学基金项目(52178353)
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |