模块化钢结构全装配螺栓-角件节点抗震性能研究

邓恩峰 ,  廉亚杰 ,  高焌栋 ,  张钫 ,  李伟 ,  王御涵

地震工程与工程振动 ›› 2026, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (4) : 99 -116.

PDF (11872KB)
地震工程与工程振动 ›› 2026, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (4) : 99 -116. DOI: 10.13197/j.eeed.2026.0410

模块化钢结构全装配螺栓-角件节点抗震性能研究

作者信息 +

Investigation on seismic performance of the fully prefabricated bolted corner-fitting connection for modular steel structures

Author information +
文章历史 +
PDF (12156K)

摘要

模块化钢结构作为预制程度最高的装配式建筑,以其施工效率高、环境污染小等优点,逐渐成为我国建筑工业化发展的重要方向。模块间节点对模块化钢结构抗震性能具有重要影响,然而,当前针对易于装配的模块间节点研究较少。本文提出一种模块化钢结构全装配螺栓-角件连接节点(fully prefabricated bolted corner-fitting connection,FPBCC),系统研究其初始刚度和抗弯承载力等性能指标的计算方法。开展了4个足尺试件的抗震性能试验,得到了FPBCC在循环荷载作用下的破坏模式、滞回曲线和耗能能力,讨论了梁截面、梁端削弱和梁柱连接方式对其抗震性能的影响。建立了FPBCC精细有限元分析模型,并通过与试验结果对比验证了模型的准确性。分析了梁截面、柱截面和螺栓强度等关键参数对FPBCC抗震性能的影响规律。推导了FPBCC节点初始刚度和抗弯承载力的理论公式并且建立了其恢复力模型,采用试验和参数分析结果验证了所推导理论公式的准确性。研究结果表明,增大梁截面后节点平均最大承载力提高42.8%,但平均延性降低13.8%,说明梁截面增大可提高承载能力,但会削弱节点变形能力;梁端削弱可使梁端更早进入屈服并参与耗能;有限元模型预测峰值承载力与试验结果的比值平均值为1.04,变异系数为0.06;所提出的初始转动刚度和峰值承载力计算公式预测误差均在15%以内,计算结果整体偏于安全,可为该类模块间连接节点的工程设计提供参考。

Abstract

As one of the most highly prefabricated forms of assembled buildings, modular steel structures have gradually become an important development direction of building industrialization in China due to their high construction efficiency and low environmental impact. Inter-module connections have a significant influence on the seismic performance of modular steel structures. However, research on easily assembled inter-module connections is still limited. A fully prefabricated bolted corner-fitting connection (FPBCC) for modular steel structures was proposed, and the calculation methods for its initial rotational stiffness and flexural bearing capacity were systematically studied. Quasi-static cyclic tests were conducted on four full-scale specimens to investigate the failure modes, hysteretic curves, and energy dissipation capacity of the FPBCC, and the effects of beam section, beam-end weakening, and beam-column connection type on its seismic performance were explored. A refined finite element model of the FPBCC was established and validated by comparing with the test results, and the effects of key parameters, including beam section, column section, and bolt strength, on the seismic performance of the FPBCC were analyzed. Analytical formulas for the initial rotational stiffness and flexural bearing capacity of the FPBCC were derived, and a restoring force model was established. The validity of the proposed formulas was verified by comparison with the test and parametric analysis results. The results indicate that, compared with the reference specimen, increasing the beam section increased the average peak load-carrying capacity by 42.8%, while decreasing the average ductility by 13.8%. Beam-end weakening promoted earlier yielding of the beam and contributed to energy dissipation. The mean ratio of the peak load-carrying capacity predicted by the finite element model to the test results was 1.04, with a coefficient of variation of 0.06. The prediction errors of the proposed formulas for the initial rotational stiffness and peak load-carrying capacity were within 15%, and the predictions were generally conservative, indicating that the proposed formulas can provide a reference for the engineering design of such inter-module connections.

关键词

模块化钢结构 / 全装配螺栓-角件连接节点 / 抗震性能 / 有限元分析 / 理论分析

Key words

modular steel structure / fully prefabricated bolted corner-fitting connection / seismic performance / finite element analysis / theoretical analysis

引用本文

引用格式 ▾
邓恩峰,廉亚杰,高焌栋,张钫,李伟,王御涵. 模块化钢结构全装配螺栓-角件节点抗震性能研究[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2026, 46(4): 99-116 DOI:10.13197/j.eeed.2026.0410

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

参考文献

[1]

王元清, 石永久, 陈宏, . 现代轻钢结构建筑及其在我国的应用[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2002, 23(1): 2-8.

[2]

Wang Yuanqing, Shi Yongjiu, Chen Hong, et al. Contemporary lightweight steel structure and its application in China[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2002, 23(1): 2-8. (in Chinese)

[3]

邓恩峰, 杜有鹏, 钱辉, . 模块化钢结构全装配可吊装节点受剪性能研究[J]. 工程力学, 2026, 43(6): 126-138.

[4]

Deng Enfeng, Du Youpeng, Qian Hui, et al. Investigation on shear performance of fully prefabricated liftable connection of modular steel structures[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2026, 43(6): 126-138. (in Chinese)

[5]

Srisangeerthan S, Hashemi M J, Rajeev P, et al. Review of performance requirements for inter-module connections in multi-story modular buildings[J]. Journal of Building Engineering, 2020, 28: 101087.

[6]

Ferdous W, Bai Y, Ngo T D, et al. New advancements, challenges and opportunities of multi-storey modular buildings: a state-of-the-art review[J]. Engineering Structures, 2019, 183: 883-893.

[7]

朱谢雨, 晏景通, 吴继华 . 钢结构模块化建筑连接节点最新进展[J]. 建筑结构, 2022, 52(增刊2): 1532-1538.

[8]

Zhu Xieyu, Yan Jingtong, Wu Jihua . Latest progress of intermodule connections of steel modular buildings[J]. Building Structure, 2022, 52(S2): 1532-1538. (in Chinese)

[9]

Deng Enfeng, Du Youpeng, Lian Junyi, et al. Shear behavior of the fully prefabricated liftable connection for modular steel construction[J]. Journal of Building Engineering, 2024, 92: 109793.

[10]

Nadeem G, Safiee N A, Abu Bakar N, et al. Connection design in modular steel construction: a review[J]. Structures, 2021, 33: 3239-3256.

[11]

丁阳, 邓恩峰, 宗亮, . 模块化钢结构建筑连接节点研究进展[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2019, 40(3): 33-40.

[12]

Ding Yang, Deng Enfeng, Zong Liang, et al. State-of-the-art on connection in modular steel construction[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2019, 40(3): 33-40. (in Chinese)

[13]

Deng Enfeng, Zong Liang, Ding Yang, et al. Monotonic and cyclic response of bolted connections with welded cover plate for modular steel construction[J]. Engineering Structures, 2018, 167: 407-419.

[14]

Chen Zhihua, Liu Jiadi, Yu Yujie . Experimental study on interior connections in modular steel buildings[J]. Engineering Structures, 2017, 147: 625-638.

[15]

Chen Zhihua, Liu Jiadi, Yu Yujie, et al. Experimental study of an innovative modular steel building connection[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2017, 139: 69-82.

[16]

Sanches R, Mercan O, Roberts B . Experimental investigations of vertical post-tensioned connection for modular steel structures[J]. Engineering Structures, 2018, 175: 776-789.

[17]

Yang Chao, Wang Shuai, Wang Xiaoguang, et al. Seismic behavior of full-scale T-shaped joints connected by through-Tie rod in MIC[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2022, 197: 107498.

[18]

Dai Xiaomeng, Zong Liang, Ding Yang, et al. Experimental study on seismic behavior of a novel plug-in self-lock joint for modular steel construction[J]. Engineering Structures, 2019, 181: 143-164.

[19]

Chen Zhihua, Wang Jian, Liu Jiadi, et al. Seismic behavior and moment transfer capacity of an innovative self-locking inter-module connection for modular steel building[J]. Engineering Structures, 2021, 245: 112978.

[20]

GB 50017- 2017 钢结构设计标准[S].

[21]

GB 50017- 2017 Standard for design of steel structures[S]. (in Chinese)

[22]

GB 50661-2011 钢结构焊接规范[S].

[23]

GB 50661- 2011 Code for welding of steel structures[S]. (in Chinese)

[24]

GB/T 228.1-2021 金属材料拉伸试验第1部分: 室温试验方法[S].

[25]

GB/T 228.1- 2021 Metallic materials tensile testing Part 1: method of test at room temperature[S]. (in Chinese)

[26]

ANSI/AISC-22 Seismic provisions for structural steel buildings[S].

[27]

Zhai Siyuan, Lyu Yifan, Cao Ke, et al. Experimental-numerical investigation and design of bolted-cover plate connections under bending for modular steel buildings[J]. Journal of Building Engineering, 2023, 75: 107057.

[28]

Sun Lele, Liang Zeqi, Cai Min, et al. Seismic behaviour of TSOBs bolted I-beam to hollow sections square column connection with inner stiffener[J]. Journal of Building Engineering, 2022, 51: 104260.

[29]

Qin Ying, Chen Zhihua, Wang Xiaodun . Experimental investigation of new internal-diaphragm connections to CFT columns under cyclic loading[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2014, 98: 35-44.

[30]

Hu Shuling, Wang Wei, Qu Bing . Seismic economic losses in mid-rise steel buildings with conventional and emerging lateral force resisting systems[J]. Engineering Structures, 2020, 204: 110021.

[31]

Deng Enfeng, Lian Junyi, Zhang Zhe, et al. Axial mechanical behavior of an innovative liftable connection for modular steel construction[J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2023, 182: 110256.

[32]

陈军 . 装配格构式梁柱半刚性节点受力机理及初始刚度研究[D]. 南昌: 南昌大学, 2021.

[33]

Chen Jun . The study on stress mechanism and initial stiffness of semi-rigid joints of fabricated lattice beam-column[D]. Nanchang: Nanchang University, 2021. (in Chinese)

[34]

方文奇 . 装配式钢框架柱-梁-柱节点力学性能研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学, 2022.

[35]

Fang Wenqi . Research on mechanical properties of column-beam-column joint of assembled steel frame[D]. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology, 2022. (in Chinese)

[36]

EN 1993-1-8: 2005 CEN, Eurocode 3: design of steel structures-Part 1-8: design of joints[S].

[37]

陈向荣, 卢小松, 李刚 . 翼缘削弱钢梁(RBS)构件的受力分析和设计[J]. 钢结构, 2003, 18(6): 51-53.

[38]

Chen Xiangrong, Lu Xiaosong, Li Gang . Mechanics analysis and design for rbs beam[J]. Steel Construction, 2003, 18(6): 51-53. (in Chinese)

[39]

D’Aniello M, Landolfo R, Piluso V, et al. Ultimate behavior of steel beams under non-uniform bending[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2012, 78: 144-158.

基金资助

河南省自然科学基金项目(242300421177)

国家自然科学基金项目(52378206)

河南省科技研发计划联合基金项目(235200810013)

河南省重点研发与推广专项(252102321146)

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (11872KB)

0

访问

0

被引

详细

导航
相关文章

AI思维导图

/