端部节间构造对特殊桁架式钢框架地震易损性影响评估

李雨祺 ,  孙国华 ,  陈慧娴 ,  徐寅 ,  倪凯晨 ,  郭林鑫

地震工程与工程振动 ›› 2026, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (4) : 191 -200.

PDF (8350KB)
地震工程与工程振动 ›› 2026, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (4) : 191 -200. DOI: 10.13197/j.eeed.2026.0417

端部节间构造对特殊桁架式钢框架地震易损性影响评估

作者信息 +

Evaluation of the influence of end segment details on the seismic fragility curves of special truss moment frames

Author information +
文章历史 +
PDF (8549K)

摘要

为研究端部节间构造对特殊桁架式钢框架结构(special truss moment frame, STMF)在远场、近场地震作用下易损性能的影响,设计了3个端部节间分别采用传统斜撑式、耗能段式和环形开洞耗能钢板式的4层STMF算例,并考虑钢材力学性能的随机性,构建了120个STMF结构算例的样本库。通过引入材料随机性,改进了传统基于增量动力分析(incremental dynamic analysis, IDA)构建地震易损性曲线方法,建立了3种不同端部节间STMF结构在不同性态水平下的地震易损性曲线。结果表明,在远场地震作用下,3种类型STMF结构在多遇地震水准达到立即使用(immediate occupancy, IO)状态的超越概率为3.19%~9.96%,罕遇地震水准下达到生命安全(life safety, LS)状态的超越概率为0.11%~4.44%,均低于10%;在近场地震作用下,3种类型STMF结构对应于多遇地震水准达到IO状态的超越概率为6.85%~11.22%,罕遇地震水准下达到LS状态的超越概率为9.50%~11.49%。不同端部节间构造对STMF结构的地震易损性能影响显著,且3种类型STMF结构在近场地震作用下的超越概率均大于其在远场地震作用下的超越概率。

Abstract

To investigate the influence of end details on the seismic vulnerability of special truss moment frames (STMF) under far-field and near-field earthquakes, three benchmark examples of four-story STMF with different end details, including traditional diagonal brace, energy dissipation segment, and circular energy-dissipating steel plate, were designed. Considering the randomness of steel mechanical properties, a sample library of 120 STMF cases was constructed. By introducing material randomness, the traditional incremental dynamic analysis (IDA) approach for constructing seismic fragility curves was improved, and the seismic fragility curves of three types of STMF structures at different performance levels were established. The analytical results show that under far-field earthquakes, the exceedance probabilities of three STMF structures reaching immediate occupancy (IO) state at frequent earthquake level range from 3.19% to 9.96%, and those reaching life safety (LS) state at rare earthquake level are between 0.11% and 4.44%, all below 10%. Under near-field earthquakes, the exceedance probabilities of three STMF structures reaching IO state at frequent earthquake level range from 6.85% to 11.22%, and those reaching LS state at rare earthquake level are between 9.50% and 11.49%. Different end details have significant effect on the seismic fragility curves of STMF structures. The exceedance probabilities of three types of STMF structures under near-field earthquakes are all larger than those under far-field earthquakes.

关键词

特殊桁架式钢框架 / 材料随机性 / 增量动力时程分析 / 地震易损性

Key words

special truss moment frame / material randomness / incremental dynamic analysis / seismic fragility

引用本文

引用格式 ▾
李雨祺,孙国华,陈慧娴,徐寅,倪凯晨,郭林鑫. 端部节间构造对特殊桁架式钢框架地震易损性影响评估[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2026, 46(4): 191-200 DOI:10.13197/j.eeed.2026.0417

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

参考文献

[1]

Goel S C, Itani A M . Seismic-resistant special truss-moment frames[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 1994, 120(6): 1781-1797.

[2]

Longo A, Montuori R, Piluso V . Theory of plastic mechanism control of dissipative truss moment frames[J]. Engineering Structures, 2012, 37: 63-75.

[3]

Longo A, Montuori R, Piluso V . Failure mode control and seismic response of dissipative truss moment frames[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2012, 138(11): 1388-1397.

[4]

Kim J, Park J . Design of special truss moment frames considering progressive collapse[J]. International Journal of Steel Structures, 2014, 14(2): 331-343.

[5]

Wongpakdee N, Leelataviwat S, Goel S C, et al. Performance-based design and collapse evaluation of buckling restrained knee braced truss moment frames[J]. Engineering Structures, 2014, 60: 23-31.

[6]

Abdollahzadeh G R, Asghari A A, Sazjini M . Seismic fragility assessment of special truss moment frames (STMF) using the capacity spectrum method[J]. Civil Engineering Infrastructures Journal, 2015, 48(1): 1-8.

[7]

Gade V P, Sahoo D R . Evaluation of collapse-resistance of special truss moment frames as per approach[J]. Engineering Structures, 2016, 126: 505-515.

[8]

Kim J, Lee J, Kang H . Seismic retrofit of special truss moment frames using viscous dampers[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2016, 123: 53-67.

[9]

甘丹, 姚玉珊, 谭永超, . 两边连接钢板式延性钢桁框结构抗侧性能有限元分析[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2018, 39(增刊2): 86-94.

[10]

Gan Dan, Yao Yushan, Tan Yongchao, et al. Finite element analysis on special truss moment frames with two-side connecting web plates subjected to lateral loads[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2018, 39(S2): 86-94. (in Chinese)

[11]

Kumar R, Sahoo D R . Seismic fragility of steel special truss moment frames with multiple ductile vierendeel panels[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2021, 143: 106603.

[12]

Whimtan R V, Reed J W, Hong S T . Earthquake damage probability matrices[C]// Proceedings of 5th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Rome, Italy, 1974.

[13]

Shinozuka M, Feng M Q, Lee J, et al. Statistical analysis of fragility curves[J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 2000, 126(12): 1224-1231.

[14]

Lagaros N D . Probabilistic fragility analysis: a tool for assessing design rules of RC buildings[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2008, 7(1): 45-56.

[15]

周奎, 李伟, 余金鑫 . 地震易损性分析方法研究综述[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2011, 31(1): 106-113.

[16]

Zhou Kui, Li Wei, Yu Jinxin . Review of seismic fragility analysis methods[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics, 2011, 31(1): 106-113. (in Chinese)

[17]

郭安薪, 侯爽, 李惠, . 城市典型建筑地震损失预测方法Ⅱ: 地震损失估计[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2007, 27(6): 70-74.

[18]

Guo Anxin, Hou Shuang, Li Hui, et al. Earthquake loss prediction method of typical urban buildings Ⅱ: earthquake loss assessment[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics, 2007, 27(6): 70-74. (in Chinese)

[19]

凌菲 . 基于性态的钢框架内填竖缝RC墙结构地震易损性研究[D]. 苏州: 苏州科技大学, 2021.

[20]

Ling Fei . Performance based seismic fragility of steel frame with slit RC wall structure[D]. Suzhou: Suzhou University of Science and Technology, 2021. (in Chinese)

[21]

ATC-63 Quantification of building seismic performance factors[S].

[22]

Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) . Quantification of building seismic performance factors (FEMA P695): Report No. ATC-63[R]. Redwood City, CA: Applied Technology Council, 2009.

[23]

GB/T 50011-2010 建筑抗震设计标准[S]. 2024年版.

[24]

GB/T 50011-2010 Code for seismic design of buildings[S]. 2024 ed. (in Chinese)

[25]

GB 50017-2017 钢结构设计标准[S].

[26]

GB 50017-2017 Standard for design of steel structures[S]. (in Chinese)

[27]

Egorova N, Eatherton M R, Maurya A . Experimental study of ring-shaped steel plate shear walls[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2014, 103: 179-189.

基金资助

国家自然科学基金项目(51578355)

国家自然科学基金项目(52378173)

江苏省自然科学基金项目(BK20231343)

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (8350KB)

0

访问

0

被引

详细

导航
相关文章

AI思维导图

/