树轮代谢组学揭示雪岭云杉与西伯利亚落叶松对梯度干旱的差异化响应

何雨 ,  何学敏 ,  张瑞波 ,  聂宗秀 ,  罗丽萍 ,  张同文 ,  秦莉

北京林业大学学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (9) : 156 -166.

PDF (3124KB)
北京林业大学学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (9) : 156 -166. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000−1522.20150519
林学

树轮代谢组学揭示雪岭云杉与西伯利亚落叶松对梯度干旱的差异化响应

作者信息 +

Divergent metabolic responses of Picea schrenkiana and Larix sibirica to a drought gradient revealed by tree-ring metabolomics

Author information +
文章历史 +
PDF (3198K)

摘要

【目的】东天山雪岭云杉和西伯利亚落叶松对干旱的响应差异已在树轮宽度和稳定同位素研究中得到证实,但上述指标反映的是树木宏观生长与水分利用的表型结果,无法揭示不同干旱强度下两类树种的微观代谢响应特征。为阐明不同树种干旱响应差异的内在代谢调控机制,本研究从代谢角度,比较两树种在不同干旱强度下的差异代谢物数量变化及关键通路响应特征。【方法】以雪岭云杉和西伯利亚落叶松为研究对象,基于游程理论划分干旱强度,利用树轮非靶向代谢组学获取代谢物数据,经数据库比对鉴定代谢物,结合多元统计分析筛选差异代谢物,并通过 KEGG 数据库进行代谢通路富集分析。【结果】(1)从轻度干旱至中度干旱,雪岭云杉差异代谢物数量由 330 个增至 513 个;西伯利亚落叶松则由 1 182 个减至 220 个。(2)轻度干旱下两树种均富集类黄酮生物合成通路,但代谢物变化趋势不同;中度干旱下,雪岭云杉富集木脂素合成通路并抑制色氨酸代谢通路,西伯利亚落叶松仅保留半乳糖代谢通路发生持续响应。【结论】两类树种在不同干旱梯度下表现出差异化的代谢响应特征,雪岭云杉的代谢响应随干旱加剧而增强,西伯利亚落叶松在轻度干旱下代谢响应广泛,中度干旱下响应减弱。本研究从代谢层面明确了不同生活型树种在不同干旱强度下的差异化响应模式,为理解针叶树种的干旱适应机制提供了代谢层面的依据。

Abstract

[Objective] Tree-ring width and stable isotopes have revealed differential drought responses between Picea schrenkiana and Larix sibirica in the eastern Tianshan Mountains. These approaches, however, capture macroscopic outcomes of growth and water use, and thus fall short of resolving species-specific metabolic adjustments under varying drought intensities. To address this gap, we compared the two species across drought gradients, with emphasis on changes in differential metabolite abundance and key pathway responses. [Method] We selected Picea schrenkiana and Larix sibirica as the study species. Drought intensities were classified using runs theory applied to the self-calibrating Palmer Drought Severity Index (scPDSI). Metabolites from tree-ring samples were profiled via untargeted metabolomics and identified through database matching. We then screened differential metabolites by multivariate statistical analysis and mapped them to KEGG pathways. [Result] (1) From mild to moderate drought, the number of differential metabolites in Picea schrenkiana increased from 330 to 513, whereas that in Larix sibirica fell from 1 182 to 220. (2) Under mild drought, both species enriched the flavonoid biosynthesis pathway,yet their metabolite accumulation patterns diverged. Under moderate drought, Picea schrenkiana enriched the lignin biosynthesis pathway while suppressing the tryptophan metabolism pathway; Larix sibirica, by contrast, retained only the galactose metabolism pathway as a sustained response. [Conclusion] The two species displayed distinct metabolic response patterns across the drought gradient. Picea schrenkiana strengthened its metabolic response with increasing drought severity, whereas Larix sibirica showed broad responses under mild drought but weakened ones under moderate drought. These findings highlight the divergent metabolic strategies of evergreen and deciduous conifers under varying drought intensities, and provide metabolic-level evidence for understanding drought adaptation in coniferous species.

关键词

雪岭云杉 / 西伯利亚落叶松 / 树轮代谢组学 / 干旱胁迫 / 差异代谢响应

Key words

Picea schrenkiana / Larix sibirica / tree-ring metabolomics / drought stress / differential metabolic response

引用本文

引用格式 ▾
何雨,何学敏,张瑞波,聂宗秀,罗丽萍,张同文,秦莉. 树轮代谢组学揭示雪岭云杉与西伯利亚落叶松对梯度干旱的差异化响应[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2026, 48(9): 156-166 DOI:10.12171/j.1000−1522.20150519

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

参考文献

[1]

Zhang Q, Liu Y, Song H M, et al. Spatial patterns and temporal evolution of tree radial growth responses to climate in the Tianshan Mountains [J].Dendrochronologia, 2025, 92:126349.

[2]

Yao J Q, Zhao Y, Chen Y N, et al. Multi—scale assessments of droughts: a case study in Xinjiang, China [J].Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 630:444-452.

[3]

Yao J Q, Chen Y N, Zhao Y, et al. Climatic and associated atmospheric water cycle changes over the Xinjiang, China [J].Journal of Hydrology, 2020, 585:124823.

[4]

Allen C D, Breshears D D, McDowell N G. On underestimation of global vulnerability to tree mortality and forest die—off from hotter drought in the Anthropocene [J].Ecosphere, 2015, 6(8):129.

[5]

Gharun M, Hörtnagl L, Paul—Limoges E, et al. Physiological response of Swiss ecosystems to 2018 drought across plant types and elevation [J].Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2020, 375(1810):20190521.

[6]

Wang T, Xu W Q, Jiang L L, et al. Application of tree—ring—based historical growth estimation in ecological process modeling: dynamic responses of spruce forests in arid regions to climate change [J].Ecological Indicators, 2026, 187:114884.

[7]

Wang X R, Jiao L, Qin Y R, et al. Moisture limitation superseding thermal forcing: elevational divergence in growth and physiological responses of Picea crassifolia to accelerated warming and drying on the Northeastern Tibetan Plateau [J].Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2026, 389:111377.

[8]

苟晓霞, 张同文, 喻树龙, 等. 天山山区不同海拔高度雪岭云杉径向生长对气候变化的响应 [J].地球环境学报, 2025, 16(4):418-432.

[9]

Gou X X, Zhang T W, Yu S L, et al. Climate change alters the radial growth of Picea schrenkiana along an elevational gradient in the Tianshan Mountains [J].Journal of Earth Environment, 2025, 16(4):418-432.

[10]

王强, 叶尔江·拜克吐尔汉, 徐栋, 等. 气候对天山中部不同海拔天山云杉径向生长的影响 [J].森林与环境学报, 2024, 44(5):530-538.

[11]

Wang Q, Yeerjiang B, Xu D, et al. Response of radial growth of Picea schrenkiana var. tianschanica to climate change at different elevations in central Tianshan [J].Journal of Forest and Environment, 2024, 44(5):530-538.

[12]

彭剑峰, 勾晓华, 陈发虎, 等. 天山东部西伯利亚落叶松树轮生长对气候要素的响应分析 [J].生态学报 , 2006, 26(8):2723-2731.

[13]

Peng J F, Gou X H, Chen F H, et al. The responses of growth ring width variations of Larix sibirica Ledb to climatic change in eastern Tianshan Mountains [J].Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2006, 26(8):2723-2731.

[14]

王劲松, 李金豹, 陈发虎, 等. 树轮宽度记录的天山东段近 200a 干湿变化 [J].冰川冻土, 2007, 29(2):209-216.

[15]

Wang J S, Li J B, Chen F H, et al. Variation of the dryness in the recent 200a derived from tree—rings width records in the east Tianshan Mountains [J].Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology, 2007, 29(2):209-216.

[16]

周玲, 孙慧兰, 杨余辉, 等. 基于不同气候态对天山及其邻区气候变化影响的分析 [J].干旱区研究, 2018, 35(6):1392-1401.

[17]

Zhou L, Sun H L, Yang Y H, et al. Analysis of climate change in the Tianshan Mountains and its adjacent areas based on different climate states [J].Arid Zone Research, 2018, 35(6):1392-1401.

[18]

张正勇, 刘琳, 唐湘玲. 1960—2010 年中国天山山区气候变化区域差异及突变特征 [J].地理科学进展, 2012, 31(11):1475-1484.

[19]

Zhang Z Y, Liu L, Tang X L. The regional difference and abrupt events of climatic change in Tianshan Mountains during 1960—2010 [J].Progress in Geography, 2012, 31(11):1475-1484.

[20]

Yuan J F, Gao S T, Fang Y T, et al. Drought aggravates the negative effects of warming on the growth of drought—intolerant tree seedlings in temperate forests [J].Ecological Processes, 2025, 14:81.

[21]

Allen C D, Macalady A K, Chenchouni H, et al. A global overview of drought and heat—induced tree mortality reveals emerging climate change risks for forests [J].Forest Ecology and Management, 2010, 259(4):660-684.

[22]

牛桂英. 天山北坡不同树龄雪岭云杉木质部水力性状及解剖结构季节性差异 [D]. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆大学,2023.

[23]

Niu G Y. Seasonal variation in hydraulic traits and anatomical structure of xylem in Picea schrenkiana of different tree ages on the northern slope of the Tianshan Mountains[D]. Urumqi: Xinjiang University,2023.

[24]

刘小萍. 天山东段两个优势针叶树种径向生长对极端气候的生态响应研究 [D]. 兰州: 西北师范大学,2021.

[25]

Liu X P. Ecological response of radial growth of two dominant coniferous tree species to extreme climate in the eastern Tianshan Mountains[D]. Lanzhou: Northwest Normal University,2021.

[26]

Jia Y, Lv G H, Guligena H, et al. Differences in the responses of tree—ring stable carbon isotopes of L. sibirica and P. schrenkiana to climate in the Eastern Tianshan Mountains [J].Forests, 2023, 14(5):1032.

[27]

Zhang G Q, Bréda N, Steil N, et al. Analysing resilience of European beech tree to recurrent extreme drought events through ring growth, wood anatomy and stable isotopes [J].Journal of Ecology, 2025, 113(4):955.

[28]

Guo K L, Nie Z X, Luo L P, et al. Tree—ring metabolism of Larix sibirica indicating plant responses to climate change [J].Current Plant Biology, 2026, 49:100067.

[29]

Rangani J, Panda A, Parida A K. Metabolomic study reveals key metabolic adjustments in the xerohalophyte Salvadora persica L. during adaptation to water deficit and subsequent recovery conditions [J].Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 2020, 150:180-195.

[30]

Wei B, Hou K, Zhang H H, et al. Integrating transcriptomics and metabolomics to studies key metabolism, pathways and candidate genes associated with drought—tolerance in Carthamus tinctorius L. under drought stress [J].Industrial Crops and Products, 2020, 151:112465.

[31]

Pan Z X, Yang B N, Li S L, et al. JA regulates the impact of combined heat stress and drought stress on the GA—mediated response of Pinus yunnanensis [J].Industrial Crops and Products, 2025, 232:121826.

[32]

Makhubu F N, Siviya L E, Rauwane M E, et al. Biochemical responses of atacama and blesbok sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas L.) cultivars to early drought stress [J].Plants, 2025, 14(22):3532.

[33]

Cheng K, Zhang J, Wei W, et al. Integrated transcriptomic and metabolomic analysis reveals the mechanism of cross—adaptation in Krascheninnikovia arborescens to combined drought and cold stress [J].Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 2025, 229(Pt B):110481.

[34]

Sarmad S, Viant M R, Dunn W B, et al. A proposed framework to evaluate the quality and reliability of targeted metabolomics assays from the UK consortium on metabolic phenotyping (MAP/UK) [J].Nature Protocols, 2023, 18(4):1017-1027.

[35]

Patti G J, Yanes O, Siuzdak G. Innovation: metabolomics: the apogee of the omics trilogy [J].Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 2012, 13(4):263-269.

[36]

Rivas—Ubach A, Sardans J, Hódar J A, et al. Close and distant: contrasting the metabolism of two closely related subspecies of Scots pine under the effects of folivory and summer drought [J].Ecology and Evolution, 2017, 7(21):8976-8988.

[37]

Rissanen K, Hölttä T, Bäck J, et al. Drought effects on carbon allocation to resin defences and on resin dynamics in old—grown Scots pine [J].Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2021, 185:104410.

[38]

Basile S, Stříbrská B, Kalyniukova A, et al. Physiological and biochemical changes of Picea abies (L.) during acute drought stress and their correlation with susceptibility to Ips typographus (L.) and I. duplicatus (Sahlberg) [J].Frontiers in Forests and Global Change, 2024, 7:1436110.

[39]

Yu C N, Luo X J, Zhan X R, et al. Comparative metabolomics reveals the metabolic variations between two endangered Taxus species (T. fuana and T. yunnanensis) in the Himalayas [J].BMC Plant Biology, 2018, 18:197.

[40]

陶然, 张珂. 基于 PDSI 的 1982—2015 年我国气象干旱特征及时空变化分析 [J].水资源保护, 2020, 36(5):50-56.

[41]

Tao R, Zhang K. PDSI—based analysis of characteristics and spatiotemporal changes of meteorological drought in China from 1982 to 2015 [J].Water Resources Protection, 2020, 36(5):50-56.

[42]

He J, Yang X, Li Z, et al. Spatiotemporal variations of meteorological droughts in China during 1961—2014: an investigation based on multi—threshold identification [J].International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2016, 7(1):63-76.

[43]

石仁娜·加汗, 张同文, 喻树龙, 等. 天山不同海拔雪岭云杉径向生长对气候变化的响应 [J].干旱区研究, 2021, 38(2):327-338.

[44]

Shirenna J, Zhang T W, Yu S L, et al. Response of Picea schrenkiana to climate change at different altitudes in Tianshan Mountains [J].Arid Zone Research, 2021, 38(2):327-338.

[45]

彭正兵, 李新建, 张瑞波, 等. 不同去趋势方法的新疆东天山高低海拔雪岭云杉树轮宽度年表对气候的响应 [J].生态学报, 2019, 39(5):1595-1604.

[46]

Peng Z B, Li X J, Zhang R B, et al. The response of tree—ring chronologies of Schrenk spruce (Picea schrenkiana Fisch. et Mey.) to climate change at high— and low—elevations of the eastern Tianshan Mountains, Xinjiang, using different detrending methods [J].Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(5):1595-1604.

[47]

Holmes R L, Adams R K, Fritts H C. Tree—ring chronologies of western North America: California, eastern Oregon and northern Great basin with procedures used in the chronology development work including users manuals for computer programs COFECHA and ARSTAN[M]. Tucson: Laboratory of Tree—Ring Research, University of Arizona,1986.

[48]

张晴, 于瑞德, 郑宏伟, 等. 天山东部不同海拔西伯利亚落叶松对气候变暖的响应分析 [J].植物研究, 2018, 38(1):14-25.

[49]

Zhang Q, Yu R D, Zheng H W, et al. Response analysis of Larix sibirica to climate warming at different elevations in the eastern Tianshan Mountains [J].Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2018, 38(1):14-25.

[50]

Broeckling C D, Beger R D, Cheng L L, et al. Current practices in LC—MS untargeted metabolomics: a scoping review on the use of pooled quality control samples [J].Analytical Chemistry, 2023, 95(51):18645-18654.

[51]

McKenzie J S, Donarski J A, Wilson J C, et al. Analysis of complex mixtures using high—resolution nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy and chemometrics [J].Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, 2011, 59(4):336-359.

[52]

赖瑞联, 吴如健, 赖钟雄. 植物类黄酮的分类、药理活性及其生物合成调控研究进展 [J].东南园艺, 2024, 12(2):81-99.

[53]

Lai R L, Wu R J, Lai Z X. Research progress on classification, pharmacological activities, and biosynthesis regulation of plant flavonoids [J].Southeast Horticulture, 2024, 12(2):81-99.

[54]

Mader M, Liesebach H, Kersten B. Drought stress—induced Picea abies transcriptome changes in the context of functional interactions [J].Silvae Genetica, 2023, 72(1):163-175.

[55]

Zhang X T, Gao X L, Liu B, et al. Transcriptome and metabolome reveal the primary and secondary metabolism changes in Larix gmelinii seedlings under abiotic stress [J].BMC Plant Biology, 2024, 24(1):1128.

[56]

Ackah M, Shi Y S, Wu M M, et al. Metabolomics response to drought stress in Morus alba L. variety Yu—711 [J].Plants, 2021, 10(8):1636.

[57]

Hahlbrock K, Scheel D. Physiology and molecular biology of phenylpropanoid metabolism [J].Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology, 1989, 40:347-369.

[58]

Wu C, Wang Y, Sun H G. Targeted and untargeted metabolomics reveals deep analysis of drought stress responses in needles and roots of Pinus taeda seedlings [J].Frontiers in Plant Science, 2023, 13:1031466.

[59]

Yan S J, Liu Q, Li W Y, et al. Raffinose family oligosaccharides: crucial regulators of plant development and stress responses [J].Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 2022, 41(4):286-314.

[60]

曾韦珊, 黄林旺, 陈曼钰,等. 火炬松针叶与树皮代谢组比较分析 [J].林业与环境科学, 2022, 38(1):51-61.

[61]

Zeng W S, Huang L W, Chen M Y, et al. Comparative analysis of metabolomics between needles and bark of Pinus taeda [J].Forestry and Environmental Science, 2022, 38(1):51-61.

[62]

Wright I J, Reich P B, Westoby M, et al. The worldwide leaf economics spectrum [J].Nature, 2004, 428(6985):821-827.

[63]

王钊颖, 陈晓萍, 程英, 等. 武夷山 49 种木本植物叶片与细根经济谱 [J].植物生态学报, 2021, 45(3):242-252.

[64]

Wang Z Y, Chen X P, Cheng Y, et al. Leaf and fine root economics spectrum across 49 woody plant species in Wuyi Mountains [J].Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2021, 45(3):242-252.

[65]

Song Y J, Sterck F J, Poorter L. Drought resilience of conifer species is driven by leaf lifespan but not by hydraulic traits [J].New Phytologist, 2022, 234(3):927-942.

[66]

Reich P B. The world—wide ‘fast—slow’ plant economics spectrum: a traits manifesto [J].Journal of Ecology, 2014, 102(2):275-301.

[67]

Hikosaka K , Onoda Y , Kitajima K. Leaf economics of deciduous and evergreen plants: how do they exhibit trait optimization under resource variations and environmental constraints [J].Oecologia, 2025, 207:99.

[68]

Liu J L, Cheng F Y, Commane R, et al. Quantifying an overlooked deciduous—needleleaf carbon sink at the southern margin of the central—Siberian permafrost zone [J].Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, 2023, 128(3):e2022JG006845.

[69]

O’Brien M J, Valtat A, Abiven S, et al. The role of soluble sugars during drought in tropical tree seedlings with contrasting tolerances [J].Journal of Plant Ecology, 2020, 13(4):389-397.

[70]

Krasensky J, Jonak C. Drought, salt, and temperature stress—induced metabolic rearrangements and regulatory networks [J].Journal of Experimental Botany, 2012, 63(4):1593-1608.

基金资助

新疆维吾尔自治区天山英才培养计划(2024TSYCCX0041)

新疆维吾尔自治区天山创新团队(2025D14004)

新疆维吾尔自治区杰出青年科学基金项目

国家自然科学基金项目(42375054、42675059)

中国气象科学研究院创新发展专项(2021KJ034)

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (3124KB)

0

访问

0

被引

详细

导航
相关文章

AI思维导图

/

〈 〉