黄土高原不同造林模式下土壤水分特征及影响因素

董亚潇 ,  王冬梅 ,  陈瑜佳 ,  徐锟 ,  杨娜

北京林业大学学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (8) : 40 -52.

PDF (3203KB)
北京林业大学学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (8) : 40 -52. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000−1522.20260045
林学

黄土高原不同造林模式下土壤水分特征及影响因素

作者信息 +

Soil moisture characteristics and influencing factors under different afforestation models on the Loess Plateau of northern China

Author information +
文章历史 +
PDF (3279K)

摘要

【目的】黄土高原气候干旱,土壤水资源是制约区域植被建设的关键要素。不同造林模式下土壤水分分布与影响因素尚不明确,有待开展系统对比研究。探究黄土高原纯林与混交林土壤水分变化差异及影响因素,能够为黄土高原区域造林模式优化与土壤水资源可持续发展提供理论依据。【方法】从 1981-2024 年发表的 187 篇有关黄土高原纯林和混交林土壤水分变化的国内外期刊及学位论文中,收集了共 1 453 块样地数据,利用外包线法及地理探测器法分析主要因子对土壤含水量的影响。【结果】(1)纯林和混交林土壤含水量存在显著垂直分异特征,在 0 ~ 100 cm 土层,纯林的平均土壤含水量显著高于混交林;100 ~ 200 cm 两种造林模式土壤水分无显著差异;而在 200 ~ 500 cm 土层,混交林的平均土壤含水量显著高于纯林;(2)土壤含水量受多种因子的影响,纯林和混交林均随年均气温和海拔高度的增加呈现先增后减的趋势;而随年均降水量的增加,纯林的土壤含水量先增加后趋于稳定,而混交林则持续上升;纯林的土壤含水量随林龄增长呈现先减少后保持稳定的趋势,混交林则呈现先减少后增加的动态变化;(3)年均降水量均对纯林和混交林土壤含水量的贡献率最大(纯林 23.3%,混交林 39.4%),任何 2 个因子交互作用的解释力均大于单一因子的解释力,其中年均降水量和海拔高度的交互作用增加效应最大(纯林 51.6%,混交林 59%)。【结论】黄土高原纯林与混交林土壤水分存在显著差异:0 ~ 100 cm 土层中,纯林具有更高的持水能力;100 ~ 200 cm 土层,造林模式间差异不明显;而在 200 ~ 500 cm 土层,混交林表现出更强的水分保持能力。年均降水量是纯林和混交林土壤水分的主要影响因素,其与海拔的交互作用解释力最大。因此在该区域造林时,应综合考虑降水和地形条件来优化造林模式,以促进土壤水资源的可持续利用。

Abstract

[Objective] The Loess Plateau is characterized by an arid climate, and soil water resources serve as a critical limiting factor for regional vegetation construction. The distribution characteristics and influencing factors of soil water under different afforestation models remain unclear, requiring systematic comparative research. This study aims to investigate the differences in soil moisture dynamics between pure and mixed forests on the Loess Plateau of northern China and to identify their key influencing factors, thereby providing a theoretical basis for optimizing afforestation models and promoting the sustainable use of soil water resources. [Method] A total of 1 453 sampling plots were compiled from 187 publications, including peer-reviewed journal articles and academic dissertations published between 1981 and 2024, focusing on soil moisture changes in pure and mixed forests on the Loess Plateau. The effects of major factors on soil moisture content were analyzed using the upper boundary line method and the Geodetector method. [Result] (1) Soil moisture exhibited clear vertical differentiation between pure and mixed forests. In the 0−100 cm soil layer, pure forests had significantly higher soil moisture than mixed forests. No significant differences were observed in the 100−200 cm layer, whereas mixed forests showed significantly higher soil moisture in the 200−500 cm layer. (2) Soil moisture was influenced by multiple factors. In both afforestation models, soil moisture first increased and then decreased with increasing mean annual temperature and altitude. With increasing mean annual precipitation, soil moisture in pure forests increased initially and then stabilized, whereas it continuously increased in mixed forests. With increasing stand age, soil moisture in pure forests decreased initially and then remained stable, whereas in mixed forests, it exhibited a decreasing-increasing trend. (3) Mean annual precipitation contributed the most to soil moisture variation in both pure and mixed forests (pure forests of 23.3% and mixed forests of 39.4%). The explanatory power of interactions between any two factors was greater than individual factors, with the interaction between mean annual precipitation and altitude showing the strongest effect (pure forests of 51.6% and mixed forests of 59.0%). [Conclusion] Soil moisture differs significantly between pure and mixed forests on the Loess Plateau. Pure forests exhibit higher water-holding capacity in the 0−100 cm soil layer, whereas mixed forests show stronger water retention in deeper layers (200−500 cm), with no evident differences in the 100−200 cm layer. Mean annual precipitation is the dominant controlling factor, and its interaction with altitude provides the highest explanatory power. These findings suggest that both precipitation and topographic conditions should be jointly considered in afforestation planning to optimize forest structure and enhance the sustainable use of soil water resources.

关键词

黄土高原 / 造林模式 / 纯林 / 混交林 / 土壤含水量 / 影响因子

Key words

the Loess Plateau / afforestation models / pure forest / mixed forests / soil moisture content / influencing factors

引用本文

引用格式 ▾
董亚潇,王冬梅,陈瑜佳,徐锟,杨娜. 黄土高原不同造林模式下土壤水分特征及影响因素[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2026, 48(8): 40-52 DOI:10.12171/j.1000−1522.20260045

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

参考文献

[1]

周欧, 古丽米热·依力哈木, 祝维, . 不同密度和水分管理下毛白杨林分土壤水分特征[J].北京林业大学学报, 2024, 46(1): 55-67.

[2]

Zhou O, Yilihamu Gulimire1, Zhu W, et al. Soil water characteristics of Populus tomentosa stands under different densities and water treatments[J].Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2024, 46(1): 55-67.

[3]

Liu M J, Chang L, Chen Q W, et al. Soil water consumption along the profile in response to soil water content variations in a black locust plantation with a rainfall exclusion in Loess Plateau[J].Journal of Hydrology, 2024, 640: 131721.

[4]

Yang L, Zhang H, Chen L. Identification on threshold and efficiency of rainfall replenishment to soil water in semi-arid loess hilly areas[J].Science China Earth Sciences, 2018, 61(3): 292-301.

[5]

李玉山, 韩仕峰, 汪正华. 黄土高原土壤水分性质及其分区[J].中国科学院西北水土保持研究所集刊 (土壤分水与土壤肥力研究专集), 1985(2): 1-17.

[6]

Li Y S, Han S F, Wang Z H. Soil moisture characteristics and regionalization on the Loess Plateau[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 1985(2): 1-17.

[7]

孙长忠, 黄宝龙, 陈海滨, . 黄土高原人工植被与其水分环境相互作用关系研究[J].北京林业大学学报, 1998, 20(3): 10-17.

[8]

Sun C Z, Huang B L, Chen H B, et al. Interaction between soil water conditions and different kinds of artificial plant cover in the Loess Plateau[J].Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 1998, 20(3): 10-17.

[9]

汪雯雯, 张宇飞, 杨文府, . 晋北地区植被覆盖度时空格局及驱动因素研究 [J/OL].应用基础与工程科学学报, 1-16[2026−04−08].https://link.cnki.net/urlid/11.3242.TB.20260319.1919.002.

[10]

Wang W W, Zhang Y F, Yang W F, et al. Study on the spatial-temporal pattern and driving factors of vegetation coverage in northern Shanxi[J/OL].Journal of Basic Science and Engineering, 1-16[2026−04−08].https://link.cnki.net/urlid/11.3242.TB.20260319.1919.002.

[11]

王丽平, 赵炯昌, 朱洪盛, . 黄土残塬小流域不同土地利用类型土壤水分特征[J].浙江农林大学学报, 2025, 42(4): 784-792.

[12]

Wang L P, Zhao J C, Zhu H S, et al. Soil moisture characteristics of different land use types in small watersheds of gully regions on the Loess Plateau[J].Journal of Zhejiang A& F University, 2025, 42(4): 784-792.

[13]

Zhang Y, Deng L, Yan W, et al. Interaction of soil water storage dynamics and long-term natural vegetation succession on the Loess Plateau, China[J].Catena, 2016, 137: 52-60.

[14]

Montagnini F, Ugalde L, Navarro C. Growth characteristics of some native tree species used in silvopastoral systems in the humid lowlands of Costa Rica[J].Agroforestry Systems, 2003, 59(2): 163-170.

[15]

Monique C, Lander B, Etienne B, et al. Ecosystem services of mixed species forest stands and monocultures: comparing practitioners’ and scientists’ perceptions with formal scientific knowledge[J].Forestry, 2014, 87(5): 639-653.

[16]

Zhang B, Xu Q, Gao D, et al. Higher soil capacity of intercepting heavy rainfall in mixed stands than in pure stands in riparian forests[J].Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 658: 1514-1522.

[17]

Dai J, Li Y, Wang L. Mixed-species plantations alleviate deep soil water depletion and facilitate hydrological niche partitioning compared to pure plantations[J].Forest Ecology and Management, 2023, 539: 121017.

[18]

Xuedong C, Ming T, Xinlu Z, et al. Why does oriental arborvitae grow better when mixed with black locust: insight on nutrient cycling?[J].Ecology and Evolution, 2018, 8(1): 744-754.

[19]

Gao X, Li H, Zhao X, et al. Identifying a suitable revegetation technique for soil restoration on water-limited and degraded land: considering both deep soil moisture deficit and soil organic carbon sequestration[J].Geoderma, 2018, 319: 61-69.

[20]

Tang Y, Wu X, Chen Y, et al. Water use strategies for two dominant tree species in pure and mixed plantations of the semiarid Chinese Loess Plateau[J].Ecohydrology, 2018, 11(4): e1943.

[21]

赵丹阳, 毕华兴, 侯贵荣, . 晋西黄土区典型林地土壤水分变化特征[J].水土保持学报, 2021, 35(1): 181-187.

[22]

Zhao D Y, Bi H X, Hou G R, et al. Soil moisture dynamics of typical plantation in loess region of West Shanxi[J].Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2021, 35(1): 181-187.

[23]

Jia X, Shao M, Zhu Y, et al. Soil moisture decline due to afforestation across the Loess Plateau, China[J].Journal of Hydrology, 2017, 546: 113-122.

[24]

张秀芝, 司剑华. 西宁市南山典型林地土壤水分变化特征[J].节水灌溉, 2025(4): 38-43.

[25]

Zhang X Z, Si J H. Characteristics of soil moisture changes in typical forest land in Nanshan Mountain, Xining City, China[J].Water Saving Irrigation, 2025(4): 38-43.

[26]

Zhao Y, Wang Y, Wang L, et al. Exploring the role of land restoration in the spatial patterns of deep soil water at watershed scales[J].Catena, 2019, 172: 387-396.

[27]

胡伟, 邵明安, 王全九. 黄土高原退耕坡地土壤水分空间变异性研究[J].水科学进展, 2006, 17(1): 74-81.

[28]

Hu W, Shao M A, Wang Q J. Study on spatial variability of soil moisture on the recultivated slope-land on the Loess Plateau[J].Advances in Water Science, 2006, 17(1): 74-81.

[29]

金明娟. 黄土塬区降水补给土壤水分的过程及其有效性研究 [D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学,2025.

[30]

Jin M J. Study on the process and effectiveness of soil water recharge by precipitation in the Loess Plateau tableland[D]. Yangling: Northwest A&F University,2025.

[31]

蔡进军. 宁夏黄土丘陵区人工林草植被生态水文过程与功能研究 [D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学,2023.

[32]

Cai J J. Study on the ecological hydrological process and function of the artificial forest and grass vegetation in the loess hilly region of Ningxia[D]. Yangling: Northwest A&F University,2023.

[33]

丁文斌, 王飞. 植被建设对黄土高原土壤水分的影响[J].生态学报, 2022, 42(13): 5531-5542.

[34]

Ding W B, Wang F. The impact of vegetation construction on soil moisture in the Loess Plateau[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2022, 42(13): 5531-5542.

[35]

费洪岩, 童倩, 万传宇, . 黄土高原不同林龄刺槐林土壤水分亏缺程度[J].水土保持学报, 2022, 36(5): 240-246.

[36]

Fei H Y, Tong Q, Wan C Y, et al. Degree of soil moisture deficit of Robinia pseudoacacia plantations at different ages on the Loess Plateau[J].Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2022, 36(5): 240-246.

[37]

李琳琳, 王照利, 郭涛, . 2000-2020 年黄土高原生态系统服务价值的时空变化及驱动因素[J].西北林学院学报, 2025, 40(5): 11-23.

[38]

Li L L, Wang Z L, Guo T, et al. Spatial and temporal changes in the value of ecosystem services and driving forces on the Loess Plateau, 2000−2020[J].Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2025, 40(5): 11-23.

[39]

Zhao C, Shao M, Jia X, et al. Particle size distribution of soils (0-500 cm) in the Loess Plateau, China[J].Geoderma Regional, 2016, 7(3): 251-258.

[40]

周红娟, 王彪, 王子涵, . 北京山区典型人工林乔木和灌木水分利用及水分生态位特征[J].生态学报, 2025, 45(21): 10732-10747.

[41]

Zhou H J, Wang B, Wang Z H, et al. Water utilization and hydrological niche differentiation of plantation trees and understory shrubs in Beijing’s mountainous region[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2025, 45(21): 10732-10747.

[42]

Matsushita M, Takata K, Hitsuma G, et al. A novel growth model evaluating age-size effect on long-term trends in tree growth[J].Functional Ecology, 2015, 29(10): 1250-1259.

[43]

Ahmad B, Wang Y, Hao J, et al. Optimizing stand structure for trade-offs between overstory timber production and understory plant diversity: a case-study of a larch plantation in northwest China[J].Land Degradation & Development, 2018, 29(9): 2998-3008.

[44]

王劲峰, 徐成东. 地理探测器: 原理与展望[J].地理学报, 2017, 72(1): 116-134.

[45]

Wang J F, Xu C D. Geodetector: principle and prospective[J].Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017, 72(1): 116-134.

[46]

张舒瑾, 余珮珩, 白少云, . 面向国土空间规划的流域景观时空分异特征及驱动因子研究[J].生态经济, 2020, 36(10): 219-227.

[47]

Zhang S J, Yu P H, Bai S Y, et al. Study on the spatio-temporal stratified heterogeneity and driving factors of watershed landscape for national spatial planning[J].Ecological Economy, 2020, 36(10): 219-227.

[48]

李琛, 吴映梅, 高彬嫔, . 高原湖泊乡村聚落空间分异及驱动力探测——以环洱海地区为例[J].经济地理, 2022, 42(4): 220-229.

[49]

Li C, Wu Y M, Gao B B, et al. Spatial differentiation and driving factors of rural settlement in Plateau Lake: a case study of the area around the Erhai[J].Economic Geography, 2022, 42(4): 220-229.

[50]

魏强, 凌雷, 柴春山, . 甘肃兴隆山森林演替过程中的土壤理化性质[J].生态学报, 2012, 32(15): 4700-4713.

[51]

Wei Q, Ling L, Chai C S, et al. Soil physical and chemical properties in forest succession process in Xinglong Mountain of Gansu[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2012, 32(15): 4700-4713.

[52]

方伟东, 亢新刚, 赵浩彦, . 长白山地区不同林型土壤特性及水源涵养功能[J].北京林业大学学报, 2011, 33(4): 40-47.

[53]

Fang W D, Kang X G, Zhao H Y, et al. Soil characteristics and water conservation of different forest types in Changbai Mountain[J].Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2011, 33(4): 40-47.

[54]

陈曦. 桥山林区南峪口流域不同林分的土壤水分过程与植被承载力研究 [D]. 西安:西安理工大学, 2023.

[55]

Chen X. The study of soil moisture process and vegetation carrying capacity of different forest stands in the Nanyukou Watershed of the Qiaoshan forest region[D]. Xi’an:Xi’an University of Technology, 2023.

[56]

白文娟. 水蚀风蚀交错带植被恢复对土壤质量的影响与植物生理生态适应性 [D]. 北京:中国科学院研究生院 (教育部水土保持与生态环境研究中心),2010.

[57]

Bai W J. Effects of vegetation restoration on soil quality and plant physio-ecological adaptability in water-wind erosion region[D]. Beijing: University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,2010.

[58]

胡静霞, 杨新兵. 清水河流域典型林分类型土壤水分特征研究[J].西南农业学报, 2018, 31(1): 118-125.

[59]

Hu J X, Yang X B. Study on soil water characteristics of typical forest types in Qingshui River Basin[J].Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 31(1): 118-125.

[60]

许丽, 刘永刚, 李得禄. 民勤绿洲人工灌木林混交与纯林配置模式的生长特性及生态效益评估[J].防护林科技, 2025(6): 1-9,17.

[61]

Xu L, Liu Y G, Li D L. Growth characteristics and ecological benefit evaluation of mixed and pure stand configuration modes of artificial shrub forests in Minqin Oasis[J].Protection Forest Science and Technology, 2025(6): 1−9, 17.

[62]

王娜娜. 基于稳定同位素的宁夏河东沙区大气−土壤系统水分运移过程研究 [D]. 银川:宁夏大学,2024.

[63]

Wang N N. Study on water transport process of atmosphere-soil system in the east sandy land of the Yellow River in Ningxia based on stable isotopes[D]. Yinchuan: Ningxia University,2024.

[64]

王军, 傅伯杰. 黄土丘陵小流域土地利用结构对土壤水分时空分布的影响[J].地理学报, 2000,55(1): 84-91.

[65]

Wang J, Fu B J. The impact of land use on spatial and temporal distribution of soil moisture on the Loess Plateau[J].Acta Geographica Sinica, 2000,55(1): 84-91.

[66]

朱悦. 晋西黄土区土壤水分特性研究 [D]. 北京:北京林业大学,2012.

[67]

Zhu Y. Study on Soil moisture characteristics in Loess Area of West Shanxi Province[D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University,2012.

[68]

张梅, 马菊. 不同人工林地土壤水分特征[J].陕西林业科技, 2025, 53(4): 50-55.

[69]

Zhang M, Ma J. Soil moisture characteristics of different artificial forest lands[J].Shaanxi Forest Science and Technology, 2025, 53(4): 50-55.

[70]

康赛, 毕华兴, 管凝, . 黄土高原典型小流域不同人工林地土壤碳水权衡关系[J].水土保持研究, 2026, 33(1): 197-204.

[71]

Kang S, Bi H X, Guan N, et al. Soil carbon-water trade-offs in different artificial forestlands of typical small watersheds on Loess Plateau[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2026, 33(1): 197-204.

[72]

Binbin L, Wantao Z, Shujie L, et al. Severe depletion of available deep soil water induced by revegetation on the arid and semiarid Loess Plateau[J].Forest Ecology and Management, 2021, 491: 119156.

[73]

张雪, 田丽慧, 杨宗雨, . 西宁市不同配置模式人工林地树木水分利用特征[J].生态学报, 2025, 45(13): 6390-6405.

[74]

Zhang X, Tian L H, Yang Z Y, et al. Characteristics of water uses of trees in plantations with different configuration patterns in Xining City[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2025, 45(13): 6390-6405.

[75]

赵影. 黄土高原半干旱区植物水分利用策略及机制 [D].北京:中国科学院大学 (中国科学院教育部水土保持与生态环境研究中心),2022.

[76]

Zhao Y. Plant water use strategies and mechanisms in the semi-arid region of the Loess Plateau[D].Beijing: University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,2022.

[77]

Jia H, Tian B, Song X, et al. Post-conversion vegetation restoration: PRE and VPD dominated the NDVI changes on the Loess Plateau[J].Journal of Environmental Management, 2025, 394: 127434.

[78]

Guo Q, Rewald B, Sandén H, et al. Above- and below-ground phenology of four tree species in mixed forests and monospecific stands[J].Functional Ecology, 2025, 39(12): 3751-3765.

[79]

Wu X, Yan X, Liu X, et al. A comparison of water use strategies between pure and mixed forests on the Chinese Loess Plateau[J].Functional Ecology, 2026, 40: 256-279.

[80]

Jia X, Wang Y, Shao M, et al. Estimating regional losses of soil water due to the conversion of agricultural land to forest in China’s Loess Plateau[J].Ecohydrology, 2017, 10(6): e1851.

[81]

Forrester I D. The spatial and temporal dynamics of species interactions in mixed-species forests: from pattern to process[J].Forest Ecology and Management, 2014, 312: 282-292.

[82]

马剑, 刘贤德, 李广, . 祁连山北麓中段青海云杉林土壤水热时空变化特征[J].干旱区地理, 2020, 43(4): 1033-1040.

[83]

Ma J, Liu X D, Li G, et al. Spatial and temporal variations of soil moisture and temperature of Picea crassifolia forest in north piedmont of central Qilian Mountains[J].Arid Land Geography, 2020, 43(4): 1033-1040.

[84]

谢正丰, 王冬梅, 张鹏, . 黄土高寒区小流域土壤水分空间变异与环境影响因子[J].水土保持学报, 2022, 36(4): 196-203.

[85]

Xie Z F, Wang D M, Zhang P, et al. Spatial variation of soil moisture and its environmental influencing factors in a small watershed in the loess alpine region[J].Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2022, 36(4): 196-203.

[86]

于博威, 刘高焕, 崔保山. 晋西黄土丘陵区人工刺槐林土壤干燥化效应[J].环境生态学, 2020, 2(Z1): 51-58.

[87]

Yu B W, Liu G H, Cui B S. Soil desiccation effects under Robinia pseudoacacia plantations in the loess hilly region of Western Shanxi Province[J].Environmental Ecology, 2020, 2(Z1): 51-58.

[88]

舒韦维, 卢立华, 李华, . 马尾松, 红锥纯林及其混交林土壤化学计量特征[J].广西林业科学, 2021, 50(3): 514-521.

[89]

Shu W W, Lu L H, Li H, et al. Soil stoichiometric characteristics of pure and mixed plantations of Pinus massoniana and Castanopsis hystrix [J].Guangxi Forestry Science, 2021, 50(3): 514-521.

[90]

de Lucia E H, Berlyn G P. The effect of increasing elevation on leaf cuticle thickness and cuticular transpiration in balsam fir[J].Canadian Journal of Botany, 1984, 62(11): 2423-2431.

[91]

崔悦, 闫冰, 李治学, . 坝上地区典型防护林水源涵养功能对林分结构的响应[J].北京林业大学学报, 2024, 46(9): 77-86.

[92]

Cui Y, Yan B, Li Z X, et al. Response of water conservation function of typical protective forests in Bashang area of northern China to stand structure[J].Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2024, 46(9): 77-86.

[93]

赵建文, 李金麟, 王圣杰. 祁连山土壤水分时空变化特征及主要驱动因素分析[J].干旱区地理, 2025, 48(8): 1480-1491.

[94]

Zhao J W, Li J L, Wang S J. Characteristics of spatial and temporal variation of soil moisture and analysis of main driving factors in the Qilian Mountains[J].Arid Land Geography, 2025, 48(8): 1480-1491.

[95]

杨雪梅, 王让会. 基于地理探测器的柯柯牙工程区土壤水分变化特征及驱动力分析[J].科学技术与工程, 2024, 24(26): 11148-11157.

[96]

Yang X M, Wang R H. Analysis of soil moisture variation characteristics and driving force in Kekeya area based on geographic detector[J].Science Technology and Engineering, 2024, 24(26): 11148-11157.

[97]

杨秋琳, 米丽娜, 刘玉忠, . 2003-2022 年宁夏不同生态分区土壤水分时空变化及其影响机制[J].水土保持通报, 2025, 45(2): 102-113.

[98]

Yang Q L, Mi L N, Liu Y Z, et al. Spatiotemporal variation of soil moisture in different ecological regions of Ningxia and their influencing mechanisms from 2003 to 2022[J].Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2025, 45(2): 102-113.

[99]

刘磊, 李小雁, 蒋志云, . 青海湖流域不同海拔高度土壤水分时空变化特征[J].资源科学, 2017, 39(2): 263-275.

[100]

Liu L, Li X Y, Jiang Z Y, et al. Variation in soil water content along different altitude gradients in the Qinghai Lake Watershed[J].Resources Science, 2017, 39(2): 263-275.

[101]

陈硕, 赵文武. 中国干旱半干旱区 1990-2020 年土壤水蚀时空变化及动态驱动力[J].水土保持学报, 2025, 39(1): 10-20.

[102]

Chen S, Zhao W W. Spatial and temporal changes and dynamic driving forces of soil water erosion in arid and semi-arid regions of China from 1990 to 2020[J].Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2025, 39(1): 10-20.

[103]

李泓儒, 李超凡. 天山北坡土壤水分时空变化及驱动力分析[J].水土保持学报, 2025, 39(3): 135-146, 153.

[104]

Li H R, Li C F. Analysis of temporal and spatial changes of soil moisture and its driving forces on the northern slope of the Tianshan Mountains[J].Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2025, 39(3): 135-146 , 153.

基金资助

国家重点研发计划(2022YFF1300404)

矿区生态复绿技术调研及试验(KJ-2023-1-2-KZ-016)

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (3203KB)

0

访问

0

被引

详细

导航
相关文章

AI思维导图

/