黄土高原不同造林模式下土壤水分特征及影响因素
Soil moisture characteristics and influencing factors under different afforestation models on the Loess Plateau of northern China
【目的】黄土高原气候干旱,土壤水资源是制约区域植被建设的关键要素。不同造林模式下土壤水分分布与影响因素尚不明确,有待开展系统对比研究。探究黄土高原纯林与混交林土壤水分变化差异及影响因素,能够为黄土高原区域造林模式优化与土壤水资源可持续发展提供理论依据。【方法】从 1981-2024 年发表的 187 篇有关黄土高原纯林和混交林土壤水分变化的国内外期刊及学位论文中,收集了共 1 453 块样地数据,利用外包线法及地理探测器法分析主要因子对土壤含水量的影响。【结果】(1)纯林和混交林土壤含水量存在显著垂直分异特征,在 0 ~ 100 cm 土层,纯林的平均土壤含水量显著高于混交林;100 ~ 200 cm 两种造林模式土壤水分无显著差异;而在 200 ~ 500 cm 土层,混交林的平均土壤含水量显著高于纯林;(2)土壤含水量受多种因子的影响,纯林和混交林均随年均气温和海拔高度的增加呈现先增后减的趋势;而随年均降水量的增加,纯林的土壤含水量先增加后趋于稳定,而混交林则持续上升;纯林的土壤含水量随林龄增长呈现先减少后保持稳定的趋势,混交林则呈现先减少后增加的动态变化;(3)年均降水量均对纯林和混交林土壤含水量的贡献率最大(纯林 23.3%,混交林 39.4%),任何 2 个因子交互作用的解释力均大于单一因子的解释力,其中年均降水量和海拔高度的交互作用增加效应最大(纯林 51.6%,混交林 59%)。【结论】黄土高原纯林与混交林土壤水分存在显著差异:0 ~ 100 cm 土层中,纯林具有更高的持水能力;100 ~ 200 cm 土层,造林模式间差异不明显;而在 200 ~ 500 cm 土层,混交林表现出更强的水分保持能力。年均降水量是纯林和混交林土壤水分的主要影响因素,其与海拔的交互作用解释力最大。因此在该区域造林时,应综合考虑降水和地形条件来优化造林模式,以促进土壤水资源的可持续利用。
[Objective] The Loess Plateau is characterized by an arid climate, and soil water resources serve as a critical limiting factor for regional vegetation construction. The distribution characteristics and influencing factors of soil water under different afforestation models remain unclear, requiring systematic comparative research. This study aims to investigate the differences in soil moisture dynamics between pure and mixed forests on the Loess Plateau of northern China and to identify their key influencing factors, thereby providing a theoretical basis for optimizing afforestation models and promoting the sustainable use of soil water resources. [Method] A total of 1 453 sampling plots were compiled from 187 publications, including peer-reviewed journal articles and academic dissertations published between 1981 and 2024, focusing on soil moisture changes in pure and mixed forests on the Loess Plateau. The effects of major factors on soil moisture content were analyzed using the upper boundary line method and the Geodetector method. [Result] (1) Soil moisture exhibited clear vertical differentiation between pure and mixed forests. In the 0−100 cm soil layer, pure forests had significantly higher soil moisture than mixed forests. No significant differences were observed in the 100−200 cm layer, whereas mixed forests showed significantly higher soil moisture in the 200−500 cm layer. (2) Soil moisture was influenced by multiple factors. In both afforestation models, soil moisture first increased and then decreased with increasing mean annual temperature and altitude. With increasing mean annual precipitation, soil moisture in pure forests increased initially and then stabilized, whereas it continuously increased in mixed forests. With increasing stand age, soil moisture in pure forests decreased initially and then remained stable, whereas in mixed forests, it exhibited a decreasing-increasing trend. (3) Mean annual precipitation contributed the most to soil moisture variation in both pure and mixed forests (pure forests of 23.3% and mixed forests of 39.4%). The explanatory power of interactions between any two factors was greater than individual factors, with the interaction between mean annual precipitation and altitude showing the strongest effect (pure forests of 51.6% and mixed forests of 59.0%). [Conclusion] Soil moisture differs significantly between pure and mixed forests on the Loess Plateau. Pure forests exhibit higher water-holding capacity in the 0−100 cm soil layer, whereas mixed forests show stronger water retention in deeper layers (200−500 cm), with no evident differences in the 100−200 cm layer. Mean annual precipitation is the dominant controlling factor, and its interaction with altitude provides the highest explanatory power. These findings suggest that both precipitation and topographic conditions should be jointly considered in afforestation planning to optimize forest structure and enhance the sustainable use of soil water resources.
| [1] |
周欧, 古丽米热·依力哈木, 祝维, |
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
李玉山, 韩仕峰, 汪正华. 黄土高原土壤水分性质及其分区[J].中国科学院西北水土保持研究所集刊 (土壤分水与土壤肥力研究专集), 1985(2): 1-17. |
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
孙长忠, 黄宝龙, 陈海滨, |
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
汪雯雯, 张宇飞, 杨文府, |
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
王丽平, 赵炯昌, 朱洪盛, |
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
赵丹阳, 毕华兴, 侯贵荣, |
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
张秀芝, 司剑华. 西宁市南山典型林地土壤水分变化特征[J].节水灌溉, 2025(4): 38-43. |
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
胡伟, 邵明安, 王全九. 黄土高原退耕坡地土壤水分空间变异性研究[J].水科学进展, 2006, 17(1): 74-81. |
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
金明娟. 黄土塬区降水补给土壤水分的过程及其有效性研究 [D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学,2025. |
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
蔡进军. 宁夏黄土丘陵区人工林草植被生态水文过程与功能研究 [D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学,2023. |
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
丁文斌, 王飞. 植被建设对黄土高原土壤水分的影响[J].生态学报, 2022, 42(13): 5531-5542. |
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
费洪岩, 童倩, 万传宇, |
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
李琳琳, 王照利, 郭涛, |
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
周红娟, 王彪, 王子涵, |
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
王劲峰, 徐成东. 地理探测器: 原理与展望[J].地理学报, 2017, 72(1): 116-134. |
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
张舒瑾, 余珮珩, 白少云, |
| [47] |
|
| [48] |
李琛, 吴映梅, 高彬嫔, |
| [49] |
|
| [50] |
魏强, 凌雷, 柴春山, |
| [51] |
|
| [52] |
方伟东, 亢新刚, 赵浩彦, |
| [53] |
|
| [54] |
陈曦. 桥山林区南峪口流域不同林分的土壤水分过程与植被承载力研究 [D]. 西安:西安理工大学, 2023. |
| [55] |
|
| [56] |
白文娟. 水蚀风蚀交错带植被恢复对土壤质量的影响与植物生理生态适应性 [D]. 北京:中国科学院研究生院 (教育部水土保持与生态环境研究中心),2010. |
| [57] |
|
| [58] |
胡静霞, 杨新兵. 清水河流域典型林分类型土壤水分特征研究[J].西南农业学报, 2018, 31(1): 118-125. |
| [59] |
|
| [60] |
许丽, 刘永刚, 李得禄. 民勤绿洲人工灌木林混交与纯林配置模式的生长特性及生态效益评估[J].防护林科技, 2025(6): 1-9,17. |
| [61] |
|
| [62] |
王娜娜. 基于稳定同位素的宁夏河东沙区大气−土壤系统水分运移过程研究 [D]. 银川:宁夏大学,2024. |
| [63] |
|
| [64] |
王军, 傅伯杰. 黄土丘陵小流域土地利用结构对土壤水分时空分布的影响[J].地理学报, 2000,55(1): 84-91. |
| [65] |
|
| [66] |
朱悦. 晋西黄土区土壤水分特性研究 [D]. 北京:北京林业大学,2012. |
| [67] |
|
| [68] |
张梅, 马菊. 不同人工林地土壤水分特征[J].陕西林业科技, 2025, 53(4): 50-55. |
| [69] |
|
| [70] |
康赛, 毕华兴, 管凝, |
| [71] |
|
| [72] |
|
| [73] |
张雪, 田丽慧, 杨宗雨, |
| [74] |
|
| [75] |
赵影. 黄土高原半干旱区植物水分利用策略及机制 [D].北京:中国科学院大学 (中国科学院教育部水土保持与生态环境研究中心),2022. |
| [76] |
|
| [77] |
|
| [78] |
|
| [79] |
|
| [80] |
|
| [81] |
|
| [82] |
马剑, 刘贤德, 李广, |
| [83] |
|
| [84] |
谢正丰, 王冬梅, 张鹏, |
| [85] |
|
| [86] |
于博威, 刘高焕, 崔保山. 晋西黄土丘陵区人工刺槐林土壤干燥化效应[J].环境生态学, 2020, 2(Z1): 51-58. |
| [87] |
|
| [88] |
舒韦维, 卢立华, 李华, |
| [89] |
|
| [90] |
|
| [91] |
崔悦, 闫冰, 李治学, |
| [92] |
|
| [93] |
赵建文, 李金麟, 王圣杰. 祁连山土壤水分时空变化特征及主要驱动因素分析[J].干旱区地理, 2025, 48(8): 1480-1491. |
| [94] |
|
| [95] |
杨雪梅, 王让会. 基于地理探测器的柯柯牙工程区土壤水分变化特征及驱动力分析[J].科学技术与工程, 2024, 24(26): 11148-11157. |
| [96] |
|
| [97] |
杨秋琳, 米丽娜, 刘玉忠, |
| [98] |
|
| [99] |
刘磊, 李小雁, 蒋志云, |
| [100] |
|
| [101] |
陈硕, 赵文武. 中国干旱半干旱区 1990-2020 年土壤水蚀时空变化及动态驱动力[J].水土保持学报, 2025, 39(1): 10-20. |
| [102] |
|
| [103] |
李泓儒, 李超凡. 天山北坡土壤水分时空变化及驱动力分析[J].水土保持学报, 2025, 39(3): 135-146, 153. |
| [104] |
|
国家重点研发计划(2022YFF1300404)
矿区生态复绿技术调研及试验(KJ-2023-1-2-KZ-016)
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |