地下滴灌玉米根系分布与吸水对灌水量的响应研究

赵经华 ,  袁莹莹 ,  阿卜杜米提·马木提 ,  杨庭瑞 ,  马明杰

南京农业大学学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (3) : 541 -550.

PDF (5200KB)
南京农业大学学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (3) : 541 -550. DOI: 10.7685/jnau.202501008
植物科学

地下滴灌玉米根系分布与吸水对灌水量的响应研究

作者信息 +

Studies on root distribution and water uptake in subsurface drip-irrigated corn in response to irrigation water volume

Author information +
文章历史 +
PDF (5324K)

摘要

[目的]本文旨在探究地下滴灌玉米农田土壤水分运移规律和玉米根系分布与吸水对灌水量的响应规律。[方法]根据北疆玉米需水量(ETc)设置5个地下滴灌灌溉水平:50%ETc(W1)、75%ETc(W2)、100%ETc(W3)、125%ETc(W4)、150%ETc(W5),利用Hydrus-2d软件对土壤水分及根系吸水进行模拟研究,分析不同灌水量下玉米农田土壤水分运移情况与玉米根系分布情况。[结果]随灌水量的增加,玉米根长密度与根表面积密度整体呈先增加后降低的趋势,且多在W3处理达到最大值,土壤含水量逐渐升高,全生育期W1至W5处理平均土壤含水量分别为12.5%、16.4%、18.9%、21.1%和23.0%。各土层根系吸水速率逐步上升,W1-W5处理玉米根系吸水速率分别为0.30、0.33、0.39、0.40和0.40cm·d-1。[结论]Hydrus-2d模型模拟值与实测值的R2>0.86,RMSE为0.01~0.07,能够有效模拟北疆地区地下滴灌玉米农田水分运移情况,100%ETc灌水处理最适宜玉米根长与根表面积的增加,玉米根系吸水速率与灌水量呈正相关关系,且玉米产量在100%ETc处理时达到最高,为17882.15kg·hm-2。

Abstract

[Objectives] The paper aimed to investigate the soil moisture transport pattern of subsurface drip irrigated maize farmland and the response pattern of maize root distribution and water uptake to irrigation water quantity. [Methods] Five levels of subsurface drip irrigation were set up according to the evapotranspiration of corn (ETc) in the northern border: 50% ETc (W1), 75% ETc (W2), 100% ETc (W3), 125% ETc (W4) and 150% ETc (W5), and Hydrus-2d software was used to simulate soil moisture and root water absorption, and analyze soil moisture transport and root distribution in corn farmland under different irrigation water levels. The soil moisture transport and corn root distribution in corn farmland were analyzed under different irrigation amounts. [Results] With the increase of irrigation water, the overall trend of maize root length density and root surface area density was first increasing and then decreasing, and mostly reached the maximum value in W3. The soil water content gradually increased, and the average soil water content of the whole life span W1-W5 was 12.5%, 16.4%, 18.9%, 21.1% and 23.0%, respectively. The root water uptake of each soil layer increased gradually, and the rate of root water uptake was 0.30, 0.33, 0.39, 0.40 and 0.40 cm·d-1, respectively. [Conclusions] The R2 between the simulated and measured values of the Hydrus-2d model reached more than 0.86, and the RMSE ranged from 0.01 to 0.07, which was able to simulate effectively the water transport situation of sub-surface drip-irrigated maize farmland in the Northern Xinjiang region, and the 100% ETc irrigation treatment was the most suitable for the increase of root length and root surface area, and the proper treatment was the most suitable for the increase of root length and root surface area of maize. The 100% ETc irrigation treatment was the most suitable for the increase of root length and root surface area, the rate of root water uptake was positively correlated with the irrigation water amount, and the maize yield reached the highest of 17882.15 kg·hm-2 at 100% ETc.

关键词

玉米 / 地下滴灌 / 灌水量 / Hydrus-2d模型 / 根系 / 吸水

Key words

maize / subsurface drip irrigation / irrigation water volume / Hydrus-2d model / root / water uptake

引用本文

引用格式 ▾
赵经华,袁莹莹,阿卜杜米提·马木提,杨庭瑞,马明杰. 地下滴灌玉米根系分布与吸水对灌水量的响应研究[J]. 南京农业大学学报, 2026, 49(3): 541-550 DOI:10.7685/jnau.202501008

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

参考文献

[1]

李星星, 欧欢, 陈娟, 等. 新疆南疆春播玉米穗部性状及产量对不同种植密度的响应[J]. 中国农学通报, 2024, 40(29): 8-13.

[2]

Li XX, Ou H, Chen J, et al. Response of ear traits and yield of spring sown maize to different planting densities in southern Xinjiang[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(29): 8-13.

[3]

沈彦俊, 齐永青, 罗建美, 等. 地理学视角的农业节水理论框架与水资源可持续利用[J]. 地理学报, 2023, 78(7): 1718-1730.

[4]

Shen YJ, Qi YQ, Luo JM, et al. The combined pathway to sustainable agricultural water saving and water resources management: an integrated geographical perspective[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2023, 78(7): 1718-1730 (in Chinese with English abstract).

[5]

贾明磊, 魏飒, 刘帆, 等. 土壤质地和滴头流量对地下滴灌土壤水分运移特征的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2025, 33(4): 749-758.

[6]

Jia ML, Wei S, Liu F, et al. Influence of soil texture and drip head flow rate on soil water transport characteristics of subsurface drip irrigation[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2025, 33(4): 749-758 (in Chinese with English abstract).

[7]

Patra K, Parihar CM, Nayak HS, et al. Appraisal of complementarity of subsurface drip fertigation and conservation agriculture for physiological performance and water economy of maize[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2023, 283: 108308.

[8]

马国荣, 庄淏然, 许德浩, 等. 青铜峡引黄灌区农田灌溉水入渗与玉米分层吸水规律研究[J]. 干旱区地理, 2024, 47(11): 1899-1914.

[9]

Ma GR, Zhuang HR, Xu DH, et al. Water infiltration and maize root water uptake patterns in the Qingtongxia Yellow River irrigation district[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2024, 47(11): 1899-1914 (in Chinese with English abstract).

[10]

赵引, 李国安, 夏江宝, 等. 覆膜和灌水量对制种玉米根系分布及产量的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2022, 38(15): 104-114.

[11]

Zhao Y, Li GA, Xia JB, et al. Effects of film mulching and irrigation amount on the root distribution and yield of seed-maize[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2022, 38(15): 104-114 (in Chinese with English abstract).

[12]

丁运韬, 程煜, 张体彬, 等. 利用HYDRUS-2D模拟膜下滴灌玉米农田深层土壤水分动态与根系吸水[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2021, 39(3): 23-32.

[13]

Ding YT, Cheng Y, Zhang TB, et al. Modeling of dynamics of deep soil water and root uptake of maize with mulched drip irrigation using HYDRUS-2D[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2021, 39(3): 23-32 (in Chinese with English abstract).

[14]

Khashaeei F, Behmanesh J, Rezaverdinejad V, et al. Field evaluation and numerical simulation of water and nitrate transport in subsurface drip irrigation of corn using HYDRUS-2D[J]. Irrigation Science, 2024, 42(2): 327-352.

[15]

Patra K, Parihar CM, Nayak HS, et al. Water budgeting in conservation agriculture-based sub-surface drip irrigation in tropical maize using HYDRUS-2D in South Asia[J]. Scientific Reports, 2021, 11: 16770.

[16]

付玉娟, 李尧, 喻浩洋, 等. Hydrus-2D模拟起垄覆膜处理对夏玉米生育期水量平衡的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2023, 39(10): 76-87.

[17]

Fu YJ, Li Y, Yu HY, et al. Effects of ridging and plastic film mulching on the water balance of summer maize during its growth period[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2023, 39(10): 76-87 (in Chinese with English abstract).

[18]

李菊, 张富仓, 王艳丽, 等. 灌水量和滴灌频率对甘肃省河西地区春玉米生长和水分利用的影响[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2021, 26(10): 8-20.

[19]

Li J, Zhang FC, Wang YL, et al. Effects of irrigation amount and drip irrigation frequency on spring maize growth and water use in Hexi area of Gansu Province[J]. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2021, 26(10): 8-20 (in Chinese with English abstract).

[20]

Richards LA. Capillary conduction of liquids through porous mediums[J]. Physics, 1931, 1(5): 318-333.

[21]

van Genuchten MT. A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1980, 44(5): 892-898.

[22]

Milthorpe FL. Simulation of field water use and crop yield[J]. Field Crops Research, 1980, 3: 95-96.

[23]

Cai Q, Zhang YL, Sun ZX, et al. Morphological plasticity of root growth under mild water stress increases water use efficiency without reducing yield in maize[J]. Biogeosciences, 2017, 14(16): 3851-3858.

[24]

段伟娜. 亏缺灌溉夏玉米根冠生长对土壤水分的动态响应研究[D]. 杨凌:西北农林科技大学, 2022.

[25]

Duan WN. Dynamic response of root-shoot growth of summer maize to soil moisture under deficit irrigation[D]. Yangling: Northwest A&F University, 2022 (in Chinese with English abstract).

[26]

Kondo M, Murty MVR, Aragones DV. Characteristics of root growth and water uptake from soil in upland rice and maize under water stress[J]. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 2000, 46(3): 721-732.

[27]

胡明新, 周广胜. 拔节期干旱和复水对春玉米物候的影响及其生理生态机制[J]. 生态学报, 2020, 40(1): 274-283.

[28]

Hu MX, Zhou GS. Phenological change and its ecophysiological mechanism of spring maize responding to drought at jointing stage and rewatering[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020, 40(1): 274-283 (in Chinese with English abstract).

[29]

蔡福, 米娜, 纪瑞鹏, 等. 关键发育期干旱及复水过程对春玉米主要生理参数的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28(11): 3643-3652.

[30]

Cai F, Mi N, Ji RP, et al. Effects of drought stress and subsequent rewatering on major physiological parameters of spring maize during the key growth periods[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2017, 28(11): 3643-3652 (in Chinese with English abstract).

[31]

陈妮娜,纪瑞鹏,贾庆宇, 关键发育期干旱对春玉米产量及籽粒品质的影响[J]. 生态学杂志,2021,40(6):1687-1694.

[32]

Chen NN, Ji RP, Jia QY, et al. Effects of drought stress at key growth stages on yield and grain quality of spring maize[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2021, 40(6): 1687-1694 (in Chinese with English abstract).

[33]

邹洪涛, 贺荣涛, 张一峰, 等. 不同灌溉方式对设施土壤团聚体稳定性及有机碳含量的影响[J]. 沈阳农业大学学报, 2025, 56(4): 1-12.

[34]

Zou HT, He RT, Zhang YF, et al. The effect of different irrigation methods on the stability of soil aggregates and organic carbon content in greenhouse soil[J]. Journal of Shenyang Agricultural University, 2025, 56(4): 1-12 (in Chinese with English abstract).

[35]

张健利, 王振华, 刘茹华, 等. 水肥互作对滴灌红枣耗水及产量的影响[J]. 排灌机械工程学报, 2023, 41(6): 597-604, 613.

[36]

Zhang JL, Wang ZH, Liu RH, et al. Effects of water and fertilizer interaction on water consumption and yield of jujube under drip irrigation[J]. Journal of Drainage and Irrigation Machinery Engineering, 2023, 41(6): 597-604, 613 (in Chinese with English abstract).

[37]

向凌潇, 张俊威, 李建明. 灌溉量与灌溉频率对番茄根系生长、产量和营养元素吸收的影响[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 52(5): 80-92,123.

[38]

Xiang LX, Zhang JW, Li JM. Effects of irrigation amount and frequency on root growth, yield and nutrient element absorption of tomato[J]. Journal of Northwest A&F University (Natural Science Edition), 2024, 52(5): 80-92, 123 (in Chinese with English abstract).

[39]

余静, 庞桂斌, 于浩洋, 等. 冬小麦测墒补灌下土壤氮素迁移特征模拟研究[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2024, 43(1): 28-34.

[40]

Yu J, Pang GB, Yu HY, et al. Characteristics of soil nitrogen transport under moisture measurement and supplemental irrigation in winter wheat[J]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 2024, 43(1): 28-34 (in Chinese with English abstract).

[41]

袁江杰, 李光永, 袁子程. 地下滴灌带类型对玉米根系生长和产量的影响[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2015, 34(12): 14-18.

[42]

Yuan JJ, Li GY, Yuan ZC. Effects of subsurface drip tape types on maize growth and yield[J]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 2015, 34(12): 14-18 (in Chinese with English abstract).

[43]

何锐, 佟长福, 王军, 等. 水氮调控对向日葵生长、水肥利用效率和土壤水盐分布的影响[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2023, 42(12): 73-81.

[44]

He R, Tong CF, Wang J, et al. Effects of water and nitrogen regulation on growth, water-fertilizer use efficiency and soil water-salt distribution in sunflower[J]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 2023, 42(12): 73-81 (in Chinese with English abstract).

[45]

Eltarabily MG, Bali KM, Negm AM, et al. Evaluation of root water uptake and urea fertigation distribution under subsurface drip irrigation[J]. Water, 2019, 11(7): 1487.

[46]

杨明达, 张素瑜, 杨慎骄, 等. 地下滴灌对冬小麦-夏玉米根系吸水特征的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2024, 43(2): 469-479.

[47]

Yang MD, Zhang SY, Yang SJ, et al. Effects of subsurface drip irrigation on root water uptake of winter wheat and summer maize[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2024, 43(2): 469-479 (in Chinese with English abstract).

[48]

吴梅, 张金珠, 王振华, 等. 水气互作对膜下滴灌玉米生理生长及产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2024, 26(8): 189-200.

[49]

Wu M, Zhang JZ, Wang ZH, et al. Effects of water and air interaction on physiological growth and yield of maize under mulched drip irrigation[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(8): 189-200 (in Chinese with English abstract).

[50]

曲俊杉, 洪明, 常浩, 等. 水氮供应对北疆春玉米产量、水氮利用及品质的影响[J]. 玉米科学, 2023, 31(2): 125-135.

[51]

Qu JS, Hong M, Chang H, et al. Effects of water and nitrogen supply on yield, water-nitrogen utilization and quality of spring maize in northern Xinjiang[J]. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2023, 31(2): 125-135 (in Chinese with English abstract).

基金资助

“天山英才”培养计划“三农”骨干人才项目()

新疆维吾尔自治区“十四五”重大专项项目(2020A01003-4)

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (5200KB)

0

访问

0

被引

详细

导航
相关文章

AI思维导图

/

〈 〉