盐胁迫和干旱胁迫对杜梨幼苗生长和根系特性的影响

肖维焘 ,  王纪忠 ,  黄志炜 ,  孙敏 ,  吴巨友 ,  陈国栋

南京农业大学学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (3) : 522 -530.

PDF (1779KB)
南京农业大学学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (3) : 522 -530. DOI: 10.7685/jnau.202501019
植物科学

盐胁迫和干旱胁迫对杜梨幼苗生长和根系特性的影响

作者信息 +

Effects of salt and drought stress on the growth and root characteristics of Pyrus betulaefolia seedlings

Author information +
文章历史 +
PDF (1821K)

摘要

[目的]本研究旨在探讨不同程度盐胁迫和干旱胁迫对杜梨幼苗生长指标及根系特性的影响,为果树耐盐、抗旱性研究和品种改良提供理论依据。[方法]以杜梨幼苗为试材,分别采用 NaCl 溶液(浓度分别为 0、3、6 和 12g·L-1,记为 CK、S1、S2 和 S3)和 PEG-6000 溶液(浓度分别为 0、50、100 和 200g·L-1,记为 CK、D1、D2 和 D3)模拟盐胁迫与干旱胁迫,测定幼苗的地上部形态、叶绿素含量、根冠比、根系活力和根系构型等生长和生理指标。[结果]随着盐胁迫程度的加深,幼苗的根系长度、根系表面积、根系体积和根系数量均呈下降趋势,而根冠比则呈先降低后升高的趋势。其中,与对照组(CK)相比,S3处理幼苗根系活力降低 81.0%,叶绿素含量减少 23.6%,株高缩短 57.3%,均差异显著;根系长度、表面积、体积和根系数量分别降低 80.0%、78.8%、73.8%和 72.5%,均差异显著。在干旱胁迫处理中,随着胁迫程度的加重,幼苗的根系长度、根系表面积、根系体积和根系数量均受到显著抑制,而根冠比呈先升高后降低的趋势。其中,D1处理虽然促进了根系伸长生长,但抑制了根系平均直径的增加;与 CK 相比,D3处理幼苗根系活力降低 67.3%,叶绿素含量减少 30.6%,株高缩短 53.3%,均差异显著;幼苗根系长度、表面积、体积和根系数量分别降低 41.78%、43.97%、70.08%和 45.51%,均差异显著。[结论]杜梨幼苗通过动态调节根冠比和根系构型响应非生物胁迫,其耐盐阈值为 6g·L-1 NaCl(S2 处理),抗旱阈值为 100g·L-1 PEG-6000(D2 处理)。当各胁迫强度超过其阈值时,幼苗的生长及生理指标均显著下降。

Abstract

[Objectives]This study aimed to investigate the effects of varying degrees of salt stress and drought stress on the growth parameters and root system characteristics ofPyrus betulaefolia seedlings, providing a theoretical foundation for research on stress tolerance and cultivar improvement in fruit trees. [Methods]P. betulaefolia seedlings were used as the experimental material. Salt stress was simulated using NaCl solutions at concentrations of 0, 3, 6 and 12 g·L-1(labeled as CK, S1, S2 and S3, respectively), and drought stress was achieved using PEG-6000 solutions at concentrations of 0, 50, 100 and 200 g·L-1 (labeled as CK, D1, D2 and D3, respectively). The growth and physiological parameters were measured, including aboveground morphology, chlorophyll content, root/shoot ratio, root activity and root system architecture. [Results]With increasing salt stress, the seedlings exhibited a notable decline in root length, root surface area, root volume and root number, while the root/shoot ratio initially decreased and then increased. Compared to the control (CK), root activity of the seedlings in S3 treatment prominently decreased by 81.0%, chlorophyll content remarkably reduced by 23.6%, and plant height dominantly shortened by 57.3%; root length, surface area, volume and root numbers significantly decreased by 80.0%, 78.8%, 73.8% and 72.5%, respectively. Under drought stress, as stress severity increased, root length, surface area, volume and root number were significantly inhibited, while the root/shoot ratio initially increased and then decreased. Specifically, root elongation growth in D1 treatment was promoted, but the increase of the average root diameter was suppressed. Compared to CK, root activity of the seedlings in D3 treatment prominently decreased by 67.3%, chlorophyll content remarkably reduced by 30.6%, and plant height dominantly shortened by 53.3%; root length, surface area, volume and root number of seedlings significantly decreased by 41.78%, 43.97%, 70.08% and 45.51%, respectively. [Conclusions]P. betulaefolia seedlings responded to abiotic stress by dynamically adjusting their root/shoot ratio and root system architecture. The salt tolerance threshold was identified as 6 g·L-1 NaCl (S2 treatment), and the drought tolerance threshold as 100 g·L-1 PEG-6000 (D2 treatment). Beyond these thresholds, seedling growth and physiological indices were significantly declined.

关键词

盐胁迫 / 干旱胁迫 / 杜梨 / 根系构型 / 根系活力

Key words

salt stress / drought stress / Pyrus betulaefolia / root architecture / root activity

引用本文

引用格式 ▾
肖维焘,王纪忠,黄志炜,孙敏,吴巨友,陈国栋. 盐胁迫和干旱胁迫对杜梨幼苗生长和根系特性的影响[J]. 南京农业大学学报, 2026, 49(3): 522-530 DOI:10.7685/jnau.202501019

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

参考文献

[1]

李慧, 张雨峰, 李晓刚, 等. 全基因组 DNA 甲基化和转录组联合分析鉴定杜梨耐盐相关转录因子[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(7): 1377-1390.

[2]

Li H, Zhang Y F, Li X G, et al. Identification of salt-tolerant transcription factors in the roots of Pyrus betulaefolia by the association analysis of genome-wide DNA methylation and transcriptome [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(7): 1377-1390(in Chinese with English abstract).

[3]

张志晓, 曾丽蓉, 赵嘉菱, 等. 五种苹果砧木的生长及生理特性对盐胁迫的响应[J]. 北方园艺, 2017(3): 19-25.

[4]

Zhang Z X, Zeng L R, Zhao J L, et al. Response to salt stress of growth and physiological character of five apple rootstocks[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2017(3): 19-25(in Chinese with English abstract).

[5]

Dai A G. Drought under global warming: a review[J]. WIREs Climate Change, 2011, 2(1): 45-65.

[6]

张兴华, 高杰, 杜伟莉, 等. 干旱胁迫对玉米品种苗期叶片光合特性的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2015, 41(1): 154-159.

[7]

Zhang X H, Gao J, Du W L, et al. Effects of drought stress on photosynthetic characteristics of maize hybrids at seedling stage[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2015, 41(1): 154-159(in Chinese with English abstract).

[8]

Liang B W, Shi Y, Yin B Y, et al. Effect of different dwarfing interstocks on the vegetative growth and nitrogen utilization efficiency of apple trees under low-nitrate and drought stress[J]. Scientia Horticulturae, 2022, 305: 111369.

[9]

马涛, 罗晨梦, 李思佳, 等. 木本植物响应干旱胁迫的研究现状[J]. 四川大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 60(5): 19-28.

[10]

Ma T, Luo C M, Li S J, et al. Current research status of woody plants responding to drought stress[J]. Journal of Sichuan University (Natural Science Edition), 2023, 60(5): 19-28(in Chinese with English abstract).

[11]

Pandey R, Garg N. High effectiveness of Rhizophagus irregularis is linked to superior modulation of antioxidant defence mechanisms in Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp. genotypes grown under salinity stress [J]. Mycorrhiza, 2017, 27(7): 669-682.

[12]

程龙, 韩占江, 石新建, 等. 白茎盐生草种子萌发特性及其对盐旱胁迫的响应[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2015, 29(3): 131-136.

[13]

Cheng L, Han Z J, Shi X J, et al. Seed germination characteristics and the response to salt and drought stress in Halostachys caspica Bunge [J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2015, 29(3): 131-136(in Chinese with English abstract).

[14]

Rai G K, Khanda D M, Choudhary S M, et al. Unlocking nature's stress buster: abscisic acid's crucial role in defending plants against abiotic stress[J]. Plant Stress, 2024, 11: 100359.

[15]

Zhang D J, Tong C L, Wang Q S, et al. Mycorrhizas affect physiological performance, antioxidant system, photosynthesis, endogenous hormones, and water content in cotton under salt stress[J]. Plants, 2024, 13(6): 805.

[16]

Han L J, Hu L L, Lv Y Y, et al. Effects of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens QST713 on mineral nutrient utilization of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) under drought stress [J]. Agronomy, 2024, 14(8): 1793.

[17]

张洁, 高琛稀, 宋春晖, 等. 干旱胁迫对不同苹果砧穗组合根系形态与生理特性的影响[J]. 西北农业学报, 2015, 24(12): 92-99.

[18]

Zhang J, Gao C X, Song C H, et al. Effects of drought stress on root morphological and physiological characteristics of different apple rootstock-scion combinations[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-occidentalis Sinica, 2015, 24(12): 92-99(in Chinese with English abstract).

[19]

Sun M X, Liu X L, Gao H F, et al. Phosphatidylcholine enhances homeostasis in peach seedling cell membrane and increases its salt stress tolerance by phosphatidic acid[J]. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2022, 23(5): 2585.

[20]

程明圣, 邹欢欢, 黄孝风, 等. 干旱与盐胁迫对毛竹幼苗生长及生理的影响[J]. 江西农业大学学报, 2021, 43(4): 842-852.

[21]

Cheng M S, Zou H H, Huang X F, et al. Effects of drought and salt stress on growth and physiology of Phyllostachys edulis seedlings [J]. Acta Agriculturae Universitatis Jiangxiensis (Natural Sciences Edition), 2021, 43(4): 842-852(in Chinese with English abstract).

[22]

朱秀云, 梁梦, 马玉. 根系活力的测定(TTC 法)实验综述报告[J]. 广东化工, 2020, 47(6): 211-212.

[23]

Zhu X Y, Liang M, Ma Y. A review report on the experiments for the determination of root activity by TTC method[J]. Guangdong Chemical Industry, 2020, 47(6): 211-212(in Chinese with English abstract).

[24]

李彦, 张英鹏, 孙明, 等. 盐分胁迫对植物的影响及植物耐盐机理研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2008, 24(1): 258-265.

[25]

Li Y, Zhang Y P, Sun M, et al. Research advance in the effects of salt stress on plant and the mechanism of plant resistance[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2008, 24(1): 258-265(in Chinese with English abstract).

[26]

Tan J L, Ben-Gal A, Shtein I, et al. Root structural plasticity enhances salt tolerance in mature olives[J]. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2020, 179: 104224.

[27]

万贤崇, 宋永俊. 盐胁迫及其钙调节对竹子根系活力和丙二醛含量的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报, 1995, 19(3): 16-20.

[28]

Wan X C, Song Y J. Effects of salt stress and calcium regulation on root activity and MDA content of bamboo[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University, 1995, 19(3): 16-20(in Chinese with English abstract).

[29]

田吉, 张芸香, 樊兴路, 等. 文冠果幼苗对盐胁迫的生长策略响应和耐盐性阈值研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2016, 32(19): 18-22.

[30]

Tian J, Zhang Y X, Fan X L, et al. Growth strategy response to salt stress and salt tolerance threshold of Xanthoceras sorbifolia Bunge seedlings [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2016, 32(19): 18-22(in Chinese with English abstract).

[31]

赵天然, 车路平, 谢会成, 等. 流苏树对 NaCl 的生理响应及耐盐阈值分析[J]. 植物生理学报, 2022, 58(10): 1935-1945.

[32]

Zhao T R, Che L P, Xie H C, et al. Physiological response and salinity tolerance threshold analysis of Chionanthus retusus to NaCl stress [J]. Plant Physiology Journal, 2022, 58(10): 1935-1945(in Chinese with English abstract).

[33]

Fan S G, Amombo E, Yin Y L, et al. Root system architecture and genomic plasticity to salinity provide insights into salt-tolerant traits in tall fescue[J]. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2023, 262: 115315.

[34]

Julkowska M M, Koevoets I T, Mol S, et al. Genetic components of root architecture remodeling in response to salt stress[J]. The Plant Cell, 2017, 29(12): 3198-3213.

[35]

朱妍钰, 汪军成, 姚立蓉, 等. 盐胁迫对小麦籽粒萌发中淀粉分解及苗期根系生长的影响[J]. 甘肃农业大学学报, 2024, 59(3): 49-54, 61.

[36]

Zhu Y Y, Wang J C, Yao L R, et al. Effect of salt stress on starch degradation in wheat seed germination and root system at seedling stage[J]. Journal of Gansu Agricultural University, 2024, 59(3): 49-54, 61(in Chinese with English abstract).

[37]

袁海, 何鹏飞, 武君洁, 等. 盐胁迫对耐盐和盐敏感玉米幼苗生长和生理特性的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2019, 47(19): 86-89.

[38]

Yuan H, He P F, Wu J J, et al. Effects of salt stress on growth and biological traits of salt-tolerant and salt-sensitive maize seedlings[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 47(19): 86-89(in Chinese with English abstract).

[39]

朱燕芳, 王延秀, 陈佰鸿, 等. 四种苹果砧木幼苗对 NaCl 胁迫的生理响应、根系生长及耐盐性评价[J]. 甘肃农业大学学报, 2017, 52(2): 48-53.

[40]

Zhu Y F, Wang Y X, Chen B H, et al. Effect of NaCl stress on growth and physiological characteristics of four kinds of apple stock[J]. Journal of Gansu Agricultural University, 2017, 52(2): 48-53(in Chinese with English abstract).

[41]

杨凯, 孙迎坤, 谭雯, 等. 盐胁迫对香石竹种子萌发及幼苗生长的影响[J]. 北方园艺, 2013(22): 86-88.

[42]

Yang K, Sun Y K, Tan W, et al. Effects of salt stress on seeds germination and seedling growth of carnation[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2013(22): 86-88(in Chinese with English abstract).

[43]

李雪芳, 柳雪, 王西娜, 等. 盐胁迫对嫁接西瓜幼苗根系构型、活力及离子分配的影响[J]. 南方农业学报, 2024, 55(10): 3084-3095.

[44]

Li X F, Liu X, Wang X N, et al. Effects of salt stress on root configuration, vitality and ion distribution in grafted watermelon seedlings[J]. Journal of Southern Agriculture, 2024, 55(10): 3084-3095(in Chinese with English abstract).

[45]

Pirnajmmedin F, Majidi M M, Gheysari M. Root and physiological characteristics associated with drought tolerance in Iranian tall fescue[J]. Euphytica, 2015, 202(1): 141-155.

[46]

姚天姿, 赵子祎, 秦曹瑜, 等. 藜麦根系形态特征及生理特性对干旱胁迫的响应研究[J]. 现代农业科技, 2024(7): 37-41,46.

[47]

Yao T Z, Zhao Z Y, Qin C Y, et al. Response of morphological and physiological characteristics of quinoa root system to drought stress[J]. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024(7): 37-41, 46(in Chinese with English abstract).

[48]

张奥, 张传领, 薛焱, 等. 碱、旱胁迫对乌拉尔甘草种子萌发及幼苗生理特性的影响[J]. 草原与草坪, 2025, 45(1): 173-181.

[49]

Zhang A, Zhang C L, Xue Y, et al. Effect of alkaline and drought stress on seed germination and seedling physiological characteristics of Glycyrrhiza uralensis [J]. Grassland and Turf, 2025, 45(1): 173-181(in Chinese with English abstract).

[50]

Wu G L, Du G Z. Relationships between seed size and seedling growth strategy of herbaceous plant: a review[J]. The Journal of Applied Ecology, 2008, 19(1): 191-197.

[51]

尹鹏, 沈佳佳, 韩璐, 等. 干旱胁迫对‘新林 1 号’杨生理生化的影响[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2024, 52(4): 1-8.

[52]

Yin P, Shen J J, Han L, et al. The effects of drought stress on the physiological and biochemical characteristics of Populus cathayana × canadensis 'Xinlin 1' [J]. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 2024, 52(4): 1-8(in Chinese with English abstract).

[53]

张嘉悦, 闫发, 封越, 等. 不同浓度 PEG 模拟干旱胁迫对大白菜种子萌发的影响[J]. 河北农业大学学报, 2024, 47(2): 38-46.

[54]

Zhang J Y, Yan F, Feng Y, et al. Effects of different concentrations of PEG simulated drought stress on seed germination of Chinese cabbage[J]. Journal of Hebei Agricultural University, 2024, 47(2): 38-46(in Chinese with English abstract).

[55]

Liu R X, Zhou Z G, Guo W Q, et al. Effects of N fertilization on root development and activity of water-stressed cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) plants [J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2008, 95(11): 1261-1270.

[56]

齐曼·尤努斯, 木合塔尔·扎热, 塔衣尔·艾合买提. 干旱胁迫下尖果沙枣幼苗的根系活力和光合特性[J]. 应用生态学报, 2011, 22(7): 1789-1795.

[57]

Qi Man Yunusi, Muhtar Zare, Tayir Ahmat. Root activity and photosynthetic characteristics of Elaeagnus oxycarpa seedlings under drought stress [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2011, 22(7): 1789-1795(in Chinese with English abstract).

[58]

李硕, 李美玄, 刘英卉, 等. 干旱-复水处理对吉林文冠果幼苗生理特性和光合参数的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2023, 51(18): 134-143.

[59]

Li S, Li M X, Liu Y H, et al. Influences of drought-rewatering on physiological characteristics and photosynthetic parameters of Xanthoceras sorbifolia seedlings in Jilin Province [J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 51(18): 134-143(in Chinese with English abstract).

[60]

尤超, 沈虹, 张营营, 等. 油桃生理特性对水分胁迫的响应[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2018, 46(16): 98-101.

[61]

You C, Shen H, Zhang Y Y, et al. Response of physiological characteristics of nectarine seedlings to water stress[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 46(16): 98-101(in Chinese with English abstract).

[62]

郝晶, 姚立蓉, 汪军成, 等. 不同基因型大麦苗期对干旱胁迫的响应及 HvPIPs 基因表达特征分析[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2023, 41(4): 41-50,60.

[63]

Hao J, Yao L R, Wang J C, et al. Response of different genotypes of barley to drought stress at seedling stage and analysis of HvPIPs gene expression characteristics [J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2023, 41(4): 41-50, 60(in Chinese with English abstract).

基金资助

江苏省农业科技自主创新资金项目(CX(22)3050)

中国博士后科学基金项目(2022M721654)

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (1779KB)

0

访问

0

被引

详细

导航
相关文章

AI思维导图

/

〈 〉