湟水干流浮游植物群落结构特征及生态健康评价

耿昭克 ,  贾洁 ,  时璐 ,  陆丹

河南师范大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (4) : 53 -59.

PDF (6140KB)
河南师范大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (4) : 53 -59. DOI: 10.16366/j.cnki.1000-2367.2025.05.29.0002
湿地修复与水体健康评价研究专题

湟水干流浮游植物群落结构特征及生态健康评价

作者信息 +

Characterization of phytoplankton community structure and ecological health assessment of the mainstream of the Huangshui River

Author information +
文章历史 +
PDF (6286K)

摘要

基于2024年3月(枯水期)、5月(平水期)、8月(丰水期)采集的湟水干流浮游植物定性定量样品,分析了浮游植物群落的结构特征,并进行功能群划分,结果表明:1)湟水干流共鉴定出浮游植物8门128种,硅藻门占比最大,其次为绿藻门和蓝藻门.浮游植物丰富度和生物量均呈现出枯水期最大,平水期次之,丰水期最小的趋势. 2)湟水干流浮游植物共划分19个功能群,优势功能群共7个,分别为 C、D、LM、MP、TD、W1、和 Y.浮游植物 H 指数、J 指数D 指数和Qr 指数均值分别为3. 58、0. 71,3. 60和4. 03,表明除东大滩水库出口以外,湟水干流水质整体处于寡污、轻污水平,为“优秀”的生态健康状态. 3)DO、WT、NH3-N、TN 为影响湟水干流浮游植物结构和优势功能群组成的最主要环境因子.

Abstract

Based on the qualitative and quantitative samples of phytoplankton collected from the mainstream of the Huangshui River in March 2024 (low water period), May (normal water period), and August (high water period), the structural characteristics of the phytoplankton community were analysed and functional groups were classified. The following results were noted: 1) Totally 128 species of phytoplankton belonging to 8 phyla were identified in the mainstream of the Huangshui River. Diatoms accounted for the largest proportion, followed by green algae and cyanobacteria. The abundance and biomass of phytoplankton showed a trend of maximum during low water period, followed by medium level during the normal water period, and minimum during high water period. 2) There were 19 functional groups of phytoplankton in the mainstream of the Huangshui, with 7 dominant functional groups, respectively C, D, LM, MP, TD, W1. The mean values of the H index, J index, D index, and Q r index for phytoplankton were 3.58, 0.71, 3.60, and 4.03, respectively, indicating that with the exception of the outlet of the Dongdatan Reservoir, the water quality of the mainstream of the Huangshui River was generally low to moderately polluted, representing an "excellent" state of ecological health. 3) DO, WT, NH 3-N and TN were the primary environmental factors influencing the phytoplankton structure and dominant functional group composition in the mainstem of the Huangshui River.

关键词

湟水干流 / 浮游植物 / 功能群 / 生态健康评价

Key words

the mainstream of the Huangshui River / phytoplankton / functional groups / ecolgical health assessment

引用本文

引用格式 ▾
耿昭克,贾洁,时璐,陆丹. 湟水干流浮游植物群落结构特征及生态健康评价[J]. 河南师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2026, 54(4): 53-59 DOI:10.16366/j.cnki.1000-2367.2025.05.29.0002

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

参考文献

[1]

陈航, 关现, 曹樱樱, 等 . 浙江省安地水库浮游植物群落结构特征及生态健康评价[J]. 水生生物学报, 2025, 49(5): 146-157.

[2]

Chen H, Guan X, Cao YY, et al. Characterization of phytoplankton community structure and ecological health assessment of andi reservoir in Zhejiang Province[J]. Acta Hydrobiologica Sinica, 2025, 49(5): 146-157.

[3]

Reynolds CS, Huszar V, Kruk C, et al. Towards a functional classification of the freshwater phytoplankton[J]. Journal of Plankton Research, 2002, 24(5): 417-428.

[4]

Padisák J, Crossetti LO, Naselli-Flores L . Use and misuse in the application of the phytoplankton functional classification: a critical review with updates[J]. Hydrobiologia, 2009, 621(1): 9645.

[5]

胡韧, 蓝于倩, 肖利娟, 等 . 淡水浮游植物功能群的概念、划分方法和应用[J]. 湖泊科学, 2015, 27(1): 11-23.

[6]

Hu R, Lan Y Q, Xiao LJ, et al. The concepts, classification and application of freshwater phytoplankton functional groups[J]. Journal of Lake Sciences, 2015, 27(1): 11-23.

[7]

陆丹, 耿昭克, 闵敏, 等 . 基于区间型贝叶斯模型的湟水干流水质评价[J]. 水利水运工程学报, 2020(2): 15-21.

[8]

Lu D, Geng ZK, Min M, et al. Water quality evaluation in Huangshui mainstream based on interval type Bayesian model[J]. Hydro-Science and Engineering, 2020(2): 15-21.

[9]

卓丰金, 杨中文, 高鑫, 等 . 湟水河流域大型底栖动物功能摄食类群时空分布特征及生态系统属性评价[J]. 生态毒理学报, 2025, 20(1): 123-139.

[10]

Zhuo FJ, Yang Z W, Gao X, et al. Temporal-spatial distribution characteristics of benthic macroinverte-brates functional feeding groups and ecosystem attributes evaluation in Huangshui River Basin[J]. Asian Journal of Ecotoxicology, 2025, 20(1): 123-139.

[11]

樊立娟, 黎嵘岚, 高举. 基于ELECTREⅢ的湟水流域水资源可持续利用能力评价[J]. 人民长江, 2025, 56(1): 110-116.

[12]

Fan LJ, Li RL, Gao J. Evaluation of sustainable utilization capacity of water resources in Huangshui Basin based on ELECTRE Ⅲ method[J]. Yangtze River, 2025, 56(1): 110-116.

[13]

青海省水利厅 . 青海河湖概览[M]. 武汉: 长江出版社, 2018: 87-88.

[14]

齐雨藻 . 中国淡水藻志-第十卷-硅藻门,羽纹纲(无壳缝目拟壳缝目):硅藻门羽纹纲(无壳缝目拟壳缝目)[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2004.

[15]

胡鸿钧, 魏印心 . 中国淡水藻类:系统、分类及生态[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2006.

[16]

方金龙, 王仕禄, 王雨春, 等 . 怒江和澜沧江上游段河流浮游植物群落特征及其水生态驱动作用[J]. 生态学杂志, 2025, 44(12): 4052-4061.

[17]

Fang JL, Wang SL, Wang YC, et al. Characteristics of phytoplankton communities and their hydroecological drivers in the Nujiang River basin and the upper section of Lancang River basin[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2025, 44(12): 4052-4061.

[18]

刘画眉, 林美兰, 徐林春, 等 . 利用流域水文站进行无资料河段径流分析[J]. 中国农村水利水电, 2015(1): 53-57.

[19]

Liu HM, Lin ML, Xu LC, et al. Runoff analysis of river reach without data by using watershed hydrological station[J]. China Rural Water and Hydropower, 2015(1): 53-57.

[20]

罗敏纳, 孙蓓丽, 朱冰川, 等 . 太湖流域浮游植物功能类群分布特征及其与环境因子的关系[J]. 湖泊科学, 2022, 34(5): 1471-1483.

[21]

Luo MN, Sun BL, Zhu BC, et al. Distribution characteristics of phytoplankton functional groups and their relationship with environmental factors in Taihu Basin[J]. Journal of Lake Sciences, 2022, 34(5): 1471-1483.

[22]

李慧, 刘妍, 范亚文, 等 . 三江平原湿地同江地区水域夏季浮游植物群落结构特征[J]. 植物学报, 2014, 49(4): 440-449.

[23]

Li H, Liu Y, Fan YW, et al. Community structure characteristics of phytoplankton in Tongjiang of the Sanjiang Plain wetland[J]. Bulletin of Botany, 2014, 49(4): 440-449.

[24]

丁一桐. 黄河干流浮游植物生物地理格局及其水环境指示作用有效性研究[D]. 西安: 西安理工大学, 2023.

[25]

Ding YT. Biogeographic pattern of phytoplankton and its effectiveness as an indicator of water quality in the yellow river mainstream[D]. Xi'an: Xi'an University of Technology, 2023.

基金资助

国家重点研发项目(2022YFC3201703-02)

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (6140KB)

0

访问

0

被引

详细

导航
相关文章

AI思维导图

/

〈 〉