新型防冲液压支架抗冲击特性研究

王成龙 ,  石敬龙 ,  尚欢 ,  张继伟 ,  王雪亭

应用力学学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (1) : 79 -92.

PDF (10778KB)
应用力学学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (1) : 79 -92. DOI: 10.11776/j.issn.1000-4939.2026.01.007
动力学与控制

新型防冲液压支架抗冲击特性研究

作者信息 +

Impact resistance characteristics of new anti-impact hydraulic support

Author information +
文章历史 +
PDF (11036K)

摘要

针对现有液压支架抗冲击支护结构无法实现主动让位、让压等问题,在前期复合式抗冲击装置的研究基础上,对基于复合式抗冲击装置的新型防冲液压支架的抗冲击特性进行了深入研究,构建了新型防冲液压支架冲击动力学模型,探究了复合式抗冲击装置的最优安装位置,研究了不同载荷和不同电流条件下复合式抗冲击装置对液压支架抗冲击特性的影响。在理论研究的基础上,试制了产品样机并进行了试验验证。研究结果显示:复合式抗冲击装置可以有效降低冲击峰值力,当复合式抗冲击装置通0、1、2 A电流时,在1.1倍工作载荷的冲击力下,冲击峰值力分别降低了2.23%、1.68%、1.11%;在1.25倍工作载荷下的冲击力下,冲击峰值力分别降低了4.41%、3.22%、2.01%;在1.4倍工作载荷的冲击力下,冲击峰值力分别降低了7.62%、5.81%、3.23%。结合冲击动力学模型,研究了改进Bang-Bang控制与模糊PID(proportional-intergral-derivative)控制的半主动控制策略,建立了仿真模型,研究结果表明:复合式抗冲击装置可以实现主动让位与主动让压,并能够提升抗冲击装置的吸能量、减小立柱所受冲击的峰值力。

Abstract

Aiming at the problem that the existing anti-impact support structure of hydraulic support cannot achieve displacement and pressure release, based on the previous research of composite anti-impact resistance device, the anti-impact resistance characteristics of new anti-impact hydraulic support based on composite impact resistance device were studied in this paper. The impact dynamic model of the new anti-impact hydraulic support was constructed, and the optimal installation position of the composite anti-impact device was explored. The influence of the composite anti-impact device on the impact resistance of the hydraulic support under different loads and different currents was studied. Based on the theoretical research, the prototype of the product was trial-produced and verified by experiments. The results show that the anti-impact peak force can be effectively reduced by the composite anti-impact device. When the composite impact device is connected with 0 A, 1 A and 2 A currents, the impact peak force is reduced by 2.23%, 1.68% and 1.11%, respectively, under the impact force of 1.1 times the working load. Under the impact force of 1.25 times the working load, the peak impact force is reduced by 4.41%, 3.22% and 2.01%, respectively. Under the impact force of 1.4 times the working load, the impact peak force is reduced by 7.62%, 5.81% and 3.23%, respectively. Combined with the anti-impact dynamics model, the active control strategy of improved Bang-Bang control and fuzzy PID control is studied, and the simulation model is established. The results show that the composite anti-impact device can realize active displacement release and active pressure release, and the energy absorption of the anti-impact device can be improved and the peak force of the impact on the column can be reduced.

关键词

防冲液压支架 / 动力学模型 / 抗冲击特性 / 半主动控制 / 试验验证

Key words

anti-impact hydraulic support / dynamic model / impact resistance characteristic / semi-active control / experimental verification

引用本文

引用格式 ▾
王成龙,石敬龙,尚欢,张继伟,王雪亭. 新型防冲液压支架抗冲击特性研究[J]. 应用力学学报, 2026, 43(1): 79-92 DOI:10.11776/j.issn.1000-4939.2026.01.007

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

参考文献

[1]

潘一山, 李忠华, 章梦涛. 我国冲击地压分布、类型、机理及防治研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2003, 22(11): 1844-1851.

[2]

PAN Yishan, LI Zhonghua, ZHANG Mengtao. Distribution, type, mechanism and prevention of rockbrust in China[J]. Chinese journal of rock mechanics and engineering, 2003, 22(11): 1844-1851 (in Chinese).

[3]

姜耀东, 赵毅鑫, 刘文岗, 等. 煤岩冲击失稳的机理和实验研究[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2009.

[4]

王国法. 液压支架技术体系研究与实践[J]. 煤炭学报, 2010, 35(11): 1903-1908.

[5]

WANG Guofa. Study and practices on technical system of hydraulic powered supports[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2010, 35(11): 1903-1908(in Chinese).

[6]

曹连民, 孙云鲁, 庞斌, 等. 液压支架制造工艺技术研究[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2016, 44(4): 83-88.

[7]

CAO Lianmin, SUN Yunlu, PANG Bin, et al. Study on manufacturing technology of hydraulic powered support[J]. Coal science and technology, 2016, 44(4): 83-88(in Chinese).

[8]

王国法, 李前, 赵志礼, 等. 强矿压冲击工作面巷道冲击倾向性测试与超前支护系统研究[J]. 山东科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 30(4): 1-9.

[9]

WANG Guofa, LI Qian, ZHAO Zhili, et al. The impact tendentiousness testing of working faces and roadways with strong rock burst and fore support system[J]. Journal of Shandong University of Science and Technology(natural science), 2011, 30(4): 1-9 (in Chinese).

[10]

王春华, 安达, 韩冲, 等. 冲击地压新型加肋板圆管式吸能防冲构件的仿真与试验[J]. 振动与冲击, 2019, 38(11): 203-210.

[11]

WANG Chunhua, AN Da, HAN Chong, et al. Simulation and tests for new tubular type energy-absorbing and anti-impact members with stiffened plate under rock burst[J]. Journal of vibration and shock, 2019, 38(11): 203-210 (in Chinese).

[12]

YAO S G, HUO Y F, YAN K B, et al. Crashworthiness study on circular hybrid corrugated tubes under axial impacts[J]. Thin-walled structures, 2019, 145: 106358.

[13]

DENG X L, LIU W Y. Experimental and numerical investigation of a novel sandwich sinusoidal lateral corrugated tubular structure under axial compression[J]. International journal of mechanical sciences, 2019, 151: 274-287.

[14]

GHASEMI A, SHAKERI M, VANINI S A S. A multi-objective optimization of energy absorption properties of thin-walled circular tube with combined bar extrusion under quasi-static axial loading: experiments and numerical simulation[J]. International journal of mechanical sciences, 2020, 180: 105691.

[15]

TIAN K, ZHANG Y, YANG F, et al. Enhancing energy absorption of circular tubes under oblique loads through introducing grooves of non-uniform depths[J]. International journal of mechanical sciences, 2020, 166: 105239.

[16]

董双勇, 褚晓威. 矿用锚杆吸能防冲支护构件的设计与分析[J]. 煤矿机械, 2020, 41(11): 62-64.

[17]

DONG Shuangyong, CHU Xiaowei. Design and analysis of energy absorption and rock burst prevention support component for mine bolt[J]. Coal mine machinery, 2020, 41(11): 62-64(in Chinese).

[18]

宋嘉祺. 冲击地压巷道支架防冲性能及优化设计[D]. 北京: 北方工业大学, 2020.

[19]

许海亮, 郭旭, 宋义敏, 等. 新型矿用圆弧形薄壁防冲吸能装置屈曲特性数值分析[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2021, 17(9): 90-96.

[20]

XU Hailiang, GUO Xu, SONG Yimin, et al. Numerical analysis on buckling characteristics of a new circular arc thin-wall anti-impact and energy-absorbing device for mine[J]. Journal of safety science and technology, 2021, 17(9): 90-96(in Chinese).

[21]

王爱文, 范德威, 潘一山, 等. 扩胀-摩擦式吸能防冲锚索及其力学特性[J]. 煤炭学报, 2022, 47(2): 695-710.

[22]

WANG Aiwen, FAN Dewei, PAN Yishan, et al. Expansion-friction energy-absorption anti-impact cable and its mechanical characteristics[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2022, 47(2): 695-710(in Chinese).

[23]

GUO C H, MAO J, XIE M. Analysis of energy absorption characteristics of corrugated top beams of anti-impact hydraulic supports[J]. Alexandria engineering journal, 2022, 61(5): 3757-3772.

[24]

WANG C L, CHEN Y F, ZENG Q L, et al. Simulation and experiment of a kind of thin-walled tube crushing member used for anti-impact column[J]. Shock and vibration, 2021, 2021(1): 6624934.

[25]

HAN C, KANG B H, CHOI S B, et al. Control of landing efficiency of an aircraft landing gear system with magnetorheological dampers[J]. Journal of aircraft, 2019, 56(5): 1980-1986.

[26]

KIM B G, YOON D S, KIM G W, et al. Design of a novel magnetorheological damper adaptable to low and high stroke velocity of vehicle suspension system[J]. Applied sciences, 2020, 10(16): 5586.

[27]

AZIZ M A, AMINOSSADATI S M. State-of-the-art developments of bypass magnetorheological (MR) dampers:a review[J]. Korea-Australia rheology journal, 2021, 33(3): 225-249.

[28]

LÜ H Z, ZHANG S S, SUN Q, et al. The dynamic models, control strategies and applications for magnetorheological damping systems:a systematic review[J]. Journal of vibration engineering & technologies, 2021, 9(1): 131-147.

[29]

LUONG Q V, JANG D S, HWANG J H. Robust adaptive control for an aircraft landing gear equipped with a magnetorheological damper[J]. Applied sciences, 2020, 10(4): 1459.

[30]

JIANG M, RUI X T, ZHU W, et al. Design and control of helicopter main reducer vibration isolation platform with magnetorheological dampers[J]. International journal of mechanics and materials in design, 2021, 17(2): 345-366.

[31]

BHAIYA V, BHARTI S D, SHRIMALI M K, et al. Hybrid seismic control of buildings using tuned mass and magnetorheological dampers[J]. Proceedings of the institution of civil engineers-structures and buildings, 2020, 173(7): 471-487.

[32]

BAGHERKHANI A, BAGHLANI A. Reliability assessment and seismic control of irregular structures by magnetorheological fluid dampers[J]. Journal of intelligent material systems and structures, 2021, 32(16): 1813-1830.

[33]

BAGHERKHANI A, BAGHLANI A. Reliability assessment of MR fluid dampers in passive and semi-active seismic control of structures[J]. Probabilistic engineering mechanics, 2021, 63: 103114.

[34]

李赵春, 顾权, 周冰倩, 等. 冲击缓冲用磁流变阻尼器的响应特性模型与实验研究[J]. 振动与冲击, 2018, 37(5): 163-168.

[35]

LI Zhaochun, GU Quan, ZHOU Bingqian, et al. Modeling and tests for response features of MR damper as a shock isolation device[J]. Journal of vibration and shock, 2018, 37(5): 163-168(in Chinese).

[36]

潘炜, 闫政涛, 朱石坚. 基于模糊PID控制的磁流变半主动抗冲击系统最优设计研究[J]. 海军工程大学学报, 2019, 31(3): 28-31.

[37]

PAN Wei, YAN Zhengtao, ZHU Shijian. Research on optimal design of MR semi-active resistance system based on fuzzy PID control[J]. Journal of Naval University of Engineering, 2019, 31(3): 28-31(in Chinese).

[38]

杨辉静, 陈巍, 陈冬. 冲击载荷下磁流变阻尼器内部磁场动态数值计算与瞬态试验测试[J]. 应用力学学报, 2020, 37(4): 1756-1762.

[39]

YANG Huijing, CHEN Wei, CHEN Dong. Dynamic numerical simulation analysis and transient experimental test of internal magnetic field for magneto-rheological damper during the impact[J]. Chinese journal of applied mechanics, 2020, 37(4): 1756-1762 (in Chinese).

[40]

白先旭, 杨森. 磁流变半主动落锤冲击缓冲系统的“软着陆”控制试验与分析[J]. 机械工程学报, 2021, 57(1): 121-127.

[41]

BAI Xianxu, YANG Sen. Experimental test and analysis of "soft-landing" control for drop-induced shock systems using magnetorheological energy absorber[J]. Journal of mechanical engineering, 2021, 57(1): 121-127(in Chinese).

[42]

张超, 韩晓明, 李强, 等. 自动榴弹发射器磁流变缓冲器设计及特性分析[J]. 弹箭与制导学报, 2021, 41(2): 25-29.

[43]

ZHANG Chao, HAN Xiaoming, LI Qiang, et al. Design and characteristic analysis of magnetorheological buffer for automatic grenade launcher[J]. Journal of projectiles, rockets, missiles and guidance, 2021, 41(2): 25-29(in Chinese).

[44]

王成龙, 苗根远, 刘延玺, 等. 基于磁流变缓冲的液压支架抗冲击技术研究[J]. 液压与气动, 2021, 45(6): 33-40.

[45]

WANG Chenglong, MIAO Genyuan, LIU Yanxi, et al. Anti shock support based on MR damper[J]. Chinese hydraulics & pneumatics, 2021, 45(6): 33-40(in Chinese).

[46]

山东科技大学. 一种复合式抗冲击装置及其应用:CN112923002A:CN202110201245.0[P]. 2021-06-08.

[47]

王成龙, 陈一方, 王成乐. 冲击地压薄壁圆管吸能构件仿真与试验研究[J]. 煤炭工程, 2021, 53(5): 142-147.

[48]

WANG Chenglong, CHEN Yifang, WANG Chengle. Simulation and experiment on energy-absorbing component of thin-walled round pipe under rock burst[J]. Coal engineering, 2021, 53(5): 142-147(in Chinese).

[49]

山东科技大学. 一种用于冲击地压工况下液压支架性能的综合试验系统及应用:CN202010080318.0[P]. 2020-06-05.

基金资助

国家自然科学基金资助项目(51974170)

国家自然科学基金资助项目(52274132)

山东省重点研发计划(重大科技创新工程)资助项目(2020CXGC011502)

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (10778KB)

121

访问

0

被引

详细

导航
相关文章

AI思维导图

/

〈 〉