基于生死单元技术的河流穿越管道力学规律研究

伍颖 ,  李都

应用力学学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (1) : 200 -212.

PDF (7430KB)
应用力学学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (1) : 200 -212. DOI: 10.11776/j.issn.1000-4939.2026.01.019
流体力学

基于生死单元技术的河流穿越管道力学规律研究

作者信息 +

Study on the mechanical laws of river crossing pipeline based on life and death units technology

Author information +
文章历史 +
PDF (7608K)

摘要

为了研究河流穿越管道从埋地到上方覆土逐渐减少以致管道完全悬空这一过程的力学特性,本研究采用ABAQUS有限元软件,基于生死单元技术建立X80输气管道上方覆土逐渐减少以致管道悬空长度不断增加的动态有限元模型;分析洪水流速、下切角度、径厚比、运行内压和埋深对河流穿越管道力学行为的影响规律;通过敏感性分析获取各影响因素对河流穿越管道应力的影响程度并排序。研究结果表明:不同参数下的管道最大等效应力、位移和应变在悬空20~30 m期间增长最快;洪水流速、管径和运行内压与最大等效应力呈正相关,管道壁厚与最大等效应力呈负相关,下切角度在悬空过程中与最大等效应力呈正相关,在悬空到一定长度时,下切角度和埋深对最大等效应力影响不大,但下切角度与位移呈正相关,埋深与位移成负相关;各影响因素对河流穿越管道最大等效应力的影响程度排序为管道壁厚>洪水流速>运行内压>埋深>下切角度,以期为管道规划、设计要求提供依据并改进,以提高其安全性。

Abstract

In order to study the mechanical properties of the process of the river crossing pipeline from the buried to the overlying soil gradually reduced so that the pipeline is completely suspended, this paper uses ABAQUS finite element software to establish a dynamic finite element model based on the life and death units technology for an X80 gas pipeline, where the length of pipeline suspension gradually increases as the overlying soil decreases. The paper analyzes the effects of flood flow velocity, undercut angle, diameter-thickness ratio, operating internal pressure, and burial depth on the mechanical behavior of river crossing pipelines. Sensitivity analysis is used to obtain the degree of influence of each factor on the stress of the river crossing pipeline and rank them accordingly. The results show that the maximum equivalent stress, displacement, and strain of the pipeline under different parameters increase the fastest during the 20-30 m suspension period. The maximum equivalent stress is positively correlated with flood flow velocity, diameter, and operating internal pressure, while it is negatively correlated with the wall thickness of the pipeline. The undercut angle is positively correlated with the maximum equivalent stress during the suspension process. When the suspension length reaches a certain value, the undercut angle and burial depth have little effect on the maximum equivalent stress. However, the undercut angle is positively correlated with displacement, while the burial depth is negatively correlated with displacement. The degree of influence of each factor on the maximum equivalent stress of the river crossing pipeline is ranked as follows: wall thickness>flood flow velocity>operating internal pressure>burial depth>undercut angle. These findings can provide basis for pipeline planning and design requirements and improve its safety.

关键词

悬空管道 / 悬空长度 / 力学规律 / 敏感性分析 / 数值模拟

Key words

suspension pipeline / suspended length / mechanics principles / sensitivity analysis / numerical simulation

引用本文

引用格式 ▾
伍颖,李都. 基于生死单元技术的河流穿越管道力学规律研究[J]. 应用力学学报, 2026, 43(1): 200-212 DOI:10.11776/j.issn.1000-4939.2026.01.019

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

参考文献

[1]

刘鹏, 李玉星, 张宇, 等. 典型地质灾害下埋地管道的应力计算[J]. 油气储运, 2021, 40(2): 157-165.

[2]

LIU Peng, LI Yuxing, ZHANG Yu, et al. Stress calculation of buried pipelines affected by typical geological hazards[J]. Oil & gas storage and transportation, 2021, 40(2): 157-165(in Chinese).

[3]

刘啸奔, 房茂立, 郑倩, 等. 基于PFDHA的X80管道应变失效可靠度计算方法[J]. 应用力学学报, 2022, 39(1): 148-154.

[4]

LIU Xiaoben, FANG Maoli, ZHENG Qian, et al. Reliability calculation method for X80 pipeline's strain failure based on PFDHA[J]. Chinese journal of applied mechanics, 2022, 39(1): 148-154(in Chinese).

[5]

王磊, 赵志超, 蔡强. 洪水对穿河天然气管道载荷影响研究[J]. 油气田地面工程, 2020, 39(5): 47-52.

[6]

WANG Lei, ZHAO Zhichao, CAI Qiang. Study on influence of flood on load of natural gas pipeline crossing river[J]. Oil-gas field surface engineering, 2020, 39(5): 47-52(in Chinese).

[7]

张鹏, 龙会成, 李志翔, 等. 黄土湿陷过程下埋地油气管道力学行为有限元模拟[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2017, 13(5): 48-55.

[8]

ZHANG Peng, LONG Huicheng, LI Zhixiang, et al. Finite element simulation on mechanical behavior of buried oil/gas pipeline in loess collapse process[J]. Journal of safety science and technology, 2017, 13(5): 48-55(in Chinese).

[9]

王利金, 刘锦昆. 埕岛油田海底管道冲刷悬空机理及对策[J]. 油气储运, 2004, 23(1): 44-48.

[10]

WANG Lijin, LIU Jinkun. The scouring span and its control methods for subsea pipeline in Chengdao Oilfield[J]. Oil & gas storage and transportation, 2004, 23(1): 44-48(in Chinese).

[11]

杨兵, 高福平, 吴应湘. 单向海流载荷下海底管道局部冲刷试验研究[J]. 工程力学, 2008, 25(3): 206-210.

[12]

YANG Bing, GAO Fuping, WU Yingxiang. Experimental study on local scour of sandy seabed under submarine pipeline in unidirectional currents[J]. Engineering mechanics, 2008, 25(3): 206-210(in Chinese).

[13]

时米波, 陈国明, 孙友义. 基于管土耦合模型的海底管道管跨涡激振动分析[J]. 石油矿场机械, 2007, 36(10): 5-8.

[14]

SHI Mibo, CHEN Guoming, SUN Youyi. Flow induced vibration analysis on submarine pipeline span based on pipe-soil coupling model[J]. Oil field equipment, 2007, 36(10): 5-8(in Chinese).

[15]

王晓霖, 帅健. 洪水中漂浮管道的应力分析[J]. 工程力学, 2011, 28(2): 212-216.

[16]

WANG Xiaolin, SHUAI Jian. Stress analysis of pipeline floating in flood[J]. Engineering mechanics, 2011, 28(2): 212-216(in Chinese).

[17]

魏孔瑞, 姚安林, 张照旭, 等. 埋地油气管道悬空沉降变形失效评估方法研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2014, 24(6): 68-73.

[18]

WEI Kongrui, YAO Anlin, ZHANG Zhaoxu, et al. Study on method for assessing failure of settlement and deformation of buried oil and gas suspended pipelines[J]. China safety science journal, 2014, 24(6): 68-73(in Chinese).

[19]

李思嘉, 段庆全, 张宏, 等. 洪水中悬跨管道加装防护索的力学行为及布索方案[J]. 天然气工业, 2016, 36(2): 102-109.

[20]

LI Sijia, DUAN Qingquan, ZHANG Hong, et al. Mechanical behaviors of protection cables installed on free-spanning pipelines in floods and its installation program[J]. Natural gas industry, 2016, 36(2): 102-109(in Chinese).

[21]

王慧, 马峻, 曹梦凡. 洪水冲击下法兰连接管道失效水速和长度研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(2): 99-103.

[22]

WANG Hui, MA Jun, CAO Mengfan. Study on failure water velocity and length of flanged pipe under impact of flood[J]. China safety science journal, 2018, 28(2): 99-103(in Chinese).

[23]

詹婷雯, 陈利琼, 徐佳, 等. 洪水作用下马惠宁穿越管道的应力分析[J]. 应用力学学报, 2019, 36(3): 625-630.

[24]

ZHAN Tingwen, CHEN Liqiong, XU Jia, et al. Stress analysis of Ma Huining cut-crossing pipeline in the flood[J]. Chinese journal of applied mechanics, 2019, 36(3): 625-630(in Chinese).

[25]

薛俊卓, 詹辉, 张国良, 等. 长输油气管道河沟段水毁灾害气象风险评价研究[J]. 安全与环境工程, 2020, 27(2): 168-174.

[26]

XUE Junzhuo, ZHAN Hui, ZHANG Guoliang, et al. Meteorological risk assessment of river channel washout disaster of long-distance oil and gas pipelines[J]. Safety and environmental engineering, 2020, 27(2): 168-174(in Chinese).

[27]

LIU M M, JIN X, WANG L, et al. Numerical investigation of local scour around a vibrating pipeline under steady currents[J]. Ocean engineering, 2021, 221: 108546.

[28]

YAO W D, DRAPER S, AN H W, et al. Experimental study of local scour around submerged compound piles in steady current[J]. Coastal engineering, 2021, 165: 103831.

[29]

王新慧, 李恒, 李兵, 等. 基于ANSYS的洪水漂浮管道的有限元分析与安全评估[J]. 中国特种设备安全, 2022, 38(7): 51-54.

[30]

WANG Xinhui, LI Heng, LI Bing, et al. Finite element analysis and safety assessment of flood floating pipeline based on ANSYS[J]. China special equipment safety, 2022, 38(7): 51-54(in Chinese).

[31]

赵林, 冯启民. 埋地管线有限元建模方法研究[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2001, 21(2): 53-57.

[32]

ZHAO Lin, FENG Qimin. Research on methods for establishing FEM model of buried pipelines[J]. Earthquake engineering and engineering vibration, 2001, 21(2): 53-57(in Chinese).

[33]

HILL R. On discontinuous plastic states, with special reference to localized necking in thin sheets[J]. Journal of the mechanics and physics of solids, 1952, 1(1): 19-30.

[34]

马廷霞, 吴锦强, 唐愚, 等. 成品油管道的极限悬空长度研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2012, 34(4): 165-173.

[35]

MA Tingxia, WU Jinqiang, TANG Yu, et al. Maximum suspended length of production pipeline[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(science & technology edition), 2012, 34(4): 165-173(in Chinese).

[36]

国家发展和改革委员会. 输油(气)钢质管道抗震设计规范: SY/T 0450-2004[S]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2004.

[37]

唐华辉, 田晨. 河流油气管道动应力特性及悬跨安全性分析[J]. 力学与实践, 2016, 38(6): 631-635.

[38]

TANG Huahui, TIAN Chen. Dynamic stress analysis and suspended span management for the crossing river oil and gas pipeline[J]. Mechanics in engineering, 2016, 38(6): 631-635(in Chinese).

[39]

郑金海, 鲍仕昱, 张蔚, 等. 河床下切对珠江三角洲峰值水位演变的影响[J]. 河海大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 50(4): 1-6.

[40]

ZHENG Jinhai, BAO Shiyu, ZHANG Wei, et al. Effect of channel deepening on the evolution of peak water level in the Pearl River Delta[J]. Journal of Hohai University(natural sciences), 2022, 50(4): 1-6(in Chinese).

[41]

于合理, 夏叶, 王之晗, 等. 采砂坑纵剖面尺寸对卵石河道河床演变影响数值试验——以石亭江双盛段为例[J]. 工程科学与技术, 2017, 49(增刊2): 83-91.

[42]

YU Heli, XIA Ye, WANG Zhihan, et al. Numerical simulation study on effect of different longitudinal profile dimensions of sandpit on riverbed evolution of pebble channel-a case of Shuangsheng Section of Shiting River[J]. Advanced engineering sciences, 2017, 49(S2): 83-91(in Chinese).

[43]

姚安林, 赵璐, 陈谦, 等. 埋地管道强夯动力响应对土体参数的敏感性分析[J]. 天然气工业, 2017, 37(7): 94-100.

[44]

YAO Anlin, ZHAO Lu, CHEN Qian, et al. Sensitivity of dynamic response of buried line pipes under dynamic compaction to soil parameters[J]. Natural gas industry, 2017, 37(7): 94-100(in Chinese).

基金资助

四川省科技计划资助项目(2019YFS0075)

四川省科技计划资助项目(2020YJ0153)

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (7430KB)

74

访问

0

被引

详细

导航
相关文章

AI思维导图

/

〈 〉