原位注热开采下裂缝形态对油页岩层热解影响分析

唐巨鹏 ,  张枭 ,  余泓浩 ,  赵亚茹

应用力学学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (1) : 213 -223.

PDF (10016KB)
应用力学学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (1) : 213 -223. DOI: 10.11776/j.issn.1000-4939.2026.01.020
流体力学

原位注热开采下裂缝形态对油页岩层热解影响分析

作者信息 +

Effect of fracture morphology on pyrolysis of oil shale layer under in-situ heat injection mining

Author information +
文章历史 +
PDF (10256K)

摘要

针对油页岩原位注热开采过程中裂缝形态对储层热解的影响效果不明,无法准确判断实际热解效率的难题。以抚顺油页岩储层为研究对象,采用数值模拟方法,建立了热-流-固三场耦合的数值模型,验证了模型的可靠性,探究油页岩2种裂缝形态(水力压裂裂缝、平行层理裂缝)注热开采过程的差异性,得到储层温度、注汽压力、地层垂直位移及上下岩层温度随注热时间变化规律。结果表明:在平行层理裂缝中油页岩储层存在多条热解路径,而水力压裂裂缝中油页岩储层基于网状高温通道均匀热解;水力压裂裂缝相较于平行层理裂缝具有更好的连通性,仅需50 d油页岩层平均温度可以达到有机质热解所需温度;开采结束后,平行层理裂缝与水力压裂裂缝模型地层最大垂直位移分别为0.14、0.12 m,距离注热井越近的岩层垂直位移越大;上下岩层由于油页岩层热量逸散所形成的高温(>100 ℃)区域面积分别为521.11、650.93 m2,水力压裂裂缝模型热量损耗更多。现场油页岩原位注热开采时需合理调节注热时长并使水力裂缝远离油页岩储层上下边界,避免高温高压蒸汽热量耗散。

Abstract

In view of the problem that the influence of fracture morphology on reservoir pyrolysis during in-situ thermal injection and exploitation of oil shale is unknown,and the actual pyrolysis efficiency cannot be accurately judged. Taking Fushun oil shale reservoir as the research object,a numerical simulation method was used to establish a numerical model of thermal-fluid-structure coupling,which compared with the previous results to verify the reliability of the model,explore the difference in the heat injection and exploitation process of the two fracture morphologies (hydraulic fracturing fracture and parallel stratum fracture) in oil shale,and obtain the variation law of reservoir temperature,steam injection pressure,vertical displacement of formation and upper and lower rock layer temperature with heat injection time. The results show that there are multiple pyrolysis paths in oil shale reservoirs in parallel fractures,while oil shale reservoirs in hydraulic fracturing fractures are uniformly pyrolyzed based on network high temperature channels. Compared with parallel fractures,hydraulic fracturing fractures have better connectivity,and the average temperature of oil shale layer can reach the temperature required for organic matter pyrolysis in only 50 days. After the end of mining,the maximum vertical displacement of parallel strata fracture and hydraulic fracturing fracture model strata was 0.14 m and 0.12 m,respectively,and the vertical displacement of the rock layer closer to the heat injection well was greater. The areas of high temperature (>100 ℃) formed by the heat dissipation of oil shale layer in the upper and lower rock formations are 521.11 m2 and 650.93 m2,respectively,and the heat loss in the hydraulic fracturing fracture model is more. During the in-situ heat injection exploitation of on-site oil shale,it is necessary to reasonably adjust the heat injection time and keep the hydraulic cracks away from the upper and lower boundaries of the oil shale reservoir to avoid high temperature and high pressure steam heat dissipation.

关键词

油页岩 / 原位注热开采 / 裂缝形态 / 平行层理裂缝 / 水力压裂裂缝

Key words

oil shale / in-situ heat injection mining / crack morphology / parallel bedding fractures / hydraulic fracturing crack

引用本文

引用格式 ▾
唐巨鹏,张枭,余泓浩,赵亚茹. 原位注热开采下裂缝形态对油页岩层热解影响分析[J]. 应用力学学报, 2026, 43(1): 213-223 DOI:10.11776/j.issn.1000-4939.2026.01.020

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

参考文献

[1]

KANG Z Q, ZHAO Y S, YANG D. Review of oil shale in-situ conversion technology[J]. Applied energy, 2020, 269: 115121.

[2]

LIU Z J, MENG Q T, DONG Q S, et al. Characteristics and resource potential of oil shale in China[J]. Oil shale, 2017, 34(1): 15-41.

[3]

刘德勋, 王红岩, 郑德温, 等. 世界油页岩原位开采技术进展[J]. 天然气工业, 2009, 29(5): 128-132.

[4]

LIU Dexun, WANG Hongyan, ZHENG Dewen, et al. World progress of oil shale in-situ exploitation methods[J]. Natural gas industry, 2009, 29(5): 128-132(in Chinese).

[5]

刘招君, 董清水, 叶松青, 等. 中国油页岩资源现状[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2006, 36(6): 869-876.

[6]

LIU Zhaojun, DONG Qingshui, YE Songqing, et al. The situation of oil shale resources in China[J]. Journal of Jilin University(earth science edition), 2006, 36(6): 869-876(in Chinese).

[7]

柳蓉, 刘招君. 国内外油页岩资源现状及综合开发潜力分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2006, 36(6): 892-898.

[8]

LIU Rong, LIU Zhaojun. Oil shale resource situation and multi-purpose development potential in China and abroad[J]. Journal of Jilin University(earth science edition), 2006, 36(6): 892-898(in Chinese).

[9]

NEI L, KRUUSMA J, IVASK M, et al. Novel approaches to bioindication of heavy metals in soils contaminated by oil shale wastes[J]. Oil shale, 2009, 26(3): 424-431.

[10]

孙友宏, 郭威, 邓孙华. 油页岩地下原位转化与钻采技术现状及发展趋势[J]. 钻探工程, 2021, 48(1): 57-67.

[11]

SUN Youhong, GUO Wei, DENG Sunhua. The status and development trend of in-situ conversion and drilling exploitation technology for oil shale[J]. Drilling engineering, 2021, 48(1): 57-67(in Chinese).

[12]

ZHAO J, YANG L S, YANG D, et al. Study on pore and fracture evolution characteristics of oil shale pyrolysed by high-temperature water vapour[J]. Oil shale, 2022, 39(1): 79-95.

[13]

KANG Z Q, XIE H Y, ZHAO Y S, et al. The feasibility of in-situ steam injection technology for oil shale underground retorting[J]. Oil shale, 2020, 37(2): 119-138.

[14]

太原理工大学. 对流加热油页岩开采油气的方法:CN200510012473.4[P]. 2010-05-05.

[15]

KANG Z Q, ZHAO Y S, YANG D, et al. A pilot investigation of pyrolysis from oil and gas extraction from oil shale by in-situ superheated steam injection[J]. Journal of petroleum science and engineering, 2020, 186: 106785.

[16]

WANG L, YANG D, KANG Z Q, et al. Experimental study on the effects of steam temperature on the pore-fracture evolution of oil shale exposed to the convection heating[J]. Journal of analytical and applied pyrolysis, 2022, 164: 105533.

[17]

康志勤, 李翔, 杨涛, 等. 基于传导、对流不同加热模式的油页岩孔隙结构变化的对比研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2018, 37(11): 2565-2575.

[18]

KANG Zhiqin, LI Xiang, YANG Tao, et al. Comparisons of pore structures of oil shale upon conduction and convection heating[J]. Chinese journal of rock mechanics and engineering, 2018, 37(11): 2565-2575(in Chinese).

[19]

HAN H, ZHONG N N, HUANG C X, et al. Numerical simulation of in situ conversion of continental oil shale in Northeast China[J]. Oil shale, 2016, 33(1): 45-57.

[20]

韩连福, 李学鑫, 刘兴斌. 薄层油页岩电加热原位改性温度场数值模拟[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2021, 21(20): 8522-8526.

[21]

HAN Lianfu, LI Xuexin, LIU Xingbin. Numerical simulation of temperature field in-situ modification of thin oil shale by electric heating[J]. Science technology and engineering, 2021, 21(20): 8522-8526(in Chinese).

[22]

ZHU J Y, YI L P, YANG Z Z, et al. Numerical simulation on the in situ upgrading of oil shale reservoir under microwave heating[J]. Fuel, 2021, 287: 119553.

[23]

王国营, 杨栋, 康志勤, 等. 原位注蒸汽开采横观各向同性油页岩储层的数值研究[J]. 太原理工大学学报, 2020, 51(1): 81-90.

[24]

WANG Guoying, YANG Dong, KANG Zhiqin, et al. Numerical study on in-situ injecting superheated steam thermal recovery of transversely isotropic oil shale reservoir[J]. Journal of Taiyuan University of Technology, 2020, 51(1): 81-90(in Chinese).

[25]

唐巨鹏, 余泓浩, 张昕, 等. 油页岩原位注热开采储层有效热解区变化规律分析[J]. 计算力学学报, 2023, 40(3): 440-446.

[26]

TANG Jupeng, YU Honghao, ZHANG Xin, et al. Analysis on variation of effective pyrolysis zones in reservoir by in-situ heat injection production of oil shale[J]. Chinese journal of computational mechanics, 2023, 40(3): 440-446(in Chinese).

[27]

YANG D, ZHAO Y S, KANG Z Q. Numerical simulation of in situ exploitation of oil shale by injecting high-temperature steam[J]. Oil shale, 2019, 36(4): 483-500.

[28]

WANG G Y, YANG D, KANG Z Q, et al. Numerical investigation of the in situ oil shale pyrolysis process by superheated steam considering the anisotropy of the thermal,hydraulic,and mechanical characteristics of oil shale[J]. Energy & fuels, 2019, 33(12): 12236-12250.

[29]

SAIF T, LIN Q Y, BIJELJIC B, et al. Microstructural imaging and characterization of oil shale before and after pyrolysis[J]. Fuel, 2017, 197: 562-574.

[30]

耿毅德, 梁卫国, 刘剑, 等. 不同温压条件下油页岩孔裂隙结构演化试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2018, 37(11): 2510-2519.

[31]

GENG Yide, LIANG Weiguo, LIU Jian, et al. Experimental study on the variation of pore and fracture structure of oil shale under different temperatures and pressures[J]. Chinese journal of rock mechanics and engineering, 2018, 37(11): 2510-2519(in Chinese).

[32]

王国营, 杨栋, 康志勤. 高温三轴应力作用下油页岩的渗透特征各向异性演化规律实验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2020, 39(6): 1129-1141.

[33]

WANG Guoying, YANG Dong, KANG Zhiqin. Experimental study on anisotropic permeability of oil shale under high temperature and triaxial stress[J]. Chinese journal of rock mechanics and engineering, 2020, 39(6): 1129-1141(in Chinese).

[34]

KANG Z Q, YANG D, ZHAO Y S, et al. Thermal cracking and corresponding permeability of Fushun oil shale[J]. Oil shale, 2011, 28(2): 273-283.

[35]

WANG L, YANG D, ZHAO Y S, et al. Evolution of pore characteristics in oil shale during pyrolysis under convection and conduction heating modes[J]. Oil shale, 2020, 37(3): 224-241.

[36]

KANG Z Q, ZHAO J, YANG D, et al. Study of the evolution of micron-scale pore structure in oil shale at different temperatures[J]. Oil shale, 2017, 34(1): 42-54.

[37]

罗文彬, 马中良, 郑伦举, 等. 海相页岩成岩-成烃过程中孔隙结构的演变——来自热模拟实验的启示[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(5): 540-552.

[38]

LUO Wenbin, MA Zhongliang, ZHENG Lunju, et al. Evolution of pore structure during diagenesis and hydrocarbon generation of marine shale:the inspiration from thermal simulation experiments[J]. Acta petrolei Sinica, 2020, 41(5): 540-552(in Chinese).

[39]

康志勤, 赵阳升, 孟巧荣, 等. 油页岩热破裂规律显微CT实验研究[J]. 地球物理学报, 2009, 52(3): 842-848.

[40]

KANG Zhiqin, ZHAO Yangsheng, MENG Qiaorong, et al. Micro-CT experimental research of oil shale thermal cracking laws[J]. Chinese journal of geophysics, 2009, 52(3): 842-848(in Chinese).

[41]

WANG L, ZHAO Y S, YANG D, et al. Effect of pyrolysis on oil shale using superheated steam:a case study on the Fushun oil shale,China[J]. Fuel, 2019, 253: 1490-1498.

基金资助

国家自然科学基金资助项目(51874165)

辽宁省兴辽英才计划资助项目(XLYC1902106)

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (10016KB)

94

访问

0

被引

详细

导航
相关文章

AI思维导图

/

〈 〉