压气储能作用下断层活化力学稳定性分析

李利萍 ,  孙智慧

应用力学学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (3) : 698 -707.

PDF (7574KB)
应用力学学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (3) : 698 -707. DOI: 10.11776/j.issn.1000-4939.2026.03.020
流体力学

压气储能作用下断层活化力学稳定性分析

作者信息 +

Mechanical stability analysis of fault activation under the action of compressed gas energy storage

Author information +
文章历史 +
PDF (7755K)

摘要

针对储气库围岩中隐伏断层力学稳定性规律尚不明确,采用数值模拟手段,以含断层围岩的废弃煤矿地下储气库为研究对象,建立压气储能热-流-固耦合模型,分析得到了断层对储气库稳定性的影响及储气库注气速率、循环周期、断层倾角和埋深等敏感性参数对断层稳定性的影响。研究结果表明:断层增加了洞室的侧面最大径向位移,但减小了顶部最大径向位移,有抗地表隆起破坏的作用;断层敏感性参数中,埋深的影响程度最大,断层倾角其次,注气速率最小;随着注气速率和循环周期的增加,断层的滑动趋势线性增加,断层的安全系数FOS线性减小;随着埋深的增加,断层的滑动趋势呈指数上升,断层的安全系数FOS(factor of safety)呈指数下降;断层倾角70°时,断层的稳定性最大,达到了抛物线的极值点。所得结论为储气库的使用寿命和安全性提供了科学参考。

Abstract

In view of the fact that the mechanical stability law of buried faults in the surrounding rock of gas storage is not clear,the numerical simulation method is used to establish the thermal-fluid-solid coupling model of compressed gas energy storage by taking the abandoned coal mine underground gas storage with fault surrounding rock as the research object. The influence of faults on the stability of gas storage and the influence of sensitive parameters such as gas injection rate,cycle period,fault dip angle and buried depth of gas storage on the stability of faults are analyzed. The results show that the fault increases the maximum radial displacement of the side of the cavern,but decreases the maximum radial displacement of the top,which has the effect of resisting the surface uplift damage. Among the fault sensitivity parameters,the buried depth has the greatest influence,the fault dip angle is second,and the gas injection rate is the smallest. With the increase of gas injection rate and cycle period,the sliding trend of the fault increases linearly,and the safety factor FOS of the fault decreases linearly. With the increase of buried depth,the sliding trend of the fault increases exponentially,and the safety factor FOS of the fault decreases exponentially. When the fault dip angle is 70°,the stability of the fault is the largest,reaching the extreme point of the parabola. The conclusions obtained provide a scientific reference for the service life and safety of gas storage.

关键词

地下压缩空气储能 / 废弃煤矿 / 内衬洞室 / 断层 / 稳定性 / 数值模拟

Key words

underground compressed air energy storage / abandoned coal mine / lined cavern / fault / stability / numerical simulation

引用本文

引用格式 ▾
李利萍,孙智慧. 压气储能作用下断层活化力学稳定性分析[J]. 应用力学学报, 2026, 43(3): 698-707 DOI:10.11776/j.issn.1000-4939.2026.03.020

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

参考文献

[1]

余国, 姜学峰, 戴家权, . “双碳”目标下中国能源发展与能源安全若干问题思考[J]. 国际石油经济, 202129(11): 1-8.

[2]

YU GuoJIANG XuefengDAI Jiaquanet al. Thoughts of China's energy development and energy security under the "dual carbon" goal[J]. International petroleum economics, 202129(11): 1-8(in Chinese).

[3]

ZHOU YXIA C CZHAO H Bet al. An iterative method for evaluating air leakage from unlined compressed air energy storage(CAES) caverns[J]. Renewable energy, 2018120: 434-445.

[4]

ZHOU S WXIA C CZHAO H Bet al. Numerical simulation for the coupled thermo-mechanical performance of a lined rock cavern for underground compressed air energy storage[J]. Journal of geophysics and engineering, 201714(6): 1382-1398.

[5]

袁亮. 我国煤炭资源高效回收及节能战略研究[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2017.

[6]

LUO XWANG J HDOONER M. Overview of current development on compressed air energy storage[J]. Energy procedia, 201462: 604-611.

[7]

蒋中明, 郭菁, 唐栋. 基于储能效率分析的CAES地下储气库容积分析[J]. 储能科学与技术, 20209(3): 892-900.

[8]

JIANG ZhongmingGUO JingTANG Dong. Cavern volume of CAES system based on energy efficiency analysis[J]. Energy storage science and technology, 20209(3): 892-900(in Chinese).

[9]

蒋中明, 郭菁, 唐栋. 压气储能地下储气库压缩湿空气热力学模型[J]. 储能科学与技术, 202110(2): 638-646.

[10]

JIANG ZhongmingGUO JingTANG Dong. A thermodynamic model of compressed humid air within an underground rock cavern for compressed air energy storage[J]. Energy storage science and technology, 202110(2): 638-646(in Chinese).

[11]

蒋中明, 刘澧源, 李双龙, . 压气储能平江试验库受力特性数值研究[J]. 长沙理工大学学报(自然科学版), 201714(4): 62-68.

[12]

JIANG ZhongmingLIU LiyuanLI Shuanglonget al. Numerical study on mechanical characteristics of the Pingjiang pilot cavern for compressed air energy storage[J]. Journal of Changsha University of Science & Technology(natural science), 201714(4): 62-68(in Chinese).

[13]

夏才初, 张平阳, 周舒威, . 大规模压气储能洞室稳定性和洞周应变分析[J]. 岩土力学, 201435(5): 1391-1398.

[14]

XIA CaichuZHANG PingyangZHOU Shuweiet al. Stability and tangential strain analysis of large-scale compressed air energy storage cavern[J]. Rock and soil mechanics, 201435(5): 1391-1398(in Chinese).

[15]

蒋中明, 甘露, 张登祥, . 压气储能地下储气库衬砌裂缝分布特征及演化规律研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 202446(1): 110-119.

[16]

JIANG ZhongmingGAN LuZHANG Dengxianget al. Distribution characteristics and evolution laws of liner cracks in underground caverns for compressed air energy storage[J]. Chinese journal of geotechnical engineering, 202446(1): 110-119(in Chinese).

[17]

徐英俊, 夏才初, 周舒威, . 基于极限分析上限定理的压气储能洞室抗隆起破坏准则[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 202241(10): 1971-1980.

[18]

XU YingjunXIA CaichuZHOU Shuweiet al. Anti-uplift failure criterion of caverns for compressed air energy storage based on the upper bound theorem of limit analysis[J]. Chinese journal of rock mechanics and engineering, 202241(10): 1971-1980(in Chinese).

[19]

ZHOU S WXIA C CZHOU Y. Long-term stability of a lined rock cavern for compressed air energy storage:thermo-mechanical damage modeling[J]. European journal of environmental and civil engineering, 202024(12): 2070-2093.

[20]

POLAŃSKI K. Influence of the variability of compressed air temperature on selected parameters of the deformation-stress state of the rock mass around a CAES salt cavern[J]. Energies, 202114(19): 6197.

[21]

HAN YMA H LYANG C Het al. The mechanical behavior of rock salt under different confining pressure unloading rates during compressed air energy storage(CAES)[J]. Journal of petroleum science and engineering, 2021196: 107676.

[22]

HUBBERT M KRUBEY W W. Role of fluid pressure in mechanics of overthrust faulting:I. Mechanics of fluid-filled porous solids and its application to overthrust faulting[J]. GSA Bulletin, 195970(2): 115-166.

[23]

张建勇, 崔振东, 周健, . 流体注入工程诱发断层活化的风险评估方法[J]. 天然气工业, 201838(8): 33-40.

[24]

ZHANG JianyongCUI ZhendongZHOU Jianet al. Risk assessment methods for fault reactivation induced by fluid injection[J]. Natural gas industry, 201838(8): 33-40(in Chinese).

[25]

焦裕, 周永胜, 张雷, . 流体对石灰岩断层摩擦滑动影响的实验研究[J]. 地球物理学报, 201962(1): 159-171.

[26]

JIAO YuZHOU YongshengZHANG Leiet al. Experimental study on the effect of fluid to friction sliding of limestone fault gouge[J]. Chinese journal of geophysics, 201962(1): 159-171(in Chinese).

[27]

BAISCH SVÖRÖS RROTHERT Eet al. A numerical model for fluid injection induced seismicity at Soultz-sous-Forêts[J]. International journal of rock mechanics and mining sciences, 201047(3): 405-413.

[28]

WU WLU D ZELSWORTH D. Fluid injection-induced fault slip during unconventional energy development:a review[J]. Energy Reviews, 20221(2): 100007.

[29]

CHENG G WLI L CZHU W Cet al. Microseismic investigation of mining-induced brittle fault activation in a Chinese coal mine[J]. International journal of rock mechanics and mining sciences, 2019123: 104096.

[30]

JIANG L SWANG PZHANG P Pet al. Numerical analysis of the effects induced by normal faults and dip angles on rock bursts[J]. Comptes rendus mécanique, 2017345(10): 690-705.

[31]

许增光, 线美婷, 熊伟, . 基于集对分析模型的岩溶区浅埋穿河隧道突涌水危险性评价[J]. 应用力学学报, 202340(1): 135-145.

[32]

XU ZengguangXIAN MeitingXIONG Weiet al. Risk assessment of water inrush in karst shallow tunnel under river based on SPA model[J]. Chinese journal of applied mechanics, 202340(1): 135-145(in Chinese).

[33]

陈飞, 付凌迪. 基于流固耦合的输气管道与断层最佳交角研究[J]. 应用力学学报, 201936(6): 1484-1489.

[34]

CHEN FeiFU Lingdi. Research of optimal crossing angle of gas transmission pipeline and fault based on fluid-solid coupling[J]. Chinese journal of applied mechanics, 201936(6): 1484-1489(in Chinese).

[35]

KUSHNIR RDAYAN AULLMANN A. Temperature and pressure variations within compressed air energy storage caverns[J]. International journal of heat and mass transfer, 201255(21/22): 5616-5630.

[36]

GEORGE S CTHOMAS S. Transport phenomena through polymeric systems[J]. Progress in polymer science, 200126(6): 985-1017.

[37]

KIM H MRUTQVIST JRYU D Wet al. Exploring the concept of compressed air energy storage(CAES) in lined rock caverns at shallow depth:a modeling study of air tightness and energy balance[J]. Applied energy, 201292: 653-667.

[38]

李宁, 刘乃飞, 李国峰. 软岩及土质隧洞围岩稳定性评价新方法[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 201433(9): 1812-1821.

[39]

LI NingLIU NaifeiLI Guofeng. New method for stability evaluation of soil and soft rock tunnels[J]. Chinese journal of rock mechanics and engineering, 201433(9): 1812-1821(in Chinese).

[40]

STREIT J EHILLIS R R. Estimating fault stability and sustainable fluid pressures for underground storage of CO2 in porous rock [J]. Energy, 200429(9/10): 1445-1456.

[41]

LI QWU Z SLI X Cet al. Site geomechanics analysis of CO2 geological sequestration [C]// IAEG 2006. London:The Geological Society of London, 2006: 1-11.

[42]

WANG R. Fundamentals of rock mechanics[J]. Earth-science reviews, 198117(3): 302.

基金资助

内蒙古自治区科技重大专项资助项目(2021ZD0034-2)

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (7574KB)

39

访问

0

被引

详细

导航
相关文章

AI思维导图

/