血浆致动脉粥样硬化指数对急性心肌梗死患者PCI术后主要心血管不良事件的预测价值

沈建峰 ,  叶平 ,  高迪 ,  都昌乐

济宁医学院学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (3) : 239 -244.

PDF (1449KB)
济宁医学院学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (3) : 239 -244. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-9760.2026.03.009
临床医学

血浆致动脉粥样硬化指数对急性心肌梗死患者PCI术后主要心血管不良事件的预测价值

作者信息 +

The predictive value of plasma atherosclerotic index for major adverse cardiovascular events after PCI in patients with acute myocardial infarction

Author information +
文章历史 +
PDF (1483K)

摘要

目的 探究血浆致动脉粥样硬化指数(AIP)对急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者行经皮冠脉介入术(PCI)后出现主要不良心血管事件(MACE)风险的预测价值。方法 采用回顾性研究方法,选取在淮南东方医院集团总院2020年1月至2023年12月采取PCI治疗,且随访24个月内发生MACE事件的患者45例作为MACE组,选取同期PCI治疗的AMI患者但24个月内未发生MACE事件的45例患者作为对照组。对比两组PCI后出院时AIP等实验室指标、病历资料、个人病史资料等并构建多因素模型及列线图预测模型,采用受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)分析AIP值单独预测MACE的价值,以及列线图预测模型预测MACE发生的价值。结果 MACE组与对照组在合并房颤(24.44% vs 6.67%,χ2=5.414,P=0.020)、合并脑血管病史(15.56% vs 2.22%,χ2=4.939,P=0.026)、血尿酸[(394.5±33.7)μmol/L vs (372.8±31.6)μmol/L,t=3.151,P=0.002]、ApoA1[(1.19±0.23)g/L vs (1.32±0.24)g/L,t=-2.623,P=0.010]、斑块总面积[(136.9±9.5)mm2 vs (122.6±9.3)mm2,t=7.216,P<0.001]、斑块负荷[(51.37±5.84)% vs (43.08±6.17)%,t=6.546,P<0.001]以及AIP[(0.18±0.05) vs (0.14±0.05),t=3.795,P<0.001]方面的差异具有统计学意义。合并房颤(OR=1.846)、既往脑血管病史(OR=1.565)、斑块负荷越大(OR=1.829)、AIP值越大(OR=5.099)是AMI患者PCI后MACE发生的危险因素(P<0.05),血清ApoA1水平越高(OR=0.448)可降低AMI患者PCI后MACE发生的风险(P<0.05)。AIP值预测AMI患者PCI后MACE发生的ROC曲线下面积AUC=0.715(95%CI:0.667~0.782);列线图模型预测AMI患者PCI后MACE发生的ROC曲线下面积AUC=0.842(95%CI:0.810~0.896)。结论 AIP与AMI患者PCI后MACE的发生具有密切关系,AIP结合病史及实验室指标构建预测模型对于预测MACE的发生具有较高价值。

Abstract

Objective To investigate the predictive value of the atherogenic index of plasma (AIP) for the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods This retrospective study selected 45 patients who underwent PCI in the Huainan Eastern Hospital Group Main Hospital between January 2020 and December 2023 and experienced major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) within 24 months of follow-up including as the MACE group. A control group of 45 AMI patients who received PCI during the same period but did not experience MACE within 24 months was also selected. Laboratory indices including the AIP at discharge, clinical data, and medical history, were compared between the two groups. A multivariate logistic regression model and a nomogram prediction model were constructed. The value of AIP alone in predicting MACE was analyzed using ROC curves, as was that of the nomogram model for MACE occurrence. Results There were statistically significant differences between the MACE group and the control group in atrial fibrillation (24.44% vs 6.67%, χ2=5.414, P=0.020), the rate of cerebrovascular disease history (15.56% vs 2.22%, χ2=4.939, P=0.026), blood uric acid (394.5±33.7 μmol/L vs 372.8±31.6 μmol/L, t=3.151, P=0.002), ApoA1 (1.19±0.23 g/L vs 1.32±0.24 g/L, t=-2.623, P=0.010), total plaque area (136.9±9.5 mm 2 vs 122.6±9.3 mm2, t=7.216, P<0.001), plaque burden (51.37%±5.84% vs 43.08%±6.17%, t=6.546, P<0.001), and AIP (0.18±0.05 vs 0.14±0.05, t=3.795, P<0.001). Atrial fibrillation (OR=1.846), a previous history of cerebrovascular disease (OR=1.565), larger plaque burden (OR=1.829), and larger AIP value (OR=5.099) were risk factors for MACE occurrence after PCI in AMI patients (P<0.05). Higher serum ApoA1 level (OR=0.448) could reduce the risk of MACE occurrence after PCI in AMI patients (P<0.05). The area under the ROC curve of AIP value for predicting MACE occurrence after PCI in AMI patients was AUC=0.715 (95%CI: 0.667~0.782); the area under the ROC curve of the nomogram model for predicting MACE occurrence after PCI in AMI patients was AUC=0.842 (95%CI: 0.810~0.896). Conclusion AIP is significantly associated with the occurrence of MACE in AMI patients after PCI. Constructing a predictive model by combining AIP with medical history and laboratory indicators has high value in predicting the occurrence of MACE.

关键词

急性心肌梗死 / 血浆致动脉粥样硬化指数 / 经皮冠脉介入术 / 预测 / 不良心血管事件

Key words

Acute myocardial infarction / Atherosclerosis index of plasma / Percutaneous coronary intervention / Prediction / Major adverse cardiovascular events

引用本文

引用格式 ▾
沈建峰,叶平,高迪,都昌乐. 血浆致动脉粥样硬化指数对急性心肌梗死患者PCI术后主要心血管不良事件的预测价值[J]. 济宁医学院学报, 2026, 49(3): 239-244 DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9760.2026.03.009

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

参考文献

[1]

刘洋, 周培敏, 余世成 . 急性心肌梗死PCI术后自理能力恢复的影响因素[J]. 介入放射学杂志, 2025, 34(11): 1254-1258. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-794X.2025.11.016.

[2]

林芳, 李寒雪, 张琳, . 老年急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者PCI术后不良心血管事件影响因素分析及列线图预测模型建立[J]. 中国动脉硬化杂志, 2024, 32(4): 319-324. DOI: 10.20039/j.cnki.1007-3949.2024.04.006.

[3]

邓毅凡, 朱米雪, 刘娟, . 残粒脂蛋白胆固醇和血浆致动脉粥样硬化指数对青年初发急性心肌梗死的预测价值研究[J]. 中国全科医学, 2023, 26(6): 659-664. DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.0564.

[4]

中国医师协会急诊医师分会, 国家卫健委能力建设与继续教育中心急诊学专家委员会, 中国医疗保健国际交流促进会急诊急救分会 . 急性冠脉综合征急诊快速诊治指南(2019)[J]. 中华急诊医学杂志, 2019, 28(4): 421-428. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0282.2019.04.003.

[5]

Byrne RA, Rossello X, Coughlan JJ, et al. 2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes[J]. Eur Heart J, 2023, 44(38): 3720-3826. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad191.

[6]

刘安恒, 郭勍, 白旭鹏, . 急性心肌梗死患者急诊冠脉介入治疗院内死亡危险因素分析[J]. 军事医学, 2025, 49(2): 114-118. DOI: 10.7644/j.issn.1674-9960.2025.02.005.

[7]

黄琨, 张红利, 张春来, . 早期多巴酚丁胺负荷超声心动图监测预测急性心肌梗死患者不良心血管事件的价值[J]. 中国医学前沿杂志(电子版), 2025, 17(5): 55-62. DOI: 10.12037/YXQY.2025.05-10.

[8]

颜治, 陈洋, 王艳, . 急性STEMI患者90 d不良事件发生风险与心房颤动血栓危险度评分的关系研究[J]. 中国循证心血管医学杂志, 2023, 15(8): 974-978. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-4055.2023.08.18.

[9]

段洪强, 祁娜, 王绍欣 . 醛固酮、血清尿酸水平及心外膜脂肪组织容积与冠心病PCI病人预后的关系[J]. 中西医结合心脑血管病杂志, 2022, 20(6): 1062-1064. DOI: 10.12102/j.issn.1672-1349.2022.06.025.

[10]

赵建国, 高海峰, 方鹏, . 冠状动脉CTA斑块特征、心外膜脂肪体积及CT值联合预测症状控制不佳的稳定型冠心病PCI术后左心室重构的预测意义[J]. 海南医学, 2025, 36(20): 2991-2996. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-6350.2025.20.019.

[11]

周暄凯, 韩晓雯, 王冠, . 基于冠状动脉造影的血浆致动脉粥样硬化指数与冠状动脉CT易损斑块相关性分析[J]. 中国医学装备, 2024, 21(10): 46-50. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-8270.2024.10.009.

[12]

刘龙, 杨灵, 毛少斌, . 联合检测血清残余胆固醇/高密度脂蛋白胆固醇比值和血尿酸对冠心病临界病变患者近期并发急性不良心血管事件风险的预测效能及意义[J]. 中国心血管病研究, 2025, 23(10): 905-910. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-5301.2025.10.007.

[13]

Bairey Merz CN . Vulnerable plaque and major adverse cardiovascular events: anatomy of a failure[J]. Eur Heart J, 2024, 45(36): 3748-3750. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae553.

[14]

张吴琼, 田晓苗, 蒋伟, . 冠状动脉斑块负荷对急性心肌梗死患者再发不良心血管事件的预测价值[J]. 中国循证心血管医学杂志, 2024, 16(6): 694-697. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-4055.2024.06.11.

[15]

王凯阳, 永佳蕙, 陶静, . 血浆致动脉粥样硬化指数对急性心肌梗死患者长期预后的影响[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2025, 41(23): 3697-3703. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2025.23.010.

[16]

金亚东, 王俊青, 王珂 . 冠状动脉CT血管造影定量参数联合血清NT-proBNP、sdLDL-C对冠状动脉粥样硬化性心脏病患者治疗后主要心血管不良事件的预测价值[J]. 中国CT和MRI杂志, 2023, 21(12): 75-78. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-5131.2023.12.023.

[17]

孙沁瑜, 邓毅凡, 杨天笑, . 糖化血红蛋白和载脂蛋白A-1比值、三酰甘油葡萄糖-体质指数及联合预测冠状动脉钙化严重程度的临床研究[J]. 中国全科医学, 2026, 29(9): 1137-1145. DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2025.0169.

基金资助

2024年度淮南联合大学安徽省级科学研究项目(自然科学)(2024AH051717)

淮南联合大学2024年度校级质量工程项目(XSZSFK2403)

淮南联合大学2024年度校级质量工程项目(XJXTD2402)

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (1449KB)

0

访问

0

被引

详细

导航
相关文章

AI思维导图

/