基于Snyder希望理论联合感恩情绪干预对青少年抑郁症患者希望水平、抑郁及述情障碍的影响

王格 ,  明亮 ,  朱文礼 ,  付晓 ,  柳慧茹 ,  沈棫华

济宁医学院学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (4) : 319 -325.

PDF (1140KB)
济宁医学院学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (4) : 319 -325. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-9760.2026.04.005
临床医学

基于Snyder希望理论联合感恩情绪干预对青少年抑郁症患者希望水平、抑郁及述情障碍的影响

作者信息 +

Effects of Snyder′s hope theory combined with gratitude intervention on hope level,depression and alexithymia among adolescent patients with depression

Author information +
文章历史 +
PDF (1166K)

摘要

目的 探讨基于Snyder希望理论联合感恩情绪护理干预方案对青少年抑郁症患者希望水平、抑郁、述情障碍的影响。方法 采用类实验研究设计,于2023年9月-2024年10月,采用便利抽样法选取芜湖市第四人民医院儿童青少年科和心理科的110例青少年抑郁症患者为研究对象,随机分为观察组(n=55)和对照组(n=55)。观察组患者接受基于Snyder希望理论联合感恩情绪护理干预方案,对照组患者接受常规精神科护理。分别在基线(T1)以及干预后2周(T2)和6周(T3),采用希望水平量表、抑郁自评量表、述情障碍量表进行数据收集,进行重复测量方差分析。结果 共计108例患者完成了干预,其中观察组53例,对照组55例,结果显示,在测量的所有基线指标上,均未观察到统计学上的显著差异(P>0.05)。各结局指标组间效应、时间效应及交互效应均具有统计学意义(P<0.05):T2、T3的组间比较结果显示,观察组在希望水平方面的得分均高于对照组(P<0.05),述情障碍得分低于对照组。结论 该研究表明基于Snyder希望理论联合感恩情绪护理干预方案显著改善了青少年抑郁症患者的希望水平,降低其抑郁和述情障碍的发生发展风险,这些发现支持该康复手段可在临床和出院后更广泛地实施。

Abstract

Objective To explore the effects of a nursing intervention based on Snyder′s hope theory combined with gratitude emotional care on hope level, depression, and alexithymia among adolescent patients with depression. Methods A quasi-experimental study design was employed. From September 2023 to October 2024,110 adolescent patients with depression were selected using convenience sampling from the Child,Adolescent,and Psychological Department of Wuhu Fourth People′s Hospital. Participants were divided into an intervention group ( n = 55) and a control group (n= 55) based on their ward assignment. The intervention group received nursing care based on Snyder′s hope theory combined with gratitude emotion intervention,while the control group received routine psychiatric nursing. Data were collected at baseline (T1),2 weeks post-intervention (T2),and 6 weeks post-intervention (T3) using the Hope Scale,Self-Rating Depression Scale,and Toronto Alexithymia Scale. Repeated measures analysis of variance was used for statistical analysis. Results A total of 108 patients completed the intervention,including 53 in the intervention group and 55 in the control group. No statistically significant differences were observed in any baseline measurements between the two groups (P>0.05). Significant group effects, time effects,and interaction effects were found for all outcome indicators (P<0.05). Intergroup comparisons at T2 and T3 showed that the intervention group scored significantly higher on hope level (P<0.05) and significantly lower on self-rated depression and alexithymia compared to the control group. Conclusion This study demonstrated that the nursing intervention based on Snyder′s hope theory combined with gratitude emotional care significantly improved hope levels and alleviated depression and alexithymia in adolescent patients with depression. These findings support that this rehabilitative intervention can be more widely implemented in clinical practice and post-discharge settings.

关键词

抑郁 / 青少年 / Snyder希望理论 / 感恩情绪干预 / 述情障碍 / 希望水平

Key words

Depression / Adolescents / Snyder′s hope theory / Gratitude intervention / Alexithymia / Hope level

引用本文

引用格式 ▾
王格,明亮,朱文礼,付晓,柳慧茹,沈棫华. 基于Snyder希望理论联合感恩情绪干预对青少年抑郁症患者希望水平、抑郁及述情障碍的影响[J]. 济宁医学院学报, 2026, 49(4): 319-325 DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9760.2026.04.005

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

参考文献

[1]

Liu L, Wang H, Chen X, et al. Gut microbiota and its metabolites in depression:from pathogenesis to treatment[J]. EBioMedicine, 2023, 90: 104527. DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2023.104527.

[2]

Idunkova A, Lacinova L, Dubiel-Hoppanova L . Stress,depression,and hippocampus:from biochemistry to electrophysiology[J]. Gen Physiol Biophys, 2023, 42(2): 107-122. DOI: 10.4149/gpb_2023001.

[3]

World Health Organization . World mental health today:latest data[EB/OL]. (2025-09-02)[ 2025-11-03]. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240113817.

[4]

McElroy E, Fearon P, Belsky J, et al. Networks of depression and anxiety symptoms across development[J]. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry, 2018, 57(12): 964-973. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaac.2018.05.027.

[5]

Arnaud AM, Brister TS, Duckworth K, et al. Impact of major depressive disorder on comorbidities:a systematic literature review[J]. J Clin Psychiatry, 2022, 83(6): 21r14328. DOI: 10.4088/JCP.21r14328.

[6]

Schlechter P, Ford T, Neufeld S . Depressive symptom networks in the UK general adolescent population and in those looked after by local authorities[J]. BMJ Ment Health, 2023, 26(1): e300707. DOI: 10.1136/bmjment-2023-300707.

[7]

Gijzen M, Rasing S, Creemers D, et al. Suicide ideation as a symptom of adolescent depression. a network analysis[J]. J Affect Disord, 2021, 278: 68-77. DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.09.029.

[8]

苗正淼, 程明, 丁紫夏, . 述情障碍与非适应性认知情绪调节策略中介家庭环境与抑郁的关系[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2022, 30(6): 1270-1275, 1281. DOI: 10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2022.06.002.

[9]

Alaie I, Philipson A, Ssegonja R, et al. Adolescent depression and adult labor market marginalization:a longitudinal cohort study[J]. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry, 2022, 31(11): 1799-1813. DOI: 10.1007/s00787-021-01825-3.

[10]

Kim KM, Kim H, Kim D, et al. The analysis of network structure among the depressive symptoms in a clinical sample of children and adolescents[J]. Asian J Psychiatr, 2021, 62: 102748. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajp.2021.102748.

[11]

Xie T, Wen J, Liu X, et al. Utilizing network analysis to understand the structure of depression in Chinese adolescents:replication with three depression scales[J]. Curr Psychol, 2022: 1-12. DOI: 10.1007/s12144-022-03201-z.

[12]

中共中央, 国务院 “健康中国2030”规划纲要[EB/OL]. (2016-12-25)[2025-01-31]. http://www.xinhuanet.com/politics/2016-10/25/c1119785867.htm.

[13]

孙欣, 旷紫霞, 石章杰, . 基于Synder希望理论的护理干预对膀胱癌术后患者影响的研究[J]. 军事护理, 2023, 40(3): 75-78. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2097-1826.2023.03.018.

[14]

伏思瑞, 邓小丽, 李玥璐, . 基于希望理论的肺康复训练对COPD患者希望水平及自我护理能力的影响[J]. 护理学杂志, 2024, 39(13): 111-115. DOI: 10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2024.13.111.

[15]

杨芳, 王安萍 . 基于Snyder希望理论的干预策略对股骨颈骨折患者术后心理状态、运动功能恢复及生活质量的影响[J]. 中国医药导报, 2024, 21(17): 161-164. DOI: 10.20047/j.issn1673-7210.2024.17.46.

[16]

和青森, 李俊芝, 刘玲霞, . 感恩对护理本科生生命意义感的影响:领悟社会支持与自尊的链式中介作用[J]. 中国健康心理学杂志, 2022, 30(7): 1049-1053. DOI: 10.13342/j.cnki.cjhp.2022.07.019.

[17]

张素敏, 闵国庆 . Snyder希望理论的心理干预对青少年抑郁症患者负性情绪、希望水平及自我效能感的影响[J]. 中国健康心理学杂志, 2024, 32(11): 1642-1646. DOI: 10.13342/j.cnki.cjhp.2024.11.008.

[18]

赵海平, 王健 . 血液透析患者的社会支持和希望[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2000(5): 49-51.

[19]

Zung WW, Richards CB, Short MJ . Self-rating depression scale in an outpatient clinic:further validation of the SDS[J]. Archives of General Psychiatry, 1965, 13(6): 508-515.

[20]

蚁金瑶, 姚树桥, 朱熊兆 . TAS-20中文版的信度、效度分析[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2003(11): 763-767.

[21]

Tavassoli N, Darvishpour A, Mansour-Ghanaei R, et al. A correlational study of hope and its relationship with spiritual health on hemodialysis patients[J]. J Educ Health Promot, 2019, 8: 146. DOI: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_461_18.

[22]

耿可 . 失依儿童希望的发展及其影响因素[D]. 上海: 华东师范大学, 2023.

[23]

蒋义娜, 申敏, 晁蕊停, . Snyder希望理论联合感恩情绪干预对卵巢癌腹腔热灌注化疗患者希望感恩水平和生活质量的影响[J]. 中国健康心理学杂志, 2024, 32(8): 1228-1232. DOI: 10.13342/j.cnki.cjhp.2024.08.021.

[24]

郑沁怡, 丁雪辰, 刘影, . 儿童社交自我知觉与抑郁感的关系:拒绝敏感性的中介作用与情绪调节能力的调节作用[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2019, 27(5): 894-899. DOI: 10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2019.05.008.

[25]

周波, 桑旭芳, 范宁, . 青少年抑郁症患者自杀风险与抑郁症状的关系:快感缺失的中介作用[J]. 中国健康心理学杂志, 2025, 33(12): 1824-1832. DOI: 10.13342/j.cnki.cjhp.2025.12.012.

[26]

张少飞 . 探究述情障碍对不同性别的青少年抑郁症患者人际关系影响的研究[D]. 合肥: 安徽医科大学, 2025.

[27]

龚云, 徐陈柯, 潘冰, . 青少年抑郁症述情障碍和家庭功能及其与抑郁的相关性研究[J]. 海南医学, 2024, 35(6): 815-818. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-6350.2024.06.011.

[28]

何娟娟, 程祺, 高志勤, . 抑郁症患者抑郁水平、心理困扰及述情障碍的关系研究[J]. 护士进修杂志, 2021, 36(17): 1552-1556. DOI: 10.16821/j.cnki.hsjx.2021.17.003.

[29]

再努热·库尔班, 李依, 巴音塞斯克, . 述情障碍在青少年社交焦虑与抑郁间的中介作用[J]. 中国医药导报, 2025, 22(12): 104-107. DOI: 10.20047/j.issn1673-7210.2025.12.21.

基金资助

安徽省护理学会项目(AHHLb202102)

芜湖市卫健委项目(WHWJ2021y073)

芜湖市卫健委项目(WHWJ2023y059)

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (1140KB)

0

访问

0

被引

详细

导航
相关文章

AI思维导图

/