Z世代的旅行“共振”——社会网络影响下的目的地选择一致性研究

王敏茹 ,  张睿

南京师大学报(自然科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (3) : 32 -40.

PDF (1032KB)
南京师大学报(自然科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (3) : 32 -40. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4616.2026.03.005

Z世代的旅行“共振”——社会网络影响下的目的地选择一致性研究

作者信息 +

The “Resonance” of Travel Among Generation Z: Study on the Consistency of Destination Choice Under the Influence of Social Networks

Author information +
文章历史 +
PDF (1056K)

摘要

深入理解旅游者的目的地选择机制有助于提升旅游需求预测的准确性. 本文基于社会网络理论与一致性理论,运用顺序陈述适应选择实验与离散选择模型,探究社会关系的结构属性与认知因素对 Z 世代旅游目的地选择一致性的影响机制. 研究发现:①自我主张与网络强化双重驱动下,Z 世代旅游者在目的地选择中呈现显著的选择一致性倾向. ②社会网络通过信息传播与关系互动影响决策. 信息的情感倾向显著影响旅游意愿,权威性与亲密度共同决定信息采纳程度与决策方向. ③权威性对旅游目的地选择一致性具有主导作用,先验形象发挥调节功能,亲密度则呈辅助效应. ④Z 世代旅游决策存在显著的社会经济与性别异质性. 该研究为理解社会网络影响下的 Z 世代旅游决策机制提供了理论支持和实践指导.

Abstract

A deep understanding of the destination choice mechanism of tourists can enhance the accuracy of tourism demand prediction. Based on social network theory and consistency theory, this paper explores the influence mechanism of the structural attributes of social relationships and cognitive factors on the consistency of tourism destination choice among Generation Z through sequential statement adaptation choice experiments and discrete choice models. The research findings are as follows: ① Generation Z tourists show a significant tendency of choice consistency in destination choice, driven by both self-assertion and network reinforcement. ② Social networks influence decision-making through information dissemination and relationship interaction. The emotional orientation of information significantly affects tourism willingness, while authority and intimacy jointly determine the degree of information adoption and decision direction. ③ Authority plays a dominant role in the consistency of destination choice, with prior image exerting a moderating function, and intimacy showing an auxiliary effect. ④ There are significant socio-economic and gender heterogeneities in the tourism decision-making of Generation Z. This paper provides theoretical support and practical guidance for understanding the tourism decision-making mechanism of Generation Z under the influence of social networks.

关键词

社会网络 / 选择一致性 / 目的地感知形象 / 旅游目的地选择

Key words

social network / choice consistency / destination perception image / tourism destination choice

引用本文

引用格式 ▾
王敏茹,张睿. Z世代的旅行“共振”——社会网络影响下的目的地选择一致性研究[J]. 南京师大学报(自然科学版), 2026, 49(3): 32-40 DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-4616.2026.03.005

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

参考文献

[1]

Song H, Wu H, Zhang H. Can nudging affect tourists' low—carbon footprint travel choices? [J].International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 2024, 36(5):1534-1556.

[2]

Park J, Qiu R T R, Jiao X, et al. Reference—dependence in multi—destination choice: a heterogeneous reference point perspective[J].Annals of Tourism Research, 2024, 109:103845.

[3]

Zacharias N A, Daldere D, Hinze O. Which collaborations allow firms to become gatekeepers? a longitudinal analysis of a large—scale collaboration network[J].European Management Journal, 2023, 41(2):263-273.

[4]

Pan X, Rasouli S, Timmermans H. Investigating tourist destination choice: effect of destination image from social network members[J].Tourism Management, 2021, 83:104217.

[5]

文彤,杨春雨,石少湘. 虚拟社群互动与网红旅游目的地打卡意愿:基于互动仪式链理论[J].地理与地理信息科学, 2025, 41(3):145-152.

[6]

罗维,吴晋峰,白倩文,等. 旅游目的地选择的学历群体差异:以北京、西安、武汉城市居民为例[J].干旱区资源与环境, 2020, 34(10):201-208.

[7]

邹统钎,黄鑫,韩全,等. 旅游目的地品牌基因选择的三力模型构建[J].人文地理, 2021, 36(6):147-156.

[8]

彭倩,邓明. 金融资产配置与家庭旅游消费:基于中国家庭金融调查数据分析[J].贵州社会科学, 2025(1):126-137.

[9]

田梅,刘菡,韩月茹,等. 移动社交媒体用户偶遇健康信息利用行为影响因素组态分析[J].情报理论与实践, 2025, 48(7):104-114.

[10]

Rigby D, Burton M, Pluske J. Preferences stability and choice consistency in discrete choice experiments[J].Environmental and Resource Economics, 2016, 65(2):441-461.

[11]

敖成兵. Z 世代消费理念的多元特质、现实成因及亚文化意义[J].中国青年研究, 2021(6):100-106.

[12]

王颖,黄燕玲,伍进. 虚实有度:Z 世代的虚拟代言人真实性感知对其旅游意愿的影响研究[J].旅游科学, 2025, 39(3):105-125.

[13]

Osgood C E, Tannenbaum P H. The principle of congruity in the prediction of attitude change[J].Psychological Review, 1955, 62(1):42-55.

[14]

Genie M G, Poudel N, Paolucci F, et al. Choice consistency in discrete choice experiments: does numeracy skill matter? [J].Value in Health, 2024, 27(11):1594-1604.

[15]

Grzywacz N M. A computational analysis of the effect of hard choices on the individuation of values[J].Brain Sciences, 2025, 15(2):131.

[16]

Hernandez—Pena L, Koch J, Bilek E, et al. Neural correlates of static and dynamic social decision—making in real—time sibling interactions[J].Human Brain Mapping, 2024, 45(11):e26788.

[17]

琼达,赵宏杰. 基于地方情感的旅游目的地选择模型建构研究[J].旅游学刊, 2016, 31(10):105-112.

[18]

曹晶晶,章锦河,王昶,等. 距离欲对旅游者目的地选择影响的解释框架[J].地理学报, 2020, 75(4):860-877.

[19]

陈劼绮,陆林,张宏梅,等. 危机情境下旅游宣传片营销对旅游者行为的影响机制:目的地形象的中介与感知安全的调节[J].地域研究与开发, 2020, 39(5):110-115.

[20]

吕洁如. 植物资源多样性与游客旅游目的地选择的关系分析[J].分子植物育种, 2023, 21(24):8244-8249.

[21]

Ngxongo N A. The impact of climate change on visitor destination selection: a case study of the Central Drakensberg Region in KwaZulu—Natal[J].Jàmbá: Journal of Disaster Risk Studies, 2021, 13(1):1161.

[22]

李艳,陈卫平. 朋友圈如何促进农村网商销售绩效:基于社会网络的视角[J].经济与管理, 2025, 39(1):27-37.

[23]

蒋亚军,郭玉,王甫园,等. 民族旅游村寨农民社会网络对社区参与的影响研究[J].地理与地理信息科学, 2024, 40(4):134-140.

[24]

何晓晨,杜海峰,王洋,等. 人际互动作用下集群行为的演化逻辑与治理[J].西安交通大学学报(社会科学版), 2023, 43(6):178-187.

[25]

Burnkrant R E, Cousineau A. Informational and normative social influence in buyer behavior [J].Journal of Consumer Research, 1975, 2(3):206-215.

[26]

Agag G, Eid R, Lababdi H C, et al. Understanding the impact of national culture differences on customers' online social shopping behaviours[J].Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 2024, 79:103827.

[27]

Nekmat E, Gower K K, Zhou S, et al. Connective—collective action on social media: moderated mediation of cognitive elaboration and perceived source credibility on personalness of source[J].Communication Research, 2019, 46(1):62-87.

[28]

Wang H J. The drivers of intimacy towards social media—based brand communities: perspective of attachment theory [J].Internet Research, 2026, 36(2):873-892.

[29]

徐红,阮成武. 教育家精神引领教师成长的三重逻辑[J].教育研究, 2026, 47(1):123-125.

[30]

雷雅钦,王波,刘俊,等. 基于游客感知的成都旅游目的地认知形象演变研究[J].热带地理, 2021, 41(5):1110-1119.

[31]

肖金岑,程豹,罗文豪. 不道德行为在组织管理中的“涓滴”效应[J].管理评论, 2023, 35(10):205-217.

[32]

孙晓华,郭旭,范世龙. 社会网络、技能提升与就业地选择[J].经济研究, 2023, 58(5):116-134.

[33]

Ruiz—Real J L, Uribe—Toril J, Gázquez—Abad J C. Destination branding: opportunities and new challenges [J].Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 2020, 17:100453.

[34]

董晨杰,王政烨,李淦棠,等. 多感觉模态信息处理的认知神经基础[J].华南师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2025(1):90-105.

[35]

肖宁,杨金华,徐元诏,等. 网红博主与网红场景对出游意愿和口碑推荐的影响[J].人文地理, 2024, 39(1):184-192.

[36]

郑鹏,邓鹏飞,孙怡欣,等. 旅游地形象与农产地形象交互影响研究[J].地理与地理信息科学, 2025, 41(4):152-160.

[37]

陈玉娟,王雨凡,孙莹. 基于抖音数据的浙江省景区村庄网络关注度的空间分异及其影响因素[J].经济地理, 2025, 45(5):213-223.

[38]

肖雪,曹羽飞. 社会化阅读中互动的价值审视[J].图书情报工作, 2025, 69(20):52-65.

[39]

San Martín H, Del Bosque I A R. Exploring the cognitive—affective nature of destination image and the role of psychological factors in its formation[J].Tourism Management, 2008, 29(2):263-277.

[40]

Chen X P, Peng S. Guanxi dynamics: shifts in the closeness of ties between Chinese coworkers [J].Management and Organization Review, 2008, 4(1):63-80.

[41]

邓小平. 教师行为、亲子互动与学前儿童创造力的关系研究[D].长春:东北师范大学, 2013.

[42]

姚琦,吴章建,张常清,等. 权力感对炫耀性亲社会行为的影响[J].心理学报, 2020, 52(12):1421-1435.

[43]

路锦怡,徐建华,孙宣. 问卷调查法的设计与实施及其在图书馆学领域的规范应用[J].图书情报工作, 2024, 68(11):4-13.

基金资助

广西哲学社会科学规划项目(24GLF023)

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (1032KB)

0

访问

0

被引

详细

导航
相关文章

AI思维导图

/

〈 〉