人地关系视角下生态——游憩网络研究进展与启示
Research Progress and Implications of Eco-recreational Network From the Perspective of Human-Environment Relationship
面对城市化带来的生态环境压力与居民游憩需求,生态-游憩网络作为复合型空间组织体系,已逐渐成为实现生态环境保护与游憩福祉提升的重要路径. 文章从人地关系视角对生态-游憩网络的概念、复合类型、构建要素、分析评价与优化进行系统梳理. 研究发现:生态-游憩网络的概念尚未明确,文章基于对相关网络概念及研究的梳理,立足人地关系视角对其进行了界定;根据复合程度与方式,将生态-游憩网络的复合类型归纳为空间叠置复合、功能交互复合与系统重构复合三类,3 种复合类型的演进展现了网络耦合的逐步深化;生态-游憩网络由节点和廊道两类要素构成,不同的网络复合类型包含的要素存在差异,且各类要素的提取方法已形成系统化范式;网络评价主要从结构和功能两个维度展开,结构评价侧重网络连通性与空间格局特征,功能评价则强调人地系统间的相互作用及功能协调;网络优化从“点-线-面”3 个层次入手,具体策略包括分类管控、结构修复与空间布局调整等. 针对当前研究存在的局限与不足,文章提出未来需在理论深化、内部关系、评价体系、多尺度视角以及优化治理几个方面进行拓展与深化.
Urbanization brings ecological and environmental pressures as well as residents' recreational demands. Eco-recreational network, as a composite spatial organization system, have gradually become an important path to achieve ecological environmental protection and the improvement of recreational well-being. This paper systematically sorts out the concept, composite types, construction elements, analysis, evaluation and optimization of eco-recreational network from the perspective of man-land relationship. The research draws the following findings: the concept of the eco-recreational network remains unclear. Based on a review of relevant network concepts and research, this paper defines the concept from the perspective of human-environment relationship. According to the degree and mode of integration, the integration types of the eco-recreational network are summarized into 3 categories, spatial overlapping integration, functional interaction integration, and system restructuring integration. The evolution of these 3 integration types demonstrates the gradual deepening of network coupling. Eco-recreational network consists of 2 types of elements: nodes and corridors. Elements contained in different composite network types show differences. Systematic paradigms have been formed for the extraction methods of various elements. Network evaluation is mainly carried out from 2 dimensions, structure and function. Structural evaluation focuses on network connectivity and spatial pattern characteristics, while functional evaluation emphasizes the interactions and functional coordination between human-environment systems. Network optimization starts from 3 levels: point-line-plane. Specific strategies include classified management and control, structural restoration and spatial layout adjustment. In view of the limitations and deficiencies of current research, this paper puts forward that future research needs to expand and deepen in several aspects, including theoretical deepening, internal relationship, evaluation system, multi-scale perspective and optimization governance.
| [1] |
邱坚坚,刘毅华,袁利, |
| [2] |
樊杰. 人地系统可持续过程、格局的前沿探索[J].地理学报,2014,69(8):1060-1068. |
| [3] |
杨蓉,袁振杰,尹铎, |
| [4] |
李可昕,胡宏,赵慧敏. 基于适应性循环理论与压力—状态—响应框架的区域社会—生态系统演进研究[J].生态学报,2022,42(24):10164-10179. |
| [5] |
刘畅,唐立娜. 景感生态学在城市生态系统服务中的应用研究:以城市公园景观设计为例[J].生态学报,2020,40(22):8141-8146. |
| [6] |
王甫园,王开泳. 珠江三角洲城市群区域绿道与生态游憩空间的连接度与分布模式[J].地理科学进展,2019,38(3):428-440. |
| [7] |
蔡晓梅,苏杨,徐卫华, |
| [8] |
王甫园,王开泳,郑鑫, |
| [9] |
冯卫红. 基于人地关系的生态旅游地域系统演变定量分析[J].人文地理,2006(4):74-78. |
| [10] |
张洪超,常青. 国家公园生态游憩监测与管理研究:现状、进展与展望[J].国家公园(中英文),2024,2(8):534-544. |
| [11] |
王甫园. 国土空间生态修复与游憩利用协同:科学内涵与研究展望[J].生态学报,2025,45(16):8230-8242. |
| [12] |
周菁,李迪华,张蕾. 菏泽市游憩网络的构建:探索整合各类游憩资源的城市绿地系统规划途径[J].中国园林,2006(8):51-55. |
| [13] |
彭建,李慧蕾,刘焱序, |
| [14] |
李权荃,金晓斌,张晓琳, |
| [15] |
许晓雪,王峤,李含嫣, |
| [16] |
原昊,丁美辰,孙依巧, |
| [17] |
白焜,王秀秀,徐孟远, |
| [18] |
武园伊,朱鹤,李江敏, |
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
高琴,陈宏伟,周媛, |
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
刘滨谊,王鹏. 绿地生态网络规划的发展历程与中国研究前沿[J].中国园林,2010,26(3):1-5. |
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
曲艺,陆明. 生态网络规划研究进展与发展趋势[J].城市发展研究,2016,23(8):29-36. |
| [25] |
李瑾,金晓斌,孙瑞, |
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
谈明洪,李秀彬. 从本土到全球网络化的人地关系思维范式转型[J].地理学报,2021,76(10):2333-2342. |
| [30] |
周媛,黎贝,李朋瑶, |
| [31] |
王倩雯,周航,张芮嘉, |
| [32] |
颜钰,陈秀铭,谢宇为, |
| [33] |
Walmsley A. Greenways and the making of urban form[J].Landscape and Urban Planning, 1995, 33(1/3):81-127. |
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
赵秋吉. 大熊猫国家公园入口社区景观生态格局演变及优化策略研究:以绵竹市为例[D].成都:西南交通大学,2023. |
| [39] |
张书颖,刘家明,朱鹤, |
| [40] |
俞孔坚. 生物保护的景观生态安全格局[J].生态学报,1999,19(1):8-15. |
| [41] |
俞孔坚,段铁武,李迪华, |
| [42] |
俞孔坚,黄刚,李迪华, |
| [43] |
徐煜辉,付洋. 重庆市大渡口区生态型游憩网络的构建初探[C]//中国城市规划年会论文集(13 山地城乡规划).贵阳:中国城市规划学会,2015:173-183. |
| [44] |
陈剑阳,尹海伟,孔繁花, |
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
王敏,梁爽,王云才. 城市双修背景下绿地生态网络构建的情景比较与综合:基于“社会—生态”功能复合的视角[J].南方建筑,2019(3):1-8. |
| [47] |
|
| [48] |
王敏,梁爽. 健康城市背景下太原市中心城区绿地生态网络规划[J].规划师,2021,37(4):44-50. |
| [49] |
李权荃,金晓斌,宋家鹏, |
| [50] |
丁金华,马珺霓. 生态与游憩双重导向下的水网乡村绿道网络构建[J].中国城市林业,2023,21(5):40-48. |
| [51] |
吴传钧. 论地理学的研究核心:人地关系地域系统[J].经济地理,1991,11(3):1-6. |
| [52] |
杨凯,曹银贵,冯喆, |
| [53] |
张玥,许端阳,李霞, |
| [54] |
|
| [55] |
|
| [56] |
蔡青,曾光明,石林, |
| [57] |
李华. 上海城市生态游憩空间格局及其优化研究[J].经济地理,2014,34(1):174-180. |
| [58] |
彭建,赵会娟,刘焱序, |
| [59] |
王晨旭,刘焱序,于超月, |
| [60] |
|
| [61] |
胡西武,贾天朝. 基于生态敏感性与景观连通性的三江源国家公园生态安全格局构建与优化[J].长江流域资源与环境,2023,32(8):1724-1735. |
| [62] |
周燕,刘梦瑶,王丽娜, |
| [63] |
|
| [64] |
|
| [65] |
|
| [66] |
刘颂,柳迪子,杜守帅. 基于多模型和权衡矩阵法的乡村生态—游憩景观安全格局重构[J].风景园林,2024,31(3):99-105. |
| [67] |
郑好,高吉喜,谢高地, |
| [68] |
Hilty J, Worboys G L, Keeley A, |
| [69] |
张艺璇,位宏,那嘉明, |
| [70] |
|
| [71] |
|
| [72] |
|
| [73] |
|
| [74] |
|
| [75] |
|
| [76] |
|
| [77] |
Huang H, Zhang M, Yu K, |
| [78] |
洪敏,昂欣玥,冀凤全. 基于遗产资源与数字足迹的徽州古道游憩廊道网络构建[J].园林,2025,42(5):44-51. |
| [79] |
|
| [80] |
黄河. 福州市绿色基础设施复合网络构建[D]. 福州:福建农林大学,2018. |
| [81] |
|
| [82] |
马珺霓. 生态与游憩双重导向下的苏南乡村绿道网络构建研究:以黎里镇为例[D].苏州:苏州科技大学,2022. |
| [83] |
|
| [84] |
周玉珊. 全域旅游视角下的内江市域复合型生态网络构建研究[D].成都:四川大学,2021. |
| [85] |
龚苑红,叶宗达,吴静, |
| [86] |
唐晓岚,张杰,周铭杰, |
| [87] |
王甫园,邓昭明,王开泳, |
| [88] |
谷康,曹静怡. 基于游憩功能的城市绿地布局:以扬州市为例[J].中国园林,2012,28(3):112-115. |
| [89] |
时薏. 生态与游憩双重导向下的市域绿道网络选线方法研究:以海南省陵水黎族自治县为例[D].北京:北京林业大学,2020. |
| [90] |
王敏,崔芊浬. 基于游憩绿道的地域生活网络重构研究:以贵州松桃苗族自治县绿地系统规划为例[J].风景园林,2015(9):121-127. |
| [91] |
姜虹,彭建. 自然保护地连通网络构建与优化的方法及前瞻[J].地理学报,2024,79(9):2176-2190. |
国家自然科学基金项目(42171239、42571300)
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |