合成致死类药物的定量系统药理模型研究与应用进展

肖霞 ,  洪峻 ,  边康麒 ,  赵宸

药学进展 ›› 2026, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (6) : 485 -495.

PDF (3171KB)
药学进展 ›› 2026, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (6) : 485 -495. DOI: 10.20053/j.issn1001-5094.202511170914
药咖论坛

合成致死类药物的定量系统药理模型研究与应用进展

作者信息 +

Advances in Quantitative Systems Pharmacology Modeling of Synthetic Lethality Drug Research and Development: from Mechanism to Application

Author information +
文章历史 +
PDF (3246K)

摘要

合成致死作为一种精准靶向肿瘤细胞的治疗策略,在癌症治疗中已展现出巨大应用潜力。由于合成致死涉及多条修复通路,其药物靶点研究已从聚腺苷二磷酸核糖聚合酶(poly ADP-ribose polymerase,PARP)扩展至多个新靶点,相关药物已陆续进入关键临床研究阶段。尽管合成致死类药物具有显著的特异性抗癌疗效,但其临床研究仍面临易耐药、血液学毒性等挑战。综述详细总结了合成致死领域多个靶点的作用机制及相关定量系统药理学(quantitative systems pharmacology,QSP)模型研究进展,探讨 QSP 建模通过整合多尺度机制与实验数据,预测合成致死类药物的临床疗效及血液学毒性,从而在临床给药方案设计、剂量优化、联合疗法筛选等方面发挥指导作用,旨在从系统角度精准推动该类药物的临床转化,提升患者临床获益并降低安全性风险。

Abstract

Synthetic lethality has emerged as a promising therapeutic strategy for precision targeting of tumor cells in cancer treatment. As it involves multiple DNA repair pathways, drug target research in this field has expanded from poly ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) to many novel targets, with related therapies advancing progressively into pivotal clinical trials. Although synthetic lethality drugs can demonstrate significant and specific anticancer efficacy, their clinical development still faces such challenges as acquired resistance and hematological toxicity. To address these limitations, this review comprehensively summarizes the mechanisms of action of multiple targets in the synthetic lethality field and the research progress of quantitative systems pharmacology (QSP) models. QSP modeling, by integrating multi-scale mechanisms and experimental data, enables the prediction of clinical efficacy and hematological toxicity of synthetic lethality drugs. It plays a guiding role in clinical dosing regimen design, dose optimization, and combination therapy screening, thereby advancing the precise clinical translation of such drugs from a systems perspective, aiming to enhance patient clinical benefits and reduce safety risks.

关键词

定量系统药理学 / 合成致死 / 血液学毒性 / 模型引导的药物研发

Key words

quantitative systems pharmacology / synthetic lethality / hematologic toxicity / model-informed drug development

引用本文

引用格式 ▾
肖霞,洪峻,边康麒,赵宸. 合成致死类药物的定量系统药理模型研究与应用进展[J]. 药学进展, 2026, 50(6): 485-495 DOI:10.20053/j.issn1001-5094.202511170914

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

参考文献

[1]

Dobzhansky T. Genetics of natural populations. xiii. recombination and variability in populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura[J].Genetics, 1946, 31(3): 269-290.

[2]

Nijman S M B. Synthetic lethality: general principles, utility and detection using genetic screens in human cells[J].Febs Letters, 2011, 585(1): 1-6.

[3]

Hartwell L H, Szankasi P, Roberts C J,et al. Integrating genetic approaches into the discovery of anticancer drugs[J].Science, 1997, 278(5340): 1064-1068.

[4]

Bryant H E, Schultz N, Thomas H D,et al. Specific killing of BRCA2—deficient tumours with inhibitors of poly(ADP—ribose) polymerase[J].Nature, 2005, 434(7035): 913-917.

[5]

Farmer H, McCabe N, Lord C J,et al. Targeting the DNA repair defect in BRCAmutant cells as a therapeutic strategy[J].Nature, 2005, 434(7035): 917-921.

[6]

Lee J M, Ledermann J A, Kohn E C. PARP inhibitors for BRCA1/2mutation—associated and BRCA—like malignancies[J].Ann Oncol, 2014, 25(1): 32-40.

[7]

Levy—Lahad E, Friedman E. Cancer risks among BRCA1and BRCA2mutation carriers[J].Br J Cancer, 2007, 96(1): 11-15.

[8]

Chabanon R M, Muirhead G, Krastev D B,et al. PARP inhibition enhances tumor cell—intrinsic immunity in ERCC1—deficient non—small cell lung cancer[J].J Clin Invest, 2019, 129(3): 1211-1228.

[9]

Cavanagh H, Rogers K M A. The role of BRCA1and BRCA2mutations in prostate, pancreatic and stomach cancers[J].Hered Cancer Clin Pract, 2015, 13(1): 16.

[10]

Kim G, Ison G, McKee A E,et al. FDA approval summary: olaparib monotherapy in patients with deleterious germline BRCA—mutated advanced ovarian cancer treated with three or more lines of chemotherapy[J].Clin Cancer Res, 2015, 21(19): 4257-4261.

[11]

Freeman A K, Monteiro A N. Phosphatases in the cellular response to DNA damage[J].Cell Commun Signal, 2010, 8: 27.

[12]

Schmitt E, Paquet C, Beauchemin M,et al. DNA—damage response network at the crossroads of cell—cycle checkpoints, cellular senescence and apoptosis[J].J Zhejiang Univ Sci B, 2007, 8(6): 377-397.

[13]

Ye Z, Shi Y, Lees—Miller S P,et al. Function and molecular mechanism of the DNA damage response in immunity and cancer immunotherapy[J].Front Immunol, 2021, 12: 797880.

[14]

Chen X J. Mechanism of homologous recombination and implications for aging—related deletions in mitochondrial DNA[J]. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev, 2013, 77(3): 476-496.

[15]

Kim J S, Krasieva T B, Kurumizaka H,et al. Independent and sequential recruitment of NHEJ and HR factors to DNA damage sites in mammalian cells[J].J Cell Biol, 2005, 170(3): 341-347.

[16]

Huang R X, Zhou P K. DNA damage response signaling pathways and targets for radiotherapy sensitization in cancer[J].Signal Transduct Target Ther, 2020, 5(1): 60.

[17]

Gohil D, Sarker A H, Roy R. Base excision repair: mechanisms and impact in biology, disease, and medicine[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2023, 24(18): 14186.

[18]

Caldecott K W. Single—strand break repair and genetic disease[J].Nat Rev Genet, 2008, 9(8): 619-631.

[19]

Patil M, Pabla N, Dong Z. Checkpoint kinase 1 in DNA damage response and cell cycle regulation[J]. Cell Mol Life Sci, 2013, 70(21): 4009-4021.

[20]

Smith J, Tho L M, Xu N,et al. The ATM—Chk2 and ATR—Chk1 pathways in DNA damage signaling and cancer[J].Adv Cancer Res, 2010, 108: 73-112.

[21]

Bukhari A B, Chan G K, Gamper A M. Targeting the DNA damage response for cancer therapy by inhibiting the kinase Wee1[J]. Front Oncol, 2022, 12: 828684.

[22]

Li Q, Qian W, Zhang Y,et al. A new wave of innovations within the DNA damage response[J].Signal Transduct Target Ther, 2023, 8: 338.

[23]

Fountzilas E, Papadopoulou K, Chatzikonstantinou T,et al. Concordance between three homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) assays in patients with high—grade epithelial ovarian cancer[J].Cancers, 2023, 15(23): 5525.

[24]

Cristescu R, Liu X Q, Arreaza G,et al. Concordance between single—nucleotide polymorphism—based genomic instability assays and a next—generation sequencing—based homologous recombination deficiency test[J].BMC Cancer, 2022, 22(1): 1310.

[25]

Jia Z, Liu Y, Qu S,et al. Evaluative methodology for HRD testing: development of standard tools for consistency assessment[J].Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics, 2025, 23(1): qzaf017.

[26]

Christie E L, Fereday S, Doig K,et al. Reversion of BRCA1/2germline mutations detected in circulating tumor DNA from patients with high—grade serous ovarian cancer[J].J Clin Oncol, 2017, 35(12): 1274-1280.

[27]

Noordermeer S M, van Attikum H. PARP inhibitor resistance: a tug—of—war in BRCA—mutated cells[J].Trends Cell Biol, 2019, 29(10): 820-834.

[28]

Giudice E, Gentile M, Salutari V,et al. PARP inhibitors resistance: mechanisms and perspectives[J].Cancers, 2022, 14(6): 1420.

[29]

Friedlander M, Lee Y C, Tew W P. Managing adverse effects associated with poly (ADP—ribose) polymerase inhibitors in ovarian cancer: a synthesis of clinical trial and real—world data[J].Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book, 2023(43): e390876.

[30]

LaFargue C J, Dal Molin G Z, Sood A K,et al. Exploring and comparing adverse events between PARP inhibitors[J].Lancet Oncol, 2019, 20(1): e15-e28.

[31]

Zheng J, Li Z, Min W. Current status and future promise of next—generation poly(ADP—Ribose) polymerase 1—selective inhibitor AZD5305[J].Front Pharmacol, 2023, 13: 979873.

[32]

Zhou T, Zhang J. Therapeutic advances and application of PARP inhibitors in breast cancer[J]. Transl Oncol, 2025, 57: 102410.

[33]

Moore K, Colombo N, Scambia G,et al. Maintenance olaparib in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer[J].N Engl J Med, 2018, 379(26): 2495-2505.

[34]

Pilié P G, Gay C M, Byers L A,et al. PARP inhibitors: extending benefit beyond BRCA—mutant cancers[J].Clin Cancer Res, 2019, 25(13): 3759-3771.

[35]

Ledermann J, Harter P, Gourley C,et al. Olaparib maintenance therapy in patients with platinum—sensitive relapsed serous ovarian cancer: a preplanned retrospective analysis of outcomes by BRCAstatus in a randomised phase 2 trial[J].Lancet Oncol, 2014, 15(8): 852-861.

[36]

Markham A. Pamiparib: first approval[J].Drugs, 2021, 81(11): 1343-1348.

[37]

Lee A. Fuzuloparib: first approval[J].Drugs, 2021, 81(10): 1221-1226.

[38]

Murai J, Huang S N, Das B B,et al. Trapping of PARP1 and PARP2 by clinical PARP inhibitors[J].Cancer Res, 2012, 72(21): 5588-5599.

[39]

Kim D S, Camacho C V, Kraus W L. Alternate therapeutic pathways for PARP inhibitors and potential mechanisms of resistance[J].Exp Mol Med, 2021, 53(1): 42-51.

[40]

Onji H, Murai J. Reconsidering the mechanisms of action of PARP inhibitors based on clinical outcomes[J].Cancer Sci, 2022, 113(9): 2943-2951.

[41]

Ronson G E, Piberger A L, Higgs M R,et al. PARP1 and PARP2 stabilise replication Forks at base excision repair intermediates through Fbh1—dependent Rad51 regulation[J].Nat Commun, 2018, 9(1): 746.

[42]

Farrés J, Martín—Caballero J, Martínez C,et al. PARP—2 is required to maintain hematopoiesis following sublethal γ—irradiation in mice[J].Blood, 2013, 122(1): 44-54.

[43]

Illuzzi G, Staniszewska A D, Gill S J,et al. Preclinical characterization of AZD5305, a next—generation, highly selective PARP1 inhibitor and trapper[J].Clin Cancer Res, 2022, 28(21): 4724-4736.

[44]

Yano K, Shiotani B. Emerging strategies for cancer therapy by ATR inhibitors[J].Cancer Sci, 2023, 114(7): 2709-2721.

[45]

Karnitz L M, Zou L. Molecular pathways: targeting ATR in cancer therapy[J].Clin Cancer Res, 2015, 21(21): 4780-4785.

[46]

Ngoi N Y L, Pilié P G, McGrail D J,et al. Targeting ATR in patients with cancer[J].Nat Rev Clin Oncol, 2024, 21(4): 278-293.

[47]

Toledo L I, Murga M, Gutierrez—Martinez P,et al. ATR signaling can drive cells into senescence in the absence of DNA breaks[J].Genes Dev, 2008, 22(3): 297-302.

[48]

Hanahan D, Weinberg R A. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation[J].Cell, 2011, 144(5): 646-674.

[49]

Barnieh F M, Loadman P M, Falconer R A. Progress towards a clinically—successful ATR inhibitor for cancer therapy[J].Curr Res Pharmacol Drug Discov, 2021, 2: 100017.

[50]

Priya B, Ravi S, Kirubakaran S. Targeting ATM and ATR for cancer therapeutics: inhibitors in clinic[J].Drug Discov Today, 2023, 28(8): 103662.

[51]

Kwon M, Kim S T, Smith S,et al. Phase II study of ceralasertib (AZD6738), in combination with durvalumab in patients with metastatic melanoma who have failed prior anti—PD—1 therapy[J].J Clin Oncol, 2021, 39(15_Suppl): 9514.

[52]

Costa P A, Hafez N, Pilat M J P,et al. A phase 2 study of the olaparib and AZD6738, an ATM/ATR inhibitor, in isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutant solid tumors[J].J Clin Oncol, 2025, 43(16_Suppl): 3089.

[53]

Qiu Z, Oleinick N L, Zhang J. ATR/CHK1 inhibitors and cancer therapy[J].Radiother Oncol, 2018, 126(3): 450-464.

[54]

Hammond E M, Freiberg R A, Giaccia A J. The roles of CHK 1 and CHK 2 in hypoxia and reoxygenation[J].Cancer Lett, 2006, 238(2): 161-167.

[55]

Minchom A, Aversa C, Lopez J. Dancing with the DNA damage response: next—generation anti—cancer therapeutic strategies[J].Ther Adv Med Oncol, 2018, 10: 1758835918786658.

[56]

Angius G, Tomao S, Stati V,et al. Prexasertib, a checkpoint kinase inhibitor: from preclinical data to clinical development[J].Cancer Chemothery Pharmacol, 2020, 85(1): 9-20.

[57]

Engelke C G, Parsels L A, Qian Y,et al. Sensitization of pancreatic cancer to chemoradiation by the CHK1 inhibitor MK8776[J].Clin Cancer Res, 2013, 19(16): 4412-4421.

[58]

Plummer E R, Kristeleit R S, Cojocaru E,et al. A first—in—human phase I/II trial of SRA737 (a CHK1 inhibitor) in subjects with advanced cancer[J].J Clini Oncol, 2019, 37(15_Suppl): 3094—3094.

[59]

Zhu J, Zou H, Yu W,et al. Checkpoint kinase inhibitor AZD7762 enhance cisplatin—induced apoptosis in osteosarcoma cells[J].Cancer Cell Int, 2019, 19: 195.

[60]

Evangelisti G, Barra F, Moioli M,et al. Prexasertib: an investigational checkpoint kinase inhibitor for the treatment of high—grade serous ovarian cancer[J].Expert Opin Investig Drugs, 2020, 29(8): 779-792.

[61]

Slotkin E K, Mauguen A, Dela Cruz F S,et al. ACR—368, a CHK1/2 kinase inhibitor, in patients with relapsed or refractory desmoplastic small round cell tumor: phase I/II trial results[J].JCO Oncol Adv, 2025, 2(1): e2400095.

[62]

Xu H, Gitto S B, Ho G Y,et al. CHK1 inhibitor SRA737 is active in PARP inhibitor resistant and CCNE1 amplified ovarian cancer[J].iScience, 2024, 27(7): 109978.

[63]

Sausville E, Lorusso P, Carducci M,et al. Phase I dose—escalation study of AZD7762, a checkpoint kinase inhibitor, in combination with gemcitabine in US patients with advanced solid tumors[J].Cancer Chemother Pharmacol, 2014, 73(3): 539-549.

[64]

Cheng B, Ding Z, Hong Y,et al. Research progress in DNA damage response (DDR) —targeting modulators: from hits to clinical candidates[J].Eur J Med Chem, 2025, 287: 117347.

[65]

Torrado C, Ashton N W, D'Andrea A D,et al. USP1 inhibition: a journey from target discovery to clinical translation[J].Pharmacol Ther, 2025, 271: 108865.

[66]

da Costa A A, Somuncu O, Ravindranathan R,et al. Single—stranded DNA gap accumulation is a functional biomarker for USP1 inhibitor sensitivity[J].Cancer Res, 2024, 84(20): 3435-3446.

[67]

Dylgjeri E, Knudsen K E. DNA—PKcs: a targetable protumorigenic protein kinase[J].Cancer Res, 2022, 82(4): 523-533.

[68]

Ohuchi K, Saga R, Hasegawa K,et al. DNA—PKcs phosphorylation specific inhibitor, NU7441, enhances the radiosensitivity of clinically relevant radioresistant oral squamous cell carcinoma cells[J].Biomed Rep, 2023, 18(4): 28.

[69]

Dhillon K K, Bajrami I, Taniguchi T,et al. Synthetic lethality: the road to novel therapies for breast cancer[J].Endocr Relat Cancer, 2016, 23(10): T39-T55.

[70]

Mahmood R D, Morgan R D, Edmondson R J,et al. First—line management of advanced high—grade serous ovarian cancer[J].Curr Oncol Rep, 2020, 22(6): 64.

[71]

Poveda A, Floquet A, Ledermann J A,et al. Olaparib tablets as maintenance therapy in patients with platinum—sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer and a BRCA1/2mutation (SOLO2/ENGOT—Ov21): a final analysis of a double—blind, randomised, placebo—controlled, phase 3 trial[J].Lancet Oncol, 2021, 22(5): 620-631.

[72]

Monk B J, Barretina—Ginesta M P, Pothuri B,et al. Niraparib first—line maintenance therapy in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer: final overall survival results from the PRIMA/ENGOT—OV26/GOG—3012 trial[J].Ann Oncol, 2024, 35(11): 981-992.

[73]

Oza A M, Lisyanskaya A, Fedenko A,et al. Rucaparib versus chemotherapy for treatment of relapsed ovarian cancer with deleteriousBRCA1or BRCA2mutation (ARIEL4): final results of an international, open—label, randomised, phase 3 trial[J].Lancet Oncol, 2025, 26(2): 249-264.

[74]

Fizazi K, Azad A A, Matsubara N,et al. First—line talazoparib with enzalutamide in HRR—deficient metastatic castration—resistant prostate cancer: the phase 3 TALAPRO—2 trial[J].Nat Med, 2024, 30(1): 257-264.

[75]

Li N, Zhang Y, Wang J,et al. Fuzuloparib maintenance therapy in patients with platinum—sensitive, recurrent ovarian carcinoma (FZOCUS—2): a multicenter, randomized, double—blind, placebo—controlled, phase III trial[J].J Clin Oncol, 2022, 40(22): 2436-2446.

[76]

Kwon M, Kim G, Kim R,et al. Phase II study of ceralasertib (AZD6738) in combination with durvalumab in patients with advanced gastric cancer[J].J Immunother Cancer, 2022, 10(7): e005041.

[77]

Konstantinopoulos P A, Cheng S C, Wahner Hendrickson A E,et al. Berzosertib plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine alone in platinum—resistant high—grade serous ovarian cancer: a multicentre, open—label, randomised, phase 2 trial[J].Lancet Oncol, 2020, 21(7): 957-968.

[78]

Yap T A, Tan D S P, Stathis A,et al. Phase ib basket expansion trial and alternative—schedule dose—escalation study of ATR inhibitor elimusertib in advanced solid tumors with DNA damage response defects[J].Cancer Discov, 2025, 15(10): 2019-2035.

[79]

Yap T A, Fontana E, Lee E K,et al. Camonsertib in DNA damage response—deficient advanced solid tumors: phase 1 trial results[J].Nat Med, 2023, 29(6): 1400-1411.

[80]

Konstantinopoulos P A, Lee J M, Gao B,et al. A Phase 2 study of prexasertib (LY2606368) in platinum resistant or refractory recurrent ovarian cancer[J].Gynecol Oncol, 2022, 167(2): 213-225.

[81]

Kristeleit R, Plummer R, Jones R,et al. A Phase 1/2 trial of SRA737 (a CHK1 inhibitor) administered orally in patients with advanced cancer[J].Br J Cancer, 2023, 129(1): 38-45.

[82]

Huffman B M, Feng H, Parmar K,et al. A phase I expansion cohort study evaluating the safety and efficacy of the CHK1 inhibitor LY2880070 with low—dose gemcitabine in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma[J].Clin Cancer Res, 2023, 29(24): 5047-5056.

[83]

Daud A I, Ashworth M T, Strosberg J,et al. Phase I dose—escalation trial of checkpoint kinase 1 inhibitor MK—8776 as monotherapy and in combination with gemcitabine in patients with advanced solid tumors[J].J Clin Oncol, 2015, 33(9): 1060-1066.

[84]

Yap T A, Lakhani N J, Patnaik A,et al. First—in—human phase I trial of the oral first—in—class ubiquitin specific peptidase 1 (USP1) inhibitor KSQ—4279 (KSQi), given as single agent (SA) and in combination with olaparib (OLA) or carboplatin (CARBO) in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors, enriched for deleterious homologous recombination repair (HRR) mutations[J].J Clin Oncol, 2024, 42(16_Suppl): 3005.

[85]

Romesser P B, Capdevila J, Garcia—Carbonero R,et al. A phase Ib study of the DNA—PK inhibitor peposertib combined with neoadjuvant chemoradiation in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer[J].Clin Cancer Res, 2024, 30(4): 695-702.

[86]

Yap T A, LoRusso P, Miller R E,et al. The DNA—PK inhibitor AZD7648 alone or combined with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in patients with advanced cancer: results of a first—in—human phase I/IIa study[J].Br J Cancer, 2025, 133(2): 168-177.

[87]

Azer K, Kaddi C D, Barrett J S,et al. History and future perspectives on the discipline of quantitative systems pharmacology modeling and its applications[J].Front Physiol, 2021, 12: 637999.

[88]

Helmlinger G, Sokolov V, Peskov K,et al. Quantitative systems pharmacology: an exemplar model—building workflow with applications in cardiovascular, metabolic, and oncology drug development[J].CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol, 2019, 8(6): 380-395.

[89]

Wang H, Ma H, Sové R J,et al. Quantitative systems pharmacology model predictions for efficacy of atezolizumab and nab—paclitaxel in triple—negative breast cancer[J].J Immunother Cancer, 2021, 9(2): e002100.

[90]

Hosseini I, Mac Gabhann F. Mechanistic models predict efficacy of CCR5—deficient stem cell transplants in HIV patient populations[J].CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol, 2016, 5(2): 82-90.

[91]

Coletti R, Leonardelli L, Parolo S,et al. A QSP model of prostate cancer immunotherapy to identify effective combination therapies[J].Sci Rep, 2020, 10(1): 9063.

[92]

Checkley S, MacCallum L, Yates J,et al. Bridging the gap between in vitroand in vivo: dose and schedule predictions for the ATR inhibitor AZD6738[J].Sci Rep, 2015, 5: 13545.

[93]

Pugh K, Davies M, Powathil G. A mathematical model to investigate the effects of ceralasertib and olaparib in targeting the cellular DNA damage response pathway[J].J Pharmacol Exp Ther, 2023, 387(1): 55-65.

[94]

Villette C C, Dupuy N, Brightman F A,et al. Semi—mechanistic efficacy model for PARP+ATR inhibitors: application to rucaparib and talazoparib in combination with gartisertib in breast cancer PDXs[J].Br J Cancer, 2025, 132(5): 481-491.

[95]

Friberg L E, Henningsson A, Maas H,et al. Model of chemotherapy—induced myelosuppression with parameter consistency across drugs[J].J Clin Oncol, 2002, 20(24): 4713-4721.

[96]

Ho T, Clermont G, Parker R S. A model of neutrophil dynamics in response to inflammatory and cancer chemotherapy challenges[J].Comput Chem Eng, 2013, 51: 187-196.

[97]

Wilson J L, Lu D, Corr N,et al. An in vitroquantitative systems pharmacology approach for deconvolving mechanisms of drug—induced, multilineage cytopenias[J].PLoS Comput Biol, 2020, 16(7): e1007620.

[98]

Dias M P, Moser S C, Ganesan S,et al. Understanding and overcoming resistance to PARP inhibitors in cancer therapy[J].Nat Rev Clin Oncol, 2021, 18(12): 773-791.

[99]

Shah P D, Wethington S L, Pagan C,et al. Combination ATR and PARP Inhibitor (CAPRI): a phase 2 study of ceralasertib plus olaparib in patients with recurrent, platinum—resistant epithelial ovarian cancer[J].Gynecol Oncol, 2021, 163(2): 246-253.

[100]

Wethington S L, Shah P D, Martin L,et al. Combination ATR (ceralasertib) and PARP (olaparib)inhibitor (CAPRI) trial in acquired PARP inhibitor—resistant homologous recombination—deficient ovarian Cancer[J].Clin Cancer Res, 2023, 29(15): 2800-2807.

[101]

Craig M. Towards quantitative systems pharmacology models of chemotherapy—induced neutropenia[J].CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol, 2017, 6(5): 293-304.

[102]

Fornari C, Oplustil O’Connor L, Pin C,et al. Quantifying drug—induced bone marrow toxicity using a novel haematopoiesis systems pharmacology model[J].CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol, 2019, 8(11): 858-868.

[103]

Iliakis G, Murmann T, Soni A. Alternative end—joining repair pathways are the ultimate backup for abrogated classical non—homologous end—joining and homologous recombination repair: implications for the formation of chromosome translocations[J].Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen, 2015, 793: 166-175.

[104]

Bhargava R, Onyango D O, Stark J M. Regulation of single—strand annealing and its role in genome maintenance[J]. Trends Genet, 2016, 32(9): 566-575.

[105]

Haynes B, Saadat N, Myung B,et al. Crosstalk between translesion synthesis, Fanconi anemia network, and homologous recombination repair pathways in interstrand DNA crosslink repair and development of chemoresistance[J].Mutat Res Mutat Res, 2015, 763: 258-266.

[106]

Guenther M K, Graab U, Fulda S. Synthetic lethal interaction between PI3K/Akt/mTOR and Ras/MEK/ERK pathway inhibition in rhabdomyosarcoma[J].Cancer Lett, 2013, 337(2): 200-209.

基金资助

江苏省科技厅创新能力建设计划项目(BM2023004)

中国科协青年人才托举工程(YESS20210160)

南京医科大学引进人才科研启动基金(NMUR20210006)

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (3171KB)

74

访问

0

被引

详细

导航
相关文章

AI思维导图

/

〈 〉