13种杀虫剂对木橑尺蠖的室内毒力测定及田间防效
周陈杰 , 马闪闪 , 洪庆红 , 鲁吐浦拉null , 王肖庆 , 吴凯蝶 , 江文楠 , 张羽菲 , 王圣印
甘肃农业大学学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (02) : 171 -178.
13种杀虫剂对木橑尺蠖的室内毒力测定及田间防效
Indoor toxicity and field control efficacy of 13 insecticides to the pest Culcula panterinaria
目的 木橑尺蠖Culcula panterinaria是一种杂食性鳞翅目害虫,为了对浙江省临安区山核桃等多种果树木和经济作物进行有效防治。 方法 本研究分别采用浸液法、浸叶法测定了13种杀虫剂对木橑尺蠖卵与1龄、3龄、5龄3个龄期幼虫的室内毒力,并通过田间试验测定了13种杀虫剂对木撩尺蠖的田间防效。 结果 乙基多杀菌素、多杀菌素和氯虫苯甲酰胺对木橑尺蠖卵的致死中浓度(LC50)分别为0.322、0.514和0.656 mg/L;多杀菌素、氯虫苯甲酰胺和乙基多杀菌素对木橑尺蠖5龄幼虫的毒力较高,致死中浓度(LC50)分别为1.414、2.147和2.658 mg/L。多杀菌素、氯虫苯甲酰胺和乙基多杀菌素对木橑尺蠖的田间防效高于其他杀虫剂,其中多杀菌素的田间防效为94.56%。 结论 推荐生物源杀虫剂多杀菌素或乙基多杀菌素与氯虫苯甲酰胺轮换使用可防治木橑尺蠖。
Objective Culcula panterinaria is an omnivorous lepidopteran pest.The study aimed to effectively control C.panterinaria which seriously damages various fruit trees and cash crops in Lin’an city of Zhejiang province. Method In this study,the indoor toxicity of 13 insecticides to C.panterinaria egg and three instars of the larva were tested by using the methods of immersion and leaf dipping,respectively.The field experiments were conducted to determine the field control effectiveness of 13 insecticides against the pest. Result The results showed that the LC50 of spinetoram,spinosad and chlorantraniliprole to C.panterinaria egg were 0.322,0.514 and 0.656 mg/L,respectively.The toxicity of spinosad,chlorantraniliprole and spinetoram to the fifth instar C.panterinaria larvae was higher than other insecticides,and the LC50 were 1.414、2.147 and 2.658 mg/L,respectively.The field control effect of spinosad,chlorantraniliprole and spinetoram on C.panterinaria was higher than that of other insecticides,among which the efficiency of spinosad was 94.56%. Conclusion The biologically derived spinosad and spinetoram,which was used in rotation with chlorantraniliprole,were recommended as the insecticides of controlling C.panterinaria.
木橑尺蠖 / 乙基多杀菌素 / 多杀菌素 / 氯虫苯甲酰胺 / 山核桃
Culcula panterinaria / spinetoram / spinosad / chlorantraniliprole / Carya cathayensis
| [1] |
季琳琳,陈素传,吴志辉, |
| [2] |
孙冬迎,马骏,王新峰.木橑尺蠖的不同虫态过冷却点测定[J].安徽农业科学,2017,16(45):136-137. |
| [3] |
罗寿.核桃木橑尺蠖防治技巧[J].农村新技术,2019(6):21. |
| [4] |
刘延欣.木橑尺蠖防治效果试验[J].现代农村科技,2021(11):61. |
| [5] |
朱俊庆,郭敏明,张爱兰.木橑尺蠖生物学特性及防治研究[J].茶叶科学,1985,5(1):51-58. |
| [6] |
张改香.豫西地区木橑尺蠖发生规律及防治技术研究[J].林业实用技术,2012(10):36-37. |
| [7] |
李丹.木橑尺蛾发生及防治[J].新农业,2015(11):36-37. |
| [8] |
张会恰.木橑尺蠖的发生与防治[J].落叶果树,2013,45(6):11. |
| [9] |
吴殿一,刘晓林,蔡百争.木撩尺蠖的发生预测与防治技术[J].农村科技开发,2001(7):18. |
| [10] |
张兵.木橑尺蠖的防治技术[J].落叶果树,2012(6):61. |
| [11] |
尤梅平.核桃木橑尺蠖防治方法[J].河北果树,2015(1):53. |
| [12] |
谭贝贝.核桃树木橑尺蠖防治技术[J].山西林业,2017(5):46-47. |
| [13] |
张莉佳.核桃木橑尺蠖发生规律及综合防治措施[J].园艺与种苗,2022,42(9):93-94. |
| [14] |
孙振龙.核桃木橑尺蠖综合防治技术[J].现代农村科技,2013(12):29. |
| [15] |
朱俊庆.木橑尺蠖的为害及防治[J].茶叶,1981(2):34. |
| [16] |
方育卿.木橑尺蠖在庐山的发生及其防治[J].南方林业科学,1990(2):17-18. |
| [17] |
秦芸婷.木橑尺蠖发生规律及防治[J].昆虫知识,1997(1):18-19. |
| [18] |
李秋生,王相宏,王巧玲.木橑尺蠖的生物学特性及防治试验[J].林业实用技术,2008(8):28-29. |
| [19] |
刘庆娟,刘永杰,周仙红, |
| [20] |
杨帆,望勇,骆海波, |
| [21] |
顾国华,葛红,韩娟, |
| [22] |
林素坤,刘凯鸿,王瑞飞, |
| [23] |
王泽华,吴青君,徐宝云, |
| [24] |
王圣印,于毅,刘永杰.西花蓟马抗甲氨基阿维菌素苯甲酸盐种群的交互抗性与生化抗性机制[J].植物保护学报,2012,39(2):159-165. |
| [25] |
颜改兰,王圣印.西花蓟马抗噻虫胺种群对杀虫剂的交互抗性及机制[J].应用生态学报,2020,31(10):3282-3288. |
| [26] |
史雪岩.多杀菌素类杀虫剂的环境降解及抗性机制研究进展[J].农药学学报,2018,20(5):557-567. |
| [27] |
苏豪,吕宝乾,张宝琴, |
| [28] |
刘旭,肖筠,姚革, |
| [29] |
崔玉芳.木尺蠖发生期的物候观察[J].山西林业科技,2004,9(3):26-27. |
| [30] |
左一鸣,王开运,姜兴印.4种抗生素类杀虫剂对小菜蛾不同龄期幼虫的毒力和杀卵作用[J].农药,2004,43(1):25-27. |
| [31] |
侯文杰,李飞,吴青君, |
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
何恒果,王进军.柑橘全爪螨对甲氰菊酯和阿维菌素的抗性选育及交互抗性[J].植物保护,2015,41(6):195-198. |
国家自然科学基金青年基金项目(31701848)
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |