4个荞麦品种对盐胁迫的生理响应及抗盐性评价
Evaluation of physiological responses and salt tolerance to salt stress in four buckwheat varieties
目的 研究不同荞麦品种对盐胁迫的生理响应及耐受性。 方法 以定甜荞1号、固荞1号、贵甜荞2号和定甜荞3号为研究对象,采用NaCl胁迫盆栽试验,以清水为对照(CK),分别对生长量(株高)、发芽率、成活率(存活率)、脯氨酸含量、可溶性糖(SS)、超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)活性、过氧化物酶(POD)活性、丙二醛(MDA)含量、叶绿素含量等指标进行测定,采用隶属函数法对其抗盐性进行综合分析评价。 结果 NaCl胁迫显著影响荞麦的种子萌发、幼苗生长发育和生理生化反应。4个荞麦品种抗盐性强弱依次为:贵甜荞2号>定甜荞1号>定甜荞3号>固荞1号,其中贵甜荞2号受害最轻,抗盐性最强;固荞1号受害最严重,抗盐性最弱。 结论 研究结果为盐碱地区荞麦种植的品种筛选提供一定理论依据,具有科学、全面、准确、方便的特点,有较高推广应用价值。
Objective To study the physiological response and tolerance of different buckwheat varieties to salt stress. Method Ding tian qiao No.1, Gu qiao No.1, Gui tian qiao No.2, and Ding tian qiao No.3 were used as material. Potting test by NaCl stress using clean water as a control (CK), growth amount (plant height), germination rate, survival rate, proline content, soluble sugar (SS) content, superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity, peroxidase (POD) activity, malondialdehyde (MDA) content, chlorophyll content and other indicators were determined. Principal component analysis and membership function method were used to comprehensively evaluate its salt resistance. Result NaCl stress significantly affected seed germination, seedling growth and development,and physiological and biochemical responses of buckwheat.The salt resistance of the four buckwheat varieties was, in order: Gui tian qiao No.2 > Ding tian qiao No.1 > Ding tian qiao No.3 > Gu qiao No.1,among them, Gui tian qiao No. 2 suffered the lightest and had the strongest salt resistance,Gu qiao No.1 is the most severely affected and the salt resistance is the weakest. Conclusion This paper provides some theoretical basis for the selection of buckwheat varieties to be grown in saline-alkali areas.
salt stress / buckwheat / physiological and biochemical / membership functions
| [1] |
施娴,李洪有,卢丙越, |
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
李润枝,靳晴,李召虎, |
| [4] |
陆启环,王雅琦,杨洪兵.外源钙和脱落酸处理对盐胁迫下苦荞麦代谢物含量的影响[J].青岛农业大学学报(自然科学版),2020,37(2):95-101. |
| [5] |
孙建昌,王兴盛,杨生龙.植物耐盐性研究进展[J].干旱地区农业研究,2008(1):226-230. |
| [6] |
杨克理.我国荞麦种质资源研究现状与展望[J].作物品种资源,1995(3):11-134. |
| [7] |
巩巧玲,冯佰利,高金锋, |
| [8] |
龙彭年.荞麦营养保健研究现状与发展对策[J].中国食物与营养,2004(8):20-23. |
| [9] |
隋德宗,许中秋,王俊毅.4个乌桕新品种对NaCl胁迫的生理响应及耐盐性评价[J].安徽农业大学学报,2021,48(6):889-894. |
| [10] |
陈毓荃.生物化学实验方法和技术[M].北京:科学出版社,2002:197-199. |
| [11] |
李妍,张超,王士岭, |
| [12] |
陆燕,王小虎,潘斌清, |
| [13] |
祁和平,石泽汉.杂交稻云两优588制种技术总结[J].农业科技通讯,2020(1):249-250. |
| [14] |
高俊凤.植物生理学实验技术[M].西安:世界图书出版社西安公司,2000:196-197. |
| [15] |
职明星,李秀菊.脯氨酸测定方法的改进[J].植物生理学通讯,2005(3):355-357. |
| [16] |
袁芳,郭建荣.利用隶属函数值法对甜高粱苗期耐盐性的综合评价[J].植物生理学报,2015,51(6):893-902. |
| [17] |
裴毅,祁欣,刘芳, |
| [18] |
高莉,田华,吕培军, |
| [19] |
段亚豪,曹玉玺,吴祖芳, |
| [20] |
张业猛,朱丽丽,李万才, |
| [21] |
杨宏伟,刘文瑜,沈宝云, |
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
蔺豆豆,赵桂琴,宫文龙, |
| [25] |
李雪芳,柳雪,王丽娜, |
| [26] |
彭智,李龙.小麦芽期和苗期耐盐性综合评价[J].植物资源遗传学报,2017,18(4):638-645. |
| [27] |
乔枫.NaHCO3胁迫对莜麦幼苗渗透调节物质和抗氧化酶活性的影响[J].甘肃农业大学报,2022,57(5):53-60. |
甘肃省科技重大专项(18ZD2NA008)
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |