防锈剂对 EPS 处理热轧带钢热镀锌性能的影响
袁玮 , 何龙 , 宋文砾 , 王少峰 , 白春雷 , 黄峰
电镀与涂饰 ›› 2026, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (5) : 149 -158.
防锈剂对 EPS 处理热轧带钢热镀锌性能的影响
Effect of rust preventive on hot-dip galvanizing of hot-rolled steel strip treated by eco-pickled surface
[目的] 研究含 Si(记为 A)和不含 Si(记为 B)两种水基防锈剂对经湿法抛丸(EPS)和 EPS+纤维刷工艺(EPS plus)除鳞防锈后的 Q235B 热轧带钢热镀锌性能的影响,旨在为实际生产中优化 EPS 除鳞工艺、提升热镀锌层品质提供数据支持与参考。[方法] 采用粗糙度轮廓仪、接触角测量仪及扫描电镜(SEM)表征除鳞防锈处理后热轧带钢的表面粗糙度、润湿性及氧化皮残留情况;对钢板进行热镀锌及溶锌试验,利用扫描电镜和电子探针分别观察锌层表面形貌及脱锌后表面抑制层形貌、锌层截面形貌及元素分布,并计算锌消耗量;通过折弯试验检测锌层结合力。[结果] 不同除鳞防锈工艺处理后钢板表面粗糙度( Ra)分别为 1.813 1 μm(EPS+A)、1.394 2 μm(EPS plus+A)、3.257 4 μm(EPS+B)和 2.804 5 μm(EPS plus+B)。除 EPS+B 处理钢板表面残留极少量氧化铁皮外,其余处理均无残留。EPS plus+B 处理试样锌消耗量最低,但镀锌层结合力不达标(2 级)。EPS plus+A 处理试样结合力为 1 级,且其锌消耗量在满足镀锌品质要求的工艺中最低。[结论] 采用含 Si 的 A 防锈剂处理的带钢表面粗糙度小、无氧化皮残留、润湿性好,有利于热镀锌时形成连续致密的 Fe–Al 抑制层,镀锌层结合力好(1 级);采用不含 Si 的 B 防锈剂处理会降低锌液在带钢表面的润湿性,阻碍锌液铺展及抑制层形成,导致折弯后镀锌层出现微裂纹。研究结果对环保除鳞工艺中防锈剂的选型与镀锌品质的提升具有一定的指导意义。
[Objective] This work studied the effect of two water-based rust preventives, Si-containing (coded as A) and Si-free (coded as B), on the hot-dip galvanizing of Q235B hot-rolled steel strip after descaling and rust prevention by eco-pickled surface (EPS, namely wet blasting) and EPS plus fiber brush (EPS plus) processes, aiming to provide data support and reference for optimizing the EPS descaling process and improving the quality of the hot-dip galvanized coating in actual production. [Method] The surface roughness, wettability, and residual oxide scale of steel strips after descaling and rust prevention were characterized using a roughness profilometer, contact angle meter, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Hot-dip galvanizing and zinc stripping were conducted on steel sheets. The surface morphology of the zinc coating and the inhibition layer after zinc stripping, and the cross-sectional morphology and elemental distribution of the zinc coating were analyzed by SEM and electron probe microanalysis (EPMA), and the zinc consumption was calculated. The adhesion of the zinc coating was evaluated by bending test. [Result] After descaling and rust prevention treatments, the surface roughness ( Ra) of the steel sheets were 1.813 1 μm (EPS+A), 1.394 2 μm (EPS plus+A), 3.257 4 μm (EPS+B), and 2.804 5 μm (EPS plus+B). Except for the EPS+B-treated sheet, which exhibited a very small amount of residual iron oxide scale, no residual scale was observed on the other specimens. The EPS plus+B-treated specimen showed the lowest zinc consumption, but its coating adhesion was only Grade 2 (unqualified). In contrast, the EPS plus+A-treated specimen achieved Grade 1 adhesion and the lowest zinc consumption among the processes that met the coating quality requirements. [Conclusion] Steel strips treated with the Si-containing rust preventive A displayed low surface roughness, no residual oxide scale, and good wettability, which facilitated the formation of a continuous and dense Fe–Al inhibition layer during hot-dip galvanizing and resulted in excellent coating adhesion (Grade 1). Treatment with the Si-free rust preventive B reduced the wettability of the molten zinc on the strip surface, hindered the spreading of the zinc liquid and the formation of the inhibition layer, and led to microcracks in the galvanized coating after bending. These findings provide meaningful guidance for the selection of rust preventives in environmentally friendly descaling processes and the improvement of galvanizing quality.
| [1] |
张博睿, 李志伟, 张丽强, |
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
柴元, 孙彬, 王建明, |
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
曹光明, 李志峰, 王皓, |
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
王国栋. 钢铁行业技术创新和发展方向[J]. 钢铁, 2015, 50(9): 1-10. |
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
王业科, 陶涛, 牛强, |
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
李传民, 王新东, 习小军, |
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
周瑾, 周存龙, 段晶晶. 基于分子动力学模拟 FeO/Fe 界面断裂过程[J]. 钢铁研究学报, 2021, 33(9): 929-935. |
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
王尚, 杨荃, 王晓晨, |
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
马二清, 崔磊, 彭梦都, |
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
刘佳伟. 2205 双相不锈钢磨料水射流除鳞及其表面完整性研究[D]. 北京: 北京科技大学, 2023. |
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
郭瑞, 周存龙, 柴泽琳, |
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
李志峰. 热轧钢材氧化铁皮演变机理与免酸洗技术开发[D]. 沈阳: 东北大学, 2018. |
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
宋木清, 王少峰, 袁玮, |
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
张宝峰. 钢板高效水基防锈剂的研制[D]. 鞍山: 辽宁科技大学, 2021. |
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
焦龙. 环保型水基防锈液的研究[D]. 沈阳: 沈阳工业大学, 2015. |
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
郭俊. PVA 水溶性金属防锈液的研制与应用[D]. 株洲: 湖南工业大学, 2016. |
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
任国鹏. 钢板水基防锈处理液的制备及性能研究[D]. 沈阳: 沈阳理工大学, 2017. |
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
天津大学物理化学教研室. 物理化学[M]. 4 版. 北京: 高 |
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
黎敏, 邵蓉, 王长成, |
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
刘力恒, 车淳山, 孔纲, |
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
胡春东, 江社明, 李远鹏, |
| [48] |
|
| [49] |
李九岭. 带钢连续热镀锌[M]. 4 版. 北京: 冶金工业出版社, 2019: 40-72. |
| [50] |
|
| [51] |
陈斌锴, 仲海峰, 张启富. 锌液中 Al 含量对 440MPa 级高强 IF 钢镀层的组织结构及抑制层的影响[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2013, 33(2): 171-174. |
| [52] |
|
| [53] |
李研, 张亮亮, 于洋, |
| [54] |
|
| [55] |
张杰, 江社明, 张启富, |
| [56] |
|
| [57] |
储双杰, 金鑫焱, 毕文珍. 内氧化对热镀锌高强钢镀层/基板界面的影响[J]. 钢铁, 2021, 56(12): 126-133, 141. |
| [58] |
|
| [59] |
彭俊, 金鑫焱. 热镀锌 TRIP 钢还原铁/基板界面表征[J]. 钢铁, 2022, 57(11): 167-174. |
| [60] |
|
| [61] |
邹英, 韩赟, 刘华赛, |
| [62] |
|
| [63] |
曹光明, 李志峰, 王皓, |
| [64] |
|
国家自然科学基金资助项目(U21A20113)
湖北省重大科技攻关项目(2023BAA003)
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |