高强度聚焦超声治疗CSP的临床研究进展

摘要

<正>剖宫产瘢痕妊娠（Cesarean scar pregnancy,CSP）是指受精卵在先前剖宫产的子宫切口瘢痕处着床的一种异位妊娠类型，其病因与早期胎盘植入相同^[1]。随着剖宫产率的上升，CSP的发病率呈现上升趋势。最新数据显示，其发生率已达到1：2 216^[2]。CSP的潜在严重并发症包括子宫破裂、大出血，甚至需要进行紧急子宫切除术以挽救生命。虽然妊娠早期终止妊娠被认为是标准治疗，但现有的治疗方法在全球范围内仍缺乏统一的标准。

关键词

剖宫产瘢痕妊娠 / 高强度聚焦超声 / 治疗 / 临床效果

[1] Nijjar S, Jauniaux E, Jurkovic D.Definition and diagnosis of cesarean scar ectopic pregnancies[J]. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol, 2023, 89: 102360.
[2] Wang Z, Chang Y, Li S.Efficacy and Safety of High-intensity Focused Ultrasound Compared with Uterine Artery Embolization in Cesarean Section Pregnancy: A Meta-analysis[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2023, 30(11): 931-932.
[3] Silva B, Viana Pinto P, Costa MA.Cesarean Scar Pregnancy: A systematic review on expectant management[J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2023, 288: 36-43.
[4] Dai Y, Peng Y, Shi Q, et al.Comparison of menstruation recovery after ultrasound-guided suction curettage in patients with cesarean scar pregnancy pretreated using high-intensity focused ultrasound and uterine artery embolization[J]. Int J Hyperthermia, 2023, 40(1): 2241686.
[5] Cao L, Qian Z, Huang L.Comparison of D&C and hysteroscopy after UAE in the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy: A case-control study[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2022, 101: e28607.
[6] Smith SN, Workman M, Alrowaily N, et al.Cesarean Scar Ectopic Pregnancy at Laparoscopy[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Can, 2022, 45(11): 101912.
[7] Huo S, Shen L, Ju Y, et al.Treatments for cesarean scar pregnancy: 11-year experience at a medical center[J]. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 2023, 36: 2162818.
[8] Tsai MC, Chang LT, Tam KW.Comparison of High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound and Conventional Surgery for Patients with Uterine Myomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2021, 28(10): 1712-1724.
[9] Zhao TT, Pang LL, Yang LL, et al.Efficacy of high-intensity focused ultrasound combined with LNG-IUS for adenomyosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2022, 308(2): 351-362.
[10] 李娟,王薇,罗丹,等. 胎盘植入患者行高强度聚焦超声与子宫动脉化疗栓塞术治疗的临床疗效对比分析[J]. 实用妇产科杂志,2018,34(11): 859-863.
[11] Ji Y, Hu K, Zhang Y, et al.High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) treatment for uterine fibroids: a meta-analysis[J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2017, 296(6): 1181-1188.
[12] Yang D, Ni Z, Yang Y, et al.The enhanced HIFU-induced thermal effect via magnetic ultrasound contrast agent microbubbles[J]. Ultrason Sonochem, 2018, 49: 111-117.
[13] Yang K, Li Q, Xu J, et al.Frequency-Domain Robust PCA for Real-Time Monitoring of HIFU Treatment[J]. IEEE Trans Med Imaging, 2024, 43(8): 3001-3012.
[14] Wang W, Chen Y, Yang Y, et al.High-intensity focused ultrasound compared with uterine artery chemoembolization with methotrexate for the management of cesarean scar pregnancy[J]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2022, 158: 572-578.
[15] Jiang Y, Liu Y, Liu N, et al.Efficacy and safety of high-intensity focused ultrasound combined with suction curettage for the treatment of caesarean scar pregnancy: a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis[J]. Int J Hyperthermia, 2024, 41(1): 2310019.
[16] Li H, Tan H.Regarding "Efficacy and Safety of High-intensity Focused Ultrasound Compared with Uterine Artery Embolization in Cesarean Section Pregnancy: A Meta-analysis"[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2023, 30(11): 931.
[17] Zhu X, Deng X, Xiao S, et al.A comparison of high-intensity focused ultrasound and uterine artery embolisation for the management of caesarean scar pregnancy[J]. Int J Hyperthermia, 2015, 32(2): 144-150.
[18] Peng Y, Dai Y, Yu G, et al.Analysis of the type of cesarean scar pregnancy impacted on the effectiveness and safety of high intensity focused ultrasound combined with ultrasound-guided suction curettage treatment[J]. Int J Hyperthermia, 2022, 39(1): 1449-1457.
[19] Zhang Y, Zhang C, He J, et al.The impact of gestational sac size on the effectiveness and safety of high intensity focused ultrasound combined with ultrasound-guided suction curettage treatment for caesarean scar pregnancy[J]. Int J Hyperthermia, 2018, 35(1): 291-297.
[20] Zhang C, Zhang Y, He J, et al.Outcomes of subsequent pregnancies in patients following treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy with high intensity focused ultrasound followed by ultrasound-guided dilation and curettage[J]. Int J Hyperthermia, 2019, 36(1): 926-931.
[21] Li Y, Hua C.Is High-intensity Focused Ultrasound Superior to Uterine Artery Embolization in Cesarean Scar Pregnancy and Subsequent Pregnancy Outcomes? A Meta-analysis of the Chinese Population[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2023, 30(3): 180-191.
[22] Liu Y, Yin Q, Xu F, et al.Clinical efficacy and safety of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation in treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) I and II[J]. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 2022, 22(1): 607.
[23] Jiang Yu, Liu Yang, Liu Nian, et al.Efficacy and safety of high-intensity focused ultrasound combined with suction curettage for the treatment of caesarean scar pregnancy: a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis[J]. Int J Hyperthermia, 2024, 41(1): 2310019.
[24] Kłobuszewski B, Szmygin M, Nieoczym K, et al.Advances in Treating Cesarean Scar Pregnancy: A Comprehensive Review of Techniques, Clinical Outcomes, and Fertility Preservation[J]. Med Sci Monit, 2024, 30: e943550.
[25] Zhang W, Liu Y, Jiang Y, et al.Efficacy of different treatment of 134 cases of cesarean scar pregnancy[J]. Minerva Surg, 2020, 76(6): 580-585.