儿童发育障碍性疾病知识问卷的编制及应用研究

唐一萍 ,  许亚雄 ,  王华 ,  胡继红 ,  罗丹

广西医科大学学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (3) : 410 -418.

PDF (1053KB)
广西医科大学学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (3) : 410 -418. DOI: 10.16190/j.cnki.45-1211/r.2026.03.011
调查研究

儿童发育障碍性疾病知识问卷的编制及应用研究

作者信息 +

Development and application of the knowledge assessment questionnaire for childhood developmental disorders

Author information +
文章历史 +
PDF (1077K)

摘要

目的:编制儿童发育障碍性疾病知识问卷,检验其信度和效度,并探讨其在发育障碍性疾病患儿照顾者中的应用价值。方法:在参考专家共识及相关指南的基础上,通过两轮专家咨询及预测试形成问卷;采用分层抽样选取湖南省不同经济发展水平地区的6家儿童康复机构作为研究现场,共征募到252名发育障碍性疾病患儿的主要照顾者参加调查;应用该知识问卷及求医行为问卷收集资料,以检验问卷的信度和效度。采用中位数分组法,将照顾者分为知识水平高分组和低分组,比较两组在就诊及康复行为上的差异,并以此确定问卷的参考临界值。结果:最终形成的知识问卷包含4个维度,共18个条目。条目水平内容效度指数(item-level content validity index,I-CVI)为0.93~1.00,量表水平内容效度指数(scale-level content validity index,S-CVI)为0.98;验证性因子分析结果显示模型拟合良好〔比较拟合指数(comparative fit index,CFI)=0.898,近似误差均方根(root mean square error of approximation,RMSEA)=0.069〕。问卷总体 Cronbach's α 系数为 0.798,各维度的 McDonald's ω 系数和Cronbach's α系数均大于0.7。以问卷总分中位数(15分)为界,知识水平低分组(得分≤15分)的照顾者更易出现诊治延误,且对康复治疗的依从性更差。因此,建议将15分作为本问卷的参考临界值,即问卷得分≤15分的照顾者可视为知识水平不足,需重点加强健康教育。结论:本研究编制的儿童发育障碍性疾病知识问卷具有良好的信度和效度,区分度较好,可用于儿童发育障碍性疾病诊治和康复相关的科学研究及临床健康教育实践。

Abstract

Objective: To develop a knowledge assessment questionnaire for childhood developmental disorders, to test its reliability and validity, and to explore its application value among caregivers of children with developmental disorders. Methods: Based on expert consensus and relevant guidelines, two rounds of expert consultation and a pre-test were conducted to form the questionnaire. Stratified sampling was employed to select six children's rehabilitation institutions across regions with varying levels of economic development in Hunan Province as the study sites, and a total of 252 primary caregivers of children with developmental disorders were recruited for the investigation. The knowledge assessment questionnaire and medical-seeking behavior questionnaire were used to collect data for further testing the reliability and validity of the developed questionnaire. By using the median grouping method, the caregivers were divided into a high-knowledge group and a low-knowledge group. The differences in medical treatment and rehabilitation behaviors were compared between the two groups, and the reference cut-off value of the questionnaire was determined accordingly. Results: The finally developed knowledge questionnaire consisted of 4 dimensions and 18 items. The item-level content validity index (I-CVI) ranged from 0.93 to 1.00, and the scale-level content validity index (S-CVI) was 0.98. Confirmatory factor analysis results revealed that the model fitted well [comparative fitted index (CFI)=0.898, root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA)=0.069]. The overall Cronbach's αcoefficient of the questionnaire was 0.798, and both McDonald's ωcoefficients and Cronbach's αcoefficient of each dimension were all greater than 0.7. Based on the median total scores of the questionnaire (15 points), caregivers in the low-knowledge group (scores≤15 points) were more likely to experience delayed diagnosis and treatment, and showed poorer compliance with rehabilitation treatment. Therefore, it was suggested that 15 points be taken as the reference cut-off value of the questionnaire. Caregivers with scores≤15 points were considered to have inadequate knowledge and require targeted health education. Conclusion: The knowledge assessment questionnaire for childhood developmental disorders has good reliability, validity and discrimination ability. It can be applied to scientific research and clinical health education practice related to the diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation of childhood developmental disorders.

关键词

儿童发育障碍 / 评估工具 / 信度 / 效度 / 照顾者 / 知晓率 / 求医行为 / 治疗依从性

Key words

childhood developmental disorders / assessment tools / reliability / validity / caregivers / knowledge rate / medical-seeking behavior / treatment compliance

引用本文

引用格式 ▾
唐一萍,许亚雄,王华,胡继红,罗丹. 儿童发育障碍性疾病知识问卷的编制及应用研究[J]. 广西医科大学学报, 2026, 43(3): 410-418 DOI:10.16190/j.cnki.45-1211/r.2026.03.011

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

参考文献

[1]

刘芸, 马静, 何雪梅, . 儿童康复相关发育性疾病的命名现状与建议[J]. 中国全科医学, 2022, 25(8): 899-904.

[2]

Liu Y, Ma J, He X M, et al. Status of diagnosis and expert advice of developmental disorder related to childhood rehabilitation[J]. Chinese General Practice, 2022, 25(8): 899-904.

[3]

罗丹, 王晓敏, 刘星, . 出生缺陷防治服务中的伦理问题及对策[J]. 广西医科大学学报, 2024, 41(6): 791-794.

[4]

Luo D, Wang X M, Liu X, et al. Ethical issues and solutions in prevention and treatment services of congenital disorders[J]. Journal of Guangxi Medical University, 2024, 41(6): 791-794.

[5]

戴耀华, 关宏岩. 儿童早期综合发展[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2005, 13(4): 327-329.

[6]

Dai Y H, Guan H Y. Early comprehensive development in children[J]. Chinese Journal of Child Health Care, 2005, 13(4): 327-329.

[7]

田园, 陈津津, 于广军. NICU 出院高危儿0~3 岁生长发育随访管理技术的专家共识[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2021, 29(8): 809-814.

[8]

Tian Y, Chen J J, Yu G J. Expert consensus on the follow-up management technologies of growth and development from 0 to 3 years old in high-risk infants discharged from neonatal intensive care unit[J]. Chinese Journal of Child Health Care, 2021, 29(8): 809-814.

[9]

张峰, 罗琼, 廖子菁, . 不同类别高危儿童3 岁前神经发育结局分析[J]. 中国康复医学杂志, 2024, 39(3): 429-431.

[10]

Zhang F, Luo Q, Liao Z J, et al. Analysis of neurodevelopmental outcome of different types of high-risk children before 3 years old[J]. Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 2024, 39(3): 429-431.

[11]

Hirota T, Nishimura T, Mikami M, et al. The role of the maternal and child health handbook in developmental surveillance:the exploration of milestone attainment trajectories[J]. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 2022, 13: 902158.

[12]

苏慧敏, 于文静, 李迅, . 家长对儿童生长发育认知的问卷调查及现状分析[J]. 中日友好医院学报, 2023, 37(6): 350-353.

[13]

Su H M, Yu W J, Li X, et al. Questionnaire survey and current situation analysis of parents′ cognition of children′s growth and development[J]. Journal of China-Japan Friendship Hospital, 2023, 37(6): 350-353.

[14]

张楠, 高雪婷, 王雯, . 学龄前儿童家长儿童保健知识知晓现状调查及影响因素分析[J]. 中国妇幼卫生杂志, 2024, 15(4): 43-48.

[15]

Zhang N, Gao X T, Wang W, et al. Investigation on the current status of preschool children′s parents′ awareness of child health care knowledge and analysis of its influencing factors[J]. Chinese Journal of Women and Children Health, 2024, 15(4): 43-48.

[16]

相琼, 张静静, 牛焕红, . 西安市家长儿童保健知识知晓状况及影响因素[J]. 实用预防医学, 2022, 29(5): 616-619.

[17]

Xiang Q, Zhang J J, Niu H H, et al. Awareness of knowledge about children′s health care and its influencing factors among children′s parents in Xi′an City[J]. Practical Preventive Medicine, 2022, 29(5): 616-619.

[18]

Stefana A, Damiani S, Granziol U, et al. Psychological,psychiatric,and behavioral sciences measurement scales:best practice guidelines for their development and validation[J]. Frontiers in Psychology, 2025, 15: 1494261.

[19]

史静琤, 莫显昆, 孙振球. 量表编制中内容效度指数的应用[J]. 中南大学学报(医学版), 2012, 37(2): 49-52.

[20]

Shi J C, Mo X K, Sun Z Q. Content validity index in scale development[J]. Journal of Central South University(Medical Science), 2012, 37(2): 49-52.

[21]

唐欢, 李娟, 余欢, . 肌少症疾病知识量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理研究, 2024, 38(21): 3806-3811.

[22]

Tang H, Li J, Yu H, et al. Development of disease knowledge scale for sarcopenia and its reliability and validity test[J]. Chinese Nursing Research, 2024, 38(21): 3806-3811.

[23]

Li C H . Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data:comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares[J]. Behavior Research Methods, 2016, 48(3): 936-949.

[24]

Schweizer K, Gold A, Krampen D, et al. Conceptualizing correlated residuals as item-level method effects in confirmatory factor analysis[J]. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2024, 84(5): 869-886.

[25]

许昱菲, 商临萍, 潘玮, . 临床护士参与抗菌药物管理知信行问卷的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理研究, 2021, 35(11): 1925-1930.

[26]

Xu Y F, Shang L P, Pan W, et al. Development and reliability and validity test of participating in antimicrobial stewardship of Knowledge,Attitude,and Practice Scale in clinical nurses[J]. Chinese Nursing Research, 2021, 35(11): 1925-1930.

[27]

白春华, 黄鸿眉. 父母依从度对语言发育迟缓儿童康复效果的影响[J]. 中国听力语言康复科学杂志, 2023, 21(2): 208-211.

[28]

Bai C H, Huang H M. Impact of parent compliance on the rehabilitation effect of children with developmental language disorder[J]. Chinese Scientific Journal of Hearing and Speech Rehabilitation, 2023, 21(2): 208-211.

[29]

Dvorsky M R, Friedman L M, Spiess M, et al. Patterns of parental adherence and the association to child and parenting outcomes following a multicomponent school-home intervention for youth with ADHD[J]. Behavior Therapy, 2021, 52(3): 745-760.

[30]

马宗艳, 王素丽, 刁颖颖, . 孤独症谱系障碍儿童康复依从性影响因素分析[J]. 中国中西医结合儿科学, 2020, 12(2): 135-137.

[31]

Ma Z Y, Wang S L, Diao Y Y, et al. Factors affecting rehabilitation compliance of children with autism spectrum disorder[J]. Chinese Pediatrics of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine, 2020, 12(2): 135-137.

[32]

王素丽, 岳保珠, 陈建贵, . 影响脑瘫儿童康复依从性的家庭因素分析[J]. 中国民康医学, 2019, 31(24): 115-116, 124.

[33]

Wang S L, Yue B Z, Chen J G, et al. Analysis of family factors influencing rehabilitation adherence in children with cerebral palsy[J]. Medical Journal of Chinese People′s Health, 2019, 31(24): 115-116, 124.

[34]

李阳, 张晓红, 胡开红. 运动发育迟滞患儿延迟就诊影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2010, 17(23): 24-26.

[35]

Li Y, Zhang X H, Hu K H. Factors influencing treatment delay for children patients with motor mental retardation[J]. Journal of Nursing(China), 2010, 17(23): 24-26.

[36]

葛海静, 黄敏辉, 詹建英. 儿童语言发育迟缓就诊延迟相关因素分析[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2016, 24(3): 325-328.

[37]

Ge H J, Huang M H, Zhan J Y. Related factors of delayed referring in children with language developmental delay[J]. Chinese Journal of Child Health Care, 2016, 24(3): 325-328.

[38]

Aldayel A S, Aldayel A A, Almutairi A M, et al. Parental knowledge of children′s developmental milestones in Riyadh,Saudi Arabia[J]. International Journal of Pediatrics, 2020, 2020: 8889912.

基金资助

芙蓉实验室科技攻关项目(2024PT5111)

湖南省出生缺陷协同防治科技重大专项子项(2019SK1011)

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (1053KB)

0

访问

0

被引

详细

导航
相关文章

AI思维导图

/