不同煤化程度煤与气化细渣混合燃烧特性分析

张一昕 ,  姜常记 ,  李岩 ,  张世宗 ,  杜宏德 ,  郭凡辉 ,  武建军

燃烧科学与技术 ›› 2026, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (4) : 354 -368.

PDF (2949KB)
燃烧科学与技术 ›› 2026, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (4) : 354 -368. DOI: 10.11715/rskxjs.R202509014

不同煤化程度煤与气化细渣混合燃烧特性分析

作者信息 +

Analysis of Mixed Combustion Characteristics of Coal with Different Degree of Coalification and Coal Gasification Fine Slag

Author information +
文章历史 +
PDF (3019K)

摘要

为提升气化细渣(CGFS)燃烧热回收效率,通过热重分析(TGA)、管式炉及鼓泡流化床试验装置,探究不同煤化程度煤对CGFS燃烧特性的影响.TGA显示,褐煤与CGFS燃烧区间差异明显,混合燃烧呈现“分阶段燃烧”.随着原煤占比的增加,点火温度(Ti)和燃尽温度(Tb)显著降低,综合燃烧特性指数(S)、燃尽指数(Db)、可燃性指数(C)整体提升,表明原煤有效改善了CGFS燃烧性能.随着原煤煤阶的升高,共燃烧相互作用由拮抗向协同转变.通过Flynne-Walle-Ozawa(FWO)和Kissinger-Akahira-Sunose(KAS)拟合表明,原煤的加入显著降低混合体系平均活化能.管式炉燃尽评估表明,褐煤与烟煤的加入使混合体系的燃烧速率均低于任一单组分;而无烟煤则通过协同作用提升燃烧速率.此外,升温速率的提高不仅通过缩短热滞后效应来增强燃烧强度,还通过促进挥发分与固定碳的连续释放显著改善燃尽能力.流化床燃烧试验表明,高含量的挥发分会使燃烧效果更好;无烟煤因固定碳含量高,点火阶段碳氧反应能垒较大,燃烧效果受限.

Abstract

To enhance the combustion heat recovery efficiency of coal gasification fine slag(CGFS), this study investigated the effects of coals with different degrees of coalification on the combustion characteristics of CGFS using thermogravimetric analysis(TGA), tube furnace, and bubbling fluidized bed testing equipment. TGA results showed significant differences in the combustion behavior of lignite and CGFS, with distinct “phased combustion” characteristics during co-combustion. With the increasing proportion of raw coal, both ignition temperature(Ti) and burnout temperature(Tb) decreased significantly. Simultaneously, comprehensive combustion characteristic index(S), burnout index(Db), and flammability index(C) exhibited an overall upward trend, which suggests that the incorporation of raw coal substantially enhances the combustion performance of CGFS. With the increase in raw coal rank, the co-combustion interaction transitions from an antagonistic to a cooperative one. The fitting results of Flynne-Walle-Ozawa(FWO) and Kissinger-Akahira-Sunose(KAS) indicate that the addition of raw coal significantly reduces the average activation energy of the mixed system. The evaluation of tube furnace burnout results indicates that the combustion rate of the mixed coal system is lower than that of any single component when lignite and bituminous coal are added. However, anthracite enhances the combustion rate via a synergistic effect. In addition, the elevated heating rate not only intensifies combustion by mitigating the thermal lag effect but also markedly enhances burnout performance through the promotion of sustained volatile and fixed carbon release. The results of the fluidized bed combustion test indicate that high volatile matter content contributes to more efficient combustion. However, due to the high fixed carbon content, anthracite presents a pronounced energy barrier during the carbon-oxygen reaction in the ignition phase, thereby limiting its combustion efficiency.

关键词

气化细渣 / 混合燃烧 / 热重分析 / 燃烧特性 / 燃尽性能 / 鼓泡流化床

Key words

coal gasification fine slag / mixed combustion / thermogravimetric analysis / combustion characteristics / burnout performance / bubbling fluidized bed

引用本文

引用格式 ▾
张一昕,姜常记,李岩,张世宗,杜宏德,郭凡辉,武建军. 不同煤化程度煤与气化细渣混合燃烧特性分析[J]. 燃烧科学与技术, 2026, 32(4): 354-368 DOI:10.11715/rskxjs.R202509014

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

参考文献

[1]

国家统计局. 中华人民共和国2024年国民经济和社会发展统计公报[N]. 人民日报, 2024.

[2]

National Bureau of Statistics of China. Statistical Communiqué on the National Economic and Social Development of the People’s Republic of China in 2024[N]. People's Daily, 2024(in Chinese).

[3]

Dai F, Zhang S, Luo Y, et al. Recent progress on hydrogen—rich syngas production from coal gasification[J]. Processes, 2023, 11(6): 1765.

[4]

Zhu S, Xu L, Yang L, et al. Effect of physicochemical properties of coal gasification fine ash on its wettability[J]. Advanced Powder Technology, 2021, 32(7): 2123-2136.

[5]

Su S, Tahir M H, Cheng X, et al. Modification and resource utilization of coal gasification slag—based material: A review[J]. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2024, 12(2): 112112.

[6]

Ren L, Ding L, Guo Q, et al. Characterization, carbon—ash separation and resource utilization of coal gasification fine slag: A comprehensive review[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2023, 398: 136554.

[7]

Shi Z, Shu Y, Wang Z, et al. Emission characteristics of coal gasification fine slag direct combustion and co—firing with coal[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2023, 344: 118498.

[8]

Guo L, Zhang T, Dai X, et al. A simple method to prepare carbon—based mesoporous materials by coal gasification of fine slag and its application in phenol adsorption[J]. Materials Research Express, 2023, 10(10): 105601.

[9]

Miao Z, Han X, Ge H, et al. Insight into the synergism of residual carbon and slag particles in coal gasification fine slag on porous composites preparation for CO2 capture [J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2024, 339: 126540.

[10]

Xu L, Dong K, Guo F, et al. Synthesis of zeolite—based porous catalysts from coal gasification fine slag for steam reforming of toluene[J]. Energy, 2023, 274: 127294.

[11]

Niu Y, Luo P, Su C, et al. Effects of coal gasification slag on the migration of Cd 2+ and Pb 2+ in soil [J]. Geomicrobiology Journal, 2024, 41(3): 243-255.

[12]

宁永安, 段一航, 高宁博, . 煤气化渣组分回收与利用技术研究进展[J]. 洁净煤技术, 2020, 26(S1): 14-19.

[13]

Ning Yongan, Duan Yihang, Gao Ningbo, et al. Progress of component recycling and utilization technology of coal gasification slag[J]. Clean Coal Technology, 2020, 26(S1): 14-19(in Chinese).

[14]

高海洋, 梁龙, 靳开宇, . 煤气化渣资源化利用综述[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2024, 52(8): 192-208.

[15]

Gao Hanyang, Liang Long, Jin Kaiyu, et al. Review on resource utilization of coal gasification slag[J]. Coal Science and Technology, 2024, 52(8): 192-208(in Chinese).

[16]

Zhang Y, Qu J, Zhang J, et al. Distribution, occurrence, and leachability of typical heavy metals in coal gasification slag[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2024, 926: 172011.

[17]

B, Deng X, Jiao F, et al. Enrichment and utilization of residual carbon from coal gasification slag: A review[J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2023, 171: 859-873.

[18]

Liu Z, Wang G, Li P, et al. Investigation on combustion of high—sulfur coal catalyzed with industrial waste slags[J]. Journal of the Energy Institute, 2019, 92(3): 621-629.

[19]

Guo Y, Guo F, Zhou L, et al. Investigation on co—combustion of coal gasification fine slag residual carbon and sawdust char blends: Physiochemical properties, combustion characteristic and kinetic behavior[J]. Fuel, 2021, 292: 120387.

[20]

Zhang Y, Jia W, Wang R, et al. Investigation of the characteristics of catalysis synergy during co—combustion for coal gasification fine slag with bituminous coal and bamboo residue[J]. Catalysts, 2021, 11(10): 1152.

[21]

Zhong Q, Zhang J, Yang Y, et al. Combustion behavior of coals in rotary kiln and their interaction on co—combustion[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2018, 32(3): 3833-3841.

[22]

Xu J, Bai Z, Bai J, et al. Physico—chemical structure and combustion properties of chars derived from co—pyrolysis of lignite with direct coal liquefaction residue[J]. Fuel, 2017, 187: 103-110.

[23]

Zou H, Evrendilek F, Liu J, et al. Combustion behaviors of pileus and stipe parts of Lentinus edodes using thermogravimetric—mass spectrometry and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy analyses: Thermal conversion, kinetic, thermodynamic, gas emission and optimization analyses[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2019, 288: 121481.

[24]

Gil M V, Casal D, Pevida C, et al. Thermal behaviour and kinetics of coal/biomass blends during co—combustion[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2010, 101(14): 5601-5608.

[25]

Doyle C D. Estimating isothermal life from thermogravimetric data[J]. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 1962, 6(24): 639-642.

[26]

Cai J, Liu R, Shen F. Improved version of Doyle integral method for nonisothermal kinetics of solid—state reactions[J]. Journal of Mathematical Chemistry, 2007, 43(3): 1127-1133.

[27]

Flynn J H, Wall L A. General treatment of the thermogravimetry of polymers[J]. Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards—A. Physics and Chemistry, 1966, 70A(6): 487-523.

[28]

Soria—Verdugo A, Goos E, García—Hernando N, et al. Analyzing the pyrolysis kinetics of several microalgae species by various differential and integral isoconversional kinetic methods and the distributed activation energy model[J]. Algal Research, 2018, 32: 11-29.

[29]

Xu C, Luo C, Du J, et al. Structure characteristics and combustion kinetics of the co—pyrolytic char of rice straw and coal gangue[J]. Scientific Reports, 2024, 14(1): 16320.

[30]

Koçer A T, Özçimen D, Gökalp İ. An experimental study on the combustion behaviours of orange peel—based solid biofuels[J]. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery, 2023, 14(18): 22839-22851.

[31]

Tang C, Pan J, Zhu D, et al. Optimizing combustion efficiency in blast furnace injection: A sustainable approach using biomass char and coal mixtures[J]. Sustainability, 2024, 16(14): 6140.

[32]

Park S—W, Jang C—H, Baek K—R, et al. Torrefaction and low—temperature carbonization of woody biomass: Evaluation of fuel characteristics of the products[J]. Energy, 2012, 45(1): 676-685.

[33]

Guo F, Zhong Z. Optimization of the co—combustion of coal and composite biomass pellets[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 185: 399-407.

[34]

Liu S, Niu Y, Wen L, et al. Effects of physical structure of high heating—rate chars on combustion characteristics[J]. Fuel, 2020, 266: 117059.

[35]

Ding Y, Li D, Zhang X, et al. Research on the co—combustion characteristics and kinetics of rice husk hydrochar with anthracite[J]. Energy, 2024, 299: 131339.

[36]

Guo L, Zhai M, Wang Z, et al. Comparison of bituminous coal and lignite during combustion: Combustion performance, coking and slagging characteristics[J]. Journal of the Energy Institute, 2019, 92(3): 802-812.

[37]

杨继元, 乔军强, 芦海云. 烟煤燃烧特性的热重分析[J]. 洁净煤技术, 2021, 27(S2): 236-239.

[38]

Yang Jiyuan, Qiao Junqiang, Lu Haiyun. Thermogravimetric analysis of combustion characteristics for bituminous coals[J]. Clean Coal Technology, 2021, 27(S2): 236-239(in Chinese).

[39]

罗睿, 王智微, 陈华冬, . 煤与生物质混燃动力学分析及协同效应[J]. 洁净煤技术, 2023, 29(S2): 196-205.

[40]

Luo Rui, Wang Zhiwei, Chen Huadong, et al. Kinetic analysis and synergistic effect of coal and biomass blending combustion[J]. Clean Coal Technology, 2023, 29(S2): 196-205(in Chinese).

[41]

Liang W, Jiang C, Wang G, et al. Research on the co—combustion characteristics and kinetics of agricultural waste hydrochar and anthracite[J]. Renewable Energy, 2022, 194: 1119-1130.

[42]

Soria—Verdugo A, Kauppinen J, Soini T, et al. Pollutant emissions released during sewage sludge combustion in a bubbling fluidized bed reactor[J]. Waste Management, 2020, 105: 27-38.

[43]

杨晋川. 褐煤与油页岩混合燃烧特性及污染物排放分析[D]. 吉林: 东北电力大学能源与动力工程学院, 2023.

[44]

Yang Jinchuan. Analysis of Mixed Combustion Characteristics and Pollutant Emissions of Lignite and Oil Shale[D]. Jilin: School of Energy and Power Engineering, Northeast Electric Power University, 2023(in Chinese).

基金资助

国家自然科学基金资助项目(51974311)

宁夏自然科学基金资助项目(2025AAC020012)

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (2949KB)

5

访问

0

被引

详细

导航
相关文章

AI思维导图

/