国际竞技体操竞争格局及2028洛杉矶奥运周期中国备战策略——基于新规则变革的系统性分析
刘婷 , 杨通烈 , 吕万刚
广州体育学院学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (3) : 81 -92.
国际竞技体操竞争格局及2028洛杉矶奥运周期中国备战策略——基于新规则变革的系统性分析
The Competitive Landscape of International Artistic Gymnastics and China’s Coping Strategy for the 2028 Los Angeles Olympic Cycle
采用文献资料、专家访谈、录像分析、数理统计及逻辑分析等研究方法,分析国际竞技体操竞争格局,探讨新规则变革对中国体操队的主要影响及中国竞技体操发展面临的主要问题,提出2028洛杉矶奥运周期中国的备战策略。研究表明:1)当前国际竞技体操竞争格局呈现出区域分化与多元共生的鲜明特征;传统竞技体操强国持续领跑,男子项目上中、日两国竞争激烈,女子项目中,美、俄优势明显;中国竞技体操的国际位势深度嵌入全球竞争格局的动态演变之中。2)我国竞技体操面临动作难度与稳定性失衡、训练理念与方法陈旧、技术动作创新不足、后备人才“质”“量”双缺、男女项目发展不均衡以及项目群众基础薄弱等问题。研究提出,从战略适配、人才强基、科技赋能、规则顺应四个维度协同发力,实现核心竞争力的整体跃升。
This study employs a comprehensive methodology integrating literature review, expert interviews, video analysis, statistical analysis, and logical reasoning to analyze the competitive landscape of international artistic gymnastics. It investigates the primary impacts of recent rule changes on the Chinese national team and identifies the key challenges confronting the development of Chinese artistic gymnastics. Furthermore, it proposes strategic preparations for China in the lead-up to the 2028 Los Angeles Olympic cycle. The findings indicate that: 1) The current international competitive landscape is characterized by distinct regional differentiation and diversified development. Traditional powerhouses continue to lead, with intense competition between China and Japan in men’s events, while the United States and Russia maintain pronounced advantages in women’s events. China’s international standing is deeply embedded in this dynamic evolution, benefiting from systematic rule interpretation and training methodologies, yet simultaneously facing challenges from multipolar competition and the rise of emerging forces. 2) The new rules, centered on the refinement of the difficulty scoring system and an increased emphasis on choreographic composition, impose higher demands on the difficulty repertoire and execution precision of Chinese gymnasts. The sport in China continues to grapple with several critical issues: an imbalance between difficulty and stability, outdated training philosophies and methods, insufficient technical innovation, a dual deficit in both the quality and quantity of reserve talent, imbalanced development between men’s and women’s programs, and a weak grassroots foundation. Accordingly, this study proposes a four-pronged strategy: Strategic Adaptation to consolidate strengths and address weaknesses, fostering balanced and synergistic development across all disciplines; Talent Development through strengthening the reserve talent pipeline to lay a solid foundation for sustainable growth; Technological Empowerment by establishing collaborative mechanisms among government, industry, academia, and research to enhance training efficacy through scientific and technological drivers; and Rule Alignment via deepening the study and application of new regulations to enhance China’s international influence and discursive power.
| [1] |
新华社. 中共中央关于制定国民经济和社会发展第十五个五年规划的建议[EB/OL]. (2025-10-23)[2025-11-22]. https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/202510/content_7046050.htm |
| [2] |
李宗浩. 竞技体育解读与“竞技体育强国”探蹊[J]. 天津体育学院学报, 2013, 28(2): 93-95. |
| [3] |
彭召方, 吴昀潞, 国伟, |
| [4] |
新华社. 奥运佳绩彰显新时代中国力量[EB/OL]. (2024-08-24)[2025-01-13]. https://www.news.cn/politics/20240824/747d5a23e20f4bddbd439afa6f2288c5/c.html. |
| [5] |
彭召方, 李佐惠, 袁玲, |
| [6] |
闫小凡, 吴昀潞, 张佳佳, |
| [7] |
中国体育报. 身似游龙轻如燕 方寸台上翩若仙——巴黎奥运会项目盘点之体操[EB/OL]. (2024-07-05)[2024-12-22]. https://www.sport.gov.cn/n20001280/n20067662/n20067613/c27882017/content.html. |
| [8] |
李思民. 我国竞技体操运动的发展特征、影响因素及发展规律研究[D]. 曲阜: 曲阜师范大学, 2010. |
| [9] |
陈林会, 刘青. 美国竞技体操发展经验与启示[J]. 体育文化导刊, 2018(7): 72-76+116. |
| [10] |
王文生, 刘宇珍. 国际体操联合会的竞赛改革与创新发展述评[J]. 首都体育学院学报, 2020, 32(1): 40-42. |
| [11] |
FIG EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE, 2024a. 2025-2028 Men’s Artistic Gymnastics Code of Points[EB/OL]. (2024-11-23)[2025-11-23]. https://www.gymnastics.sport/publicdir/rules/files/en_1.1%20-%20MAG%20CoP%202025-2028.pdf. |
| [12] |
FIG EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE, 2024b. 2025-2028 Women’s Artistic Gymnastics Code of Points[EB/OL]. (2024-11-23)[2025-11-23]. https://www.gymnastics.sport/publicdir/rules/files/en_1.1%20-%20WAG%20COP%202025-2028.pdf. |
| [13] |
刘欢, 董建国, 何卫. 巴黎奥运周期中国、日本体操男子团体竞技实力与重大失误及落地稳定性之间的关系[J]. 中国体育科技, 2025, 61(6): 19-27. |
| [14] |
张军舰. 第46届世界体操锦标赛中国队成绩分析[J]. 体育文化导刊, 2016(9): 71-76. |
| [15] |
彭国强, 杨国庆. 世界竞技体育强国重点项目奥运备战举措及对我国备战东京奥运会的启示[J]. 体育科学, 2020, 40(2): 3-14+39. |
| [16] |
郑湘平, 王洁迪, 姚潇治, 刘芷琳, 聂应军. 巴黎奥运周期我国女子竞技体操备战策略研究——兼论2028年奥运会备战形势与备战方略[J]. 武汉体育学院学报, 2023, 57(6): 85-91. |
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
何俊. 东京奥运会中国女子体操补齐跳马短板的重要意义和基本路径[J]. 体育与科学, 2021, 42(1): 73-82. |
| [19] |
杨国庆. 中国备战参赛东京奥运会的制胜优势与经验启示——兼论2024年巴黎奥运会的备战形势与基本方略[J]. 体育科学, 2021, 41(12): 18-29. |
| [20] |
国家体育总局体操运动管理中心. 体育总局体操中心所属国家队运动员、教练员选拔与监督工作管理规定(试行)[EB/OL]. (2015-07-06)[2024-12-29]. https://www.sport.gov.cn/tczx/n5272/c20991750/content.html. |
| [21] |
陈林会. 我国竞技体操项目优化发展的管理方略研究[J]. 中国体育科技, 2018, 54(4): 53-61+145. |
| [22] |
叶晓东, 李凯, 芦伟. 巴黎奥运周期我国竞技体操备战探索[J]. 中国体育教练员, 2024, 32(1): 23-25+45. |
| [23] |
中国体育报. “冰丝带”劲吹体操风 体操等级比赛北京站“优化升级”[EB/OL]. (2025-09-22)[2025-10-23]. https://www.sport.gov.cn/n20001280/n20067662/n20067613/c29076973/content.html. |
| [24] |
李贵庆, 王岗, 杨继美. 对我国竞技体操保持长盛不衰的理性思考[J]. 北京体育大学学报, 2017, 40(10): 30-38. |
| [25] |
吕万刚, 季彦霞. 中国竞技体操后备人才培养多元共治的影响因素研究[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2024, 50(3): 1-10. |
| [26] |
竞技体育司. 体育总局关于印发《合作组建国家高水平运动队管理办法(试行)》的通知[EB/OL]. (2025-08-20)[2025-10-23]. https://www.sport.gov.cn/jts/n5005/c28972163/content.html. |
| [27] |
陈小平. 从助力到引领——竞技运动训练科学化的转折与发展[J]. 体育与科学, 2023, 44(3): 1-10. |
| [28] |
体操运动管理中心. 体育总局体操中心关于2021年度国家体操队购买科技服务项目招标结果公示的通知[EB/OL]. (2021-03-10)[2024-09-23]. https://www.sport.gov.cn/n315/n20001395/c20002267/content.html |
| [29] |
吴彰忠, 钟亚平, 史金田, |
| [30] |
曹景伟. 以高水平体育科技自立自强赋能新时代体育强国建设[J]. 体育科学, 2023, 43(2): 3-11. |
| [31] |
于思远, 郭振, 刘波. 新征程中我国竞技体育国际话语权建设:意涵、困境及纾解[J]. 西安体育学院学报, 2023, 40(3): 257-263. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |