甘油三酯-葡萄糖指数对局晚期和晚期非小细胞肺癌免疫治疗疗效及预后的影响

孔子越 ,  马啸 ,  魏晨晨 ,  陆彬彬 ,  王朝霞

南京医科大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (7) : 1073 -1083.

PDF (42488KB)
南京医科大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (7) : 1073 -1083. DOI: 10.7655/NYDXBNSN250515
临床研究

甘油三酯-葡萄糖指数对局晚期和晚期非小细胞肺癌免疫治疗疗效及预后的影响

作者信息 +

The impact of triglyceride-glucose index on the efficacy of immunotherapy and prognosis of locally advanced and advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Author information +
文章历史 +
PDF (43507K)

摘要

目的:研究胰岛素抵抗标志物甘油三酯-葡萄糖(triglyceride-glucose,TyG)指数是否可预测替雷利珠单抗联合化疗的局部晚期和晚期非小细胞肺癌(non-small cell lung cancer,NSCLC)患者的临床结局。方法:回顾性分析243例局晚期和晚期接受替雷利珠单抗联合化疗治疗的NSCLC患者的数据,根据使用X-tile软件确定的最佳截断值9.3,将患者分为高TyG指数组和低TyG指数组。Cox比例风险回归分析确定了影响总生存期(overall survival,OS)的独立预后因素,并基于这些因素建立列线图预测模型。结果:研究队列包括160例高TyG指数患者和83例低TyG指数患者。低TyG指数组的中位无进展生存期和DS显著长于高TyG指数组。低TyG指数组的客观缓解率为55.42%,而高TyG指数组为30.63%;相应的疾病控制率分别为95.18%和56.88%。多因素回归分析确定了治疗前最大肿瘤直径、程序性死亡配体1(programmed death ligand 1,PD-L1)阳性比例评分、体重指数(body mass index,BMI)和TyG指数作为DS的独立预后预测因子。列线图模型表明了TyG指数(HR=2.99,95%CI:1.73~5.16,P<0.001)作为主要预后预测因子的重要性,其次是PD-L1阳性比例评分、治疗前肿瘤最大直径和BMI。结论:TyG指数是局晚期和晚期NSCLC患者联合免疫治疗和化疗疗效的长期预测指标,低TyG指数预后较好。

Abstract

Objective:To investigate whether triglyceride - glucose(TyG)index,a marker of insulin resistance,can predict the clinical outcome of patients with locally advanced and advanced non - small cell lung cancer(NSCLC)treated with tislelizumab combined with chemotherapy. Methods:We retrospectively analyzed data from 243 patients who were treated with tislelizumab combined with chemotherapy with locally advanced and advanced NSCLC,dividing them into high and low TyG index groups based on an optimal cut - off value of 9.3,determined using the X - tile software. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis identified independent prognostic factors for overall survival(OS),and a prediction nomogram model was developed based on them. Results:The study cohort included 160 patients with a high TyG index and 83 with a low TyG index. The median progression-free survival and OS in the low TyG index group were significantly longer than in the high TyG index group. The objective response rate was 55.42% in the low TyG index group and 30.63% in the high TyG index group,while the respective disease control rates were 95.18% and 56.88% . Multifactorial regression analysis identified pre-treatment maximum tumour diameter,proportion score for programmed death ligand 1(PD - L1)positivity,body mass index(BMI),and TyG index as independent prognostic predictors of OS. The nomogram model emphasized the importance of the TyG index(hazard ratio:2.99,95% CI:1.73-5.16,P<0.001)as a major prognostic predictor,followed by the PD - L1 tumor proportion score,pre - treatment tumour diameter,and BMI. Conclusion:TyG index is a long - term predictor of the efficacy of combined immunotherapy and chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced and advanced NSCLC,and low TyG index has a better prognosis.

关键词

非小细胞肺癌 / 免疫治疗 / 预测模型 / 有效性 / 安全性

Key words

non-small cell lung cancer / immunotherapy / prediction model / efficacy / safety

引用本文

引用格式 ▾
孔子越,马啸,魏晨晨,陆彬彬,王朝霞. 甘油三酯-葡萄糖指数对局晚期和晚期非小细胞肺癌免疫治疗疗效及预后的影响[J]. 南京医科大学学报(自然科学版), 2026, 46(7): 1073-1083 DOI:10.7655/NYDXBNSN250515

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

参考文献

[1]

BRAY F, LAVERSANNE M, SUNG H, et al. Global cancer statistics 2022:GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2024, 74(3):229-263

[2]

LAHIRI A, MAJI A, POTDAR P D, et al. Lung cancer immunotherapy:progress,pitfalls,and promises[J]. Mol Cancer, 2023, 22(1):40

[3]

ZHOU S J, XIE J J, HUANG Z Q, et al. Anti—PD—(L)1 immunotherapy for brain metastases in non—small cell lung cancer:Mechanisms,advances,and challenges[J]. Cancer Lett, 2021, 502:166-179

[4]

PANG L L, GAN J D, HUANG Y H, et al. Role of antiangiogenic agents in first—line treatment for advanced NSCLC in the era of immunotherapy[J]. BMC Cancer, 2023, 23(1):72

[5]

SIVORI S, VACCA P, DEL ZOTTO G, et al. Human NK cells:surface receptors,inhibitory checkpoints,and translational applications[J]. Cell Mol Immunol, 2019, 16(5):430-441

[6]

WU Y L, ZHANG L, FAN Y, et al. Randomized clinical trial of pembrolizumab vs. chemotherapy for previously untreated Chinese patients with PD—L1—positive locally advanced or metastatic non—small—cell lung cancer:KEYNOTE—042 China Study[J]. Int J Cancer, 2021, 148(9):2313-2320

[7]

RECK M, RODRÍGUEZ—ABREU D, ROBINSON A G, et al. Five—year outcomes with pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy for metastatic non—small—cell lung cancer with PD—L1 tumor proportion score ≥50[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2021, 39(21):2339-2349

[8]

TANAKA H, MAKIGUCHI T, TOZUKA T, et al. Comparison of immune checkpoint inhibitor plus chemotherapy or ipilimumab plus nivolumab—based therapy for NSCLC patients with PD—L1 TPS(1—49%):TOPGAN2023—01[J]. Eur J Cancer, 2024, 213:115117

[9]

ORILLARD E, ADHIKARI A, MALOUF R S, et al. Immune checkpoint inhibitors plus platinum—based chemotherapy compared to platinum—based chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab for first—line treatment of older people with advanced non—small cell lung cancer[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2024, 8(8):CD015495

[10]

QU F J, ZHOU Y, WU S. Progress of immune checkpoint inhibitors therapy for non—small cell lung cancer with liver metastases[J]. Br J Cancer, 2024, 130(2):165-175

[11]

TACHIBANA Y, MORIMOTO K, YAMADA T, et al. Depth of response and treatment outcomes of immune checkpoint inhibitor—based therapy in patients with advanced non—small cell lung cancer and high PD—L1 expression:an exploratory analysis of retrospective multicenter cohort[J]. Invest New Drugs, 2024, 42(5):538-546

[12]

SONG K, LEE H W, CHOI H S, et al. Comparison of the modified TyG indices and other parameters to predict non—alcoholic fatty liver disease in youth[J]. Biology, 2022, 11(5):685

[13]

YAO Z Y, MA X, CUI Y Z, et al. Impact of triglyceride—glucose index on the long—term prognosis of advanced gastric cancer patients receiving immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2025, 31(5):102249

[14]

TAO S Y, YU L T, LI J, et al. Multiple triglyceride—derived metabolic indices and incident cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and coronary heart disease[J]. Cardiovasc Diabetol, 2024, 23(1):359

[15]

XIAO Y, WANG H, TANG Y, et al. Increased risk of diabetes in cancer survivors:a pooled analysis of 13 population—based cohort studies[J]. ESMO Open, 2021, 6(4):100218

[16]

FRITZ J, BJØRGE T, NAGEL G, et al. The triglyceride—glucose index as a measure of insulin resistance and risk of obesity—related cancers[J]. Int J Epidemiol, 2020, 49(1):193-204

[17]

MARTINI A, SHAH Q N, WAINGANKAR N, et al. The obesity paradox in metastatic castration—resistant prostate cancer[J]. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis, 2022, 25(3):472-478

[18]

YI M, ZHENG X L, NIU M K, et al. Combination strategies with PD—1/PD—L1 blockade:current advances and future directions[J]. Mol Cancer, 2022, 21(1):28

[19]

GARASSINO M C, GADGEEL S, ESTEBAN E, et al. Patient—reported outcomes following pembrolizumab or placebo plus pemetrexed and platinum in patients with previously untreated,metastatic,non—squamous non—small—cell lung cancer(KEYNOTE—189):a multicentre,double—blind,randomised,placebo—controlled,phase 3 trial[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2020, 21(3):387-397

[20]

EMANCIPATOR K. Keytruda and PD—L1:a real—world example of co—development of a drug with a predictive biomarker[J]. AAPS J, 2020, 23(1):5

[21]

ZHAO Q, ZHANG T Y, CHENG Y J, et al. Impacts of triglyceride—glucose index on prognosis of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and non—ST—segment elevation acute coronary syndrome:results from an observational cohort study in China[J]. Cardiovasc Diabetol, 2020, 19(1):108

[22]

ZHANG R T, SHI S S, CHEN W H, et al. Independent effects of the triglyceride—glucose index on all—cause mortality in critically ill patients with coronary heart disease:analysis of the MIMIC—Ⅲ database[J]. Cardiovasc Diabetol, 2023, 22(1):10

[23]

QIN G L, SUN Z, JIN Y X, et al. The association between the triglyceride—glucose index and prognosis in postoperative renal cell carcinoma patients:a retrospective cohort study[J]. Front Endocrinol, 2024, 15:1301703

[24]

WU Z L, YANG J Y, MA Z Y, et al. Associations between triglyceride—glucose related indices and the risk of incident pancreatic cancer:a large—scale prospective cohort study in the UK Biobank[J]. BMC Cancer, 2025, 25(1):327

[25]

MA X Z, BI E G, LU Y, et al. Cholesterol induces CD8+ T cell exhaustion in the tumor microenvironment[J]. Cell Metab, 2019, 30(1):143-156

[26]

CHIEFARI E, MIRABELLI M, LA VIGNERA S, et al. Insulin resistance and cancer:in search for a causal link[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2021, 22(20):11137

[27]

WANG Y N, LEE H H, HSU J L, et al. The impact of PD—L1 N—linked glycosylation on cancer therapy and clinical diagnosis[J]. J Biomed Sci, 2020, 27(1):77

[28]

POZNYAK A, GRECHKO A V, POGGIO P, et al. The diabetes mellitus—atherosclerosis connection:the role of lipid and glucose metabolism and chronic inflammation[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2020, 21(5):1835

[29]

KENNEL K B, BOZLAR M, DE VALK A F, et al. Cancer—associated fibroblasts in inflammation and antitumor immunity[J]. Clin Cancer Res, 2023, 29(6):1009-1016

[30]

RAŠKOVÁ M, LACINA L, KEJÍK Z, et al. The role of IL—6 in cancer cell invasiveness and metastasis—overview and therapeutic opportunities[J]. Cells, 2022, 11(22):3698

[31]

AHN N, BAUMEISTER S E, AMANN U, et al. Visceral adiposity index(VAI),lipid accumulation product(LAP),and product of triglycerides and glucose(TyG)to discriminate prediabetes and diabetes[J]. Sci Rep, 2019, 9(1):9693

[32]

BREIT S N, BROWN D A, TSAI V W. The GDF15—GFRAL pathway in health and metabolic disease:friend or foe?[J]. Annu Rev Physiol, 2021, 83:127-151

[33]

ZHANG H, LIU Y, WANG J, et al. Association of the triglyceride—glucose index with clinical outcomes in patients with advanced non—small cell lung cancer receiving pembrolizumab and chemotherapy[J]. Front Oncol, 2025, 15:1616302

[34]

MARTIN L, SENESSE P, GIOULBASANIS I, et al. Diagnostic criteria for the classification of cancer—associated weight loss[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2015, 33(1):90-99

[35]

IYENGAR N M, GUCALP A, DANNENBERG A J, et al. Obesity and cancer mechanisms:tumor microenvironment and inflammation[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2016, 34(35):4270-4276

基金资助

南京医科大学部省共建肿瘤个体化医学协同创新中心-恒瑞医药临床研究基金面上项目(2024CICCPMHR020)

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (42488KB)

0

访问

0

被引

详细

导航
相关文章

AI思维导图

/