冠状动脉造影及介入治疗患者辐射剂量的影响因素分析及预测模型构建

冯婕 ,  渠强 ,  雷心仪 ,  陈思彤 ,  鲍志鹏 ,  左智 ,  李新立 ,  王晖 ,  姚文明

南京医科大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (8) : 1218 -1228.

PDF (679KB)
南京医科大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (8) : 1218 -1228. DOI: 10.7655/NYDXBNSN260138
临床研究

冠状动脉造影及介入治疗患者辐射剂量的影响因素分析及预测模型构建

作者信息 +

Analysis of influencing factors and development of a prediction model for radiation dose in patients undergoing coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention

Author information +
文章历史 +
PDF (694K)

摘要

目的: 探究影响冠状动脉造影(coronary angiography,CAG)及介入治疗(percutaneous coronary intervention,PCI)患者辐射剂量的因素,并构建辐射剂量的临床预测模型。方法: 回顾性纳入2020年1月—2024年12月于南京医科大学第一附属医院就诊并行CAG的293例阻塞性冠心病患者,按7∶3比例随机分为训练集(208例)和测试集(85例)。以术中辐射剂量为结局,基于临床特征及介入相关变量,采用多种变量筛选和建模方法建立多因素线性回归预测模型并构建列线图,在测试集中采用均方根误差(root mean square error,RMSE)、平均绝对误差(mean absolute error,MAE)、决定系数R2和校准曲线评价模型性能。结果: 最终模型纳入年龄、体重指数(body mass index,BMI)、甘油三酯、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(high-density lipoprotein cholesterol,HDL-C)、左室舒张末期内径(left ventricular end-diastolic diameter,LVDd)、左室射血分数(left ventricular ejection fraction,LVEF)、手术时间及透视时间8个变量。多因素分析显示BMI、LVDd、LVEF、手术时间和透视时间与辐射剂量呈正相关,HDL-C与辐射剂量呈负相关。模型在测试集中表现良好,RMSE为170.1,MAE为136.1,R2为0.55。校准曲线显示观测值与预测值的一致性较好。结论: 基于常规可获得的临床特征及介入相关指标构建的辐射剂量预测模型在内部验证中具有较好的预测性能,可为CAG及PCI患者的辐射剂量风险评估和剂量管理提供参考。

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the influencing factors of radiation dose in patients undergoing coronary angiography(CAG)and percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI),and to develop a clinical prediction model for radiation dose. Methods: A total of 293 patients with obstructive coronary artery disease who underwent CAG at the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from January 2020 to December 2024 were retrospectively enrolled. Patients were randomly divided into a training set(n=208)and a testing set(n=85)at a ratio of 7∶3. Intraoperative radiation dose was defined as the outcome variable. Based on clinical characteristics and interventional procedure-related variables,multiple variable selection and modeling methods were applied to establish a multivariable linear regression prediction model,and a nomogram was constructed. Model performance was evaluated in the testing set using the root mean square error(RMSE),mean absolute error(MAE),coefficient of determination(R2),and calibration plot. Results: The final model included age,body mass index(BMI),triglycerides,high-density lipoprotein cholesterol(HDL-C),left ventricular end-diastolic diameter(LVDd),left ventricular ejection fraction(LVEF),procedure time,and fluoroscopy time. Multivariate analysis showed that BMI,LVDd,LVEF,procedure time,and fluoroscopy time were positively associated with radiation dose,whereas HDL-C was negatively associated with radiation dose. The model demonstrated good predictive performance in the testing set,with an RMSE of 170.1,MAE of 136.1,and R2 of 0.55. The calibration plot showed good agreement between the observed and predicted radiation doses. Conclusion: The radiation dose prediction model based on routinely available clinical and interventional variables showed good predictive performance in internal validation,and may provide a useful reference for radiation risk assessment and dose management in patients undergoing CAG and PCI.

关键词

冠心病 / 冠状动脉造影 / 冠状动脉介入治疗 / 辐射剂量 / 影响因素分析 / 预测模型

Key words

coronary heart disease / coronary angiography / percutaneous coronary intervention / radiation dose / analysis of influencing factors / prediction model

引用本文

引用格式 ▾
冯婕,渠强,雷心仪,陈思彤,鲍志鹏,左智,李新立,王晖,姚文明. 冠状动脉造影及介入治疗患者辐射剂量的影响因素分析及预测模型构建[J]. 南京医科大学学报(自然科学版), 2026, 46(8): 1218-1228 DOI:10.7655/NYDXBNSN260138

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

参考文献

[1]

COUSINS C, MILLER D L, BERNARDI G, et al. ICRP PUBLICATION 120:radiological protection in cardiology[J]. Ann ICRP, 2013, 42(1):1-125

[2]

TAMIRISA K P, ALASNAG M, CALVERT P, et al. Radiation exposure,training,and safety in cardiology[J]. JACC Adv, 2024, 3(4):100863

[3]

ROGUIN A, WU P, COHOON T, et al. Update on radiation safety in the cath lab—moving toward a“lead—free”environment[J]. J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv, 2023, 2(4):101040

[4]

STOCKER T J, ABDEL—WAHAB M, MÖLLMANN H, et al. Trends and predictors of radiation exposure in percutaneous coronary intervention:the PROTECTION VIII study[J]. Eurointervention, 2022, 18(4):e324-e332

[5]

ZANCA F, COLLARD C, HENRY M, et al. Optimizing patient and staff radiation exposure in interventional cardiology:how to achieve it[J]. Radiat Prot Dosimetry, 2025, 201(10):709-719

[6]

赵俏俏, 范瑶华, 黄卓, . 心血管介入诊疗患者峰值皮肤剂量水平测量与分析[J]. 中国辐射卫生, 2024, 33(3):229-233

[7]

ZHAO Q Q, FAN Y H, HUANG Z, et al. Measurement and analysis of peak skin dose for patients with interventional cardiology procedures[J]. Chinese Journal of Radiological Health, 2024, 33(3):229-233

[8]

NAIDU S S, ABBOTT J D, BAGAI J, et al. SCAI expert consensus update on best practices in the cardiac catheterization laboratory:this statement was endorsed by the American College of Cardiology(ACC),the American Heart Association(AHA),and the Heart Rhythm Society(HRS) in April 2021[J]. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2021, 98(2):255-276

[9]

YE Y, ZHOU X, LI Y, et al. Procedural factors associated with high radiation exposure during percutaneous coronary intervention[J]. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2025, 106(2):774-779

[10]

RAO S V, BEN—AMI LERNER J. Radiation exposure:the risk shared by patient and physician[J]. JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 2024, 17(21):2499-2501

[11]

COLLINS G S, MOONS K G M, DHIMAN P, et al. TRIPOD+AI statement:updated guidance for reporting clinical prediction models that use regression or machine learning methods[J]. BMJ, 2024, 385:e078378

[12]

俞雯吉, 陈勇峻, 杨晓宇, . 心外膜脂肪容积预测阻塞性冠心病伴心肌缺血的增益价值[J]. 中华心血管病杂志, 2023, 51(6):633-641

[13]

YU W J, CHEN Y J, YANG X Y, et al. Incremental value of epicardial fat volume on predicting obstructive coronary artery disease with myocardial ischemia[J]. Chinese Journal of Cardiology, 2023, 51(6):633-641

[14]

中华医学会感染病学分会肝衰竭与人工肝学组, 中华医学会肝病学分会重型肝病与人工肝学组. 肝衰竭诊治指南(2024年版)[J]. 中华肝脏病杂志, 2025, 33(1):18-33

[15]

Chinese Society of Infectious Diseases, Chinese Society of Hepatology. Guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of liver failure(2024 version)[J]. Chinese Journal of Hepatology, 2025, 33(1):18-33

[16]

全国eGFR课题协作组. MDRD方程在我国慢性肾脏病患者中的改良和评估[J]. 中华肾脏病杂志, 2006, 22(10):589-595

[17]

Chinese eGFR Investigation Collaboration. Modification and evaluation of MDRD estimating equation for Chinese patients with chronic kidney disease[J]. Chinese Journal of Nephrology, 2006, 22(10):589-595

[18]

Kidney Disease:Improving Global Outcomes(KDIGO) CKD Work Group. KDIGO 2024 clinical practice guideline for the evaluation and management of chronic kidney disease[J]. Kidney Int, 2024, 105(4s):S117-S314

[19]

中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会. GBZ 130—2020 放射诊断放射防护要求[S]. 2020

[20]

National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China. GBZ 130—2020 requirements for radiological protection in diagnostic radiology[S]. 2020

[21]

中华人民共和国卫生部. GBZ 179—2006 医疗照射放射防护基本要求[S]. 2006

[22]

Ministry of Health of the People’s Republic of China. GBZ 179—2006 basic principles for radiological protection of medical exposure[S]. 2006

[23]

FEGHALI J A, DELÉPIERRE J, BELAC O C, et al. Patient exposure dose in interventional cardiology per clinical and technical complexity levels. Part 1:results of the VERIDIC project[J]. Acta Radiol, 2023, 64(1):108-118

[24]

SAELMANS A, SEINEN T, PERA V, et al. Implementation and updating of clinical prediction models:a systematic review[J]. Mayo Clin Proc Digit Health, 2025, 3(3):100228

[25]

EFTHIMIOU O, SEO M, CHALKOU K, et al. Developing clinical prediction models:a step—by—step guide[J]. BMJ, 2024, 386:e078276

[26]

VERDOIA M, PIPAN P, VIOLA O, et al. Impact of different measures of body size on the radiation dose during coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention:results from a large single center cohort[J]. Angiology, 2022, 73(5):478-484

[27]

NEGLIA D, CASELLI C, MAFFEI E, et al. Rapid plaque progression is independently associated with hyperglycemia and low HDL cholesterol in patients with stable coronary artery disease:a PARADIGM study[J]. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging, 2024, 17(7):e016481

[28]

LAUKKANEN J A, POHJONEN T, KURL S, et al. Associations of high—density lipoprotein cholesterol levels with the presence and severity of coronary atherosclerosis[J]. Atherosclerosis, 2025, 410:118629

[29]

HE W, YAO Q, LI D, et al. Association between left ventricular remodeling and coronary chronic total occlusion in hypertensive coronary artery disease patients[J]. Sci Rep, 2025, 15(1):24239

[30]

VANO E, FERNANDEZ—SOTO J M, TEN J I, et al. Occupational and patient doses for interventional radiology integrated into a dose management system[J]. Br J Radiol, 2023, 96(1143):20220607

[31]

LAWTON J S, TAMIS—HOLLAND J E, BANGALORE S, et al. 2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI Guideline for coronary artery revascularization:a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on clinical practice guidelines[J]. Circulation, 2022, 145(3):e18-e114

[32]

RYAN M, TRUESDELL A G, MURPHY G J, et al. Revascularization in ischemic left ventricular dysfunction:a pathophysiology—guided,evidence—based approach[J]. JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 2025, 18(24):2977-2994

[33]

METKUS T S, BECKIE T M, COHEN M G, et al. The heart team for coronary revascularization decisions:2 illustrative cases[J]. JACC Case Rep, 2022, 4(3):115-120

[34]

KIM M, LEE S P, KWAK S, et al. Impact of age on coronary artery plaque progression and clinical outcome:a PARADIGM substudy[J]. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr, 2021, 15(3):232-239

[35]

SAFFAR SOFLAEI S, SALEHI—SANGANI P, FALLAHI Z, et al. Triglyceride—glucose index association with severity of coronary artery disease[J]. Endocrinol Diabetes Metab, 2025, 8(2):e70025

[36]

靳国梁, 崔力萌, 马小龙, . 心血管介入诊断与治疗典型值调查与放射防护优化评估:一项单中心横断面调查[J]. 中国辐射卫生, 2025, 34(4):530-533

[37]

JIN G L, CUI L M, MA X L, et al. Investigation of typical values in cardiovascular interventional diagnosis and treatment and assessment of radiation protection optimization:a single—center cross—sectional study[J]. Chinese Journal of Radiological Health, 2025, 34(4):530-533

[38]

TANAKA T, MATSUBARA K, KOBAYASHI S. Evaluation of peak skin dose during percutaneous coronary intervention procedures:relationship with fluoroscopic pulse rate and target vessel[J]. Radiol Phys Technol, 2021, 14(1):34-40

[39]

GUPTA A, CHHIKARA S, VIJAYVERGIYA R, et al. Radiation exposure reduction and patient outcome by using very low frame rate fluoroscopy protocol(3.8 + 7.5 fps) during percutaneous coronary intervention[J]. Front Cardiovasc Med, 2021, 8:625873

基金资助

国家自然科学基金(82370389)

国家自然科学基金(81970339)

国家高技术研究发展计划(2017YFC1700505)

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (679KB)

60

访问

0

被引

详细

导航
相关文章

AI思维导图

/