胆道恶性肿瘤合并高危复发因素患者术后辅助靶向联合免疫治疗的安全性及有效性分析

张寅祺 ,  兰欣 ,  韩国勇 ,  孔连宝 ,  吴金道

南京医科大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (7) : 1055 -1063.

PDF (474KB)
南京医科大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (7) : 1055 -1063. DOI: 10.7655/NYDXBNSN260395
临床研究

胆道恶性肿瘤合并高危复发因素患者术后辅助靶向联合免疫治疗的安全性及有效性分析

作者信息 +

Safety and efficacy analysis of postoperative adjuvant targeted therapy combined with immunotherapy in patients of biliary tract carcinoma with high-risk factors for recurrence

Author information +
文章历史 +
PDF (485K)

摘要

目的:探讨术后辅助靶向联合免疫治疗在合并高危复发因素的胆道恶性肿瘤患者中的安全性与有效性。方法:回顾性分析2023年1—12月于南京医科大学第一附属医院接受手术切除后不愿接受辅助化疗、自愿选择靶向联合免疫治疗的24例胆道恶性肿瘤合并高危复发因素患者的临床资料。记录患者临床病理特征、无复发生存期(relapse-free survival,RFS)、总生存期(overall survival,OS)及不良反应(adverse event,AE)发生情况。采用Kaplan-Meier法进行生存分析,Cox比例风险回归分析影响RFS的因素。结果:24例患者随访期间,12例(50.00%)患者复发,7例(29.17%)患者死亡,中位RFS为12个月,中位OS未达到。其中,R0切除合并高危复发因素患者的中位RFS、中位OS均未达到,R1切除患者的中位RFS为8个月,中位OS未达到。R0切除合并高危复发因素患者的RFS率、OS率均显著高于R1切除患者。预后因素分析显示,年龄<60岁、肿瘤单发、R0切除、无淋巴结转移、无血管侵犯、单一复发高危因素为影响患者RFS的因素(P均<0.05)。安全性方面,AE发生率为79.17%(19/24),3级AE发生率为8.33%(2/24),无治疗相关死亡事件发生。结论:术后辅助靶向联合免疫治疗在合并高危复发因素的胆道恶性肿瘤患者中显示出一定的疗效,且安全性可控。年龄<60岁、肿瘤单发、R0切除、无淋巴结转移、无血管侵犯、单一复发危险因素为本研究中影响患者RFS的因素。

Abstract

Objective:To explore the safety and efficacy of postoperative adjuvant targeted therapy combined with immunotherapy in patients of biliary tract carcinoma with high-risk factors for recurrence. Methods:A retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical data of 24 patients with biliary tract carcinoma complicated with high-risk factors for recurrence,who underwent surgical resection in the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from January to December 2023,declined adjuvant chemotherapy,and voluntarily opted for targeted therapy combined with immunotherapy. The clinicopathological characteristics,relapse-free survival(RFS),overall survival(OS),and incidence of adverse events(AE)of the enrolled patients were recorded. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method,and the Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to analyze the factors affecting RFS. Results:During the follow-up of the 24 patients,12 patients(50.00%)developed recurrence and 7 patients(29.17%)died. The median RFS was 12 months,and the median OS was not reached. Among them,the median RFS and median OS were not reached in patients with R0 resection and high-risk factors for recurrence,while the median RFS was 8 months and the median OS was not reached in patients with R1 resection. The RFS rate and OS rate of patients with R0 resection and high-risk factors for recurrence were significantly higher than those of patients with R1 resection. Prognostic factor analysis showed that age <60 years,single tumor,R0 resection,no lymph node metastasis,no vascular invasion,and single high-risk recurrence factor were prognostic factors affecting RFS(all P < 0.05). In terms of safety,the incidence of all-grade AE was 79.17%(19/24),and the incidence of grade 3 AE was 8.33%(2/24). No treatment-related death occurred. Conclusion:Postoperative adjuvant targeted therapy combined with immunotherapy shows certain efficacy and controllable safety in biliary tract carcinoma patients with high-risk factors for recurrence. Age <60 years,single tumor,R0 resection,no lymph node metastasis,no vascular invasion,and single high-risk recurrence factor are prognostic factors affecting RFS in this research.

关键词

胆道恶性肿瘤 / 高危复发因素 / 靶向治疗 / 免疫治疗 / 有效性 / 安全性

Key words

biliary tract carcinoma / high-risk factors for recurrence / targeted therapy / immunotherapy / efficacy / safety

引用本文

引用格式 ▾
张寅祺,兰欣,韩国勇,孔连宝,吴金道. 胆道恶性肿瘤合并高危复发因素患者术后辅助靶向联合免疫治疗的安全性及有效性分析[J]. 南京医科大学学报(自然科学版), 2026, 46(7): 1055-1063 DOI:10.7655/NYDXBNSN260395

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

参考文献

[1]

RIMASSA L, KHAN S, GROOT K B, et al. Mapping the landscape of biliary tract cancer in Europe:challenges and controversies[J]. Lancet Reg Health Eur, 2025, 50:101171

[2]

SHIBATA Y, JANSSON H, KOBAYASHI K, et al. Assessing surgical resection in recurrent biliary tract cancer:international two—centre experience[J]. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2026, 52(1):111159

[3]

PENG Y H, XIA G Y, LI Y F, et al. Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy and chemoimmunotherapy after radical resection for biliary tract cancer:a retrospective study[J]. Oncologist, 2025, 30(6):oyaf163

[4]

SAKAMOTO K, UCHIDA Y, KADONO K, et al. Prognostic impact of additional resection of bile duct margins in radical resection for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma[J]. Anticancer Res, 2025, 45(11):5095-5107

[5]

RIZZO A, BRANDI G. BILCAP trial and adjuvant capecitabine in resectable biliary tract cancer:reflections on a standard of care[J]. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2021, 15(5):483-485

[6]

PRIMROSE J N, FOX R P, PALMER D H, et al. Capecitabine compared with observation in resected biliary tract cancer(BILCAP):a randomised,controlled,multicentre,phase 3 study[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2019, 20(5):663-673

[7]

GOETZE T O, RODERBURG C, FRIEDRICH F W, et al. New perspectives in biliary tract cancers[J]. ESMO Gastrointest Oncol, 2024, 5:100092

[8]

XIN X, MIAO R Y. FGFR2—rearranged biliary tract cancer:biology,resistance mechanisms,and emerging therapeutic strategies[J]. Cancers, 2026, 18(3):531

[9]

BARBE—RICHAUD J B, MOINARD—BUTOT F, COTTON M, et al. Outcome of metastatic biliary tract cancer harbouring IDH1 or FGFR2 alterations:a retrospective observational real—world study from a French cohort[J]. J Clin Med, 2025, 14(19):6759

[10]

MIE T, SASAKI T, OKAMOTO T, et al. Current status of targeted therapy for biliary tract cancer in the era of precision medicine[J]. Cancers, 2024, 16(5):879

[11]

CHI Y, SHU Y Q, BA Y, et al. Anlotinib monotherapy for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer:a double—blinded,placebo—controlled,randomized phase Ⅲ trial(ALTER0703)[J]. Oncologist, 2021, 26(10):e1693-e1703

[12]

LI J J, ZHOU S R, XU X Q, et al. Sintilimab and anlotinib with gemcitabine plus cisplatin in advanced biliary tract cancer:SAGC a randomized phase 2 trial[J]. Nat Commun, 2025, 16:5559

[13]

LOU Y D, CHEN Y J, GUO K B, et al. Emerging biomarkers for immunotherapy response in biliary tract cancers:a comprehensive review of immune checkpoint inhibitor strategies[J]. Biomark Med, 2024, 18(15/16):703-715

[14]

YUE S W, ZHANG Y P, ZHANG W. Recent advances in immunotherapy for advanced biliary tract cancer[J]. Curr Treat Options Oncol, 2024, 25(8):1089-1111

[15]

DANPANICHKUL P, NG C H, TAN D J H, et al. The global burden of early—onset biliary tract cancer:insight from the global burden of disease study 2019[J]. J Clin Exp Hepatol, 2024, 14(2):101320

[16]

SU J, LIANG Y H, HE X F. Global,regional,and national burden and trends analysis of gallbladder and biliary tract cancer from 1990 to 2019 and predictions to 2030:a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019[J]. Front Med, 2024, 11:1384314

[17]

QUEIROZ M M, LIMA N F, BIACHI DE CASTRIA T. Immunotherapy and targeted therapy for advanced biliary tract cancer:adding new flavors to the pizza[J]. Cancers, 2023, 15(7):1970

[18]

MAO T H, LI X, WANG L, et al. Efficacy and safety of targeted therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with advanced or metastatic biliary tract cancer:a meta—analysis of and sequential analysis of trials[J]. Hepatol Int, 2025, 19(6):1412-1427

[19]

JIN S L, ZHAO R H, ZHOU C, et al. Feasibility and tolerability of sintilimab plus anlotinib as the second—line therapy for patients with advanced biliary tract cancers:an open—label,single—arm,phase Ⅱ clinical trial[J]. Int J Cancer, 2023, 152(8):1648-1658

[20]

AN T Q, HUI Q, ZONG H, et al. Efficacy and safety of anlotinib plus anti—PD—1 agents in patients with refractory advanced biliary tract cancers[J]. Clin Transl Oncol, 2024, 26(8):2006-2019

[21]

王敬晗, 李炜, 马文聪, . 程序性细胞死亡蛋白—1抑制剂治疗晚期胆道恶性肿瘤疗效和预后因素分析[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2021, 41(5):559-564

[22]

WANG J H, LI W, MA W C, et al. Efficacy and prognostic factors of programmed cell death protein—1 inhibitors in the treatment of advanced biliary tract cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Practical Surgery, 2021, 41(5):559-564

[23]

马升明, 刘建文, 郭艳, . 肝门胆管癌不同手术方案治疗的临床效果及预后影响因素分析[J]. 实用癌症杂志, 2023, 38(7):1194-1196

[24]

MA S M, LIU J W, GUO Y, et al. Clinical effect of different surgical methods for hepatic portal cholangiocarcinoma and prognostic factors[J]. The Practical Journal of Cancer, 2023, 38(7):1194-1196

[25]

BURRIS H A, OKUSAKA T, VOGEL A, et al. Durvalumab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin in advanced biliary tract cancer(TOPAZ—1):patient—reported outcomes from a randomised,double—blind,placebo—controlled,phase 3 trial[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2024, 25(5):626-635

[26]

KELLEY R K, UENO M, YOO C, et al. Pembrolizumab in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin compared with gemcitabine and cisplatin alone for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer(KEYNOTE—966):a randomised,double—blind,placebo—controlled,phase 3 trial[J]. Lancet, 2023, 401(10391):1853-1865

[27]

MATRANGA G, CAROLLO A, ALAIMO M, et al. Safety profiles of the new target therapies-pemigatinib,futibatinib,and ivosidenib—for the treatment of cholangiocarcinoma:a systematic review[J]. Ther Adv Drug Saf, 2025, 16:20420986251347376

[28]

JIANG Q, HUANG J S, ZHANG B, et al. Efficacy and safety of anti—PD1/PDL1 in advanced biliary tract cancer:a systematic review and meta—analysis[J]. Front Immunol, 2022, 13:801909

基金资助

北京陈菊梅公益基金会(L2025070182)

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (474KB)

0

访问

0

被引

详细

导航
相关文章

AI思维导图

/