资金约束下考虑制造商公平关切的低碳供应链联合减排决策

Joint Emission Reduction Decisions in a Low-Carbon Supply Chain Considering Manufacturer Fairness Concerns under Financial Constraints

摘要

为探究资金约束及企业公平关切行为对低碳供应链联合减排决策的影响,针对一个低碳供应商与一个存在公平关切行为的低碳制造商组成的供应链,基于博弈理论,分别构建无资金约束以及双边资金约束“链外+链内”组合融资下的联合减排决策模型,研究了不同环境下供应链各主体最优减排决策和收益,并对结果进行比较分析.研究发现,不同资金环境及组合融资模式下,制造商公平关切会降低供应链碳减排水平、产品售价、市场需求以及供应商收益,但可能提高制造商收益.与制造商碳减排水平相比,供应商碳减排水平在无资金约束以及双边资金约束“供应商银行借贷+贸易信贷”组合融资下更高,但在“制造商银行借贷+预付款”组合融资模式下的高低受提前支付批发价敏感系数的影响.与无资金约束情形相比,供应链双边资金约束对供应商收益产生消极影响,但对制造商可能产生积极影响;与“制造商银行借贷+预付款”组合融资模式相比,供应商通常偏爱选择“供应商银行借贷+贸易信贷”组合融资模式,而制造商对两种组合融资模式的选择偏好受推迟/提前支付批发价敏感系数的影响.

Abstract

To explore the impact of capital constraints and firms’ fairness concerns on joint emission reduction decisions in low-carbon supply chains,based on game theory,we construct the joint emission reduction game models for a low-carbon supply chain consisting of a supplier and a fairness-concerned manufacturer under the financing model with no financial constraints and bilateral financial constraints with external-internal combination financing.The optimal emission reduction decisions and benefits of each party under different environments are studied,and the results are compared and analyzed.Research has found that under different environments and combination financing models,the manufacturer’s fairness concern can reduce the level of carbon emissions reduction,product prices,market demand,and supplier profits,but may increase the manufacturer’s utility.Compared with the carbon reduction level of the manufacturer,the carbon reduction level of the supplier is higher under the combination financing of “supplier bank lending+trade credit” without financial constraints and bilateral financial constraints.However,the level under the combination financing model of “manufacturer bank loan+advance payment” is affected by the sensitivity coefficient of advance payment wholesale price.Compared with the situation without financial constraints,bilateral financial constraints in the supply chain have a negative impact on supplier revenue,but may have a positive impact on the manufacturer.Compared with the combination financing model of “manufacturer bank loan+advance payment”,the supplier usually prefers to choose the “supplier bank lending+trade credit” model,and the manufacturer’s preference for the two combination financing models is influenced by the sensitivity coefficient of delayed/advance payment wholesale price.

关键词

双边资金约束 / 低碳供应链 / 公平关切 / 联合减排 / 组合融资

Key words

bilateral financial constraints / low-carbon supply chain / fairness concern / joint emission reduction / combination financing

参考文献

[1] 余萍, 魏守道. 研发溢出、消费者低碳偏好与供应链横向研发策略[J]. 系统管理学报, 2022, 31(4):758-769.

[2] YU P, WEI S D. Research and development spillover,consumer environmental awareness,and horizontal research and development strategy of supply chain[J]. Journal of Systems & Management, 2022, 31(4):758-769.

[3] XIA L, MONROE K B, COX J L. The price is unfair! A conceptual framework of price fairness perceptions[J]. Journal of Marketing, 2004, 68(4):1-15.

[4] QIN J J, ZHAO Y H, XIA L J. Carbon emission reduction with capital constraint under greening financing and cost sharing contract[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2018, 15(4):750.

[5] 杨浩雄, 段炜钰. 面向制造商资金约束的绿色供应链融资策略研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28(8):126-133.

[6] YANG H X, DUAN W Y. Research on financing mode for capital constrainted manufacturer in green supply chain[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2019, 28(8):126-133.

[7] ZONG S L, HUANG N. Optimal financing decision with financial constraints for a manufacturer in a low-carbon supply chain[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2023, 30(37):86998-87015.

[8] 张川, 马慧敏, 郭振. 碳限额与交易机制和消费者低碳偏好下的供应链减排及融资策略[J]. 控制与决策, 2023, 38(11):3271-3278.

[9] ZHANG C, MA H M, GUO Z. Carbon emission reduction and financing strategy for a supply chain under cap-and-trade regulation and consumer’s low-carbon preference[J]. Control and Decision, 2023, 38(11):3271-3278.

[10] AN S M, LI B, SONG D P, et al. Green credit financing versus trade credit financing in a supply chain with carbon emission limits[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2021, 292(1):125-142.

[11] WANG M X, ZHAO R D, LI B. Impact of financing models and carbon allowance allocation rules in a supply chain[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 302:126794.

[12] 郭志芳, 李玉婷, 田春英. 考虑公平关切的绿色供应链融资策略研究[J]. 控制工程, 2023, 30(11):1999-2010.

[13] GUO Z F, LI Y T, TIAN C Y. Research on financing strategy of capital constrained green supply chain considering fairness concern[J]. Control Engineering of China, 2023, 30(11):1999-2010.

[14] 邹清明, 谢文芳, 李玉琼. 制造商过度自信的绿色供应链融资和定价策略[J]. 中国管理科学, 2026, 34(3):170-180.

[15] ZOU Q M, XIE W F, LI Y Q. Financing and pricing decisions for a green supply chain with manufacturer’s overconfidence[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2026, 34(3):170-180.

[16] 黄瑞芬, 孙俊凤, 王君. 碳限额与交易机制下受资金约束的供应链优化[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(6):82-89.

[17] HUANG R F, SUN J F, WANG J. Optimization of supply chain with capital constraint under carbon cap-and-trading mechanism[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2020, 29(6):82-89.

[18] WU D D, YANG L P, OLSON D L. Green supply chain management under capital constraint[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2019, 215:3-10.

[19] 张克勇, 李春霞, 姚建明, 等. 零售商采购资金约束下的低碳供应链融资决策研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(8):108-116.

[20] ZHANG K Y, LI C X, YAO J M, et al. Research on low carbon supply chain financing decision under the purchase capital constraint of the retailer[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2021, 30(8):108-116.

[21] 曹细玉, 覃艳华, 余小艳. 双边资金约束下的双渠道供应链定价与碳减排决策研究[J]. 四川师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 47(3):384-393.

[22] CAO X Y, QIN Y H, YU X Y. Research on pricing and emission reduction decision of dual-channel supply chain under bilateral capital constraints[J]. Journal of Sichuan Normal University (Natural Science), 2024, 47(3):384-393.

[23] 魏洁, 任科, 章凯玥. 考虑双边资金约束的绿色供应链融资组合策略研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2025(5):201-208.

[24] WEI J, REN K, ZHANG K Y. Research on green supply chain financing portfolio strategies considering bilateral capital constraints[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2025(5):201-208.

[25] LIU Z L, ANDERSON T D, CRUZ J M. Consumer environmental awareness and competition in two-stage supply chains[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2012, 218(3):602-613.

[26] 林强, 赵震铮, 霍宝锋, 等. 考虑碳交易政策的零售商合作减排策略:融资减排或技术减排[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2024, 44(3):986-1005.

[27] LIN Q, ZHAO Z Z, HUO B F, et al. Retailers’ emissions reduction strategies under carbon trading policy:Financing emissions reduction or technological emissions reduction[J]. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2024, 44(3):986-1005.

[28] WANG Q P, ZHAO D Z, HE L F. Contracting emission reduction for supply chains considering market low-carbon preference[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016, 120:72-84.

[29] 唐书传, 刘云志, 肖条军. 考虑社会责任的供应链定价与碳减排决策[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(4):99-108.

[30] TANG S Z, LIU Y Z, XIAO T J. Pricing and carbon emission reduction decisions in a socially responsible supply chain[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2020, 28(4):99-108.

[31] 张令荣, 王锋, 刘笑言. 碳交易与区块链技术下双产品低碳供应链减排决策研究[J]. 管理工程学报, 2025, 39(4):239-250.

[32] ZHANG L R, WANG F, LIU X Y. Research on emission reduction decision of dual-product low-carbon supply chain under carbon trading and blockchain technology[J]. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 2025, 39(4):239-250.

[33] 孙嘉轶, 路阳阳, 滕春贤. 区块链技术对低碳供应链合作策略的影响研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(10):293-303.

[34] SUN J Y, LU Y Y, TENG C X. A study on the impact of blockchain technology on the cooperative strategy of low carbon supply chain[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2025, 33(10):293-303.

[35] 曹柬, 赵泱, 许佳阳, 等. 零售商具公平关切的闭环供应链动态决策优化[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2020, 26(11):3142-3155.

[36] CAO J, ZHAO Y, XU J Y, et al. Dynamic optimization of closed-loop supply chain with retailer’s fairness concerns[J]. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 2020, 26(11):3142-3155.

[37] 韩同银, 刘丽, 金浩. 考虑政府补贴和公平关切的双渠道绿色供应链决策研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(4):194-204.

[38] HAN T Y, LIU L, JIN H. Research on dual-channel green supply chain decision making considering the government subsidy and fairness concerns[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2022, 30(4):194-204.

[39] JI J N, ZHANG Z Y, YANG L. Carbon emission reduction decisions in the retail-/dual-channel supply chain with consumers’ preference[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 141:852-867.

[40] 郭金森, 陈卓, 周永务. 基于金融机构借贷与商业信用组合融资的双渠道供应链运作策略[J]. 运筹与管理, 2023, 32(8):24-31.

[41] GUO J S, CHEN Z, ZHOU Y W. Equilibrium financing portfolio strategies for dual-channel supply chain with financial institution lending and commercial credit[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2023, 32(8):24-31.

[42] 石平, 颜波, 石松. 考虑公平的绿色供应链定价与产品绿色度决策[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2016, 36(8):1937-1950.

[43] SHI P, YAN B, SHI S. Pricing and product green degree decisions in green supply chains with fairness concerns[J]. Systems Engineering —Theory & Practice, 2016, 36(8):1937-1950.

[44] 贺勇, 陈志豪, 廖诺. 政府补贴方式对绿色供应链制造商减排决策的影响机制[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(6):87-98.

[45] HE Y, CHEN Z H, LIAO N. The impact mechanism of government subsidy approach on manufacturer’s decision-making in green supply chain[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2022, 30(6):87-98.

基金资助

国家社会科学基金重点项目(23AGL006)