低能量冲击波治疗难治性前列腺盆腔综合征6个月疗效分析

徐啸 ,  李贵忠 ,  戴翔 ,  王杰

现代泌尿外科杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (2) : 157 -160.

PDF (867KB)
现代泌尿外科杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (2) : 157 -160. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-8291.2025.02.013
临床研究

低能量冲击波治疗难治性前列腺盆腔综合征6个月疗效分析

作者信息 +

An analysis of 6-month follow-up efficacy of low-intensity extracorporeal shock wave therapy for refractory prostate-pelvic syndrome

Author information +
文章历史 +
PDF (887K)

摘要

目的 评估低能量冲击波治疗难治性前列腺盆腔综合征的长期疗效及安全性。方法 回顾性分析2020年1月-2023年1月于首都医科大学附属北京积水潭医院泌尿外科接受低能量冲击波治疗的173例难治性前列腺盆腔综合征患者的临床资料。所有患者均接受会阴部低能量冲击波治疗,1次/周,连续8周。比较患者治疗前、治疗后当时(疗程结束时)及治疗后1、3、6个月美国国立卫生研究院-慢性前列腺炎症状指数(NIH-CPSI)、国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)、视觉疼痛模拟量表评分(VAS)及国际勃起功能指数5评分(IIEF-5)的变化。结果 共有142例(82.1%)患者完成全部随访。患者治疗后当时及治疗后1、3、6个月的NIH-CPSI、IPSS、VAS、IIEF-5均较治疗前明显改善,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。所有患者随访全程未见明显不良反应及并发症发生。治疗后当时NIH-CPSI下降≥6分的患者有115例(81.0%);IPSS下降≥3分的患者有99例(69.7%);VAS下降≥3分的患者有121例(85.2%);IIEF-5升高≥4分的患者有105例(73.9%)。治疗后6个月时,上述治疗有效的患者均可以维持令人满意的疗效。结论 采用低能量冲击波治疗难治性前列腺盆腔综合征,能显著改善患者的临床症状,提高其生活质量,疗效至少可维持6个月。

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of low-intensity extracorporeal shock wave therapy (Li-ESWT) for refractory prostate-pelvic syndrome (PPS). Methods Clinical data of 173 patients with refractory PPS undergoing Li-ESWT at our hospital during Jan. 2020 and Jan. 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients received weekly treatment for 8 consecutive weeks. Changes in the National Institutes of Health chronic prostatitis symptom index (NIH-CPSI), international prostate symptom score (IPSS), visual analog scale (VAS), and international index of erectile function-5 (IIEF-5) were compared before treatment, immediately, 1, 3, and 6 months after treatment. Results A total of 142 patients (82.1%) completed all follow-ups. Compared to baseline data, there was a statistically significant improvement in NIH-CPSI, IPSS, VAS, and IIEF-5 scores immediately after treatment and 1, 3, and 6 months after treatment (P<0.01). No significant adverse reactions or complications were observed throughout the follow-up. At the time of treatment completion, 115 patients (81.0%) had a decrease of ≥6 in NIH-CPSI; 99 patients (69.7%) had a decrease of ≥3 in IPSS; 121 patients (85.2%) had a decrease of ≥3 in VAS; 105 patients (73.9%) had an increase of ≥4 in IIEF-5. At the 6-month follow-up, patients who responded to treatment maintained satisfactory therapeutic effects. Conclusion Li-ESWT can significantly improve clinical symptoms and quality of life for patients with refractory PPS, with therapeutic effects lasting at least 6 months.

关键词

低能量冲击波 / 前列腺盆腔综合征 / 慢性前列腺炎 / 慢性骨盆疼痛综合征

Key words

low-intensity extracorporeal shock wave therapy / prostate-pelvic syndrome / chronic prostatitis / chronic pelvic pain syndrome

引用本文

引用格式 ▾
徐啸,李贵忠,戴翔,王杰. 低能量冲击波治疗难治性前列腺盆腔综合征6个月疗效分析[J]. 现代泌尿外科杂志, 2025, 30(2): 157-160 DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-8291.2025.02.013

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

参考文献

[1]

KRIEGER JN, NYBERG LJ, NICKEL JC. NIH consensus definition and classification of prostatitis[J]. JAMA, 1999, 282(3): 236-237.

[2]

梁朝朝, 夏术阶, 邓春华, 等. 前列腺盆腔综合征中国专家共识(2024版)[J]. 现代泌尿外科杂志, 2024, 9(29): 756-761.

[3]

SKAUDICKAS D, LENČIAUSKAS P, SKAUDICKAS A, et al. Low intensity extracorporeal shockwave therapy for chronic pelvic pain syndrome: long-term follow-up[J]. Open Med (Wars), 2023, 18(1): 20230832.

[4]

PALMIERI A, CAI T, DI LUISE L, et al. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy in association with bromelain and escin for the management of patients affected by chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome[J]. Biomed Rep, 2023, 18(1): 7.

[5]

MENG J, JIN C, LI J, et al. Metabolomics analysis reveals the differential metabolites and establishes the therapeutic effect prediction nomogram among CP/CPPS patients who respond or do not respond to LiST[J]. Front Immunol, 2022, 13: 953403.

[6]

CHEN PY, CHENG JH, WU ZS, et al. New frontiers of extracorporeal shock wave medicine in Urology from bench to clinical studies[J]. Biomedicines, 2022, 10(3): 675.

[7]

李远超, 蒙冬如, 李文华, 等. 低能量冲击波与低频TENS治疗顽固性ⅢB型前列腺炎的临床对照研究[J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2023, 29(23): 3350-3355.

[8]

朱小东, 卞军, 潘枫渝, 等. 低能量冲击波治疗顽固性ⅢB型前列腺炎的临床分析[J]. 临床泌尿外科杂志, 2020, 35(10): 771-773, 777.

[9]

陈鸿杰, 杨宁刚, 张骏. 低能量冲击波治疗慢性前列腺炎/慢性骨盆疼痛综合征的疗效观察[J]. 中华男科学杂志, 2024,4( 30): 374-377.

[10]

SAKR AM, FAWZI AM, KAMEL M, et al. Outcomes and clinical predictors of extracorporeal shock wave therapy in the treatment of chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome: a prospective randomized double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial[J]. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis, 2022, 25(1): 93-99.

[11]

SAHIN S, BICER M, EREN GA, et al. Acupuncture relieves symptoms in chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome: a randomized, sham-controlled trial[J]. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis, 2015, 18(3): 249-254.

[12]

KIM KS, CHOI YS, BAE WJ, et al. Efficacy of Low-intensity extracorporeal shockwave therapy for the treatment of chronic pelvic pain syndrome Ⅲb: a prospective-randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study[J]. World J Mens Health, 2022, 40(3): 473-480.

[13]

ZIMMERMANN R, CUMPANAS A, MICLEA F, et al. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy for the treatment of chronic pelvic pain syndrome in males: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study[J]. Eur Urol, 2009, 56(3): 418-424.

[14]

SOKMEN D, COMEZ YI. Long-term efficacy and safety of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (Li-ESWT) protocols in the treatment of chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS) patients[J]. Aging Male, 2023, 26(1): 2253876.

[15]

金晨, 付子越, 章颂, 等. 体外冲击波治疗在慢性前列腺炎/慢性盆腔疼痛综合征中的应用进展及其潜在作用机制[J]. 中华泌尿外科杂志, 2022, 43(3): 234-236.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (867KB)

0

访问

0

被引

详细

导航
相关文章

AI思维导图

/

〈 〉