一体位机器人辅助腹腔镜与后腹腔镜肾输尿管切除术治疗上尿路尿路上皮癌的疗效比较

续万荣 ,  高田宇 ,  康子明 ,  王城 ,  尚攀峰

现代泌尿外科杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (4) : 315 -321.

PDF (1721KB)
现代泌尿外科杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (4) : 315 -321. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-8291.2025.04.009
临床研究

一体位机器人辅助腹腔镜与后腹腔镜肾输尿管切除术治疗上尿路尿路上皮癌的疗效比较

作者信息 +

A comparison of the efficacy between single-position robot-assisted laparoscopic and retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephroureterectomy in the treatment of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma

Author information +
文章历史 +
PDF (1762K)

摘要

目的 探讨一体位机器人辅助腹腔镜肾输尿管切除术治疗上尿路尿路上皮癌(UTUC)的临床安全性和疗效。方法 回顾性研究兰州大学第二医院泌尿外科2020年12月-2023年8月接受一体位机器人辅助腹腔镜(RRNU组:35例)和后腹腔镜(LRNU组:101例)肾输尿管切除术的136例UTUC患者,比较两组患者的围手术期及安全性指标,采用Kaplan-Meier法比较两组患者的膀胱无复发生存率(IVRFS)、无复发生存率(RFS)、总体生存率(OS)。结果 两组患者的基线资料差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),手术均顺利完成,无中转开放。RRNU组的术后总体并发症发生率[37.1%(13/35)vs.56.4%(57/101)]、术后住院时间[6(5,7)d vs.7(6,8)d]、引流管留置时间[3(2,4)d vs.4(3,5)d]等围手术期指标均优于LRNU组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05),两种术式的安全性指标相似(P>0.05),生存分析显示RRNU组患者的疗效[IVRFS(1年:92.1%,2年:85.2%)、RFS(1年:82.4%,2年:74.9%)、OS(1年:90.6%,2年:84.2%)]与LRNU组相似(P>0.05)。结论 与后腹腔镜RNU手术相比,一体位RRNU治疗UTUC具有较高的安全性和较好的疗效,同时在降低术后并发症发生率、缩短住院时间等围手术期指标方面更具优势。

Abstract

Objective To explore the clinical safety and efficacy of a single-position robot-assisted radical nephroureterectomy (RRUN) in the treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Methods A retrospective study was conducted on 136 UTUC patients who underwent RRUN (n=35) and laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy (LRUN, n=101) in our hospital during Dec. 2020 and Aug. 2023. The perioperative and safety indicators of the two groups were compared. The intravesical recurrence-free survival (IVRFS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS) of the two groups were compared using Kaplan-Meier method. Results There were no significant differences in the baseline data between the two groups (P>0.05). All surgeries were successfully completed without conversion to open surgery. RRUN demonstrated superior perioperative outcomes compared to LRUN in overall postoperative complication rate [37.1% (13/35) vs. 56.4% (57/101)], postoperative hospital stay [6 (5, 7) days vs. 7 (6, 8) days], and catheter indwelling time [3 (2, 4) days vs. 4 (3, 5) days], with statistically significant differences (P<0.05). Safety indicators of both surgical approaches were similar (P>0.05). Survival analysis showed no significant difference in oncological outcomes between the two groups [IVRFS (1 year: 92.1%, 2 years: 85.2%), RFS (1 year: 82.4%, 2 years: 74.9%), OS (1 year: 90.6%, 2 years: 84.2%)] (P>0.05). Conclusion Compared with retroperitoneal LRUN, single-position RRUN for UTUC demonstrates comparable safety and oncological efficacy, while offering significant advantages in perioperative outcomes such as reducing postoperative complication rate and shortening hospital stay.

关键词

上尿路尿路上皮癌 / 机器人辅助 / 肾输尿管切除术 / 腹腔镜 / 一体位

Key words

upper tract urothelial carcinoma / robot-assisted / nephroureterectomy / laparoscope / single-position

引用本文

引用格式 ▾
续万荣,高田宇,康子明,王城,尚攀峰. 一体位机器人辅助腹腔镜与后腹腔镜肾输尿管切除术治疗上尿路尿路上皮癌的疗效比较[J]. 现代泌尿外科杂志, 2025, 30(4): 315-321 DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-8291.2025.04.009

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

参考文献

[1]

ROUPRÊT M, SEISEN T, BIRTLE AJ, et al. European Association of Urology Guidelines on upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: 2023 update[J]. Eur Urol, 2023, 84(1): 49-64.

[2]

HEROUT R, BAUNACKE M, FLEGAR L, et al. Upper tract urothelial carcinoma in Germany: epidemiological data and surgical treatment trends in a total population analysis from 2006 to 2019[J]. World J Urol, 2023, 41(1): 127-133.

[3]

LI CC, CHANG CH, HUANG CP, et al. Comparing oncological outcomes and surgical complications of hand-assisted, laparoscopic and robotic nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma[J]. Front Oncol, 2021, 11: 731460.

[4]

AFFERI L, ABUFARAJ M, SORIA F, et al. A comparison of perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic versus open nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis[J]. Minerva Urol Nephrol, 2022, 74(1): 49-56.

[5]

PEYRONNET B, SEISEN T, DOMINGUEZ-ESCRIG JL, et al. Oncological outcomes of laparoscopic nephroureterectomy versus open radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: an European association of urology guidelines systematic review[J]. Eur Urol Focus, 2019, 5(2): 205-223.

[6]

杨雷, 王钰雄, 安伟, 等. 机器人辅助腹腔镜与传统腹腔镜根治性肾输尿管切除术治疗非转移性上尿路尿路上皮癌的安全性和有效性分析[J]. 中华泌尿外科杂志, 2024, 45(2): 85-90.

[7]

DARWICHE F, SWAIN S, KALLINGAL G, et al. Operative technique and early experience for robotic-assisted laparoscopic nephroureterectomy (RALNU) using da Vinci Xi[J]. Springer Plus, 2015, 4: 298.

[8]

PARK SY, JEONG W, HAM WS, et al. Initial experience of robotic nephroureterectomy: a hybrid-port technique[J]. BJU Int, 2009, 104(11): 1718-1721.

[9]

丁国庆, 王平, 叶烈夫, 等. 机器人辅助腹腔镜治疗上尿路尿路上皮癌专家共识[J]. 微创泌尿外科杂志, 2024, 13(2): 87-92.

[10]

PETROS FG. Epidemiology, clinical presentation, and evaluation of upper-tract urothelial carcinoma[J]. Trans Androl Urol, 2020, 9(4): 1794-1798.

[11]

中国医师协会泌尿外科医师分会肿瘤专业委员会, 中国医师协会泌尿外科, 医师分会上尿路尿路上皮癌(CUDA-UTUC)协作组. 上尿路尿路上皮癌诊断与治疗中国专家共识[J]. 中华泌尿外科杂志, 2018, 39(7): 485-488.

[12]

YE H, FENG X, WANG Y, et al. Single-docking robotic-assisted nephroureterectomy and extravesical bladder cuff excision without intraoperative repositioning: the technique and oncological outcomes[J]. Asian J Surg, 2020, 43(10): 978-985.

[13]

DE GROOTE R, DE CAESTECKER K, LARCHER A, et al. Robot-assisted nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: results from three high-volume robotic surgery institutions[J]. J Robot Surg, 2020, 14(1): 211-219.

[14]

朱安康. 两种术式治疗输尿管下段尿路上皮癌临床效果的比较[D]. 吉林大学, 2024.

[15]

WU Z, LI M, WANG J, et al. Pure retroperitoneoscopic extravesical standardized seeable (PRESS) excision of distal ureter and bladder cuff in radical nephroureterectomy: step-by-step technique[J]. Minerva Urol Nephrol, 2021, 73(3): 392-400.

[16]

GROSSMANN NC, SORIA F, JUVET T, et al. Comparing oncological and perioperative outcomes of open versus laparoscopic versus robotic radical nephroureterectomy for the treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a multicenter, multinational, propensity score-matched analysis[J]. Cancers, 2023, 15(5): 1409.

[17]

BANG S, CHO HJ, HA US, et al. Retroperitoneal single-port robot-assisted nephroureterectomy with bladder cuff excision: initial experience and description of the technique[J]. J Clin Med, 2023, 12(18): 6901.

[18]

WHITE-KONING M, PALUDETTO MN, LE LOUEDEC F, et al. Formulae recently proposed to estimate renal glomerular filtration rate improve the prediction of carboplatin clearance[J]. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol, 2020, 85(3): 585-592.

[19]

GABRIEL PE, PINAR U, LENFANT L, et al. Perioperative, renal function and oncological outcomes of robot-assisted radical nephroureterectomy for patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma[J]. World J Urol, 2023, 41(11): 3001-3007.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (1721KB)

0

访问

0

被引

详细

导航
相关文章

AI思维导图

/

〈 〉