黑莓果实不同发育期8种矿质元素含量的ICP-MS测定及不确定度评定

李松 ,  郭小妮 ,  李舜尧 ,  李曙光 ,  辛秀兰 ,  张强

果树学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (8) : 2178 -2190.

PDF (2114KB)
果树学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (8) : 2178 -2190. DOI: 10.13925/j.cnki.gsxb.20250724
栽培·生理·生态

黑莓果实不同发育期8种矿质元素含量的ICP-MS测定及不确定度评定

作者信息 +

ICP-MS determination and uncertainty assessment of eight mineral elements in blackberry fruits at different developmental stages

Author information +
文章历史 +
PDF (2164K)

摘要

【目的】探究不确定度分量对黑莓成熟过程中8种矿质元素(钠、钾、钙、镁、铜、铁、锌、锰)含量动态变化的影响,为不确定度评定试验方法提供数据支持。【方法】采用电感耦合等离子体质谱法(inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry,ICP-MS),通过动态碰撞池模式,对比压力罐消解法(sealed digestion,SD)与微波消解法(microwave digestion,MD),研究黑莓成熟过程中钠、钾、钙、镁、铜、铁、锌、锰8种元素含量的动态变化,并引入13个不确定度分量以评价试验方法对结果的影响。【结果】8种元素标准曲线相关系数均大于0.999,加标回收率为93.33%~104.50%,方法灵敏度高、精密度高;在黑莓成熟过程中,8种元素含量整体呈明显下降趋势,青果期至转色期降幅最大,其中钠、钾、锰在果实成熟过程中下降幅度最明显;称量、定容、样品制备、标准溶液配制、样品基质是主要的不确定度来源,其中加标回收率 u1(Sm)、移液管 u2(std)、内标 u2(Sm)、母液 u1(std)4个分量对试验结果影响最大,8种元素合成不确定度为0.011 271~0.022 888,扩展不确定度变异系数为钠(2.76%)、钾(2.54%)、钙(2.25%)、镁(2.49%)、铜(2.66%)、铁(2.89%)、锌(4.58%)、锰(3.12%)。【结论】采用电感耦合等离子体质谱法测定黑莓中钠、钾、钙、镁、铜、铁、锌、锰元素含量,方法准确可行,且在果实成熟过程中8种元素含量均明显下降。

Abstract

【Objective】To clarify changes in the mineral composition of blackberry fruits, this study used organically grown blackberries at different maturity stages as raw materials. It compared wet digestion and microwave digestion methods, incorporated uncertainty analysis, and comprehensively evaluated the reliability of the experimental approach. This research would provide technical support for assessing dynamic changes in mineral elements during blackberry ripening. 【Methods】Using inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) with dynamic collision cell mode, this study compared the sealed digestion (SD) and microwave digestion (MD) methods to investigate the dynamic changes in sodium, potassium, calcium, magnesium, copper, iron, zinc, and manganese during blackberry ripening. The following parameters were included: Spiked recovery u 1(Sm), pipette u 2(std), internal standard u 2(Sm), mother liquor u 1(std), sample repeatability u 2(Cp), volumetric flask temperature u 2(V), fitting u 3(std), blank solution repeatability u 1(Cp), volumetric flask calibration u 1(V), volumetric flask repeatability u 3(V), balance repeatability u 2(m), balance calibration u 1(m), and instrument u 3(Sm). 【Results】The correlation coefficients for the standard curves of all 8 elements exceeded 0.999, with spiked recovery rates ranging from 93.33% to 104.50%. This method demonstrated high sensitivity and precision. During blackberry development, as the fruits expanded and ripened, the contents of the 8 minerals showed a significant overall downward trend: an initial decline followed by stabilization. From the green fruit stage to the color change stage, the concentrations of all 8 minerals decreased substantially, with the most pronounced changes observed in sodium, potassium, and zinc. During color change stage Ⅱ, the concentrations of sodium, iron, magnesium, calcium, zinc, and manganese increased, while those of potassium and copper decreased. During color change stage Ⅲ, potassium and manganese increased, while the remaining six elements decreased. At maturity, sodium, potassium and manganese decreased, while the other five elements increased to varying degrees. This indicates that all eight elements show a significant downward trend during blackberry fruit coloration, suggesting that substantial physiological changes accompany this process and significantly impact mineral absorption and metabolism. The contents of sodium, potassium, and manganese show the most pronounced decline during fruit ripening, which would provide theoretical support for water and fertilizer management in blackberry cultivation. The uncertainty values for each component during the testing process, sorted from largest to smallest, are as follows: Spiked recovery u 1(Sm) > Pipette u 2(std) > Internal standard u 2(Sm) > Stock solution u 1(std) > Sample repeatability u 2(Cp) > Volumetric flask temperature u 2(V) > Fitting u 3(std) > Blank solution repeatability u 1(Cp) > Volumetric flask calibration u 1(V) > Instrument u 3(Sm). Among the five uncertainty sources, volumetric flask repeatability u 3(Sm) has the highest uncertainty, (V) > volumetric flask repeatability u 3(V) > balance repeatability u 2(m) > balance calibration u 1(m) > instrument u 3(Sm). For the other five uncertainty sources, the uncertainty contribution ranks as follows: sample matrix U rel(Sm) > standard curve preparation U rel(std) > sample preparation U rel(Cp) > volume adjustment U rel(V) > weighing U rel(m). This indicates that standard curve preparation and the sample matrix are the dominant contributors to uncertainty in the determination of eight elements in blackberries by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Among these factors, spiked recovery, pipette usage, internal standards, and standard stock solutions exerted the greatest influence on the test results in this study. The expanded uncertainty coefficients for all 8 elements were below 5%, and in descending order, they are: Calcium < magnesium < potassium < copper < sodium < iron < manganese < zinc. Component analysis revealed that the spiked recovery of manganese and zinc introduced relatively higher uncertainties. The combined uncertainty for the eight elements ranged from 0.011 271 to 0.022 888, with expanded uncertainty percentages as follows: sodium (2.76%), potassium (2.54%), calcium (2.25%), magnesium (2.49%), copper (2.66%), iron (2.89%), zinc (4.58%), and manganese (3.12%). 【Conclusion】This study established a microwave digestion-inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) method to determine the contents of eight minerals in blackberries. After validating the method's linearity, detection capability, precision, accuracy, robustness, and measurement uncertainty, this research clarified the variation trends of these eight mineral contents during the fruit development of blackberries. The findings would provide data support and a theoretical basis for further relevant research.

关键词

黑莓 / 矿质元素 / 电感耦合等离子体质谱法 / 不确定度

Key words

Blackberry / Mineral elements / Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry / Uncertainty

引用本文

引用格式 ▾
李松,郭小妮,李舜尧,李曙光,辛秀兰,张强. 黑莓果实不同发育期8种矿质元素含量的ICP-MS测定及不确定度评定[J]. 果树学报, 2026, 43(8): 2178-2190 DOI:10.13925/j.cnki.gsxb.20250724

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

参考文献

[1]

吴林, 张强, 王颖, 李金英. 中国树莓科学研究和产业发展的回顾与展望[J]. 吉林农业大学学报202143(3): 265-274.

[2]

Wu Lin, Zhang Qiang, Wang Ying, Li Jinying. Review and prospect of scientific research and industrial development of raspberry in China[J]. Journal of Jilin Agricultural University, 2021, 43(3): 265-274.

[3]

李维林, 孙醉君, 郑海燕. 黑莓鲜果及其加工品的营养成分[J]. 天然产物研究与开发199810(1): 55-59.

[4]

Li Weilin, Sun Zuijun, Zheng Haiyan. An analysis of nutrient constituents of fruit and products of blackberry[J]. Natural Product Research and Development, 1998, 10(1): 55-59.

[5]

黄庆文, 雷家军, 洪建源. 抗病大果型红树莓新品种美22、澳洲红[J]. 果树科学199714(1): 57-58.

[6]

Huang Qingwen, Lei Jiajun, Hong Jianyuan. Disease-resistant new varieties of large-fruited red raspberry - Mei 22, Australian Red[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 1997, 14(1): 57-58.

[7]

吴文龙, 缪启新, 郑生智, 王珍霞, 赵昌民. 黑莓的实生选优[J]. 植物资源与环境19965(1): 23-25.

[8]

Wu Wenlong, Miao Qixin, Zheng Shengzhi, Wang Zhenxia, Zhao Changmin. Seedling selection of blackberry[J]. Journal of Plant Resources and Environment, 1996, 5(1): 23-25.

[9]

Sensoy R I G, Gundogdu M, Sensoy S, Celik F, Dogan A . HPLC analysis of blackberry fruits for organic acid and sugar contents[J]. Acta Horticulturae, 2015(1089): 77-81.

[10]

Ibrahim A F M, Hafez L M, Yousif A B . Protective role of polyphenols (anthocyanin, gallic acid) and blackberry juice against acrylamide reproductive toxicity in male rats[J]. International Journal of Progressive Sciences and Technologies, 2021, 23(2): 292-300.

[11]

Lim S H, Choi C I . Potentials of raspberry ketone as a natural antioxidant[J]. Antioxidants, 2021, 10(3): 482.

[12]

谢晓岚, 和莉, 马小娅, 焦志敏, 张昊. ICP-MS法测定不同品种黑莓果实中矿质元素含量[J]. 矿产勘查20189(7): 1467-1471.

[13]

Xie Xiaolan, He Li, Ma Xiaoya, Jiao Zhimin, Zhang Hao. Determination of mineral elements contents in different varieties of blackberry by ICP-MS[J]. Mineral Exploration, 2018, 9(7): 1467-1471.

[14]

Moreno-Medina B L, Casierra-Posada F, Medina-Vargas O J . Phenolic profile and antioxidant capacity of blackberry fruits (Rubus spp.) grown in Colombia [J]. Erwerbs-Obstbau, 2023, 65(4): 1047-1056.

[15]

Kumar S, Chauhan D D A P S, Prasad M . Phytochemical analysis and antioxidant evaluation of blackberry, blueberry, and goldenberry extracts[J]. Proceedings, 2024, 105(1): 95.

[16]

Annous B A, Buckley D A, Kingsley D H . Efficacy of chlorine dioxide gas against hepatitis a virus on blueberries, blackberries, raspberries, and strawberries[J]. Food and Environmental Virology, 2021, 13(2): 241-247.

[17]

Tony S K, Hassan M S, Ismail H A, El-Naem G F A, Gazwi H S S . Effect of anthocyanin-rich blackberry juice on endoplasmic reticulum stress in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2023, 30(32): 79067-79081.

[18]

Derrick S A, Kristo A S, Reaves S K, Sikalidis A K . Effects of dietary red raspberry consumption on pre-diabetes and type 2 diabetes mellitus parameters[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2021, 18(17): 9364.

[19]

赵金璐, 陈洪生, 林罗强, 张春鹏, 白明翰, 刘明. 利用免疫组织化学及蛋白质组学对树莓提取物抑制大鼠肝癌机制的研究[J]. 现代生物医学进展201212(28): 5423-5426.

[20]

Zhao Jinlu, Chen Hongsheng, Lin Luoqiang, Zhang Chunpeng, Bai Minghan, Liu Ming. Immunohistochemistry and proteomic study on chemoprevention effect of raspberry in primary liver cancer of rats[J]. Progress in Modern Biomedicine, 2012, 12(28): 5423-5426.

[21]

Matilainen R, Tummavuori J . Determination of boron in fertilizers by inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry: Studies of some spectral interferences at different wavelengths[J]. Journal of Aoac International, 1995, 78(3): 598-603.

[22]

Khan N, Jeong I S, Hwang I M, Kim J S, Choi S H, Nho E Y, Choi J Y, Park K S, Kim K S . Analysis of minor and trace elements in milk and yogurts by inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS)[J]. Food Chemistry, 2014, 147: 220-224.

[23]

王亚玲, 赵军英, 乔为仓, 张明辉, 刘妍, 陈历俊. 电感耦合等离子体质谱法测定母乳中10种矿物元素[J]. 食品科学202142(14): 165-169.

[24]

Wang Yaling, Zhao Junying, Qiao Weicang, Zhang Minghui, Liu Yan, Chen Lijun. Determination of 10 elements in breast milk by inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry[J]. Food Science, 2021, 42(14): 165-169.

[25]

王彦花, 郭楠楠, 齐贝贝. 不同前处理方法测定猪肝中重金属含量的比较[J]. 食品科技202146(8): 298-302.

[26]

Wang Yanhua, Guo Nannan, Qi Beibei. Comparison of different pretreatment methods for determination of heavy metal content in pork liver[J]. Food Science and Technology, 2021, 46(8): 298-302.

[27]

Ibourki M, Hallouch O, Devkota K, Guillaume D, Hirich A, Gharby S . Elemental analysis in food: An overview[J]. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 2023, 120: 105330.

[28]

JJF 1059.1- 2012 测量不确定度评定与表示[S].

[29]

JJF 1059.1- 2012 Evaluation and expression of uncertainty in measurement[S].

[30]

杨永建, 夏莎莎, 李红华, 黎刚, 张庆华, 裴志国. 波长色散X射线荧光法测定土壤中的砷及不确定度评定[J]. 环境工程学报202418(2): 609-613.

[31]

Yang Yongjian, Xia Shasha, Li Honghua, Li Gang, Zhang Qinghua, Pei Zhiguo. Determination of arsenic in soil by wavelength dispersive X-ray fluorescence spectrometry and uncertainty evaluation[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2024, 18(2): 609-613.

[32]

GB 5009.268- 2025 食品安全国家标准食品中多元素的测定[S].

[33]

GB 5009.268- 2025 Determination of multiple elements in foods[S].

[34]

GB/T 27417- 2017 合格评定化学分析方法确认和验证指南[S].

[35]

GB/T 27417- 2017 Conformity assessment-Guidance on validation and verification of chemical analytical methods[S].

[36]

GB/T 27404-2026 实验室质量控制规范食品理化检测[S].

[37]

GB/T 27404- 2026 Criterion on quality control of laboratories: Chemical testing of food[S].

[38]

Braeuer S, Goessler W, Kameník J, Konvalinková T, Žigová A, Borovička J . Arsenic hyperaccumulation and speciation in the edible ink stain bolete (Cyanoboletus pulverulentus) [J]. Food Chemistry, 2018, 242: 225-231.

[39]

Mohamed R, Zainudin B H, Yaakob A S . Method validation and determination of heavy metals in cocoa beans and cocoa products by microwave assisted digestion technique with inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry[J]. Food Chemistry, 2020, 303: 125392.

[40]

开建荣, 王彩艳, 石欣, 李彩虹, 杨春霞, 王晓菁. 中宁枸杞中矿物元素在生长期的动态变化研究[J]. 食品与发酵工业202248(4): 218-225.

[41]

Kai Jianrong, Wang Caiyan, Shi Xin, Li Caihong, Yang Chunxia, Wang Xiaojing. Study on dynamic changes of mineral elements in Zhongning Lycium barbarum during growing period [J]. Food and Fermentation Industries, 2022, 48(4): 218-225.

[42]

陈虹, 冯一峰, 赵航, 王建宇, 吴翠云. 骏枣叶片、果实中矿质元素含量的周年变化动态[J]. 北方园艺2020(10): 32-39.

[43]

Chen Hong, Feng Yifeng, Zhao Hang, Wang Jianyu, Wu Cuiyun. Annual changes of mineral element content in Jun jujube leaves and fruits[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2020(10): 32-39.

[44]

魏丽红, 翟秋喜. 软枣猕猴桃叶片矿质元素变化与果实品质的关系[J]. 北方园艺2019(2): 60-64.

[45]

Wei Lihong, Zhai Qiuxi. Relationships between leaf mineral elements changes and fruit quality of Actinidia arguta [J]. Northern Horticulture, 2019(2): 60-64.

[46]

乔亚丽, 郁继华, 李旺雄, 金宁, 金莉, 吕剑, 肖雪梅, 唐中褀, 胡琳莉. 番茄果实不同采收时间矿质元素变化分析[J]. 浙江农业学报202032(3): 430-436.

[47]

Qiao Yali, Yu Jihua, Li Wangxiong, Jin Ning, Jin Li, Jian, Xiao Xuemei, Tang Zhongqi, Hu Linli. Comparative analysis of mineral elements contents in tomato fruits at different harvest time[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2020, 32(3): 430-436.

[48]

王瑶, 董林水, 宋爱云, 刘京涛, 陆兆华, 彭玲, 张梦利. 冬枣果实发育期结果枝叶与营养枝叶矿质元素动态变化的比较[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文)201927(5): 738-746.

[49]

Wang Yao, Dong Linshui, Song Aiyun, Liu Jingtao, Lu Zhaohua, Peng Ling, Zhang Mengli. Comparison of mineral elements between fruit and vegetative branch leaves of the Chinese winter jujube during the fruit development stage[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2019, 27(5): 738-746.

[50]

Yang L J, Tu J L, Zhu M L, Liu W, Dai Z Y, He F, Zhu B, Xiao J X . The phenomenon of ‘later-blooming flowers ripening first’ and its potential physiological mechanisms during fruit ripening in four rabbiteye blueberry cultivars[J]. South African Journal of Botany, 2025, 187: 602-612.

[51]

Molognoni L, de Sá Ploêncio L A, Machado A M L, Daguer H . The role of measurement uncertainty in the conformity assessment of the chemical composition of feeds[J]. Microchemical Journal, 2017, 131: 79-91.

[52]

汤逸飞, 屠雨晨, 黄芳, 陈欣慰, 张国平. 基于QuEChERS-气相色谱三重四级杆串联质谱内标法测定结球甘蓝中30种农药残留的不确定度评定[J]. 计量科学与技术202266(2): 25-32.

[53]

Tang Yifei, Tu Yuchen, Huang Fang, Chen Xinwei, Zhang Guoping. Uncertainty evaluation for measurements of 30 pesticide residues in Brassica oleracea by a QuEChERS-Gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method [J]. Metrology Science and Technology, 2022, 66(2): 25-32.

[54]

张立佳, 莫楠, 刘丽君, 高玉杰, 胡雪, 李翠枝. 超高效液相色谱-串联质谱法测定乳饮料中香兰素的不确定度评定[J]. 饮料工业202225(1): 12-17.

[55]

Zhang Lijia, Mo Nan, Liu Lijun, Gao Yujie, Hu Xue, Li Cuizhi. Evaluation of uncertainty in determination of vanillin in milk beverage by ultra performance liquid chromatography mass spectrometry[J]. Beverage Industry, 2022, 25(1): 12-17.

基金资助

北京市教委科研计划资助项目(KM202310858002)

国家重点研发计划项目(2024YFC3308500)

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (2114KB)

0

访问

0

被引

详细

导航
相关文章

AI思维导图

/