全球疫苗集中采购的价格效应

黄玉鑫 ,  于潇依 ,  许铭 , 

北京大学学报(医学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 58 ›› Issue (3) : 437 -445.

PDF (1560KB)
北京大学学报(医学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 58 ›› Issue (3) : 437 -445. DOI: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2026.03.001
论著

全球疫苗集中采购的价格效应

作者信息 +

Price effects of global vaccine pooled procurement

Author information +
文章历史 +
PDF (1597K)

摘要

目的:评估以联合国儿童基金会(United Nations Children's Fund,UNICEF)和泛美卫生组织(Pan Ameri-can Health Organization,PAHO)为代表的国际集中采购机制对疫苗价格的影响。方法:基于2013—2024年188个国家的14497条疫苗采购交易记录,采用高维固定效应模型与事件研究法识别价格效应及动态趋势,并进行多维异质性分析。结果:(1)基准模型表明,相比单一国家的自主采购,通过 UNICEF 进行集中采购的疫苗价格平均显著降低 $27.6\mathrm{\%}\text{ }(\mathit{\beta }=-0.323,\text{ }\mathit{P}<0.01)\text{ }$ ;PAHO 机制同样显示出约 30.9% 的初步降价潜力($\beta=-0.370, ~ P=$0.052)。(2)事件研究法严格验证了平行趋势假设(事前系数联合显著性检验 F=0.27,P=0.845),动态追踪显示,在由自主采购转换为集中采购的当年,即可实现约 30.0% 的价格降幅(β=-0.356,P<0.01),且该降价效应在后续年份中保持持续稳定。(3)异质性检验揭示,集中采购具有显著的"扶弱"效应,即小规模买家获得的降价幅度($38.5\mathrm{\%},\mathit{\beta }=-0.487,\mathit{P}<0.01$)显著高于大规模买家($22.5\mathrm{\%},\mathit{\beta }=-0.255,\mathit{P}<0.01$);非全球疫苗免疫联盟(Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization,GAVI)援助国家的边际降价系数(β=-0.418,P<0.01)远大于GAVI 受援国(β=-0.118,P<0.05);高收入国家组的降幅最大(β=-0.475,P<0.01)。(4)供给侧调节效应分析表明,UNICEF 的集体议价能力具备跨市场结构的鲁棒性(robustness),未因市场集中度的上升而发生统计学意义上的显著衰减(交互项 β=0.095,P>0.10)。结论:制度化集中采购能够显著降低疫苗价格;对处于免疫规划融资转型期及面临高自主采购基准价的国家,加人高效的国际集中采购平台是替代外部资金援助、维持疫苗长期可负担性的重要制度安排。

Abstract

Objective:To evaluate the impact of international pooled procurement mechanisms,which are primarily represented by the United Nations Children's Fund(UNICEF)and the Pan American Health Organization(PAHO),on the procurement prices of vaccines. Methods:Based on 14497 vac- cine procurement transaction records collected from 188 different countries spanning the period from 2013 to 2024,this research employed a high-dimensional fixed effects model along with an event study metho- dology to accurately identify the price effects and dynamic temporal trends,while simultaneously conduc- ting a multidimensional heterogeneity analysis. Results:(1)The baseline model demonstrated that, when compared to the independent self-procurement conducted by individual nations,utilizing pooled procurement through the UNICEF significantly reduced the average vaccine prices by 27.6%(β= -0.323,P<0.01).The PAHO mechanism similarly exhibited an initial price reduction potential of ap- proximately 30.9%(β=-0.370,P=0.052).(2)The event study method strictly validated the parallel trend assumption(joint significance test of pre-treatment coefficients:F=0.27,P=0.845). Dynamic tracking revealed that a price reduction of approximately $30.0\mathrm{\%}(\mathit{\beta }=-0.356,\mathit{P}<0.01)$ was achieved exactly in the year of transitioning from self-procurement to pooled procurement,and this reduc- tion effect remained persistently stable in subsequent years.(3)Heterogeneity tests revealed a significant "pro-poor"effect of pooled procurement:the price reduction margin obtained by small-scale buyers $(38.5\mathrm{\%},\mathit{\beta }=-0.487,\mathit{P}<0.01)$ was significantly higher than that of large-scale buyers(22.5%, β=-0.255,P<0.01).The marginal price reduction coefficient for non-Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization(GAVI)eligible countries(β=-0.418,P<0.01)was substantially larger than that for GAVI eligible countries (β=-0.118,P<0.05).The high-income country group experienced the most substantial price drop (β=-0.475,P<0.01).(4)The supply-side moderating effect analysis indicated that UNICEF's collective bargaining power maintained robustness across diverse market struc- tures,showing no statistically significant attenuation despite increases in market concentration(interac- tion term β=0.095,P>0.10). Conclusion:Institutionalized pooled procurement mechanisms are ca- pable of significantly reducing vaccine prices.For those countries that are currently in the immunization financing transition period,as well as those facing high self-procurement benchmark prices,participating in an efficient international pooled procurement platform serves as a critical institutional arrangement to replace external financial aid and to effectively maintain the long-term affordability of vaccines.

关键词

疫苗 / 集中采购 / 成本及成本分析 / 全球健康 / 市场结构

Key words

Vaccines / Pooled procurement / Costs and cost analysis / Global health / Market structure

引用本文

引用格式 ▾
黄玉鑫,于潇依,许铭,. 全球疫苗集中采购的价格效应[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2026, 58(3): 437-445 DOI:10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2026.03.001

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

参考文献

[1]

Lindstrand A, Cherian T, Chang-Blanc D, et al. The world of im- munization:Achievements,challenges,and strategic vision for the next decade[J]. J Infect Dis, 2021, 224(12Suppl 2):S452- S467.

[2]

Ozawa S, Grewal S, Portnoy A, et al. Funding gap for immuniza- tion across 94 low-and middle-income countries[J]. Vaccine, 2016, 34(50):6408-6416.

[3]

Al-Eitan LN, Almahdawi DL, Abu Khiarah RA, et al. Bridging gaps in vaccine access and equity:A middle eastern perspective[J]. Vaccines, 2025, 13(8): 806.

[4]

Hussain R, Bukhari NI, Ur Rehman A, et al. Vaccine prices:A systematic review of literature[J]. Vaccines(Basel), 2020, 8 (4): 629.

[5]

Danzon PM, Pereira NS, Tejwani SS. Vaccine supply:A cross- national perspective[J]. Health Aff, 2005, 24(3):706-717.

[6]

Plotkin S, Robinson JM, Cunningham G, et al. The complexity and cost of vaccine manufacturing:An overview[J]. Vaccine, 2017, 35(33):4064-4071.

[7]

Forslid R, Herzing M. On the optimal production capacity for in- fluenza vaccine[J]. Health Econ, 2015, 24(6):726-741.

[8]

Agarwal R, Reed T. Financing vaccine equity:Funding for day- zero of the next pandemic[J]. Oxf Rev Econ Policy, 2022, 38 (4):833-850.

[9]

Engle-Warnick J, Ruffle BJ. Buyer concentration as a source of countervailing power: Evidence from experimental posted-offer markets[J/OL]. J Behav Exp Econ, 2005.[ 2025-11-29].

[10]

Kim SW, Skordis-Worrall J. Can voluntary pooled procurement re- duce the price of antiretroviral drugs?A case study of Efavirenz [J].Health Policy Plan, 2017, 32(4):516-526.

[11]

Wang LX, Bin Zahur N. Procurement institutions and essential drug supply in low and middle-income countries[J]. J Health Econ, 2025, 101: 102996.

[12]

Danzon PM, Mulcahy AW, Towse AK. Pharmaceutical pricing in emerging markets:Effects of income,competition,and procure- ment[J]. Health Econ, 2015, 24(2):238-252.

[13]

Seidman G, Atun R. Do changes to supply chains and procure- ment processes yield cost savings and improve availability of phar- maceuticals,vaccines or health products?A systematic review of evidence from low-income and middle-income countries[J]. BMJ Glob Health, 2017, 2(2):e000243.

[14]

Li L. Price discrimination and bargaining power in the global vac- cine market[D]. Durham: Duke University, 2013.

[15]

Cernuschi T, Gilchrist S, Hajizada A, et al. Price transparency is a step towards sustainable access in middle income countries[J]. BMJ, 2020, 368: 15375.

[16]

Dubois P, Lefouili Y, Straub S. Pooled procurement of drugs in low and middle income countries[J]. Eur Econ Rev, 2021, 132: 103655.

[17]

Huff-Rousselle M. The logical underpinnings and benefits of pooled pharmaceutical procurement:A pragmatic role for our pub- lic institutions?[J]. Soc Sci Med, 2012, 75 (9):1572-1580.

[18]

Cernuschi T, Furrer E, Schwalbe N, et al. Advance market com- mitment for pneumococcal vaccines:Putting theory into practice[J]. Bull World Health Organ, 2011, 89(12):913-918.

[19]

Sriudomporn S, Watts E, Yoon Sim S, et al. Achieving immuni- zation agenda 2030 coverage targets for 14 pathogens:Projected product and immunization delivery costs for 194 countries, 2021 - 2030 [J]. Vaccine X,2022, 13: 100256.

[20]

Rochlin DH, Rizk NM, Matros E, et al. Negotiated rates for sur- gical cancer care in the era of price transparency-prices reflect market competition[J]. Ann Surg, 2024, 279(3):385-391.

[21]

Balli HO, Sørensen BE. Interaction effects in econometrics[J]. Empir Econ, 2013, 45(1):583-603.

[22]

Schmidheiny K, Siegloch S. On event studies and distributed-lags in two-way fixed effects models:Identification,equivalence,and generalization[J]. J Appl Econom, 2023, 38(5):695-713.

[23]

Gilmore AB, Fabbri A, Baum F, et al. Defining and concep- tualising the commercial determinants of health[J]. Lancet, 2023, 401(10383):1194-1213.

[24]

Saxenian H, Alkenbrack S, Attaran MF, et al.Sustainable finan- cing for immunization agenda 2030

[25]

[ J . Vaccine, 2024, 42(Suppl 1):S73-S81.]

[26]

Parmaksiz K, Pisani E, Bal R, et al. A systematic review of pooled procurement of medicines and vaccines:Identifying ele- ments of success[J]. Global Health, 2022, 18(1): 59.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (1560KB)

0

访问

0

被引

详细

导航
相关文章

AI思维导图

/

〈 〉