一期融合治疗踝及后足感染性关节炎

王执宇 ,  李文菁 ,  张保宙 ,  李莹 ,  杜辉 ,  王岩 ,  武勇

北京大学学报(医学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 58 ›› Issue (4) : 842 -847.

PDF (2232KB)
北京大学学报(医学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 58 ›› Issue (4) : 842 -847. DOI: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2026.04.022
论著

一期融合治疗踝及后足感染性关节炎

作者信息 +

Single-stage arthrodesis for septic arthritis of the ankle and hindfoot

Author information +
文章历史 +
PDF (2285K)

摘要

目的:评估一期清创、关节融合、Ilizarov 外固定架固定治疗踝及后足感染性关节炎的临床效果。方法:选择2015年4月至2023年6月北京积水潭医院足踝外科由同一术者行一期清创、关节融合、Ilizarov 外固定架固定手术治疗的 12 例踝关节及后足感染性关节炎患者的临床资料进行回顾性分析,其中男 8 例,女 4 例;手术时平均年龄为(53.6±16.2)岁,均为单侧手术。记录患者一般临床特征、细菌培养结果和拆除外固定架时间,记录并比较患者术前及末次随访时美国足踝外科协会(American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society,AOFAS)踝-后足评分和疼痛视觉模拟评分(visual analogue scale,VAS),记录患者对手术的满意度以及并发症发生情况。结果:所有患者术后平均随访(51.3±34.0)个月,其中细菌培养阳性 7 例。所有患者感染均得到控制,骨愈合率 100% ,中位外固定架拆除时间 16 (12,24)周。术前,中位 VAS 评分 7 (5.3,7.8)  分,平均 AOFAS 踝-后足评分(42.8±10.4)分;末次随访时,中位 VAS 评分 1(0,2) 分,平均 AOFAS 踝-后足评分(77.6±10.2)分,均较术前显著改善(P<0.01)。并发症方面,针道感染 1 例,肢体短缩 3 例,肢体麻木 2 例。 12 例患者 9 例对手术非常满意, 3 例对手术满意。结论:一期清创、关节融合、Ilizarov 外固定架固定是治疗踝及后足感染性关节炎的可靠方法,能有效控制感染,缩短治疗时间,且患者术后功能恢复及影像学结果良好。

Abstract

Objective:To evaluate the clinical outcomes of one-stage debridement,arthrodesis,and Ilizarov external fixation for the treatment of septic arthritis of the ankle and hindfoot. Methods:A retro- spective analysis was conducted on 12 patients with septic arthritis of the ankle or hindfoot who underwent one-stage debridement,arthrodesis,and Ilizarov external fixation performed by the same surgeon between April 2015 and June 2023.The study included 8 males and 4 females,with a mean age of(53.6 ± 16.2)years at surgery;all procedures were unilateral.General clinical characteristics,bacterial culture results,and the time to external fixator removal were recorded.The American Orthopaedic Foot and An-kle Society(AOFAS)ankle-hindfoot score and the visual analogue scale(VAS)for pain were recorded and compared between the preoperative period and the final follow-up.Patient satisfaction with the sur- gery and the occurrence of complications were also documented. Results:All patients were followed up for a mean of(51.3±34.0)months postoperatively.Positive bacterial cultures were found in 7 cases. Infection control was achieved in all patients,with a 100% bone fusion rate confirmed by radiographs or CT.The median time to external fixator removal was 16(12,24) weeks.Preoperatively,the median VAS score was 7 (5.3,7.8)points,and the mean AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score was(42.8 ± 10.4) points.At the final follow-up,the median VAS score was 1(0,2) point,and the mean AOFAS score was(77.6 ± 10.2)points,both showing significant improvement compared with preoperative values(P< 0.01).Regarding complications,there was 1 case of pin tract infection, 3 cases of limb shortening,and 2 cases of skin numbness.Nine patients were very satisfied with the surgery,and 3 were satisfied. Conclusion:One-stage debridement,arthrodesis,and Ilizarov external fixation are a reliable method for treating septic arthritis of the ankle and hindfoot.It effectively controls infection,shortens treatment dura- tion,and yields favorable functional and imaging outcomes,with high patient satisfaction and acceptable complication rates.

关键词

感染性关节炎 / 踝关节 / 后足 / 一期手术 / 融合

Key words

Septic arthritis / Ankle / Hindfoot / Single-stage procedure / Arthrodesis

引用本文

引用格式 ▾
王执宇,李文菁,张保宙,李莹,杜辉,王岩,武勇. 一期融合治疗踝及后足感染性关节炎[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2026, 58(4): 842-847 DOI:10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2026.04.022

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

参考文献

[1]

Simoni G, Maccauro G, Fenga D, et al. Arthrodesis of the ankle joint in septic osteoarthritis:Six years long term outcomes in au- thors'personal experience[J]. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci, 2019, 23(Suppl 2):139-144.

[2]

Hong YC, Jung KJ, Chang HJ, et al. Staged joint arthrodesis in the treatment of severe septic ankle arthritis sequelae:A case re- port[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2021, 18 (23): 12473.

[3]

Kienast B, Kiene J, Gille J, et al. Posttraumatic severe infection of the ankle joint-long term results of the treatment with resection arthrodesis in 133 cases[J]. Eur J Med Res, 2010, 15(2): 54.

[4]

Mankovecky MR, Roukis TS. Arthroscopic synovectomy,irriga- tion,and debridement for treatment of septic ankle arthrosis:A systematic review and case series[J]. J Foot Ankle Surg, 2014, 53(5):615-619.

[5]

Hulscher JBF te Velde EA, Schuurman AH, et al. Arthrodesis after osteosynthesis and infection of the ankle joint[J]. Injury, 2001, 32(2):145-152.

[6]

Suda AJ, Richter A, Abou-Nouar G, et al. Arthrodesis for septic arthritis of the ankle:Risk factors and complications[J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2016, 136(10):1343-1348.

[7]

Pérez-Prieto D, Portillo ME, González-Lucena G, et al. Foot and ankle infections:Debridement,early fixation and rifampicin pro- vide earlier recovery of function and quality of life[J]. Foot Ankle Surg, 2019, 25(1):13-18.

[8]

Kollig E, Esenwein SA, Muhr G, et al. Fusion of the septic ankle:Experience with 15 cases using hybrid external fixation[J]. J Trauma Inj Infect Crit Care, 2003, 55(4):685-691.

[9]

Klouche S, El-Masri F, Graff W, et al. Arthrodesis with internal fixation of the infected ankle[J]. J Foot Ankle Surg, 2011, 50 (1):25-30.

[10]

Hartmann R, Grubhofer F, Waibel FWA, et al. Treatment of hindfoot and ankle infections with Ilizarov external fixator or spacer,followed by secondary arthrodesis[J]. J Orthop Res, 2021, 39(10):2151-2158.

[11]

Richter I, Krähenbühl N, Ruiz R, et al. Mid-to long-term out- come in patients treated with a mini-open sinus-tarsi approach for calcaneal fractures[J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2021, 141 (4):611-617.

[12]

Movassaghi K, Wakefield C, Bohl DD, et al. Septic arthritis of the native ankle[J]. JBJS Rev, 2019, 7(3):e6.

[13]

Mercurio M, Castioni D, Porco E, et al. Periprosthetic ankle in- fection:Eradication rate,complications,and limb salvage.A sys- tematic review[J]. Foot Ankle Surg, 2022, 28(5):550-556.

[14]

Solow M, Sarraj M, Johal H, et al. A case report of pneumococcal septic arthritis following a respiratory and gastrointestinal prodrome with accompanying literature review[J]. J Foot Ankle Surg, 2019, 58(6):1293-1297.

[15]

Gee C, Tandon T, Avasthi A, et al. Primary meningococcal septic arthritis of the ankle joint:A case report[J]. J Foot Ankle Surg, 2014, 53(2):216-218.

[16]

Rabinovich RV. Complex ankle arthrodesis:Review of the litera- ture[J]. World J Orthop, 2015, 6(8): 602.

[17]

Ellington K, Hirose CB, Bemenderfer TB. What is the treatment "algorithm"for infection after ankle or hindfoot arthrodesis[J]. Foot Ankle Int, 2019, 40(Suppl 1):64S-70S.

[18]

Perlman MH, Thordarson DB. Ankle fusion in a high risk popula- tion:An assessment of nonunion risk factors[J]. Foot Ankle Int, 1999, 20(8):491-496.

[19]

Cierny G, Cook WG, Mader JT. Ankle arthrodesis in the presence of continuous sepsis[J]. Clin Podiatric Med Surg, 1990, 7(3): 545-563.

[20]

Meyer C, Badillo K, Burns P. Safety and complication rate of ring external fixation in the foot and ankle[J]. J Foot Ankle Surg, 2023, 62(6):991-995.

基金资助

北京市卫生健康科技成果和适宜技术推广项目(BHTPP2024038)

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (2232KB)

0

访问

0

被引

详细

导航
相关文章

AI思维导图

/

〈 〉