基于约束判别法的日照市地下空间资源综合质量评价

Comprehensive Quality Evaluation of Underground Space Resources in Rizhao City Based on Constraint Discriminant Method

摘要

开展城市地下空间资源综合质量评价,是推进地下空间合理开发利用的关键环节.日照市主城区近年来经济发展迅速,但地下空间开发利用程度偏低,亟需开展地下空间资源综合质量评价,为区域地下空间资源合理开发利用提供科学依据.本文以日照市主城区为研究区,结合层次分析法和最不利判别法模型,分别构建地质适宜性评价体系和潜在价值评价体系,对研究区的地下空间开发地质适宜性和潜在价值进行评价;在此基础上,运用加权法模型和约束判别法模型开展地下空间资源综合质量评价,并对比两类模型的评价效果.结果表明:研究区地下空间资源以综合质量高、中等级为主,合计约占总面积的80%;综合质量低的区域约占总面积的20%,主要分布在研究区北部,在其他区域零星分布,其中,北部集中分布区主要为地下空间开发潜在价值低的区域,零星分布区主要受文物与饮用水源保护区、高层建筑分布区的制约,以及海水入侵等地质灾害的影响.相较于加权法模型,约束判别法模型的评价结果更符合研究区实际情况,更适用于研究区的地下空间资源综合质量评价.

Abstract

Carrying out comprehensive quality evaluation is a vital component in the development and utilization of urban underground space resources. Recently, the economy of Rizhao City has developed quickly, but underground space is not being used to its full potential. Due to the rapid economic growth of Rizhao City in recent years and the low rate of underground space utilization, it is urgent to conduct a thorough quality evaluation of underground space resources to establish a foundation for their rational development and utilization. This study evaluates the geological suitability and potential value of the underground space development in the main urban area of Rizhao City, the study area, establishing the geological suitability evaluation system and the potential value evaluation system, and combining the analytic hierarchy process and the most unfavorable discrimination model. Furthermore, a weighted method model and a constraint discriminant model were used to evaluate the quality of underground space resources. The evaluation effect of the two models was compared and analyzed. The results indicate that the subsurface space resources in the research area, which make up roughly 80% of the total area, are mostly of high or medium comprehensive quality. About 20% of the total area is made up of low-comprehensive quality areas, which are primarily found in the northern part of the study area and other sporadic distribution areas. The northern concentrated distribution area is primarily the area with low potential value for underground space development. Geological catastrophes include the destruction of historical sites, water supplies, and high-rise buildings, and seawater incursion primarily affects dispersed distribution areas. Furthermore, as compared to the weighted model, the evaluation results of the constrained discriminant model are more consistent with the actual circumstances of the study area, making it more appropriate for the comprehensive quality assessment of underground space resources in the study area.

关键词

城市地下空间资源 / 地质适宜性评价 / 综合质量评价 / 约束判别法 / 日照市

Key words

urban underground space resources / geological suitability evaluation / comprehensive quality evaluation / constraint discrimination method / Rizhao City

参考文献

[1] Qiao Y, Peng F L, Sabri S, et al. Socio-Environmental Costs of Underground Space Use for Urban Sustainability[J]. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2019, 51: 101757.

[2] Radosław T, Uliasz-Misiak B. Use of Underground Space for the Storage of Selected Gases (CH₄, H₂, and CO₂) - Possible Conflicts of Interest [J]. Gospodarka Surowcami Mineralnymi-Mineral Resources Management, 2021, 37(1): 141-160.

[3] 张茂省, 王化齐, 王尧, 等. 中国城市地质调查进展与展望[J]. 西北地质, 2018, 51(4): 1-9.

[4] Zhang Maosheng, Wang Huaqi, Wang Yao, et al. Progress and Prospect of Urban Geological Survey in China[J]. Northwestern Geology, 2018, 51(4): 1-9.

[5] Admiraal H, Cornaro A. Future Cities, Resilient Cities: The Role of Underground Space in Achieving Urban Resilience[J]. Underground Space, 2020, 5(3): 223-228.

[6] Bidarmaghz A, Choudhary R, Soga K, et al. Large-Scale Urban Underground Hydro-Thermal Modelling: A Case Study of the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea, London[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 700: 134955.

[7] Broere W. Urban Underground Space: Solving the Problems of Today’s Cities[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2016, 55: 245-248.

[8] Peng F L, Qiao Y K, Zhao J W, et al. Planning and Implementation of Underground Space in Chinese Central Business District (CBD): A Case of Shanghai Hongqiao CBD[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2020, 95: 103176.

[9] Feng Q L, Sun H J, Wang Y, et al. A Four-Stage Suitability Evaluation Framework Considering Restrictive Factor for Underground Space Sustainable Development and the Application in Jinan Pilot Zone[J]. Revista Internacional de Contaminación Ambiental, 2022, 38: 185-198.

[10] 闫金凯, 赵银鑫, 王志恒, 等. 银川市地下空间资源综合质量评价[J]. 地质通报, 2021, 40(10): 1636-1643.

[11] Yan Jinkai, Zhao Yinxin, Wang Zhiheng, et al. Comprehensive Quality Evaluation of Underground Space Resources in Yinchuan City[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2021, 40(10): 1636-1643.

[12] 许京琦. 中等城市地下空间开发利用规划研究[D]. 昆明: 昆明理工大学, 2016.

[13] Xu Jingqi. Research of Development and Utilization Planning of Underground Space in Medium-Sized Cities[D]. Kunming: Kunming University of Science and Technology, 2016.

[14] 王绮, 黄国民, 卢恩琪, 等. 基于地理探测器的旅游生态安全时空特征及影响因素研究[J]. 东北师大学报(自然科学版), 2024, 56(4): 133-143.

[15] Wang Qi, Huang Guomin, Lu Enqi, et al. Study on the Spatial-Temporal Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Tourism Ecological Security Based on Geodetector[J]. Journal of Northeast Normal University (Natural Science Edition), 2024, 56(4): 133-143.

[16] 计扬, 巴仁基, 肖成志, 等. 岷江上游1995-2020年生态地质环境安全评价与时空演化分析[J]. 现代地质, 2024, 38(3): 648-659.

[17] Ji Yang, Ba Renji, Xiao Chengzhi, et al. Spatiotemporal Evolution and Assessment of Ecological and Geological Environment Safety in the Upper Reaches of the Minjiang River from 1995 to 2020[J]. Geoscience, 2024, 38(3): 648-659.

[18] 刘波, 李诗浓, 李伟, 等. 基于栅格信息量法的区域地面沉降风险评价:以河北省沧州市为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(3): 919-929.

[19] Liu Bo, Li Shinong, Li Wei, et al. Risk Assessment of Regional Land Subsidence Based on Raster Information Quantity Method: Case Study in Cangzhou City of Hebei Province[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2025, 55(3): 919-929.

[20] 李伊淇, 李静, 赵子欣, 等. 蒙东农牧交错区社会-生态系统韧性时空演变及驱动机制[J]. 东北师大学报(自然科学版), 2026, 58(1): 146-156.

[21] Li Yiqi, Li Jing, Zhao Zixin, et al. Spatio-Temporal Evolution and Driving Mechanisms of Social-Ecological System Resilience in the Agro-Pastoral Ecotone of Eastern Inner Mongolia, China[J]. Journal of Northeast Normal University (Natural Science Edition), 2026, 58(1): 146-156.

[22] 张晓波, 刘凯, 蒋鹏, 等. 基于约束条件的深圳市南山区地下空间开发地质适宜性评价[J]. 水文地质工程地质, 2023, 50(4): 213-224.

[23] Zhang Xiaobo, Liu Kai, Jiang Peng, et al. Geological Suitability Evaluation of Underground Space Development in the Nanshan District of Shenzhen Based on Constraint Conditions[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2023, 50(4): 213-224.

[24] 郭骏瀚, 刘凯, 邓岳飞, 等. 基于熵权优化法的地下空间资源地质适宜性评价[J]. 地质通报, 2023, 42(增刊1): 385-396.

[25] Guo Junhan, Liu Kai, Deng Yuefei, et al. Geological Suitability Evaluation of Underground Space Resources Based on the Entropy Weight Optimization Method[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2023, 42(Sup. 1): 385-396.

[26] 郭建民, 祝文君. 基于层次分析法的地下空间资源潜在价值评估[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2005, 1(5): 655-659, 664.

[27] Guo Jianmin, Zhu Wenjun. Potential Value Evaluation of Underground Space Resource Based on AHP Method[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2005, 1(5): 655-659, 664.

[28] 日照市东港区统计局. 2021年东港区国民经济和社会发展统计公报[R]. 日照: 日照市东港区统计局, 2022.

[29] Statistics Bureau of Donggang District, Rizhao. 2021 National Economic and Social Development Statistical Bulletin of Donggang District[R]. Rizhao: Statistics Bureau of Donggang District, Rizhao, 2022.

[30] 日照市统计局. 2022年日照市国民经济和社会发展统计公报[R]. 日照: 日照市统计局, 2023.

[31] Statistics Bureau of Rizhao City. 2022 National Economic and Social Development Statistical Bulletin of Rizhao City[R]. Rizhao: Statistics Bureau of Rizhao City, 2023.

[32] 日照市人民政府. 日照市城市总体规划(2018-2035年)[R]. 日照: 日照市人民政府, 2018.

[33] People’s Government of Rizhao City. Comprehensive Urban Master Plan of Rizhao City (2018-2035)[R]. Rizhao: People’s Government of Rizhao City, 2018.

[34] Zhou C A, Chen C, Ren H. Comprehensive Evaluation on Multiple Constraint Elements of City Underground Space Development and Utilization Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process and Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Method[J]. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 2013, 357/358/359/360: 2754-2758.

[35] 王海刚, 贾三满, 杨艳, 等. 基于GIS的城市地下空间资源综合质量评估研究[J]. 上海国土资源, 2011, 32(1): 59-62,77.

[36] Wang Haigang, Jia Sanman, Yang Yan, et al. The Assessment of Synthesize Quality for Urban Underground Space Resources Based on GIS[J]. Shanghai Land & Resources, 2011, 32(1): 59-62, 77.

[37] 江思义, 王启耀, 李春玲, 等. 基于专家层次分析法的地下空间适宜性评价[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2019, 15(5): 1290-1299.

[38] Jiang Siyi, Wang Qiyao, Li Chunling, et al. Evaluation Suitability for the Underground Space Using Expert-Analytic Hierarchy Process[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2019, 15(5): 1290-1299.

[39] Shi S J, Shuo L X, Cui X T. The Application of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) in Mine Geological Environment Evaluation[J]. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 2013, 416/417: 2020-2024.

[40] 蒋杰, 葛伟亚, 马青山, 等. 南昌市中心城区地下空间开发地质适宜性评价[J]. 地质通报, 2021, 40(5): 734-744.

[41] Jiang Jie, Ge Weiya, Ma Qingshan, et al. Geological Environment Suitability Assessment of Underground Space Development in Nanchang City[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2021, 40(5): 734-744.

[42] 龙睿, 张发旺, 栾崧, 等. 广州市城区地下空间开发利用适宜性评价研究[J]. 西北地质, 2020, 53(4): 194-206.

[43] Long Rui, Zhang Fawang, Luan Song, et al. Evaluation of Urban Underground Space of Guangzhou City: Its Development and Utilization[J]. Northwestern Geology, 2020, 53(4): 194-206.

[44] 吴栋哲, 姜琦刚, 顾宗瑞, 等. 基于AHP的海峡沿岸地区生态地质环境质量评价:以马六甲海峡北岸马来西亚西南沿海地区为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(2): 619-632.

[45] Wu Dongzhe, Jiang Qigang, Gu Zongrui, et al. Evaluation of Eco-Geological Environment Quality in Strait Coastal Areas Based on AHP: Taking Southwest Coastal Areas of Malaysia of North Coast of Malacca Strait as an Example[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2024, 54(2): 619-632.

[46] 城市地下空间资源地质评估标准:DB11/T 1895-2021[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2022.

[47] Standard for Geological Assessment on Urban Underground Space Resources: DB11/T 1895-2021[S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2022.

[48] Li H Q, Li X Z, Soh C. An Integrated Strategy for Sustainable Development of the Urban Underground: From Strategic, Economic and Societal Aspects[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2016, 55: 67-82.

[49] Dou F F, Li X H, Xing H X, et al. 3D Geological Suitability Evaluation for Urban Underground Space Development: A Case Study of Qianjiang Newtown in Hangzhou, Eastern China[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2021, 115: 104052.

基金资助

深地国家科技重大专项(2024ZD1004103)

中国地质科学院基本科研业务费专项(JKY202404)