基于 CUSUM 分析的腹腔镜宫颈癌根治术学习曲线与围手术期并发症的回顾性分析

梁振 ,  闫晓东 ,  马冬梅 ,  朱琳

山东大学学报(医学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (7) : 35 -41.

PDF (1041KB)
山东大学学报(医学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (7) : 35 -41. DOI: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2026.0293
临床医学

基于 CUSUM 分析的腹腔镜宫颈癌根治术学习曲线与围手术期并发症的回顾性分析

作者信息 +

A retrospective study of the learning curve and perioperative complications of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer based on CUSUM analysis

Author information +
文章历史 +
PDF (1065K)

摘要

目的 探讨手术学习曲线对腹腔镜宫颈癌根治术并发症及术中关键指标的影响,分析手术学习曲线与术后并发症发生的关联,为该手术的质量控制及术者的培训提供理论参考。方法 选取山东大学齐鲁第二医院同一术者(主任医师)主刀的102例早期宫颈癌行腹腔镜下宫颈癌根治术的患者,按手术时间采用累积和(cumulative sum, CUSUM)分析法拟合学习曲线,分为两阶段(前29例为学习曲线成长阶段,后73例为成熟阶段),比较两阶段手术相关指标及术后并发症发生情况并进行统计分析。结果 学习曲线的最佳拟合方程为CUSUMn=-117.850+89.4n-1.759n2+0.009n3(R2=0.956,P<0.05),拟合曲线良好,计算出成长阶段为前29例,后73例为成熟阶段。相较于成长阶段,成熟阶段手术时间更短、术中出血量更少,组间差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。对比成长与成熟两个阶段的术中术后并发症(如术中器官损伤、淋巴囊肿、感染、输尿管狭窄等)发生率差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。结论 CUSUM分析表明,经过29例的手术积累,术者可稳定掌握该手术技术;随着手术学习曲线由成长阶段过渡到成熟阶段,手术的出血量更少,手术时间更短,术中术后并发症相当。

Abstract

Objective To investigate the impact of surgical learning curves on complications and intraoperative key indicators after laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for women with cervical cancer. and to analyze, the association between the surgical learning curve and postoperative complications, so as to provide a theoretical reference for quality control and surgeon training. Methods A total of 102 patients who were diagnosed with early-stage cervical cancer and underwent laparoscopic radical hysterectomy were enrolled in the study. All patients were operated on by the same senior surgeon (chief physician) at the Second Qilu Hospital of Shandong University. Cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis based on operative time was applied to model the learning curve, dividing the cases into two phases: the learning phase (the first 29 cases) and the mastery phase (the subsequent 73 cases). Intraoperative parameters and postoperative complication rates were then compared between these two phases. Results The optimal CUSUM fitting equation was CUSUMn=-117.850+89.4n-1.759n2+0.009n3( R2 =0.956, P<0.05), indicating a strong model fit. Based on this model, the learning phase was attributed to the first 29 cases, while the subsequent 73 cases constituted the mastery phase. In the mastery phase, operative time and intraoperative blood loss were significantly reduced compared to the learning phase (P<0.05). However, there were no statistically significant differences between the two phases in the incidence of intraoperative or postoperative complications (including organ injury, lymphocysts, infections, and ureteral stenosis) (P>0.05). Conclusion CUSUM analysis showed that the surgeon became technically stable after performing around 29 cases. As the learning curve transitioned from the growth phase to the mastery phase, the operative efficiency improved, with shorter surgery times and reduced blood loss. Meanwhile, the rates of intraoperative and postoperative complications remained comparable.

关键词

腹腔镜宫颈癌根治术 / 并发症 / 手术学习曲线 / 早期宫颈癌 / 回顾性分析 / 累积和分析

Key words

Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer / Complications / Surgical learning curve / Early-stage cervical cancer / Retrospective analysis / Cumulative sum analysis

引用本文

引用格式 ▾
梁振,闫晓东,马冬梅,朱琳. 基于 CUSUM 分析的腹腔镜宫颈癌根治术学习曲线与围手术期并发症的回顾性分析[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2026, 46(7): 35-41 DOI:10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2026.0293

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

参考文献

[1]

Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel R L, et al. Global cancer statis- tics 2020:GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mor- tality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J]. CA A Cancer J Clin, 2021, 71(3):209-249.

[2]

Yue S Q, Wang Q, Zhang J J, et al. Understanding cer- vical cancer at single-cell resolution[J]. Cancer Lett, 2023, 576:216408.DOI:10.1016/j.canlet.2023.216408

[3]

Xue P, Dang L, Kong L H, et al. Deep learning enabled liquid-based cytology model for cervical precancer and cancer detection[J]. Nat Commun, 2025, 16: 3506. DOI:10.1038/s41467-025-58883-3

[4]

Kietpeerakool C, Rattanakanokchai S, Shawky M, et al. Simple hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy versus radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for women with stage IA2-IB1 cervical cancer[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2025, 202510 ( 10 ):CD012335. DOI:10.1002/14651858.cd012335.pub2

[5]

Cohen P A, Jhingran A, Oaknin A, et al. Cervical cancer[J]. Lancet, 2019, 393(10167):169-182.

[6]

Uwins C, Patel H, Prakash Bhandoria G, et al.Laparo- scopic and robotic surgery for endometrial and cervical

[7]

马星, 刘晓霞. 早期宫颈癌的腹腔镜下根治术与开腹手术比较[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2020, 24(11):111-113.

[8]

Ma Xing, Liu Xiaoxia. Open surgery versus laparoscopic radical resection in treatment of early cervical cancer[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2020, 24(11): 111-113.

[9]

Lovell D Y, Naumann R W. The benefits of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer:res Ipsaloquitur?[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2022, 29(7):805-806.

[10]

Ramirez P T, Frumovitz M, Pareja R, et al. Minimally invasive versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervi- cal cancer[J]. N Engl J Med, 2018, 379 ( 20 ):1895-1904.

[11]

Chong G O, Park N Y, Hong D G, et al. Learning curve of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic and/or para-aortic lymphadenectomy in the early and lo- cally advanced cervical cancer comparison of the first 50 and second 50 cases[J]. Int J Gynecol Cancer, 2009, 19(8):1459-1464.

[12]

高玮睿, 杨萍. 经培训的手术者学习曲线对早期宫颈癌腹腔镜根治术并发症的影响[J]. 中国医师杂志, 2022, 24(8):1125-1130.

[13]

Gao Weirui, Yang Ping. The influence of trained sur- geons'learning curve on the complications of laparoscopic radical surgery for early cervical cancer[J]. Journal of Chinese Physician, 2022, 24(8):1125-1130.

[14]

Cibula D, Marnitz S, Jarkovský J, et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy without systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in females with early-stage cervical cancer:final outcome of the SENTIX prospective,single-arm, noninferiority,international trial[J]. Nat Cancer, 2025, 6(9):1585-1594.

[15]

Hardie A N, Wenzel H H B, Schnack T H, et al. Onco- logical outcomes after radical hysterectomy followed by adjuvant( chemo )radiation or no further treatment in women with cervical cancer FIGO 2018 IB2-IIA2-A multinational population-based cohort study[J]. Eur J Cancer, 2025, 227:115664.DOI:10.1016/j.ejca.2025.115664

[16]

Tu H, Huang H, Li Y F, et al. Sentinel-lymph-node biopsy alone or with lymphadenectomy in cervical cancer[J]. N Engl J Med, 2025, 393 15(15):1463-1474.

[17]

Meng Y F, Cui L Y, Fang C, et al. Simplifying surgical criteria for early-stage cervical cancer:prognostic equi- valence of total vs.radical hysterectomy in a retrospective SEER cohort analysis[J].Int J Surg, 2025, 111(9): 6211-6220.

[18]

Koh W J, Abu-Rustum N R, Bean S, et al. Cervical cancer,version 3.2019,NCCN clinical practice

[19]

guidelines in oncology[J]. J Natl Compr Canc Netw, 2019, 17(1):64-84.

[20]

Marth C, Landoni F, Mahner S, et al. Cervical cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis,treat- ment and follow-up[J]. Ann Oncol,2017,28:iv72-iv83.DOI:10.1093/annonc/mdx220

[21]

Gopu P, Antony F, Cyriac S, et al. Updates on systemic therapy for cervical cancer[J]. Indian J Med Res, 2021, 154(2):293-302.

[22]

Yang X M, Chen S B, Li Y H, et al. Laparoscopic radi- cal hysterectomy with Karez technique for stage IB3 and IIA2 cervical cancer:a multicenter retrospective cohort study[J]. Int J Surg, 2025, 111(7):4516-4527.

[23]

Pahisa J, Martínez-Román S, Torné A, et al. Compara- tive study of laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy and open wertheim-meigs in patients with early-stage cervical cancer eleven years of experience[J]. Int J Gynecol Cancer, 2010, 20(1):173-178.

[24]

申沛, 朱前勇, 郭伟平, 等. 腹腔镜下宫颈癌根治术致泌尿系统脏器损伤的原因及预防[J]. 中国内镜杂志, 2014, 20(11):1168-1171.

[25]

Shen Pei, Zhu Qianyong, Guo Weiping, et al. The rea- son and prevention of genitourinary organ secondary to laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in the early cervical cancer[J]. China Journal of Endoscopy, 2014, 20(11): 1168-1171.

[26]

王家飞, 赵卫东. 腹腔镜下宫颈癌根治术的学习曲线的分析[J]. 安徽医药, 2015, 19(1):61-65.

[27]

Wang Jiafei, Zhao Weidong. Learning curve analysis of peritoneoscopic radical hysterectomy of cervical cancer[J]. Anhui Medical and Pharmaceutical Journal, 2015, 19(1):61-65.

[28]

Kim S, Min K J, Lee S, et al. Learning curve could af- fect oncologic outcome of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer[J]. Asian J Surg, 2021, 44(1):174-180.

[29]

陈卉. 手术医师成长曲线对宫颈癌手术并发症及规范性的影响[D]. 甘肃中医药大学, 2024.

[30]

张瑜, 范丽丝, 郭楠楠, 等. 手术频率对腹腔镜下宫颈癌根治术学习曲线的影响[J]. 实用医药杂志, 2017, 34(10):881-882.

[31]

Zhang Yu, Fan Lisi, Guo Nannan, et al. Influence of operation frequency on the learning curve of laparoscopic radical resection of cervical cancer[J]. Practical Journal of Medicine&Pharmacy, 2017, 34(10):881-882.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (1041KB)

0

访问

0

被引

详细

导航
相关文章

AI思维导图

/

〈 〉