By applying a centrally symmetric weak magnetic field, in which the magnetic intensity difference between the neighboring lattice points is B/2, the two-qubit information perfect transfer in the spin chain with the lattice number N=3 can be achieved. The influence of this specific magnetic field distribution on the two-qubit information perfect transfer in the N=4 and N=5 spin chains are also respectively studied. Besides, the investigation is also extended to the spin chain with the arbitrary lattice point number. The results indicate that the time condition to achieve the perfect transfer depends on the magnetic induction intensity difference, and has no relation with the lattice number of the chain. Based on this, the quantum control scheme of the two-qubit information transfer in the spin chain with the arbitrary lattice point number is proposed: By adjusting the magnetic induction intensity difference between the neighboring lattice points, the time conditions of quantum information perfect transfer can be manipulated.
CAIY, FENGJ L, WANGH L, et al. Quantum-network generation based on four-wave mixing[J]. Physical Review A, 2015, 91(1): 013843. DOI:10.1103/PhysRevA.91.013843 .
[2]
LIX, MAY, HANJ, et al. Perfect quantum state transfer in a superconducting qubit chain with parametrically tunable couplings[J]. Physical Review Applied, 2018, 10(5): 054009. DOI:10.1103/PhysRevApplied.10.054009 .
[3]
CHRISTANDLM, VINETL, ZHEDANOVA. Analytic next-to-nearest-neighbor XX models with perfect state transfer and fractional revival[J]. Physical Review A, 2017, 96(3): 032335. DOI:10.1103/PhysRevA.96.032335 .
[4]
ZHANGC L, LIUW W. Generation of W state by combining adiabatic passage and quantum Zeno techniques[J]. Indian Journal of Physics, 2019, 93(1): 67-73. DOI:10.1007/s12648-018-1256-7 .
[5]
BENJAMINS C, BOSES. Quantum computing with an always-on Heisenberg interaction[J]. Physical Review Letters, 2003, 90(24): 247901. DOI:10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.247901 .
[6]
AJOYA, CAPPELLAROP. Mixed-state quantum transport in correlated spin networks[J]. Physical Review A, 2012, 85(4): 042305. DOI:10.1103/PhysRevA.85.042305 .
[7]
HUANGY C, MOOREJ E. Excited-state entanglement and thermal mutual information in random spin chains[J]. Physical Review B, 2014, 90(22): 220202. DOI:10.1103/PhysRevB.90.220202 .
[8]
RONKER, SPILLERT P, D’AMICOI. Effect of perturbations on information transfer in spin chains[J]. Physical Review A, 2011, 83(1): 012325. DOI:10.1103/PhysRevA.83.012325 .
[9]
RAFIEEM, LUPOC, MANCINIS. Noise to lubricate qubit transfer in a spin network[J]. Physical Review A, 2013, 88(3): 032325. DOI:10.1103/PhysRevA.88.032325 .
[10]
BOSES. Quantum communication through an unmodulated spin chain[J]. Physical Review Letters, 2003, 91(20): 207901. DOI:10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.207901 .
[11]
CHRISTANDLM, DATTAN, EKERTA, et al. Perfect state transfer in quantum spin networks[J]. Physical Review Letters, 2004, 92(18): 187902. DOI:10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.187902 .
[12]
CHENJ L, WANGQ L. Perfect transfer of entangled states on spin chain[J]. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 2007, 46(3): 614-624. DOI:10.1007/s10773-006-9202-4 .
[13]
CHRISTANDLM, DATTAN, DORLAST C, et al. Perfect transfer of arbitrary states in quantum spin networks[J]. Physical Review A, 2005, 71(3): 032312. DOI:10.1103/PhysRevA.71.032312 .
WANGQ L, RENH F. Control of two-qubit quantum information transfer in N=3 spin chain[J]. Journal of Wuhan University (Natural Science Edition), 2020, 66(6): 561-564. DOI:10.14188/j.1671-8836.2020.0125(Ch ).