基于新型复合指标构建脓毒症患者预后列线图模型

罗彦 ,  詹丽英 ,  黄建会 ,  王俊强

武汉大学学报(医学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (8) : 1051 -1057.

PDF (841KB)
武汉大学学报(医学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (8) : 1051 -1057. DOI: 10.14188/j.1671-8852.2025.1261
脓毒症专题研究

基于新型复合指标构建脓毒症患者预后列线图模型

作者信息 +

Construction of a prognostic nomogram model for sepsis patients based on novel composite indicators

Author information +
文章历史 +
PDF (860K)

摘要

目的:基于中性粒细胞与血小板比值(NPR)、中性粒细胞与单核细胞比值(NMR)、乳酸与血细胞比容比值(LHR),构建并验证脓毒症患者预后的列线图预测模型,以期为临床预后评估提供可视化工具。方法:采用回顾性队列研究设计,选取2021年2月至2025年2月泸州市中医医院收治的228例脓毒症患者作为研究对象,收集一般资料、实验室指标、疾病严重度评分以及治疗信息等。根据住院结局将患者分为死亡组(96例)和存活组(132例)。采用多因素Logistic回归分析筛选28天全因死亡的危险因素,并基于回归结果构建列线图预测模型。通过Bootstrap法进行内部验证,采用受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)、校准曲线及决策曲线分析(DCA)评估模型的区分度、校准能力和临床实用性。结果:死亡组NPR、NMR与LHR均高于存活组(P<0.05)。多因素Logistic回归分析结果显示,NPR升高、NMR升高、LHR升高、APACHE Ⅱ评分升高及SOFA评分升高均为脓毒症患者28天全因死亡的独立危险因素(P<0.05)。基于回归结果构建列线图预测模型,经验证该模型具有较好的拟合优度(Hosmer⁃Lemeshow检验χ²=5.032,P>0.05)、校准度(平均绝对误差=0.005,C⁃index=0.992)和区分度(AUC=0.992,95%CI:0.986~0.999),并具备较高的临床实用性。结论:脓毒症患者NPR、NMR与LHR升高与28天全因死亡风险增加密切相关,基于NPR、NMR与LHR构建的列线图预测模型能有效预测脓毒症患者的28天全因死亡风险。

Abstract

Objective: To develop and validate a nomogram prediction model for the prognosis of sepsis patients based on the neutrophil⁃to⁃platelet ratio (NPR), neutrophil⁃to⁃monocyte ratio (NMR), and lactate⁃to⁃hematocrit ratio (LHR), in order to provide a visual tool for prognostic assessment. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted involving 228 sepsis patients admitted to Luzhou Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital between February 2021 and February 2025. General information, laboratory indicators, disease severity scores, and treatment details were collected. Patients were divided into a death group (96 cases) and a survival group (132 cases) based on the outcomes of 28⁃day mortality. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors influencing 28⁃day mortality. A nomogram prediction model was constructed based on the regression results and internally validated using the Bootstrap method. The model's discriminative ability, calibration, and clinical applicability were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Results: The death group had significantly higher NPR, NMR, and LHR levels as compared with the survival group (P<0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that increased NPR, NMR, LHR, APACHE Ⅱ score, and SOFA score were risk factors for 28⁃day mortality in sepsis patients (P<0.05). The nomogram prediction model constructed based on these factors demonstrated good goodness⁃of⁃fit (Hosmer⁃Lemeshow test:χ²=5.032, P>0.05), calibration (mean absolute error=0.005, C⁃index=0.992), discriminative ability (area under the curve (AUC)=0.992 (95%CI: 0.986⁃0.999)), and clinical utility. Conclusion: Elevated NPR, NMR, and LHR are associated with an increased risk of 28⁃day mortality in sepsis patients. The nomogram prediction model based on NPR, NMR, and LHR can effectively predict the risk of 28⁃day mortality in these patients.

关键词

脓毒症 / 预后 / 列线图 / 中性粒细胞/血小板比值 / 中性粒细胞/单核细胞比值 / 乳酸/血细胞比容比值

Key words

Sepsis / Prognosis / Nomogram / Neutrophil⁃to⁃Platelet Ratio / Neutrophil⁃to⁃Monocyte Ratio / Lactate⁃to⁃Hematocrit Ratio

引用本文

引用格式 ▾
罗彦,詹丽英,黄建会,王俊强. 基于新型复合指标构建脓毒症患者预后列线图模型[J]. 武汉大学学报(医学版), 2026, 47(8): 1051-1057 DOI:10.14188/j.1671-8852.2025.1261

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

参考文献

[1]

朱义玲, 崔娟娟, 李燕双, . 外周血中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值和淋巴细胞与单核细胞比值在脓毒症患者诊断和预后中的价值[J]. 中国感染与化疗杂志, 2025, 25(2): 149-154.

[2]

ZHU Y L, CUI J J, LI Y S, et al. Value of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and lymphocyte to monocyte ratio in peripheral blood for diagnosis and prognosis in patients with sepsis[J]. Chin J Infect Chemother, 2025, 25(2): 149-154.

[3]

苏维雪, 姜利, 席修明, . 血压变异与脓毒症患者住院死亡的关系[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2024, 45(2): 181-186.

[4]

SU W X, JIANG L, XI X M, et al. The correlation between systolic blood pressure variability and in—hospital mortality in patients with sepsis[J]. J Cap Med Univ, 2024, 45(2): 181-186.

[5]

杨晓英, 庞秀峰, 朱玉琴, . 脓毒症合并急性肺损伤患者SOFA评分、APACHEⅡ评分、炎症因子水平变化及临床意义[J]. 海南医学, 2023, 34(12): 1692-1695.

[6]

YANG X Y, PANG X F, ZHU Y Q, et al. Changes and clinical significance of sequential organ failure assessment score, acute physiological and chronic health evalution Ⅱ score, and inflammatory factors level in patients with sepsis complicated with acute lung injury[J]. Hainan Med J, 2023, 34(12): 1692-1695.

[7]

杨惠安, 俞晓玲, 官升灿, . 中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值、血小板计数与平均血小板体积比值对重症肺炎并发脓毒症病人预后的评估价值[J]. 安徽医药, 2024, 28(7): 1451-1456.

[8]

YANG H A, YU X L, GUAN S C, et al. Prognostic value of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio, platelet to mean platelet volume ratio in severe pneumonia patients complicated with sepsis[J]. Anhui Med Pharm J, 2024, 28(7): 1451-1456.

[9]

贾亚娟, 蒙钰铭, 高志伟, . 血小板与淋巴细胞比值、降钙素原和白细胞介素6联合检测对脓毒症患者预后价值的研究[J]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(2): 118-123.

[10]

JIA Y J, MENG Y M, GAO Z W, et al. Prognostic value of combined detection of platelet—lymphocyte ratio, procalcitonin and interleukin—6 in patients with sepsis[J]. Chin J Crit Care Med (Electronic Edition), 2024, 17(2): 118-123.

[11]

黄超, 谷柳莹, 伊尔潘江·阿不杜克然木, . 中性粒细胞与血小板比值对脓毒症急性肾损伤发生的预测价值[J]. 医学研究杂志, 2025, 54(6): 103-108.

[12]

HUANG C, GU L Y, YIERPANJIANG·ABUDUKERANMU,et al. Value of the ratio of neutrophil count to platelet count in predicting the occurrence of acute kidney injury in sepsis[J]. J Med Res, 2025, 54(6): 103-108.

[13]

单楚笑, 孙宜田, 朱孟静, . 中性粒细胞计数、单核细胞计数、中性粒细胞与单核细胞比值与间质性肺疾病急性加重短期转归的相关性分析[J]. 安徽医药, 2024, 28(10): 2043-2049.

[14]

SHAN C X, SUN Y T, ZHU M J, et al. Correlation analysis of neutrophil count, monocyte count and NMR with short—term outcome of acute exacerbation of interstitial lung disease[J]. Anhui Med Pharm J, 2024, 28(10): 2043-2049.

[15]

DEMIR B, ŞAŞMAZ M İ, SAGLAM GURMEN E, et al. Prognostic value of lactate to hematocrit ratio score in patients with severe thoracoabdominal trauma[J]. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg, 2022, 28(7): 927-932.

[16]

SINGER M, DEUTSCHMAN C S, SEYMOUR C W, et al. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (sepsis—3)[J]. JAMA, 2016, 315(8): 801-810.

[17]

KNAUS W A, DRAPER E A, WAGNER D P, et al. APACHE Ⅱ —A severity of disease classification system: Reply[J]. Crit Care Med, 1986, 14(8): 755.

[18]

FERREIRA F L, BOTA D P, BROSS A, et al. Serial evaluation of the SOFA score to predict outcome in critically ill patients[J]. JAMA, 2001, 286(14): 1754-1758.

[19]

HERWANTO V, SINTO R, NAINGGOLAN L, et al. Immune response subphenotyping to predict mortality in sepsis: A prospective study in resource—limited setting[J]. Crit Care Explor, 2025, 7(9): e1315.

[20]

YANG C, ZHU J X, ZHANG Y Y, et al. Effects of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation on sepsis—induced coagulopathy: Protocol for a randomised controlled trial[J]. BMJ Open, 2025, 15(8): e102904.

[21]

WANG X Y, LI J Z, ZHANG Y X, et al. HIF1A/BNIP3 pathway affects ferroptosis in sepsis—induced cardiomyopathy through binding to BCL—2[J]. Redox Rep, 2025, 30(1): 2544412.

[22]

叶慧, 张钧, 谢鑫友 . 红细胞分布宽度与血小板计数比值、中性粒细胞计数与血小板计数比值对严重烧伤患者的预后评估[J]. 临床检验杂志, 2021, 39(1): 40-42.

[23]

YE H, ZHANG J, XIE X Y. Prognostic evaluation of red blood cell distribution width and platelet count ratio, neutrophil count and platelet count ratio in severely burned patients[J]. Chin J Clin Lab Sci, 2021, 39(1): 40-42.

[24]

冯契靓, 张诚实, 崔栋慧, . 外周血中性粒细胞与血小板计数比值对呼吸衰竭患者预后的评估价值[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2023, 43(16): 3915-3917.

[25]

FENG Q L, ZHANG C S, CUI D H, et al. Evaluation of the ratio of neutrophil to platelet count in peripheral blood on the prognosis of patients with respiratory failure[J]. Chin J Gerontol, 2023, 43(16): 3915-3917.

[26]

LIAO F Y, FAN J B, WANG R, et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps in sepsis: Trade—off between pros and cons[J]. Burns Trauma, 2025, 13: tkaf046.

[27]

SI Y R, YOU S S, LEI Q, et al. Time series analysis between platelet counts and 60—day mortality in sepsis patients with thrombocytopenia: A retrospective cohort study[J]. BMC Infect Dis, 2025, 25(1): 1084.

[28]

BANI—AHMAD M A, AL—HUSEIN B A, ALSHAABI D Q, et al. The predictivity of hematological parameters and related inflammatory biomarkers of male subjects with chronic polysubstance use disorder[J]. Brain Behav Immun Health, 2025, 48: 101095.

[29]

NOORMOHAMMADPOUR P, HUENIKEN K, PIENKOWSKI M, et al. Differential prognostic association of systemic inflammatory biomarkers on survival outcomes in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients by human papillomavirus status[J]. Neoplasia, 2025, 66: 101178.

[30]

XIA X H, WANG Y M, XIE M X, et al. Elevated neutrophil—to—monocyte ratio as a prognostic marker for poor outcomes in neonatal sepsis[J]. Heliyon, 2022, 8(10): e11181.

[31]

SAMUELS A N, COLLINS N M, HANLON K, et al. The predictive ability of blood—based biomarkers to detect bacteremia in hospitalized neonatal foals[J]. Vet J, 2025, 314: 106427.

[32]

PIOTROWSKI D, SĄCZEWSKA—PIOTROWSKA A, JAROSZEWICZ J, et al. Lymphocyte—to—monocyte ratio as the best simple predictor of bacterial infection in patients with liver cirrhosis[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2020, 17(5): 1727.

[33]

张璐, 张淑立, 孙怡, . 乳酸与血细胞比容比值预测社区获得性肺炎患者住院死亡率价值优于CURB—65评分[J]. 临床医学进展, 2025(4): 2162-2172.

[34]

ZHANG L, ZHANG S L, SUN Y, et al. Lactate to hematocrit ratio is superior to the CURB—65 score in predicting In—hospital mortality in patients with community—acquired pneumonia[J]. Adv Clin Med, 2025(4): 2162-2172.

[35]

DUAN W T, YANG F, LING H, et al. Association between lactate to hematocrit ratio and 30—day all—cause mortality in patients with sepsis: A retrospective analysis of the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care Ⅳ database[J]. Front Med, 2024, 11: 1422883.

[36]

邢冬梅, 隋冰冰, 王磊 . 老年脓毒症患者住院期间死亡风险预测模型的建立与验证[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2024, 28(8): 39-44.

[37]

XING D M, SUI B B, WANG L. Establishment and validation of risk prediction model for mortality in elderly patients with sepsis during hospitalization[J]. J Clin Med Pract, 2024, 28(8): 39-44.

[38]

吴维维, 黄素芳, 熊杰, . 脓毒症死亡影响因素分析[J]. 中国临床研究, 2024, 37(11): 1680-1685.

[39]

WU W W, HUANG S F, XIONG J, et al. Analysis of risk factors for death in patients with sepsis[J]. Chin J Clin Res, 2024, 37(11): 1680-1685.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (841KB)

2

访问

0

被引

详细

导航
相关文章

AI思维导图

/