脑胶质瘤MRI参数、微血管密度与预后的相关性研究*

南燕 ,  鲁君 ,  彭少华

四川大学学报(医学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (3) : 795 -800.

PDF (2442KB)
四川大学学报(医学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (3) : 795 -800. DOI: 10.12182/20260560202
论著

脑胶质瘤MRI参数、微血管密度与预后的相关性研究*

作者信息 +

Study of the Correlation Between MRI Parameters, Microvascular Density, and Prognosis in Glioma

Author information +
文章历史 +
PDF (2500K)

摘要

目的 分析多模态MRI检查参数〔表观弥散系数(ADC)、脑血流量(CBF)、胆碱(Cho)/肌酸(Cr)〕与脑胶质瘤患者微血管密度(MVD)的相关性及其对预后的评估价值。方法 回顾性分析2019年1月–2024年1月间在我院确诊为脑胶质瘤的200例患者病历资料,以WHO为分级基础,Ⅰ~Ⅱ级为低级别组(n=122);Ⅲ~Ⅳ级为高级别组(n=78);以预后情况为依据,分为预后良好组(n=114)和预后不良组(n=86)。Pearson相关性检验多模态MRI检查参数与脑胶质瘤MVD之间的关系,受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)的曲线下面积(AUC)评价多模态MRI检查参数以及MVD对高级别脑胶质瘤患者的诊断价值及其预后不良的预测价值,最后Hosmer-Lemeshow检查评估模型的拟合度。结果 低级别患者ADC值高于高级别组,CBF、Cho/Cr以及MVD均低于高级别组(P<0.05)。预后良好组患者ADC值高于预后不良组,CBF以及Cho/Cr值均低于预后不良组(P<0.05)。脑胶质瘤患者ADC与MVD呈负相关(r=-0.226,P=0.001);CBF和Cho/Cr与MVD均呈正相关(r=0.235、0.396,P<0.001)。ADC、CBF、Cho/Cr、MVD诊断高级别脑胶质瘤患者的AUC分别为0.870、0.696、0.926、0.950,四者联合的AUC为0.997。多模态MRI检查参数对脑胶质瘤患者预后的ROC曲线中,DC+CBF+Cho/Cr联合预测的AUC为0.876,ADC、CBF、Cho/Cr单独诊断的AUC分别为0.718、0.688、0.808。Hosmer-Lemeshow检验显示ADC+CBF+Cho/Cr联合预测模型拟合度良好(χ2=8.570,P=0.380),即ADC+CBF+Cho/Cr联合预测模型具有较高的精确度。结论 ADC、CBF、Cho/Cr与脑胶质瘤患者MVD具有弱相关性,四者联合诊断高级别脑胶质瘤患者的价值较高,前三者联合对患者预后的预测价值较高。

Abstract

Objective To analyze the correlations between multimodal MRI examination parameters – apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), cerebral blood flow (CBF), and choline (Cho)/creatine (Cr)-and microvessel density (MVD) in patients with glioma, as well as the prognostic value of these parameters. Methods The medical records of 200 patients diagnosed with glioma at our hospital from January 2019 to January 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the WHO classification, patients were divided into a low-grade group (n = 122) and a high-grade group (n = 78). Patients were further divided into a good prognosis group (n = 114) and a poor prognosis group (n = 86). The Pearson correlation test was used to analyze the relationship between multimodal MRI parameters and MVD in glioma patients. The area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the diagnostic value of multimodal MRI parameters and MVD for high-grade glioma and their predictive value for poor prognosis. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test was used to assess the goodness of fit of the model. Results The ADC value in the low-grade group was higher than in the high-grade group, while CBF, Cho/Cr, and MVD were lower in the low-grade group (P < 0.05). The ADC value in the good prognosis group was higher than in the poor prognosis group, while CBF and Cho/Cr values were lower in the poor prognosis group ( P < 0.05). ADC was negatively correlated with MVD in glioma patients ( r = -0.226, P = 0.001); CBF and Cho/Cr were positively correlated with MVD (r = 0.235 and 0.396, P = 0.001 and < 0.001, respectively). The AUCs of ADC, CBF, Cho/Cr, and MVD for diagnosing high-grade glioma were 0.870, 0.696, 0.926, and 0.950, respectively. The combined AUC of these four parameters was 0.997. For prognosis prediction based on multimodal MRI parameters, the combined AUC of ADC+CBF+Cho/Cr was 0.876, while the AUCs of ADC, CBF, and Cho/Cr alone were 0.718, 0.688, and 0.808, respectively. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test showed that the combined model (ADC + CBF + Cho/Cr) fit was good ( χ2 = 8.570, P = 0.380), indicating that the combined prediction model had high accuracy. Conclusion ADC, CBF, and Cho/Cr have a weak correlation with MVD in glioma patients. The combination of these four parameters has high value in diagnosing high-grade glioma, and the combination of the first three parameters has higher predictive value for patient prognosis.

关键词

多模态MRI / 脑胶质瘤 / 微血管密度 / 预后

Key words

Multimodal MRI / Brain glioma / Microvascular density / Prognosis

引用本文

引用格式 ▾
南燕,鲁君,彭少华. 脑胶质瘤MRI参数、微血管密度与预后的相关性研究*[J]. 四川大学学报(医学版), 2026, 57(3): 795-800 DOI:10.12182/20260560202

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

参考文献

[1]

黄颖倩, 赵静, 初建平, 等. 基于不同扩散模型的扩散加权成像在脑胶质瘤分级和预测IDH-1突变的对比分析. 中山大学学报(医学科学版), 2021, 42(1): 87-94. doi: 10.13471/j.cnki.j.sun.yat-sen.univ(med.sci).2021.0012.

[2]

HUANG Y Q, ZHAO J, CHU J P, et al. Evaluating glioma in terms of grading and predicting IDH-1 mutation status by advanced diffusion weighted imaging: a comparative study of DTI, DKI and NODDI. Journal of Sun Yat-sen University (Medical Sciences), 2021, 42(1): 87-94. doi: 10.13471/j.cnki.j.sun.yat-sen.univ(med.sci).2021.0012.

[3]

钟昱珏, 马笑笑, 段祺, 等. 脑胶质瘤TERT启动子突变的影像学研究进展. 四川大学学报(医学版), 2024, 55(6): 1350-1356. doi: 10.12182/20241160501.

[4]

ZHONG Y J, MA X X, DUAN Q, et al. Research progress in imaging investigation of TERT promoter mutations in gliomas. J Sichuan Univ (Med Sci), 2024, 55(6): 1350-1356. doi: 10.12182/20241160501.

[5]

田恒屹, 王瑜, 计亚荣, 等. 3DGE-UNet磁共振成像的脑胶质瘤全自动分割算法: 对不充分全局特征提取的改进. 四川大学学报(医学版), 2024, 55(2): 447-454. doi: 10.12182/20240360208.

[6]

TTIAN H Y, WANG Y, JI Y R, et al. Fully automatic glioma segmentation algorithm of magnetic resonance imaging based on 3D-UNet with more global contextual feature extraction: an improvement on insufficient extraction of global features. J Sichuan Univ (Med Sci), 2024, 55(2): 447-454. doi: 10.12182/20240360208.

[7]

王静, 宗会迁, 张娅, 等. 多参数磁共振成像影像组学鉴别高级别胶质瘤及单发脑转移瘤的价值. 现代肿瘤医学, 2024, 32(22): 4338-4344. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4992.2024.22.020.

[8]

WANG J, ZONG H Q, ZHANG Y, et al. The value of multi-parameter magnetic resonance imaging radiomics in distinguishing high-grade gliomas from single brain metastases. Journal of Modern Oncology, 2024, 32(22): 4338-4344. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4992.2024.22.020.

[9]

GERALDES C. Manganese oxide nanoparticles for MRI-based multimodal imaging and theranostics. Molecules, 2024, 29(23): 5591. doi: 10.3390/molecules29235591.

[10]

KUPERSTOCK J, GEDIK R, HORNÝ M, et al. Differences in female and male-to-female transgender facial skin micro-vessel density. Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med, 2021, 23(3): 199-204. doi: 10.1089/fpsam.2020.0065.

[11]

阮君, 张晓琦, 刘文涛, 等. 基于多模态MRI影像组学在胶质瘤分级预测中的应用: 多中心验证研究. 临床放射学杂志, 2022, 41(8): 1408-1415. doi: 10.13437/j.cnki.jcr.2022.08.002.

[12]

RUAN J, ZHANG X Q, LIU W T, et al. The diagnostic efficacy of different MRI sequences to construct radscore for the staging of glioma. Journal of Clinical Radiology, 2022, 41(8): 1408-1415. doi: 10.13437/j.cnki.jcr.2022.08.002.

[13]

邬立, 陆斌, 赵蕾, 等. 多模态神经导航及术中超声在高级别胶质瘤手术中的应用. 中国神经精神疾病杂志, 2022, 48(8): 463-468. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0152.2022.08.003.

[14]

WU L, LU B, ZHAO L, et al. Application of multimodal neuronavigation and intraoperative ultrasound in the surgical treatment of high-grade glioma. Chinese Journal of Nervous and Mental Diseases, 2022, 48(8): 463-468. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0152.2022.08.003.

[15]

国家卫生健康委员会医政医管局, 中国抗癌协会脑胶质瘤专业委员会, 中国医师协会脑胶质瘤专业委员会 . 脑胶质瘤诊疗指南(2022版). 中华神经外科杂志, 2022, 38(8): 757-777. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112050-20220510-00239.

[16]

EICHTEN A, ADLER A P, COOPER B, et al. Rapid decrease in tumor perfusion following VEGF blockade predicts long-term tumor growth inhibition in preclinical tumor models. Angiogenesis, 2013, 16(2): 429-441. doi: 10.1007/s10456-012-9328-3.Epub2012Dec13.

[17]

WU P B, FILLEY A C, MILLER M L, et al. Benign glioma. Adv Exp Med Biol, 2023, 1405: 31-71. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-23705-8_2.

[18]

PERIVOLIOTIS K, NTELLAS P, DADOULI K, et al. Microvessel density (MVD) in patients with osteosarcoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Invest, 2024, 42(1): 104-114. doi: 10.1080/07357907.2024.2311266.

[19]

XUAN K, XIANG L, HUANG X, et al. Multimodal MRI reconstruction assisted with spatial alignment network. IEEE Trans Med Imaging, 2022, 41(9): 2499-2509. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2022.3164050.

[20]

李奕虹, 所信君, 冯全志. 多模态MRI检查对脑胶质瘤患者病理分级的诊断价值及术后复发的预测价值. 癌症进展, 2024, 22(20): 2255-2258. doi: 10.11877/j.issn.1672-1535.2024.22.20.13.

[21]

LI Y H, SUO X J, FENG Q Z. Diagnostic value of multimodal MRI examination for pathological grading of glioma patients and the predictive value of postoperative recurrence. Oncology Progress, 2024, 22(20): 2255-2258. doi: 10.11877/j.issn.1672-1535.2024.22.20.13.

[22]

冯会玉, 王伟, 何晨曦, 等. 多模态MRI对脑胶质瘤的诊断价值及术后同步放化疗疗效的评估价值研究. 中国CT和MRI杂志, 2023, 21(7): 12-14. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-5131.2023.07.004.

[23]

FENG H Y, WANG W, HE C X, et al. Study on the diagnostic value of multimodal mri for brain glioma and the evaluation value of concurrent postoperative radiotherapy and chemotherapy after operation. Chinese Journal of CT and MRI, 2023, 21(7): 12-14. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-5131.2023.07.004.

[24]

刘天笑, 周晶, 贺曦. 多模态MRI检查在脑胶质瘤术前分级及术后疗效评估中的应用价值. 癌症进展, 2024, 22(21): 2396-2399. doi: 10.11877/j.issn.1672-1535.2024.22.21.20.

[25]

LIU T X, ZHOU J, HE X. Application value of multimodal MRI examination in preoperative grading and postoperative efficacy evaluation of brain glioma. Oncology Progress, 2024, 22(21): 2396-2399. doi: 10.11877/j.issn.1672-1535.2024.22.21.20.

[26]

王大堃, 朱建忠, 刘辉, 等. DCE-MRI测量Ktrans值、Ve值联合ADC值与脑胶质瘤患者MVD及病理分期的相关性. 中国临床医学影像杂志, 2020, 31(11): 766-769. doi: 10.12117/jccmi.2020.11.002.

[27]

WANG D K, ZHU J Z, LIU H, et al. The correlation between Ktrans, Ve value measured by DCE-MRI combined with ADC value and MVD, pathological stage in glioma patients. Journal of China Clinic Medical Imaging, 2020, 31(11): 766-769. doi: 10.12117/jccmi.2020.11.002.

[28]

KUROKAWA R, KUROKAWA M, BABA A, et al. Dynamic susceptibility contrast-MRI parameters, ADC values, and the T2-FLAIR mismatch sign are useful to differentiate between H3-mutant and H3-wild-type high-grade midline glioma. Eur Radiol, 2022, 32(6): 3672-3682. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-08476-7.

[29]

WANG Q P, LEI D Q, YUAN Y, et al. Accuracy of ADC derived from DWI for differentiating high-grade from low-grade gliomas: systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore), 2020, 99(8): e19254. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019254.

[30]

MOHAMMADI S, GHADERI S, JOUZDANI A F, et al. Differentiation between high-grade glioma and brain metastasis using cerebral perfusion-related parameters (cerebral blood volume and cerebral blood flow): a systematic review and meta-analysis of perfusion-weighted MRI techniques. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2025, 61(2): 758-768. doi: 10.1002/jmri.29473.

[31]

ZENG Q, LIU H, ZHANG K, et al. Noninvasive evaluation of cerebral glioma grade by using multivoxel 3D proton MR spectroscopy. Magn Reson Imaging, 2011, 29(1): 25-31. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2010.07.017.

[32]

张剑宁, 刘聪为. 脑胶质瘤新型治疗方案研究进展. 肿瘤防治研究, 2022, 49(6): 505-513. doi: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2022.21.1514.

[33]

ZHANG J N, LIU C W. Progress of novel treatment options for glioma. Journal of Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment, 2022, 49(6): 505-513. doi: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2022.21.1514.

[34]

张艳文, 邢伟, 卢海涛, 等. 动态对比增强磁共振成像定量分析在术前胶质瘤分级中的临床价值. 临床放射学杂志, 2020, 39(10): 1926-1930. doi: 10.13437/j.cnki.jcr.2020.10.006.

[35]

ZHANG Y W, XING W, LU H T, et al. Clinical value of dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging quantitative analysis in preoperative glioma grading. Journal of Clinical Radiology, 2020, 39(10): 1926-1930. doi: 10.13437/j.cnki.jcr.2020.10.006.

基金资助

*兵团指导性科技计划项目(2022ZD032)

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (2442KB)

67

访问

0

被引

详细

导航
相关文章

AI思维导图

/

〈 〉