非妇科患者泌尿生殖道支原体感染特征与耐药分析

周丹 ,  袁余 ,  刘雅 ,  肖玉玲

四川大学学报(医学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (4) : 1160 -1164.

PDF (2364KB)
四川大学学报(医学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (4) : 1160 -1164. DOI: 10.12182/20260760208
论著

非妇科患者泌尿生殖道支原体感染特征与耐药分析

作者信息 +

Characteristics and Drug Resistance Analysis of Urogenital Mycoplasma Infections in Patient Specimens From Non-Gynecologic Departments

Author information +
文章历史 +
PDF (2419K)

摘要

目的 分析四川大学华西医院2020-2024年非妇科患者泌尿生殖道支原体感染的流行病学特征及耐药情况。方法 本研究对2020-2024年间本院泌尿外科、皮肤性病科等相关科室(不含妇科)送检的856例支原体培养标本进行了回顾性分析。采用法国生物梅里埃比色法试剂盒进行支原体培养、鉴定及药敏试验。分析支原体检出率、种属分布、人群特征及耐药谱。结果 总体阳性率14.02%(120/856),以尿道分泌物为主(48.33%)。单纯脲原体属感染占89.17%(107/120),单纯人型支原体感染占4.17%(5/120),混合感染占6.66%(8/120)。非妇科泌尿生殖道支原体感染患者中,女性患者阳性率(24.67%)高于男性(8.27%)(P<0.05),感染风险为男性的2.98倍(风险比 = 2.98, 95% CI:2.12~4.19);高发年龄为30~39岁(50.00%)。喹诺酮类普遍耐药(氧氟沙星和环丙沙星耐药率>80%);大环内酯类的交沙霉素敏感率最高(93.33%);四环素类的多西环素敏感率为100%。结论 泌尿生殖道支原体感染以单纯脲原体属为主,女性及30~39岁人群高发。在临床指征明确时,治疗可优先考虑四环素类药物如多西环素,并需特别关注人型支原体及混合感染对大环内酯类的高耐药问题。

Abstract

Objective To analyze the epidemiological characteristics and drug resistance patterns of urogenital mycoplasma infections in patient specimens from non-gynecologic departments at West China Hospital, Sichuan University between 2020 and 2024, and to provide evidence for clinical diagnosis, treatment, and antimicrobial stewardship of mycoplasma infections in non-gynecologic patients. Methods A total of 856 Mycoplasma culture specimens were retrospectively analyzed in the study. All specimens were submitted for lab analysis by urology, dermatovenereology, and other relevant departments (excluding gynecology) of our hospital between 2020 and 2024. Mycoplasma culture, identification, and antimicrobial susceptibility testing were performed using the bioMérieux colorimetric kit (France). The detection rate, species distribution, demographic characteristics, and antimicrobial resistance profiles of mycoplasma infections were analyzed accordingly. Results The overall positivity rate was 14.02% (120/856), with urethral secretions constituting the predominant specimen type (48.33%). Ureaplasma spp. infections accounted for 89.17% (107/120), Mycoplasma hominis infections for 4.17% (5/120), and co-infections for 6.66% (8/120). Among patients with non-gynecologic urogenital mycoplasma infections, the positive rate in women (24.67%) was higher than that in men (8.27%) (P < 0.05), with women exhibiting a 2.98-fold higher risk of infection (risk ratio [RR] = 2.98, 95% CI: 2.12-4.19) compared to men. The peak incidence occurred in the 30-39 age group (50.00%). High resistance to quinolones was prevalent, with resistance rates exceeding 80% for both ofloxacin and ciprofloxacin. Among macrolides, josamycin exhibited the highest susceptibility rate (93.33%). Among tetracycline-class antibiotics, all isolates were 100% susceptible to doxycycline. Conclusion Urogenital mycoplasma infections are predominantly caused by Ureaplasma spp. infection, with higher incidence among women and individuals aged 30-39 years. When clear clinical indications are present, tetracycline-class antibiotics, such as doxycycline, should be considered preferential therapeutic options. Special attention should also be given to the high rates of macrolide resistance of Mycoplasma hominis infections and co-infections.

关键词

支原体属 / 微生物耐药性 / 泌尿生殖系统感染

Key words

Mycoplasma / Drug resistance, Microbial / Urogenital system infections

引用本文

引用格式 ▾
周丹,袁余,刘雅,肖玉玲. 非妇科患者泌尿生殖道支原体感染特征与耐药分析[J]. 四川大学学报(医学版), 2026, 57(4): 1160-1164 DOI:10.12182/20260760208

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

参考文献

[1]

Wu Y, Majidzadeh N, Li Y, et al. Trends of fluoroquinolones resistance in mycoplasma and ureaplasma urogenital isolates: systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Glob Antimicrob Resist, 2024, 36: 13. DOI: 10.1016/j.jgar.2023.11.007.

[2]

Ondondo R O, Whittington W L, Astete S G, et al. Differential association of ureaplasma species with non-gonococcal urethritis in heterosexual men[J]. Sex Transm Infect, 2010, 86(4): 271. DOI: 10.1136/sti.2009.040394.

[3]

Zhou Y, Wu X, Shen B, et al. The relationship between ureaplasma species and male infertility: pathogenicity, biology, diagnosis, and treatment[J]. Altern Ther Health Med, 2024, 30(6): 96.

[4]

Workowski K A, Bachmann L H, Chan P A, et al. Sexually transmitted infections treatment guidelines, 2021[J]. MMWR Recomm Rep, 2021, 70(4): 1. DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.rr7004a1.

[5]

中华医学会妇产科学分会感染性疾病协作组, 中国性学会性医学专业委员会生殖道感染学组 . 生殖道支原体感染诊治中国专家共识(2025年版)[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2025, 41(5): 541. DOI: 10.19538/j.fk2025050113.

[6]

Pereyre S, Henin N, Dolzy A, et al. Evaluation of commercial, customized microdilution plates for Ureaplasma parvum, Ureaplasma urealyticum, and Mycoplasma hominis antimicrobial susceptibility testing and determination of antimicrobial resistance prevalence in France[J/OL]. J Clin Microbiol, 2024, 62(7): e0022624. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38832769. DOI: 10.1128/jcm.00226-24.

[7]

Chalker V J, Sharratt M G, Rees C L, et al. Tetracycline Resistance Mediated by tet(M) has variable integrative conjugative element composition in Mycoplasma hominis strains isolated in the United Kingdom from 2005 to 2015[J/OL]. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 2021, 65(4). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33468475. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.02513-20.

[8]

Zhao L, Liu A, Li R, et al. Antimicrobial resistance, genetic characterization, and molecular epidemiology of Ureaplasma species in males with infertility[J]. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis, 2020, 39(11): 2177. DOI: 10.1007/s10096-020-03969-7.

[9]

Pavoni M, Principe L, Foschi C, et al. Antimicrobial resistance of genital mycoplasma and ureaplasma: a multicentre study over a 5-year period in Italy (2017-2021)[J]. Microb Drug Resist, 2024, 30(1): 55. DOI: 10.1089/mdr.2023.0202.

[10]

Liu W, Yang T, Kong Y, et al. Ureaplasma infections: update on epidemiology, antimicrobial resistance, and pathogenesis[J]. Crit Rev Microbiol, 2025, 51(2): 317. DOI: 10.1080/1040841X.2024.2349556.

[11]

Ramaloko W T, Maningi N E, Osei Sekyere J. Global prevalence, resistance rates, and underlying resistance mechanisms of clinical Mycoplasma and Ureaplasma species[J/OL]. J Appl Microbiol, 2025, 136(1). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39719365. DOI: 10.1093/jambio/lxae308.

[12]

Gozukucuk R, Cakiroglu B. How does gender affect ureaplasma and mycoplasma growth and antimicrobial susceptibility rates?[J]. Urologia, 2023, 90(3): 542. DOI: 10.1177/03915603221143422.

[13]

Waites J T, Crabb D M, Ratliff A E, et al. Antimicrobial susceptibility and genetic mechanisms of resistance of Ureaplasma isolates in North America between 2012 and 2023[J/OL]. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 2025, 69(6): e0186824. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40323432. DOI: 10.1128/aac.01868-24.

[14]

Zheng J, Li Y, Zhao J, et al. Study on Drug resistance to treatment for ureaplasma urealyticum infections in the female genital tract[J/OL]. Clin Lab, 2024, 70(4): 231146. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38623683. DOI: 10.7754/Clin.Lab.2024.231146.

[15]

Yang T, Pan L, Wu N, et al. Antimicrobial resistance in clinical Ureaplasma spp. and Mycoplasma hominis and Structural Mechanisms underlying quinolone resistance[J/OL]. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 2020, 64(6): e02560-19. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32229497. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.02560-19.

[16]

Sharratt M, Sands K, Portal E A R, et al. Defining fluoroquinolone resistance-mediating mutations from non-resistance polymorphisms in Mycoplasma hominis topoisomerases[J/OL]. Antibiotics (Basel), 2021, 10(11): 1379. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34827317. DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics10111379.

[17]

Wen X, Nobakht M S, Yang Y, et al. Tetracyclines resistance in Mycoplasma and Ureaplasma urogenital isolates derived from human: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J/OL]. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob, 2023, 22(1): 83. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37697380. DOI: 10.1186/s12941-023-00628-5.

[18]

Shao L, Wu X, Gao S, et al. Epidemiological investigation and antimicrobial susceptibility analysis of Ureaplasma and Mycoplasma hominis in a teaching hospital in Shenyang, China[J]. J Infect Chemother, 2021, 27(8): 1212. DOI: 10.1016/j.jiac.2021.03.022.

[19]

尤金彪, 廖颖婷, 董金敏, . 2013年-2021年杭州地区泌尿生殖道支原体感染状况及耐药变迁分析[J]. 中国卫生检验杂志, 2022, 32(23): 2858.

[20]

You J B, Liao Y T, Dong J M, et al. Analysis of infection status and drug resistance of Mycoplasma in urogenital tract in Hangzhou area from 2013 to 2021[J]. Chin J Health Lab Tec, 2022, 32(23): 2858.

[21]

王震文, 张鹏飞, 周保成. 2015-2022年连云港地区生殖道支原体感染情况及耐药变迁分析[J]. 临床检验杂志, 2023, 41(20): 793. DOI: 10.13602/j.cnki.jcls.2023.10.17.

[22]

Wang Z W, Zhang P F, Zhou B C. Analysis for infection rate and drug resistance of urogenital tract mycoplasma in Lianyungang district from 2015 to 2022[J]. Chin J Clin Lab Sci, 2023, 41(20): 793. DOI: 10.13602/j.cnki.jcls.2023.10.17.

[23]

刘艳丽, 李冰, 张绍佳. 2364例泌尿生殖道感染者支原体感染情况及耐药性分析[J]. 中国病原生物学杂志, 2024, 19(7): 828. DOI: 10.13350/j.cjpb.240717.

[24]

Liu Y L, Li B, Zhang S J. Analysis of Mycoplasma infection and drug resistance in 2364 cases of urinary and reproductive tract infections[J]. Journal of Pathogen Biology, 2024, 19(7): 828. DOI: 10.13350/j.cjpb.240717.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (2364KB)

3

访问

0

被引

详细

导航
相关文章

AI思维导图

/