不同药剂对马铃薯晚疫病的防治效果及经济效益分析

孔乐辉 ,  范奕 ,  韩儆仁 ,  罗磊 ,  谭伟军 ,  边彩燕 ,  李亚杰 ,  马宁

中国马铃薯 ›› 2025, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (1) : 64 -73.

PDF (1088KB)
中国马铃薯 ›› 2025, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (1) : 64 -73. DOI: 10.19918/j.cnki.1672-3635.2025.01.009
病虫防治

不同药剂对马铃薯晚疫病的防治效果及经济效益分析

作者信息 +

Control Efficacy and Economic Benefit Analysis of Different Fungicides on Potato Late Blight

Author information +
文章历史 +
PDF (1113K)

摘要

由致病疫霉(Phytophthora infestans)引起的晚疫病是马铃薯生产中的一种毁灭性病害,在全球普遍发生,危害严重。为科学评估并筛选出当前市场上广泛使用的马铃薯晚疫病最佳防治药剂,采用两因素裂区设计,探究10种杀菌剂对‘定薯7号’(中抗)和‘新大坪’(感病)两个品种马铃薯晚疫病的田间防治效果,并进行经济效益评价。20%丁子香酚、23.4%双炔酰菌胺和10%氟噻唑吡乙酮处理均表现出显著的防治效果,并在总收入、经济效益和产投比表现突出,优于其他处理。其中,20%丁子香酚处理‘新大坪’的三次防治效果均在73.00%以上,且使‘定薯7号’和‘新大坪’分别增产26.94%和31.07%,增产效果显著。20%丁子香酚处理下,‘定薯7号’和‘新大坪’的总收入分别为122 525元/hm2和73 721元/hm2,经济效益分别为101 240元/hm2和50 757元/hm2,产投比分别为5.76和3.21。综上,20%丁子香酚防治效果突出、增产效果显著、经济效益明显,可作为防治马铃薯晚疫病的田间最佳药剂,23.4%双炔酰菌胺和10%氟噻唑吡乙酮是防治马铃薯晚疫病的次优选择。

Abstract

Late blight caused by Phytophthora infestans is a devastating disease in potato production, occurring globally and causing severe damage. To scientifically evaluate and select the best fungicides for controlling late blight in the current market, a two-factor split-plot design was adopted to investigate the field control effects of 10 fungicides on the late blight of 'Dingshu 7' (moderately resistant) and 'Xindaping' (susceptible), and to conduct economic benefit evaluations. Treatment with eugenol 20%, mandipropamid 23.4%, and oxathiapiprolin 10% all exhibited significant control effects and excelled in total income, economic benefit, and output-input ratio, outperforming the other treatments. Among them, the three control effects of eugenol 20% on 'Xindaping' were all above 73.00%, and it also increased the yield of 'Dingshu 7' and 'Xindaping' by 26.94% and 31.07%, respectively, with a significant yield-increasing effect. Under the eugenol 20% treatment, the total income of 'Dingshu 7' and 'Xindaping' was 122 525 Yuan/ha and 73 721 Yuan/ha respectively, with economic benefits of 101 240 Yuan/ha and 50 757 Yuan/ha, and output-input ratio of 5.76 and 3.21. In conclusion, eugenol 20% exhibits superior efficacy in disease control, substantial yield improvement, and considerable economic returns, thereby emerging as the most suitable field application for the management of potato late blight. As alternative options, mandipropamid 23.4% and oxathiapiprolin 10% demonstrate effective control of potato late blight and may be considered for use under specific conditions.

关键词

马铃薯 / 晚疫病 / 杀菌剂 / 经济效益

Key words

potato / late blight / fungicide / economic benefit

引用本文

引用格式 ▾
孔乐辉,范奕,韩儆仁,罗磊,谭伟军,边彩燕,李亚杰,马宁. 不同药剂对马铃薯晚疫病的防治效果及经济效益分析[J]. 中国马铃薯, 2025, 39(1): 64-73 DOI:10.19918/j.cnki.1672-3635.2025.01.009

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

参考文献

[1]

Bvenura C, Witbooi H, Kambizi L. Pigmented potatoes: a potential panacea for food and nutrition security and health?[J]. Foods, 2022, 11(2): 175.

[2]

马英杰, 陈炜, 邓生菊. 我国马铃薯产业高质量发展路径分析[J]. 中国蔬菜, 2024(6): 11-18.

[3]

Fry W. Phytophthora infestans: the plant (and R gene) destroyer[J]. Molecular Plant Pathology, 2008, 9(3): 385-402.

[4]

Fry W E, Birch P R, Judelson H S, et al. Five reasons to consider Phytophthora infestans a reemerging pathogen[J]. Phytopathology, 2015, 105(7): 966-981.

[5]

Fu X P, Liu S, Ru J R, et al. Biological control of potato late blight by Streptomyces sp. FXP04 and potential role of secondary metabolites [J]. Biological Control, 2022, 16(9): 104891.

[6]

Sharma S, Sundaresha S, Bhardwaj V. Biotechnological approaches in management of oomycetes diseases[J]. 3 Biotech, 2021, 11(6): 274.

[7]

Wharton P S, Kirk W W, Schafer R L, et al. Evaluation of biological seed treatments in combination with management practices for the control of seed-borne late blight in potato[J]. Biological Control, 2012, 63(7): 326-332.

[8]

蒋敏华, 杨清, 李丽, . 马铃薯抗晚疫病转基因研究进展[J]. 种子, 2006(12): 46-50.

[9]

Cohen Y, Rubin A E, Galperin M. Effective control of two genotypes of phytophthora infestans in the field by three oxathiapiprolin fungicidal mixtures[J]. PLoS One, 2021, 16(10): 258-280.

[10]

李德明, 罗磊, 姚彦红, . 马铃薯新品种‘定薯7号’的选育[J]. 中国马铃薯, 2022, 36(3): 286-288.

[11]

张振军. 陇中旱区马铃薯新品种产量和抗病性试验[J]. 中国马铃薯, 2018, 32(3): 137-142.

[12]

国家质量技术监督局. GB/T17980.34—2000《农药田间药效试验准则(一)杀菌剂防治马铃薯晚疫病》[S]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000.

[13]

王喜刚, 郭成瑾, 张丽荣, . 宁夏马铃薯晚疫病菌交配型和生理小种研究[J]. 植物保护学报, 2022, 48(1): 227-233.

[14]

杨帅, 王文重, 魏琪, . 植物源农药丁子香酚与苦参碱对两种马铃薯主要病害的毒力测定及评价[J]. 黑龙江农业科学, 2021(11): 35-38.

[15]

王艺霖, 赵玲玲, 杜晓云, . 杀菌剂复配对樱桃茎腐病菌的联合生物活性及田间防效[J]. 农药, 2024, 63(2): 142-146.

[16]

林述平, 凌晓曦, 邓召利, . 丁子香酚对辣椒疫霉菌的毒力测定[J]. 江西农业学报, 2011, 23(2): 102-106.

[17]

张茂明, 顾鑫, 杨晓贺, . 六种生物药剂防治马铃薯晚疫病的筛选试验[J]. 黑龙江农业科学, 2021(12): 40-43.

[18]

田恒林, 沈艳芬, 肖春芳, . 防治马铃薯晚疫病新药剂-丁子香酚[J]. 中国马铃薯, 2013, 27(3): 162-165.

[19]

郭成瑾, 张丽荣, 沈瑞清, . 防治马铃薯晚疫病药剂筛选试验[J]. 农药, 2012, 51(2): 151-152.

[20]

迟会伟, 刁杰, 聂开晟, . 新型杀菌剂双炔酰菌胺[J]. 农药, 2007(1): 52-54.

[21]

张心宽. 不同杀菌剂对马铃薯晚疫病田间防治效果[J]. 中国果菜, 2017, 37(7): 7-9.

[22]

路粉, 吴杰, 赵建江, . 致病疫霉对烯酰吗啉和双炔酰菌胺的敏感性动态监测及马铃薯晚疫病田间防治药剂筛选[J]. 农药学学报, 2023, 25(6): 1279-1287.

[23]

张建平, 张福金, 王振, . 氟噻唑吡乙酮对马铃薯晚疫病最低有效防控剂量的研究[J]. 农药学学报, 2020, 22(3): 556-560.

[24]

路粉, 赵建江, 刘晓芸, . 马铃薯晚疫病菌对甲霜灵的抗性监测及替代药剂防治效果[J]. 中国农业科学, 2018, 51(14): 2700-2710.

[25]

叶建春, 王慧芹, 施春婷. 9个杀菌剂或药剂组合防治冬种马铃薯晚疫病的田间效果[J]. 农业科技通讯, 2017(9): 58-61.

基金资助

甘肃省重点研发计划项目(23YFNJ0005)

甘肃省重点研发计划项目(24YFNJ002)

甘肃省自然科学基金(24JRRA838)

甘肃省自然科学基金(25JRRJ002)

甘肃省技术创新引导计划-农业类(22CX8NJ153)

甘肃省陇原青年英才专项资金

科技特派员(团)专项(25CXNJ002)

乡村振兴专项(25CXNA046)

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (1088KB)

366

访问

0

被引

详细

导航
相关文章

AI思维导图

/