气候、土壤驱动下施肥方式对马铃薯商品薯率的影响——基于Meta分析

魏联军 ,  牛军凯 ,  袁懿璇 ,  王禹慷 ,  常海洋 ,  李华泽 ,  宋银 ,  田鹏 ,  孟玉玲 ,  单卫星 ,  张鹏

中国马铃薯 ›› 2025, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (4) : 283 -299.

PDF (1753KB)
中国马铃薯 ›› 2025, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (4) : 283 -299. DOI: 10.19918/j.cnki.1672-3635.2025.04.006
土壤肥料

气候、土壤驱动下施肥方式对马铃薯商品薯率的影响——基于Meta分析

作者信息 +

Impact of Fertilization Practices on Marketable Tuber Percentage Driven by Climate and Soil: A Meta-Analysis

Author information +
文章历史 +
PDF (1794K)

摘要

商品薯率是衡量生产效益的重要指标,可通过科学施肥进行提升。通过整合分析国内外现有相关研究结果,探讨不同施肥方式对马铃薯商品薯率的影响,为马铃薯科学施肥、提高生产效益、促进种植业可持续发展提供一定的参考依据。基于中国知网、万方数据库、Web of Science数据库,以“马铃薯” “商品薯率” “化肥” “有机肥”为关键词检索已公开发表的国内外相关文献,筛选出103篇813组试验数据。以不施肥为对照,不同施肥方式为试验组,通过Meta分析方法定量整合分析不同肥料种类、气候条件和土壤性质下施肥方式对马铃薯商品薯率的影响。不同施肥均能显著(P<0.05)提高马铃薯商品薯率,其中粪肥配施无机肥增幅最大。当年均气温<6 ℃、年均降水量200~400 mm时,有机无机肥配施可以显著(P<0.05)提升马铃薯商品薯率;当土壤pH<5.5、土壤有机质14~24 g/kg 时,配施对马铃薯商品薯率的提高幅度最大。单施有机肥处理下,粪肥对马铃薯商品薯率增幅最大,且在年均气温<6 ℃、年均降水量200~400 mm时效益最明显;单施无机肥处理下,氮磷钾肥对马铃薯商品薯率增幅最大,且当土壤pH<5.5、土壤有机质<14 g/kg时增幅显著。因此,在大部分区域,粪肥配施无机肥能保证马铃薯商品薯率最大化;在年均气温较低且土壤有机质水平较低的半干旱地区,应侧重以粪肥为来源的有机肥配施措施;在土壤pH<5.5且有机质水平较低的区域,采用单施氮磷钾肥的方式能有效提高马铃薯商品薯率。

Abstract

The marketable tuber percentage as an important indicator for evaluating production efficiency in potato cultivation can be improved and enhanced through scientific fertilization management. Through integrated analysis of existing domestic and international research findings, this study explored the impact of different fertilization methods on the marketable tuber percentage, aiming to provide reference for scientifically applying fertilizers, enhancing production efficiency, and promoting sustainable development in potato cultivation. By collecting publicly available literature from databases including CNKI, Wanfang Data, and Web of Science using keywords like "potato", "marketable tuber percentage", "chemical fertilizer", and "organic fertilizer", a total of 103 publications and 813 sets of experimental data were selected. Using no fertilization as the control and different fertilization treatments as experimental groups, a meta-analysis was employed to quantitatively integrate the effects of fertilization methods on the marketable tuber percentage under various fertilizer types, climatic conditions, and soil properties. All fertilization treatments significantly (P<0.05) increased the marketable tuber percentage, with the combination of manure and chemical fertilizers showing the greatest increase. Under conditions where the mean annual temperature was <6 ℃ and annual precipitation was 200-400 mm, the combined application of organic and chemical fertilizers resulted in significant (P<0.05) increase in the marketable tuber percentage. The greatest improvement from combined fertilization also occurred when soil pH was <5.5 and soil organic matter content was 14-24 g/kg. Under sole organic fertilizer application, manure produced the greatest increase in the marketable tuber percentage, with the most pronounced benefits observed at mean annual temperatures <6 ℃ and precipitation of 200-400 mm. Under sole chemical fertilizer application, NPK fertilizer yielded the highest increase in the marketable tuber percentage, particularly when soil pH was <5.5 and soil organic matter was <14 g/kg. Therefore, in most regions, the combination of manure and chemical fertilizers ensures the maximization of the marketable tuber percentage. In semi-arid regions with lower mean annual temperatures and lower soil organic matter levels, emphasis should be placed on combined fertilization practices using manure as the organic source. In the region with soil pH <5.5 and low organic matter levels, the application of NPK fertilizer alone could effectively increase the marketable tuber percentage.

关键词

马铃薯 / 商品薯率 / 施肥方式 / Meta分析

Key words

potato / marketable tuber percentage / fertilization practice / meta-analysis

引用本文

引用格式 ▾
魏联军,牛军凯,袁懿璇,王禹慷,常海洋,李华泽,宋银,田鹏,孟玉玲,单卫星,张鹏. 气候、土壤驱动下施肥方式对马铃薯商品薯率的影响——基于Meta分析[J]. 中国马铃薯, 2025, 39(4): 283-299 DOI:10.19918/j.cnki.1672-3635.2025.04.006

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

参考文献

[1]

Han X, Yang R, Zhang L, et al. A review of potato salt tolerance[J]. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2023, 24(13): 10726.

[2]

王鹏, 李芳弟, 郭天顺, . 基于主成分分析、相关性分析和隶属函数法对22个马铃薯品种的综合评价[J]. 中国瓜菜, 2023, 36(7): 78-87.

[3]

徐建飞, 金黎平. 马铃薯遗传育种研究: 现状与展望[J]. 中国农业科学, 2017, 50(6): 990-1015.

[4]

Sato N, Shimizu N, Nakajima M. Techno economic analysis of the production of potato powder applying potato starch purification system in Japan[J]. Discover Applied Sciences, 2024, 6(5): 253.

[5]

杨丽辉, 蒙美莲, 陈有君, . 肥料配施对马铃薯产量和品质的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2013, 29(12): 136-140.

[6]

景宇鹏, 赵沛义, 康文钦, . 不同施肥处理对阴山北麓旱作区土壤肥力及马铃薯产量的影响[J]. 北方农业学报, 2021, 49(2): 36-43.

[7]

Pan Z, Fan D, Jiang R, et al. Improving potato productivity and mitigating nitrogen losses using enhanced-efficiency fertilizers: A global meta-analysis[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2023, 348: 108416.

[8]

魏巧俏, 谢军红, 付永柯, . 有机氮替代无机氮对旱作马铃薯生长、产量及农田碳排放的影响[J]. 农业资源与环境学报, 2025, 42(3): 707-715.

[9]

徐玉坤, 薛龙飞. 不同施肥模式对马铃薯光合特性及产量品质的影响[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2022, 27(6): 83-90.

[10]

Hlisnikovský L, Menšík L, Kunzová E. The effect of soil-climate conditions, farmyard manure and mineral fertilizers on potato yield and soil chemical parameters[J]. Plants, 2021, 10(11): 2473.

[11]

Hedges L V, Gurevitch J, Curtis P S. The meta-analysis of response ratios in experimental ecology[J]. Ecology, 1999, 80(4): 1150-1156.

[12]

Zhang N, Ye X, Gao Y, et al. Environment and agricultural practices regulate enhanced biochar-induced soil carbon pools and crop yield: A meta-analysis[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2023, 905: 167290.

[13]

Zhou Z, Zhang S, Jiang N, et al. Effects of organic fertilizer incorporation practices on crops yield, soil quality, and soil fauna feeding activity in the wheat-maize rotation system[J]. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 2022, 10: 1058071.

[14]

Liu W, Cui S, Wu L, et al. Effects of bio-organic fertilizer on soil fertility, yield, and quality of tea[J]. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 2023, 23(4): 5109-5121.

[15]

李春越, 常顺, 钟凡心, . 种植模式和施肥对黄土旱塬农田土壤团聚体及其碳分布的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(1): 191-200.

[16]

马文军, 武均, 宋雪峰, . 不同施肥处理对马铃薯农田土壤理化性状及产量的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(15): 87-91.

[17]

Hou J, Xing C, Zhang J, et al. Increase in potato yield by the combined application of biochar and organic fertilizer: Key role of rhizosphere microbial diversity[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2024, 15: 1389864.

[18]

柳燕兰, 郭贤仕, 张绪成, . 密度和施肥对旱地马铃薯干物质积累、产量和水肥利用的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(2): 320-331.

[19]

张玲玉, 陈光蕾, 赵洪猛, . 基于微生物化学计量学研究有机肥促进稻田土壤磷转化的作用[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2023, 39(12): 1610-1618.

[20]

张瑞福, 陈玉, 孙新丽, . 中国生物肥料与有机肥料研究三十年: 回顾与展望[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2024, 30(7): 1262-1273.

[21]

张君, 潘志华, 段玉, . 长期定位轮作施肥对马铃薯产量和水肥利用效率的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2020, 36(4): 36-43.

[22]

Balík J, Suran P, Sedlář O, et al. The effect of long-term farmyard manure and mineral fertilizer application on the increase in soil organic matter quality of cambisols[J]. Agronomy, 2023, 13(12): 2960.

[23]

吴征, 周维秀, 杨永智, . 有机肥替代化肥对马铃薯干物质积累、分配与产量的影响[J]. 甘肃农业大学学报, 2024, 59(1): 113-122.

[24]

宁琳懿睿, 仇少君, 徐新朋, . 基于产量反应和农学效率的马铃薯智能化推荐施肥[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2023, 29(12): 2272-2281.

[25]

马伟清, 王培伦, 杨元军, . 不同类型肥料对马铃薯产量及块茎品质的影响[J]. 山东农业科学, 2010, 42(3): 59-60.

[26]

谢永贤. 不同培肥措施对土壤养分及马铃薯产量的影响[J]. 中国马铃薯, 2017, 31(1): 25-29.

[27]

李书田, 段玉, 郭天文, . 马铃薯产量和品质对钾肥品种和施用时期的响应[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2024(12): 159-166.

[28]

张孟鸽, 李永梅, 范茂攀, . 高肥力土壤下马铃薯磷肥利用及投入阈值研究[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2024, 43(8): 1838-1845.

[29]

郭亚军, 邱慧珍, 张玉娇, . 不同施肥方式对马铃薯农田土壤有机碳组分和碳库管理指数的影响[J]. 土壤通报, 2021, 52(4): 912-919.

[30]

Olkeba B, Shoeb Q, Bobe B. Effects of straw mulch and farmyard manure on runoff, erosion, in situ water conservation, and yield and yield components of wheat at the Highlands of Bale, south eastern Ethiopia[J]. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 2012, 7(44): 5879-5886, 20.

[31]

Yuan J, Wang J, Ye J, et al. Long-term organic fertilization enhances potassium uptake and yield of sweet potato by expanding soil aggregates-associated potassium stocks[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2023, 358: 108701.

[32]

邱吟霜, 王西娜, 李培富, . 不同种类有机肥及用量对当季旱地土壤肥力和玉米产量的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2019(6): 182-189.

[33]

张宁, 陶荣浩, 刘佩诗, . 不同种类有机肥配施化肥对茶叶生长、品质和土壤肥力的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(8): 1844-1852.

[34]

Machado D, Sarmiento L, Gonzalez-Prieto S. The use of organic substrates with contrasting C/N ratio in the regulation of nitrogen use efficiency and losses in a potato agroecosystem[J]. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 2010, 88(3): 411-427.

[35]

袁慧琳, 李雅莹, 顾文杰, . 长期施用新鲜与腐熟畜禽粪肥土壤溶解性有机质与微生物群落的特征及其关联性[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(2): 307-325.

[36]

Chen C T, Setter T L. Role of tuber developmental processes in response of potato to high temperature and elevated CO2[J]. Plants, 2021, 10(5): 871.

[37]

Pushpalatha R, Santhosh Mithra V, Sunitha S, et al. Impact of climate change on the yield of tropical root and tuber crops vs. rice and potato in India [J]. Food Security, 2022, 14(2): 495-508.

[38]

乔焕焕, 李红兵, 郑太波, . 干旱与复水对马铃薯块茎膨大期碳氮转运的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2019, 37(4): 154-162.

[39]

李金全, 李兆磊, 江国福, . 中国农田耕层土壤有机碳现状及控制因素[J]. 复旦学报: 自然科学版, 2016, 55(2): 247-256, 266.

[40]

Blecharczyk A, Kowalczewski P Ł, Sawinska Z, et al. Impact of crop sequence and fertilization on potato yield in a long-term study[J]. Plants, 2023, 12(3): 495.

[41]

Haase T, Schüler C, Heß J. The effect of different N and K sources on Tuber nutrient uptake, total and graded yield of potatoes (Solanum tuberosum L.) for processing [J]. European Journal of Agronomy, 2007, 26(3): 187-197.

[42]

卢志强, 温思佳, 李雨泽, . 免耕对玉米生产力的影响: 基于全球荟萃分析[J]. 西北农业学报, 2024, 33(3): 452-468.

[43]

赵学强, 潘贤章, 马海艺, . 中国酸性土壤利用的科学问题与策略[J]. 土壤学报, 2023, 60(5): 1248-1263.

[44]

Jasim A, Sharma L K, Zaeen A, et al. Potato phosphorus response in soils with high value of phosphorus[J]. Agriculture, 2020, 10(7): 264.

[45]

兰慧至, 王泽宇, 王心慧, . 炭基有机肥配施化肥对马铃薯生长和产量及品质的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2023(11): 120-126.

[46]

杜二小, 李焕春, 任永峰, . 氮肥减施与替代对马铃薯农田土壤理化性状及产量品质的影响[J]. 北方农业学报, 2023, 51(6): 10-17.

基金资助

国家重点研发计划项目(2023YFD2302100)

国家自然科学基金项目(32372236)

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (1753KB)

144

访问

0

被引

详细

导航
相关文章

AI思维导图

/