急性闭角型青光眼超声乳化联合房角分离术后屈光预测准确性分析

王新萌 ,  姬俊雅 ,  于浩南 ,  付鸿臣 ,  王翔 ,  郑泽坤 ,  李艳 ,  钟莹莹

山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (02) : 74 -79.

PDF (1344KB)
山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (02) : 74 -79. DOI: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2024.597
论著

急性闭角型青光眼超声乳化联合房角分离术后屈光预测准确性分析

作者信息 +

Analysis of refractive prediction accuracy after phacoemulsification combined with goniosynechialysis in acute Angle closure glaucoma

Author information +
文章历史 +
PDF (1375K)

摘要

目的 本研究旨在探讨5种人工晶状体度数计算公式,即Haigis、Hoffer Q、Barrett Universal II、SRK/T和Kane在合并白内障的急性闭角型青光眼(acute angle closure glaucoma, AACG)中的准确性。方法 本研究纳入56只AACG伴白内障眼,对其行超声乳化联合人工晶状体植入伴房角分离术。计算并比较术后3个月5种人工晶状体度数计算公式的屈光预测误差(prediction error, PE)、中位数绝对误差(median absolute error, MedARE)、平均绝对误差(mean absolute error, MAE)、近似误差均方根(root mean square error of approximation, RMSEA)以及PE在(±0.25)、(±0.50)、(±0.75)、(±1.00)D内的眼睛比例。分析影响AACG眼屈光预测误差的因素。结果 各公式的MAE表现为Haigis(0.44 D)、 Barrett Universal II (0.55 D)、 Kane(0.60 D)、SRK/T (0.68 D)和Hoffer Q (0.69 D),5种公式预测误差在(±0.50)屈光度内的眼睛比例分别为71.43% (Haigis)、57.14% (Barrett Universal II)、55.36% (Kane)、44.64% (Hoffer Q)和42.56 %(SRK/T),各公式术后均出现近视漂移。结论 5种人工晶体计算公式中Haigis表现最好,Barrett Universal II和Kane也取得了令人满意的效果,需注意AACG眼行白内障摘除联合晶状体植入伴房角分离术后可能引起的近视漂移。

Abstract

Objective This study aims to investigate the accuracy of five intraocular lens power calculation formulas, namely, Haigis, Hoffer Q, Barrett Universal II, SRK/T and Kane, in acute angle-closure glaucoma (AACG) combined with cataract. Methods This study included 56 eyes with AACG and cataracts, which underwent phacoemulsification combined with intraocular lens implantation and goniosynechialysis. The refractive prediction error (PE), median absolute error (MedARE), mean absolute error (MAE), root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA), and the proportion of eyes with refractive prediction error (PE) within the ranges of (±0.25), (±0.50), (±0.75), (±1.00) D. Factors influencing refractive prediction error in AACG eyes were analyzed. Results The MAE performance of each formula is as follows: Haigis (0.44 D), Barrett Universalll (0.55 D), Kane (0.60 D), SRK/T (0.68 D), and Hoffer Q (0.69 D). The proportions of eyes with prediction errors within ±0.50 diopters for the five formulas were 71.43% (Haigis), 57.14% (Barrett Universal II), 55.36% (Kane), 44.64% (Hoffer Q), and 42.56% (SRK/T). Myopic drift was observed postoperatively for all formulas. Conclusion Among the five artificial lens formulas, Haigis performed the best; Barrett Universalll and Kane also achieved satisfactory results. lt should be noted that myopia drift may occur after AACG cataract extraction combined with lens implantation and goniosynechialysis.

关键词

人工晶状体度数计算公式 / 急性闭角型青光眼 / 白内障 / 超声乳化术 / 房角分离术

Key words

IOL formula / Acute angle closure glaucoma / Cataract / Phacoemulsification / Goniosynechialysis

引用本文

引用格式 ▾
王新萌,姬俊雅,于浩南,付鸿臣,王翔,郑泽坤,李艳,钟莹莹. 急性闭角型青光眼超声乳化联合房角分离术后屈光预测准确性分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2026, 40(02): 74-79 DOI:10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2024.597

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

参考文献

[1]

王宁利, 王怀洲 . 新型微创抗青光眼手术推广过程中应严格掌握适应证[J]. 中华眼科杂志, 2021, 57(9) 641-643. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112142-20210719-00341

[2]

WANG Lixin , WANG Huaizhou . Strictly following the indications during the promotion of micro-invasive glaucoma surgeries[J]. Chinese Journal of Ophthalmology, 2021, 57(9) 641-643. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112142-20210719-00341

[3]

Panse K , Le C , Hubbell M , et al. Surgical outcomes of phacoemulsification/goniosynechialysis with and without endocyclophotocoagulation in patients with chronic angle closure glaucoma[J]. Indian J Ophthalmol, 2019, 67(3): 366-370. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_895_18

[4]

Razeghinejad MR , Myers JS . Contemporary approach to the diagnosis and management of primary angle-closure disease[J]. Surv Ophthalmol, 2018, 63(6): 754-768. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2018.05.001

[5]

Kang SY , Hong SM , Won JB , et al. Inaccuracy of intraocular lens power prediction for cataract surgery in angle-closure glaucoma[J]. Yonsei Med J, 2009, 50(2): 206-210. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2009.50.2.206

[6]

Khoramnia R , Auffarth G , Łabuz G , et al. Refractive outcomes after cataract surgery[J]. Diagnostics (Basel), 2022, 12(2): 243. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12020243

[7]

Hoffer KJ , Aramberri J , Haigis W , et al. Protocols for studies of intraocular lens formula accuracy[J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 2015, 160(3): 403-405.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2015.05.029

[8]

Stopyra W , Voytsekhivskyy O , Grzybowski A . Accuracy of 20 intraocular lens power calculation formulas in medium-long eyes[J]. Ophthalmol Ther, 2024, 13(7): 1893-1907. doi: 10.1007/s40123-024-00954-7

[9]

高雪, 郝琳琳, 刘少华, . 两种人工晶体计算公式预测闭角型青光眼合并白内障患者超声乳化手术后屈光度准确性的比较[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2018, 32(1): 68-71. doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2017.512

[10]

GAO Xue , HAO Linlin , LIU Shaohua , et al. Comparison of two intraocular lens measurement formulas for prediction of postoperative refraction accuracy in patients with angle closure glaucoma and cataract[J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2018, 32(1): 68-71. doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.0.2017.512

[11]

Gökce SE , Zeiter JH , Weikert MP , et al. Intraocular lens power calculations in short eyes using 7 formulas[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2017, 43(7): 892-897. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.07.004

[12]

Pereira A , Popovic MM, Ahmed Y , et al. A comparative analysis of 12 intraocular lens power formulas[J]. Int Ophthalmol, 2021, 41(12): 4137-4150. doi: 10.1007/s10792-021-01966-z

[13]

Darcy K , Gunn D , Tavassoli S , et al. Assessment of the accuracy of new and updated intraocular lens power calculation formulas in 10930 eyes from the UK National Health Service[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2020, 46(1): 2-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2019.08.014

[14]

Connell BJ , Kane JX . Comparison of the Kane formula with existing formulas for intraocular lens power selection[J]. BMJ Open Ophthalmol, 2019, 4(1): e000251. doi: 10.1136/bmjophth-2018-000251

[15]

Savini G , Di Maita M , Hoffer KJ , et al. Comparison of 13 formulas for IOL power calculation with measurements from partial coherence interferometry[J]. Br J Ophthalmol, 2021, 105(4): 484-489. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-316193

[16]

Melles RB , Holladay JT , Chang WJ . Accuracy of intraocular lens calculation formulas[J]. Ophthalmology, 2018, 125(2): 169-178. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.08.027

[17]

Eom Y , Kang SY , Song JS , et al. Comparison of Hoffer Q and Haigis formulae for intraocular lens power calculation according to the anterior chamber depth in short eyes[J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 2014, 157(4): 818-824.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2013.12.017

[18]

Wang QW , Jiang W , Lin T , et al. Meta-analysis of accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation formulas in short eyes[J]. Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 2018, 46(4): 356-363. doi: 10.1111/ceo.13058

[19]

Kim JW , Eom Y , Yoon EG , et al. Algorithmic intraocular lens power calculation formulas election by keratometry, anterior chamber depth and axial length[J]. Acta Ophthalmol, 2022, 100(3): e701-e709. doi: 10.1111/aos.14956

[20]

Lu WH , Hou Y , Yang HF , et al. A systemic review and network meta-analysis of accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation formulas in primary angle-closure conditions[J]. PLoS One, 2022, 17(10): e0276286. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276286

[21]

Lin YD , Yin YL , Huang CK , et al. Accuracy of new intraocular lens calculation formulas in primary angle closure glaucoma patients who underwent phacoemulsification combined with goniosynechialysis [ J ]. Int Ophthalmol, 2024, 45(1): 2. doi: 10.1007/s10792-024-03367-4

[22]

Hou M , Ding YJ , Liu LP , et al. Accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation in primary angle-closure disease: comparison of 7 formulas[J]. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 2021, 259(12): 3739-3747. doi: 10.1007/s00417-021-05295-w

[23]

Day AC , Cooper D , Burr J , et al. Clear lens extraction for the management of primary angle closure glaucoma: surgical technique and refractive outcomes in the EAGLE cohort[J]. Br J Ophthalmol, 2018, 102(12): 1658-1662. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2017-311447

[24]

Kim NH , Gim Y , Choi KR , et al. Comparison of intraocular lens power calculation formulas in patients with a history of acute primary angle-closure attack[J]. BMC Ophthalmol, 2023, 23(1): 482. doi: 10.1186/s12886-023-03232-5

[25]

Omoto MK , Torii H , Hayashi K , et al. Ratio of axial length to corneal radius in Japanese patients and accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation based on biometric data[J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 2020, 218: 320-329. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2020.03.006

[26]

Nishide T , Hayakawa N , Kimura I , et al. Postoperative refractive error following cataract surgery after the first attack of acute primary angle closure[J]. Int Ophthalmol, 2014, 34(4): 805-808. doi: 10.1007/s10792-013-9878-4

[27]

Guyton DL , Uozato H , Wisnicki HJ . Rapid determination of intraocular lens tilt and decentration through the undilated pupil[J]. Ophthalmology, 1990, 97(10): 1259-1264. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(90)32422-3

[28]

Korynta J , Bok J , Cendelin J . Changes in refraction induced by change in intraocular lens position[J]. J Refract Corneal Surg, 1994, 10(5): 556-564.

[29]

Joo J , Whang WJ , Oh TH , et al. Accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation formulas in primary angle closure glaucoma[J]. Korean J Ophthalmol, 2011, 25(6): 375-379. doi: 10.3341/kjo.2011.25.6.375

[30]

Jeong J , Song H , Lee JK , et al. The effect of ocular biometric factors on the accuracy of various IOL power calculation formulas[J]. BMC Ophthalmol, 2017, 17(1): 62. doi: 10.1186/s12886-017-0454-y

[31]

邓水凤, 庞柏林, 廖锐, . 原发性急性闭角型青光眼合并白内障超乳术后的屈光误差及其相关影响因素[J]. 国际眼科杂志, 2018, 18(8): 1488-1491. doi: 10.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2018.8.32

[32]

DENG Shuifeng , PANG Bolin , LIAO Rui , et al. Analysis of the refraction error and the influencing factors after phacoemulsification in acute primary angle-closure glaucoma with cataract[J]. International Eye Science, 2018, 18(8): 1488-1491. doi: 10.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2018.8.32

[33]

Ning XN , Yang YH , Yan H , et al. Anterior chamber depth-a predictor of refractive outcomes after age-related cataract surgery[J]. BMC Ophthalmol, 2019, 19(1): 134. doi: 10.1186/s12886-019-1144-8

[34]

Lee TE , Yoo C , Kim YY . The effects of peripheral anterior synechiae on refractive outcomes after cataract surgery in eyes with primary angle-closure disease[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2021, 100(14): e24673. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000024673

[35]

Suzuki T , Ueta Y , Tachi N , et al. Refractive outcomes after immediate primary phacoemulsification for acute primary angle closure[J]. Sci Rep, 2023, 13(1): 13283. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-40585-9

[36]

Hata M , Hirose F , Oishi A , et al. Changes in choroidal thickness and optical axial length accompanying intraocular pressure increase[J]. Jpn J Ophthalmol, 2012, 56(6): 564-568. doi: 10.1007/s10384-012-0173-0

[37]

Leydolt C , Findl O , Drexler W . Effects of change in intraocular pressure on axial eye length and lens position[J]. Eye, 2007, 22(5): 657-661. doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6702709

基金资助

潍坊市青年医学人才托举工程资助

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (1344KB)

0

访问

0

被引

详细

导航
相关文章

AI思维导图

/