儿童肺炎支原体肺炎行多次支气管肺泡灌洗术的危险因素分析

刘国文 ,  赵华锋 ,  王海立 ,  邵贤丽 ,  王倩云 ,  许丽

中国妇幼健康研究 ›› 2024, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (6) : 12 -17.

PDF (1293KB)
中国妇幼健康研究 ›› 2024, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (6) : 12 -17. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5293.2024.06.003
专题研究

儿童肺炎支原体肺炎行多次支气管肺泡灌洗术的危险因素分析

作者信息 +

Analysis of risk factors for multiple bronchoalveolar lavage in children with mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia

Author information +
文章历史 +
PDF (1323K)

摘要

目的 探究儿童肺炎支原体肺炎(MPP)行多次支气管肺泡灌洗术(BAL)的危险因素。方法 回顾性分析2021年3月至2023年3月期间在潍坊市人民医院儿科住院治疗并行支气管肺泡灌洗术的176例肺炎支原体肺炎患儿的临床资料,根据行支气管肺泡灌洗术的次数,将患儿分为单次组和多次组(≥2次),对两组的相关影响因素进行单因素分析和多因素Logistic回归分析,使用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析相关因素评估肺炎支原体肺炎患儿行多次支气管肺泡灌洗术的预测价值。结果 176例患儿中单次组为129例,多次组为47例.多次组BAL前热程、胸腔积液比例、中性粒细胞百分比、血小板计数(PLT)、C反应蛋白(CRP)、血沉(ESR)、D-二聚体(DD)、谷丙转氨酶(ALT)、乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)、肺炎支原体抗体(MP-IgG、MP-IgM)、塑形痰栓或堵塞比例均高于单次组,差异有统计学意义(t/Z/χ2值介于-9.140~66.458之间,P<0.05);多因素Logistic回归分析结果显示,DD(OR=2.395,95%CI:1.262~4.544)、BAL前热程(OR=1.675,95%CI:1.048~2.678)、中性粒细胞百分比(OR=1.120,95%CI:1.001~1.254)、ALT(OR=1.056,95%CI:1.006~1.108)及塑形痰栓或堵塞(OR=279.875,95%CI:10.925~7170.118)是MPP患儿行多次支气管肺泡灌洗术的独立危险因素(P<0.05);ROC曲线提示DD曲线下面积(AUC)为0.951(95%CI:0.920~0.982,P<0.001),最佳截断值为2.085ug/mL;BAL前热程AUC为0.862(95%CI:0.803~0.921,P<0.001),最佳截断值为7.5天;中性粒细胞百分比AUC为0.806(95%CI:0.735~0.876,P<0.001),最佳截断值为69.25%;ALT的AUC为0.774(95%CI:0.691~0.850,P<0.001),最佳截断值为20.5U/L。结论 过强的免疫炎症反应、ALT的显著升高及塑形性支气管炎的形成是MPP患儿行多次BAL的危险因素.

Abstract

Objective To investigate the risk factors of multiple bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) in children with mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia (MPP). Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on clinical data of 176 children diagnosed with MPP and treated with BAL at the Department of Pediatrics, Weifang People's Hospital from March 2021 to March 2023. According to the times of BAL, the children were divided into single group and multiple group (≥2 times). Both univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to analyze the relevant influencing factors of the two groups, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to analyze that the relevant factors to evaluate the predictive value of multiple BAL in MPP children. Results Among the 176 children, 129 were in the single group and 47 were in the multiple group. The multiple group exhibited significantly higher pre-BAL fever duration, pleural effusion ratio, neutrophil percentage, platelet count (PLT), C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), D-dimer (DD), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), mycoplasma pneumoniae antibodies (MP)-IgG, MP-IgM, and the proportions of plastic sputum plugs or obstruction compared to the single group (t/Z/χ2=-9.140-66.458, P<0.05). The results of multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that DD (OR=2.395, 95%CI:1.262-4.544), pre-BAL fever duration (OR=1.675, 95%CI:1.048-2.678), neutrophil percentage (OR=1.120, 95%CI:1.001-1.254), ALT (OR=1.056, 95%CI:1.006-1.108), and presence of plastic sputum plugs or obstruction (OR=279.875, 95%CI:10.925-7170.118) as independent risk factors for multiple BAL in children with MPP (P<0.05). The ROC curve analysis indicated that DD had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.951 (95%CI:0.920-0.982, P<0.001) with the optimal cutoff value of 2.085μg/mL. Pre-BAL fever duration had an AUC of 0.862 (95%CI:0.803-0.921, P<0.001) with the optimal cutoff value of 7.5 days. Neutrophil percentage had an AUC of 0.806 (95%CI:0.735-0.876, P<0.001) with the optimal cutoff value of 69.25%. ALT had an AUC of 0.774 (95%CI:0.691-0.850, P<0.001) with the optimal cutoff value of 20.5U/L. Conclusion Excessive immune inflammatory response, significant elevation of ALT and the development of plastic bronchitis are risk factors for multiple BAL in children with MPP.

关键词

肺炎支原体肺炎 / 危险因素 / 支气管肺泡灌洗术 / 儿童

Key words

mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia / risk factors / bronchoalveolar lavage / children

引用本文

引用格式 ▾
刘国文,赵华锋,王海立,邵贤丽,王倩云,许丽. 儿童肺炎支原体肺炎行多次支气管肺泡灌洗术的危险因素分析[J]. 中国妇幼健康研究, 2024, 35(6): 12-17 DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1673-5293.2024.06.003

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

参考文献

[1]

Jain S, Williams D J, Arnold S R, et al. Community-acquired pneumonia requiring hospitalization among U.S. children[J]. N Engl J Med, 2015, 372(9): 835-845.

[2]

赖雪玲, 李月凤. 不同年龄儿童肺炎支原体肺炎的临床特征分析[J]. 当代医学, 2022, 28(3): 137-139.

[3]

徐怀彦, 尚莉丽. 小儿支原体肺炎诊疗研究进展[J]. 中医临床研究, 2021, 13(29): 146-148.

[4]

明丹. 小儿肺炎支原体肺炎的药物治疗进展[J]. 临床医学, 2021, 41(1): 120-122.

[5]

王金菊, 刘治学, 李海燕. 重症支原体肺炎患儿支气管镜灌洗治疗的效果[J]. 精准医学杂志, 2023, 38(1): 44-46, 50.

[6]

儿童社区获得性肺炎诊疗规范(2019年版)编写审定专家组. 儿童社区获得性肺炎诊疗规范(2019年版)[J]. 全科医学临床与教育, 2019, 17(9): 771-777.

[7]

陈德晖, 黄燕, 焦安夏, 等. 中国儿童难治性肺炎呼吸内镜介入诊疗专家共识[J]. 中国实用儿科杂志, 2019, 34(6): 449-457.

[8]

Kim K, Jung S, Kim M, et al. Global trends in the proportion of macrolide-resistant mycoplasma pneumoniae infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. JAMA Netw Open, 2022, 5(7): e2220949.

[9]

刘冉, 许磊. 纤维支气管镜早期介入治疗儿童重症肺炎支原体肺炎合并肺不张的临床疗效[J]. 中国内镜杂志, 2022, 28(11): 71-76.

[10]

韩琳, 冷雪芹. D-二聚体在临床疾病中的研究进展[J]. 中国现代医药杂志, 2022, 24(9): 106-108.

[11]

Milenkovic M, Hadzibegovic A, Kovac M, et al. D-dimer, CRP, PCT, and IL-6 levels at admission to ICU can predict in-hospital mortality in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia[J]. Oxid Med Cell Longev, 2022, 2022: 8997709.

[12]

熊英, 覃雨荻, 陈丽阳. 支原体肺炎合并气道黏液栓堵塞儿童D-二聚体、CRP、PCT水平及临床意义[J]. 湖南师范大学学报(医学版), 2021, 18(1): 131-134.

[13]

Zheng Y, Hua L, Zhao Q, et al. The level of D-dimer is positively correlated with the severity of mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia in children[J]. Front Cell Infect Microbiol, 2021, 11: 687391.

[14]

Huang X, Li D, Liu F, et al. Clinical significance of D-dimer levels in refractory mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia[J]. BMC Infect Dis, 2021, 21(1): 14.

[15]

杨丽微, 仇有喜, 杨松. 支气管肺泡灌洗液中细胞分类及炎症因子水平与MPP合并气道黏液栓患儿预后的关联性分析[J]. 中国临床新医学, 2023, 16(10): 1065-1070.

[16]

张嵘, 王婷, 蒋吴君, 等. 影响难治性肺炎支原体肺炎患儿支气管镜下灌洗治疗次数的危险因素[J]. 中华实用儿科临床杂志, 2018, 33(22): 1694-1698.

[17]

韩聪莉. 糖皮质激素辅助治疗肺炎支原体性肺炎患儿的临床疗效[J]. 中国妇幼健康研究, 2017, 28(S2): 23-24.

[18]

Liew P X, Kubes P. The neutrophil's role during health and disease[J]. Physiol Rev, 2019, 99(2): 1223-1248.

[19]

温涛, 袁麒儿, 曹亦陶, 等. 中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值和单核细胞/淋巴细胞比值在儿童支原体肺炎中的临床意义评价[J]. 系统医学, 2022, 7(18): 29-32.

[20]

Bi Y, Zhu Y, Ma X, et al. Development of a scale for early prediction of refractory mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia in hospitalized children[J]. Sci Rep, 2021, 11(1): 6595.

[21]

Zhu Y, Luo Y, Li L, et al. Immune response plays a role in mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia[J]. Front Immunol, 2023, 14: 1189647.

[22]

Poddighe D, Demirkaya E, Sazonov V, et al. Mycoplasma pneumoniae infections and primary immune deficiencies[J]. Int J Clin Pract, 2022, 2022: 6343818.

[23]

唐爱群, 唐宇轩, 杨清广, 等. 小儿肺炎支原体感染并发消化系统损害的临床特征及相关危险因素分析[J]. 当代临床医刊, 2020, 33(1): 80-82.

[24]

Poddighe D. Mycoplasma pneumoniae-related hepatitis in children[J]. Microb Pathog, 2020, 139: 103863.

[25]

刘敏宁, 刘银娜, 杜秋燕, 等. 儿童支原体肺炎转氨酶升高的类型及意义[J]. 中国妇幼健康研究, 2019, 30(10): 1316-1319.

[26]

索静宇, 辛丽红, 康媛洁. 儿童难治性肺炎支原体肺炎后发生塑型性支气管炎的影响因素分析[J]. 临床医学研究与实践, 2021, 6(28): 36-39.

[27]

Zhong H, Yin R, Zhao R, et al. Analysis of clinical characteristics and risk factors of plastic bronchitis in children with mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia[J]. Front Pediatr, 2021, 9: 735093.

[28]

Zhang H, Yang J, Zhao W, et al. Clinical features and risk factors of plastic bronchitis caused by refractory mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia in children: a practical nomogram prediction model[J]. Eur J Pediatr, 2023, 182(3): 1239-1249.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (1293KB)

106

访问

0

被引

详细

导航
相关文章

AI思维导图

/

〈 〉