地域分布及评定方法的差异对中国女性妊娠期抑郁检出率的影响
The impact of regional distribution and differences in assessment methods on the detection rate of depression during pregnancy in Chinese women
目的 分析不同地域分布及评定方法对中国女性妊娠期抑郁检出率的影响。方法 利用Meta分析方法,对中国女性妊娠期抑郁检出率进行系统描述,并阐明不同地域分布及评定方法对其产生的影响。结果 最终纳入39篇文献,共102533名孕妇,检出妊娠期抑郁者24005例,检出率为22%(95%CI:18%~27%),妊娠早期和晚期的抑郁检出率分别为25%(95%CI:18%~33%)、20%(95%CI:15%~25%).地域分布亚组分析发现:华东地区妊娠期抑郁的检出率相对较低,为18%(95%CI:13%~23%).华南地区、西南地区、华北地区及其他地区妊娠期抑郁检出率分别为27%(95%CI:14%~41%)、21%(95%CI:14%~29%)、31%(95%CI:18%~44%)、22%(95%CI:12%~31%).评定方法亚组分析发现:应用爱丁堡产后抑郁量表(EPDS)、抑郁筛查量表(PHQ-9)、抑郁自评量表(SDS)及其他量表进行妊娠期抑郁筛查的结果分别为24%(95%CI:20%~28%)、20%(95%CI:9%~31%)、39%(95%CI:23%~55%)、10%(95%CI:7%~12%)。结论 中国女性妊娠早期抑郁的检出率较晚期高,华南、华北地区妊娠期抑郁检出率较高,不同的量表筛查出的妊娠期抑郁检出率亦有所不同.
Objective To analyze the impact of regional distribution and assessment methods on the detection rate of depression during pregnancy in Chinese women. Methods A meta-analysis was used to systematically describe the detection rate of depression during pregnancy in Chinese women and to clarify the effects of different regional distribution and assessment methods. Results This study finally included 39 articles, comprising 102533 pregnant women, with 24005 cases of detected depression during pregnancy, yielding a detection rate of 22% (95%CI: 18%-27%). The detection rates of depression during the first and third trimester of pregnancy were 25% (95%CI: 18%-33%), 20% (95%CI: 15%-25%), respectively. Subgroup analysis by regional distribution found that the detection rate of prenatal depression in East China was relatively low at 18% (95%CI: 13%-23%), and the detection rate in South China, Southwest China, North China and other regions were 27% (95%CI: 14%-41%), 21% (95%CI: 14%-29%), 31% (95%CI: 18%-44%), and 22% (95%CI: 12%-31%), respectively. Subgroup analysis of assessment methods showed that the results of screening for depression during pregnancy using the Edinburgh postnatal depression scale (EPDS), the patient health questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), the self-rating depression scale (SDS), and other scales were 24% (95%CI: 20%-28%), 20% (95%CI: 9%-31%), 39% (95%CI: 23%-55%) and 10% (95%CI: 7%-12%), respectively. Conclusion The detection rate of depression during pregnancy in the first trimester is higher than that in the second and third trimester, and the higher detection rates are found in South China and North China. Different assessment scales yield varying detection rates for depression during pregnancy.
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
夏贤, 胡卫红, 贺木兰, |
| [9] |
曾宪涛, 刘慧, 陈曦, |
| [10] |
陈浩, 郭清, 章宝丹, |
| [11] |
董青青, 李玉萍, 缪华章, |
| [12] |
曹丹凤, 刘宗花, 王君芝, |
| [13] |
胡焕青, 张继, 赵薇, |
| [14] |
张英, 张梦笑, 王红菊, |
| [15] |
王蒂, 蔡传兰, 王磊, |
| [16] |
荆蕊平, 刘金环, 张静. 孕妇临产前焦虑、抑郁及其影响因素分析[J]. 中国健康心理学杂志, 2008, 16(9): 1042-1044. |
| [17] |
谢悦, 潘雄飞, 赵志梅, |
| [18] |
徐叶清, 翁婷婷, 严双琴, |
| [19] |
李珊珊, 贝为武, 张晓庆, |
| [20] |
陈思齐, 袁伟霞, 刘佩意, |
| [21] |
杨怀洁, 王涛, 杨虹, |
| [22] |
欧阳娜, 王洁, 李吉娜, |
| [23] |
樊晶, 孔令华, 王馨悦, |
| [24] |
周小兰, 刘华, 李晓虹, |
| [25] |
王颖, 王玉琼. 孕妇妊娠各期抑郁发生状况的纵向研究[J]. 解放军护理杂志, 2020, 37(7): 6-10. |
| [26] |
沈蕊, 王立聪, 周晓兰, |
| [27] |
王进, 董燕, 王晓丽, |
| [28] |
樊长佳, 宛杨, 尚文茹, |
| [29] |
徐瑶, 肖超群, 周燕莉, |
| [30] |
王明欢, 李玉红, 袁德慧, |
| [31] |
金懿, 刘诗迪, 王旭, |
| [32] |
王葳, 尹晓辉, 王晓霞, |
| [33] |
赵志梅, 赵霏, 杨雪, |
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
普诗涵, 陈聪, 陈思佳, |
| [36] |
陈萌, 游顶云, 邢宸瑜, |
| [37] |
郑媛媛, 孙媛, 刘晓巍, |
| [38] |
王银平, 韩娜, 杨洁, |
| [39] |
叶优春, 张晶, 陈小珍, |
| [40] |
吴散散, 陈云利, 冯雅慧, |
| [41] |
陈林英, 邹晓璇, 徐文, |
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
王玉琼, 王颖, 郭秀静. 妊娠早期和中期孕妇发生抑郁状况的调查及分析[J]. 解放军护理杂志, 2015, 32(18): 5-8. |
| [44] |
陈梦琪, 马晓英, |
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
|
| [48] |
|
| [49] |
|
| [50] |
|
| [51] |
|
| [52] |
|
| [53] |
钱正宁. 华东地区经济高质量发展水平影响因子分析[D]. 杭州电子科技大学, 2021. |
| [54] |
|
| [55] |
|
| [56] |
|
| [57] |
|
| [58] |
余敏, 徐东, 蔡毅媛, |
| [59] |
|
国家自然科学基金项目(81761128034)
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |